Dataset Viewer
prompt
listlengths 1
1
| images
images listlengths 2
2
| answer
stringclasses 2
values |
|---|---|---|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is on a flat rock with two small pebbles nearby.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 1 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is on a flat rock with two small pebbles nearby.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 1 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is on a flat rock with two small pebbles nearby.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 1 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is on a flat rock with two small pebbles nearby.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 1 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is on a flat rock with two small pebbles nearby.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 2 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is near a shallow puddle with one fallen leaf on the ground.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 2 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is near a shallow puddle with one fallen leaf on the ground.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 2 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is near a shallow puddle with one fallen leaf on the ground.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 2 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is near a shallow puddle with one fallen leaf on the ground.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 1 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is near a shallow puddle with one fallen leaf on the ground.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 1 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is on short grass beside two rounded stones.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 2 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is on short grass beside two rounded stones.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 1 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is on short grass beside two rounded stones.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 1 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is on short grass beside two rounded stones.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 1 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is on short grass beside two rounded stones.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 1 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is next to a gray rock on bare ground.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 1 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is next to a gray rock on bare ground.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 1 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is next to a gray rock on bare ground.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 2 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is next to a gray rock on bare ground.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 2 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is next to a gray rock on bare ground.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 2 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is by a small puddle reflecting pale blue sky.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 2 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is by a small puddle reflecting pale blue sky.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 1 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is by a small puddle reflecting pale blue sky.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 1 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is by a small puddle reflecting pale blue sky.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 1 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is by a small puddle reflecting pale blue sky.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 2 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is on short green grass beside a weathered log.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 1 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is on short green grass beside a weathered log.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 2 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is on short green grass beside a weathered log.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 1 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is on short green grass beside a weathered log.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 1 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is on short green grass beside a weathered log.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 1 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is to the left of a rounded rock on open ground.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 1 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is to the left of a rounded rock on open ground.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 1 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is to the left of a rounded rock on open ground.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 2 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is to the left of a rounded rock on open ground.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 2 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is to the left of a rounded rock on open ground.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 1 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is between two small stones on a patch of dirt.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 1 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is between two small stones on a patch of dirt.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 2 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is between two small stones on a patch of dirt.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 1 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is between two small stones on a patch of dirt.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 1 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is between two small stones on a patch of dirt.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 2 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is beside a short log with a rock to its left.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 1 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is beside a short log with a rock to its left.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 2 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is beside a short log with a rock to its left.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 1 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is beside a short log with a rock to its left.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 2 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is beside a short log with a rock to its left.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 1 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is on open ground with a single tree trunk in the background.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 2 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is on open ground with a single tree trunk in the background.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 1 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is on open ground with a single tree trunk in the background.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 1 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is on open ground with a single tree trunk in the background.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 1 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is on open ground with a single tree trunk in the background.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 1 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is near a rock with low bushes in the background.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 1 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is near a rock with low bushes in the background.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 1 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is near a rock with low bushes in the background.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 1 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is near a rock with low bushes in the background.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 2 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is near a rock with low bushes in the background.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 1 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is by a shallow puddle with a driftwood log in the background.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 2 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is by a shallow puddle with a driftwood log in the background.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 1 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is by a shallow puddle with a driftwood log in the background.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 1 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is by a shallow puddle with a driftwood log in the background.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 2 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is by a shallow puddle with a driftwood log in the background.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 1 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is on a sandy path with two small rocks nearby.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 1 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is on a sandy path with two small rocks nearby.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 1 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is on a sandy path with two small rocks nearby.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 1 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is on a sandy path with two small rocks nearby.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 2 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is on a sandy path with two small rocks nearby.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 2 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is in a grassy clearing where two low shrubs are present.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 1 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is in a grassy clearing where two low shrubs are present.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 1 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is in a grassy clearing where two low shrubs are present.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 2 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is in a grassy clearing where two low shrubs are present.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 2 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is in a grassy clearing where two low shrubs are present.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 2 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is near a pond edge with two cattail plants beside the water.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 1 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is near a pond edge with two cattail plants beside the water.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 2 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is near a pond edge with two cattail plants beside the water.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 1 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is near a pond edge with two cattail plants beside the water.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 2 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is near a pond edge with two cattail plants beside the water.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 1 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is in a meadow dotted with yellow wildflowers.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 1 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is in a meadow dotted with yellow wildflowers.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 1 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is in a meadow dotted with yellow wildflowers.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 2 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is in a meadow dotted with yellow wildflowers.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 2 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is in a meadow dotted with yellow wildflowers.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 2 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is beside a wooden fence painted brown.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 2 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is beside a wooden fence painted brown.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 2 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is beside a wooden fence painted brown.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 2 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is beside a wooden fence painted brown.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 1 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is beside a wooden fence painted brown.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 1 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is next to a shrub bearing red berries.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 2 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is next to a shrub bearing red berries.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 2 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is next to a shrub bearing red berries.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 2 is better
|
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "image",
"text": null
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": "Given a caption and two images generated based on this caption, please analyze in detail the two provided images. Evaluate them on various dimensions such as semantic consistency (how closely the image content aligns with the caption), aesthetics (composition, color usage, artistic expression), authenticity (realism and attention to detail), and any other factors you deem relevant. For each evaluation dimension, provide a score between 1-10 for both images (e.g., Image 1: 8/10, Image 2: 6/10) and provide a concise rationale for the score. Calculate the total score for each image by summing all dimension scores. Use a chain-of-thought process to detail your reasoning steps, and enclose all your detailed reasoning within <think> and </think> tags. Then, in the <answer> tag, output exactly one of the following strings: 'Image 1 is better' or 'Image 2 is better' based on the total scores. No additional text is allowed in the <answer> section.\n\nExample output format:\n<think>\n1. Semantic consistency: Image 1 (9/10) - ...; Image 2 (7/10) - ...\n2. Aesthetics: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (8/10) - ...\n3. Authenticity: Image 1 (8/10) - ...; Image 2 (5/10) - ...\n[Additional dimensions if any]: Image 2 (8/10) - ...; Image 1 (6/10) - ...\nTotal score:\nImage 1: 9+8+8+6=31\nImage 2: 7+8+5+8=28\n</think>\n<answer>Image 1 is better</answer>\n**Note: In the example above, scores and the final answer are placeholders meant only to demonstrate the format. Your actual evaluation should be based on the quality of two given images.**\n\nYour task is provided as follows:\nText Caption: [A bird is next to a shrub bearing red berries.]"
}
]
}
] |
Image 2 is better
|
End of preview. Expand
in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 15