The dataset viewer is not available for this dataset.
Need help to make the dataset viewer work? Make sure to review how to configure the dataset viewer, and open a discussion for direct support.
arXiv AI Entity Graph — Models, Frameworks and Benchmarks in CS Research
Structured entity extraction from arXiv CS papers — every AI model, framework, benchmark, and dataset mentioned in paper titles and abstracts, normalized to canonical names with provider, family, and confidence metadata.
Coverage: January 2024 – present · Daily updates · 23 CS categories
Sample: January 2024 + January 2025 + June 2026 (10 days each)
What makes this different
- arXiv has 2 million papers. Anyone can read them. Nobody has turned them into a structured, normalized, daily-updating database of who's using what — until now.
- Every entity mention is normalized:
GPT-4,gpt4,GPT-4-turboall resolve to the same canonical row withfamily=GPT,provider=OpenAI,model_type=llm. Your queries don't need to handle aliases. - This is not a retrieval benchmark or a paper corpus. It is an analytics database — built to answer questions like "which models are researchers actually using?", "when did DeepSeek R1 go mainstream?", and "what benchmarks are used to evaluate GPT-4o?"
Key findings (Jan 2024 – Jun 2026)
- GPT dominates at 5,652 papers citing it across the full window — but Alibaba's Qwen family (Qwen3 + Qwen2.5 + Qwen combined = 4,723 papers) rivals OpenAI's total footprint in 2026
- DeepSeek R1: fastest adoption on record — 3 papers in January 2025, 48 in February (16x spike in one month), sustained at 50–90/month since
- o1 enters the top 20 at 620 papers — reasoning models are now mainstream research infrastructure, not a curiosity
- cs.CL overtook cs.LG as the dominant category — language research (27,452 entity rows) now exceeds pure ML (20,040)
- Stable Diffusion at 884 papers — image generation is a serious parallel research track to LLMs
Schema
entities — the core table
| Column | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
paper_id |
varchar | arXiv paper ID |
version |
int | Paper version |
paper_year |
int | Year derived from paper ID |
paper_month |
int | Month derived from paper ID |
entity_type |
varchar | model, framework, benchmark, dataset |
entity |
varchar | Canonical entity name |
confidence |
double | 1.0 = confirmed · 0.2 = ambiguous · 0.1 = likely false positive |
family |
varchar | Model family (e.g. GPT, Llama, Qwen) |
provider |
varchar | Provider (e.g. OpenAI, Meta, Alibaba) |
model_type |
varchar | llm, reasoning_llm, vlm, embedding, image_gen, speech, ssm |
domain |
varchar | Benchmark domain (e.g. math, code, reasoning) |
ingest_date |
date | Partition column — date paper was ingested |
papers
| Column | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
paper_id |
varchar | arXiv paper ID |
title |
varchar | Paper title |
abstract |
varchar | Full abstract |
primary_category |
varchar | arXiv primary category (e.g. cs.LG) |
paper_year |
int | Year |
published_at |
timestamp | Submission date |
doi |
varchar | DOI if available |
pdf_url |
varchar | Direct PDF link |
is_ai |
boolean | Core AI category (cs.AI, cs.CV, cs.CL, cs.NE) |
is_ml |
boolean | ML category (cs.LG, stat.ML) |
is_llm |
boolean | LLM-related paper |
is_other_cs |
boolean | CS but outside core AI/ML |
Additional tables: authors, citations, categories, versions, links
Try it in 30 seconds
import duckdb
con = duckdb.connect("arxiv_ai_graph_sample.duckdb")
# Most cited models in AI/NLP papers — pre-built view
con.execute("SELECT * FROM model_citations LIMIT 20").df()
# Or write your own
con.execute("""
SELECT provider, entity, model_type,
COUNT(DISTINCT paper_id) AS papers_citing
FROM entities
WHERE entity_type = 'model'
AND confidence = 1.0
AND paper_year >= 2025
GROUP BY 1, 2, 3
ORDER BY papers_citing DESC
LIMIT 20
""").df()
Sample output — top models, Jan 2024 – Jun 2026
| provider | entity | model_type | papers_citing |
|---|---|---|---|
| OpenAI | GPT | llm | 5,652 |
| OpenAI | GPT-4 | llm | 3,549 |
| OpenAI | GPT-4o | llm | 2,967 |
| Meta | Llama | llm | 1,822 |
| Alibaba | Qwen3 | llm | 1,782 |
| Meta | Llama 3 | llm | 1,727 |
| Alibaba | Qwen2.5 | llm | 1,668 |
| Anthropic | Claude | llm | 1,585 |
| Gemini | llm | 1,476 | |
| Alibaba | Qwen | llm | 1,273 |
| Meta | Llama 2 | llm | 1,141 |
| Meta | Llama 3.1 | llm | 1,039 |
| DeepSeek AI | DeepSeek R1 | llm | 1,007 |
| Stability AI | Stable Diffusion | image_gen | 884 |
| LLaVA Team | LLaVA | vlm | 867 |
| Gemini 2.5 | llm | 747 | |
| Gemma | llm | 731 | |
| Mistral AI | Mistral | llm | 708 |
| OpenAI | o1 | reasoning_llm | 620 |
| DeepSeek AI | DeepSeek | llm | 613 |
DeepSeek R1 adoption curve
The sharpest adoption spike in the dataset — from 3 papers in January 2025 to 48 in February, sustained at 50–90/month ever since:
| Month | Papers citing DeepSeek R1 |
|---|---|
| Jan 2025 | 3 |
| Feb 2025 | 48 |
| Mar 2025 | 49 |
| Apr 2025 | 47 |
| May 2025 | 90 |
| Jun 2025 | 82 |
| Jul 2025 | 52 |
| Aug 2025 | 52 |
| Sep 2025 | 56 |
| Oct 2025 | 84 |
| Nov 2025 | 54 |
| Dec 2025 | 48 |
| Jan 2026 | 53 |
| Feb 2026 | 44 |
| Mar 2026 | 57 |
| Apr 2026 | 80 |
| May 2026 | 67 |
| Jun 2026 | 38 |
More example queries
-- Framework adoption across ML papers
SELECT entity, provider, model_type AS framework_type,
COUNT(DISTINCT paper_id) AS papers
FROM entities
WHERE entity_type = 'framework' AND confidence = 1.0
GROUP BY 1, 2, 3
ORDER BY papers DESC
LIMIT 15;
-- Which benchmarks does GPT-4o get evaluated on?
SELECT e2.entity AS benchmark, COUNT(*) AS papers
FROM entities e1
JOIN entities e2 ON e1.paper_id = e2.paper_id
WHERE e1.entity = 'GPT-4o'
AND e2.entity_type = 'benchmark'
AND e1.confidence = 1.0
AND e2.confidence = 1.0
GROUP BY 1
ORDER BY papers DESC;
-- Provider market share by month (trend analysis)
SELECT DATE_TRUNC('month', ingest_date) AS month,
provider,
COUNT(DISTINCT paper_id) AS papers
FROM entities
WHERE entity_type = 'model' AND confidence = 1.0
GROUP BY 1, 2
ORDER BY 1, papers DESC;
-- LLM research bleeding into non-core CS categories
SELECT p.primary_category, COUNT(DISTINCT p.paper_id) AS papers
FROM papers p
WHERE p.is_llm = true AND p.is_other_cs = true
GROUP BY 1
ORDER BY papers DESC;
-- Model adoption velocity — which models grew fastest in 2025?
SELECT entity, provider, COUNT(1) knt
FROM entities
WHERE entity_type = 'model' AND confidence = 1.0
GROUP BY 1, 2
ORDER BY knt DESC
LIMIT 15;
Confidence scoring
Entity extraction uses a deterministic rule-based pipeline with a curated YAML knowledge base — fully auditable, no LLM black box.
| Score | Meaning |
|---|---|
1.0 |
Unambiguous alias match, or ambiguous alias confirmed by positive context |
0.2 |
Ambiguous alias — matched but context inconclusive |
0.1 |
Likely false positive — negative context matched |
Always filter WHERE confidence = 1.0 for highest-precision results.
Ambiguous tokens (e.g. "Flux" in physics papers, "Ray" in computer vision) are handled with positive/negative context windows — the methodology is documented in the dataset repository.
Coverage
Date range: January 2024 – present (daily updates)
Categories: cs.LG · cs.CL · cs.CV · cs.AI · cs.NE · cs.CR · cs.SE · cs.DC · cs.IR · cs.HC · cs.RO · cs.MA · cs.SD · cs.DB · cs.GT · cs.PL · stat.ML · eess.IV · eess.SP · q-bio.QM
Entity counts (Jan 2024 – Jun 2026):
| Type | Total entities | Unique entities | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| model | ~65,000 | 100+ | GPT-4o, Llama 3.1, Qwen3, DeepSeek R1 |
| framework | ~55,000 | 40+ | PyTorch, DeepSpeed, vLLM, LoRA |
| benchmark | ~15,000 | 50+ | MMLU, HumanEval, GSM8K, SWE-bench |
| dataset | ~4,000 | 30+ | The Pile, FineWeb, LAION |
Category breakdown (entity rows):
| Category | Entities | Description |
|---|---|---|
| cs.CL | 27,452 | Computation and Language |
| cs.LG | 20,040 | Machine Learning |
| cs.CV | 19,790 | Computer Vision |
| cs.AI | 9,167 | Artificial Intelligence |
| cs.CR | 3,951 | Security and Cryptography |
| cs.SE | 3,763 | Software Engineering |
Pricing and access
| Tier | Coverage | Format | Price |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free sample | 3 × 10-day windows (Jan 2024, Jan 2025, Jun 2026) | DuckDB file (this repo) | Free |
| Snapshot | Jan 2024 – Jun 2026, full | Parquet on S3 | $49 one-time |
| Subscription | Jan 2024 – present + daily updates | Parquet on S3, daily delta | $29/month |
What you get with the full dataset
- All 7 tables in Parquet format, partitioned by
ingest_date aws s3 syncaccess — pipe directly into your existing data stack- 2.5 years of history with daily updates going forward
- Schema-stable with a changelog — no breaking changes without notice
- Daily new partition by 9am UTC
How to purchase
→ Snapshot — $49 one-time
Full dataset, Jan 2024 – Jun 2026. Download once, use forever.
→ Subscription — $29/month
Full dataset + daily updates. Cancel anytime.
After purchase you will receive AWS credentials by email within 24 hours. Download with:
```bash aws configure --profile arxiv-ai-graph aws s3 sync s3://arxiv-ai-graph/snapshot/ ./arxiv-data/ --profile arxiv-ai-graph ```
For enterprise pricing, custom date ranges, or questions: [nowudoit@gmail.com]
License
Metadata (titles, abstracts, authors, categories) derived from arXiv under CC0 1.0 Public Domain. Entity extraction, normalization, confidence scoring, and schema are original work licensed under CC BY 4.0.
Attribution: arXiv AI Entity Graph by arxgraph, CC BY 4.0https://huggingface.co/datasets/arxgraph/arxiv-ai-entity-graph
- Downloads last month
- 91