pretty_name: 'GENIUS: Generative Fluid Intelligence Evaluation Suite'
language:
- en
license: cc-by-nc-4.0
size_categories:
- n<1K
task_categories:
- image-to-image
- text-to-image
tags:
- image
- multimodal
- benchmark
- image-generation
- visual-reasoning
- fluid-intelligence
- interleaved
- expert-generated
- arxiv:2602.11144
configs:
- config_name: implicit_pattern
default: true
data_files:
- split: test
path: viewer/implicit_pattern.jsonl
- config_name: symbolic_constraint
data_files:
- split: test
path: viewer/symbolic_constraint.jsonl
- config_name: visual_constraint
data_files:
- split: test
path: viewer/visual_constraint.jsonl
- config_name: prior_conflicting
data_files:
- split: test
path: viewer/prior_conflicting.jsonl
- config_name: multi_semantic
data_files:
- split: test
path: viewer/multi_semantic.jsonl
Leaderboard
GENIUS evaluates every generated image on three complementary axes, each scored 0 (fail), 1 (partial), or 2 (perfect):
- Rule Compliance (RC): follows the newly defined rule, grounded by expert-written evaluation hints.
- Visual Consistency (VC): preserves required identities, objects, and contextual visual attributes.
- Aesthetic Quality (AQ): remains visually coherent and avoids obvious generation artifacts.
The Overall score uses the paper's weighted metric ratio RC:VC:AQ = 6:3.5:0.5. The primary Gemini score averages three independent judge runs per sample. Qwen2.5-VL-72B is an independent robustness judge: it assigns lower absolute scores overall, while preserving the main relative performance trends.
| Rank by Gemini | Model / Method | Type | Interleaved | Gemini-3-Pro Overall | Qwen2.5-VL-72B Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nano Banana Pro | Proprietary | β | 57.19 | 48.35 |
| 2 | SeeDream 4.5 | Proprietary | β | 52.84 | 44.17 |
| 3 | Nano Banana | Proprietary | β | 50.66 | 42.88 |
| 4 | GPT-Image | Proprietary | β | 47.15 | 40.94 |
| 5 | Emu3.5-Image | Open source | β | 36.67 | 28.80 |
| 6 | FLUX.2-dev | Open source | β | 34.39 | 27.37 |
| 7 | Ours (Bagel + attention intervention) | Training-free method | β | 32.92 | 23.91 |
| 8 | Qwen-Image | Open source | β | 30.58 | 25.67 |
| 9 | Omini-Gen2 | Open source | β | 27.87 | 21.12 |
| 10 | Bagel | Open source | β | 26.74 | 18.97 |
| 11 | GLM-Image | Open source | β | 24.71 | 17.45 |
| 12 | SeeDream 4.0 | Proprietary | β | 21.26 | 17.74 |
| 13 | NextStep-1 | Open source | β | 10.44 | 9.90 |
GENIUS leaderboard judged by Gemini-3-Pro:
What is GENIUS?
Most image-generation benchmarks primarily test crystallized intelligence: whether a model can retrieve and reproduce concepts learned during pre-training. GENIUS instead evaluates **Generative Fluid Intelligence (GFI)**βthe ability to solve visual-generation problems whose rules are defined entirely by the immediate multimodal context.
GENIUS contains 510 expert-curated test cases with interleaved text and multi-image inputs. Removing either modality makes an instance unsolvable. The benchmark spans three core capabilities:
| GFI capability | What it tests | Tasks | Samples |
|---|---|---|---|
| π§© Implicit Pattern Induction | Infer unstated visual preferences and apply them to a new image | Implicit Pattern Generation | 86 |
| π Ad-hoc Constraint Execution | Execute newly defined visual or symbolic rules | Symbolic Constraint Generation; Visual Constraint Generation | 213 |
| π Contextual Knowledge Adaptation | Follow contextual knowledge even when it conflicts with familiar semantics or physical priors | Prior-Conflicting Generation; Multi-Semantic Generation | 211 |
| Total | 3 dimensions Β· 5 tasks Β· 20 sub-tasks | 510 |
Dataset composition
| Viewer config | Dimension | Sub-tasks | Samples |
|---|---|---|---|
implicit_pattern |
Implicit Pattern Induction | Overall Style (15), Spatial Relationship (14), Visual Feature (18), Palette (20), Entity (19) | 86 |
symbolic_constraint |
Ad-hoc Constraint Execution | Operation Implementation (27), Visual Metaphor (29), Layout (30), Visual Feature (38), Instance Binding (29) | 153 |
visual_constraint |
Ad-hoc Constraint Execution | Simple Constraint (26), Complex Constraint (34) | 60 |
prior_conflicting |
Contextual Knowledge Adaptation | Abnormal Biological Growth (21), Gravity Anomaly (20), Abnormal Animal Behavior (20), Time Reversal (20), Weather Anomaly (20) | 101 |
multi_semantic |
Contextual Knowledge Adaptation | Noun Phrase (50), Verb Phrase (30), Adjective Phrase (30) | 110 |
Each record contains:
| Field | Description |
|---|---|
id |
Task-local identifier used to name the generated output |
dimension / task |
GFI capability dimension and benchmark task |
sub_dimension |
Fine-grained capability category |
sub_sub_dimension |
Additional fine-grained category used by some symbolic constraints |
context |
Interleaved context that establishes the new rule or pattern |
instruction |
Image-generation or image-editing request |
rc_hint |
Human-verified gold hint for Rule Compliance evaluation |
vc_hint |
Human-verified gold hint for Visual Consistency, when applicable |
image_paths |
Ordered, de-duplicated repository paths for images referenced by the record |
Image placeholders use the form <image:NAME> and resolve to CONFIG/images/NAME.png. For example, <image:space_0> in the implicit_pattern config refers to implicit_pattern/images/space_0.png.
Viewer representation. The five
viewer/*.jsonlfiles are generated from the canonical*/test_data.jsonannotations. They preserve all annotation text while normalizing the occasionally mixed string/list representation ofvc_hintinto a nullable string, giving the Dataset Viewer a stable schema. Rebuild them withpython scripts/build_viewer_data.pyafter changing the source annotations.
Quick start
Load any of the five task configs directly with π€ Datasets:
from datasets import load_dataset
dataset = load_dataset(
"HankYang428/GENIUS",
"implicit_pattern", # or symbolic_constraint, visual_constraint,
# prior_conflicting, multi_semantic
split="test",
)
print(dataset[0])
Download the full repository, including all reference images:
git lfs install
git clone https://huggingface.co/datasets/HankYang428/GENIUS
Alternative mirrors: Google Drive Β· Baidu Netdisk (password: iek1)
For model-output layout and evaluation commands, see the official code repository.
Intended use and limitations
GENIUS is designed for evaluating multimodal image-generation and image-editing systems on novel, context-defined problems. It is a compact evaluation suite, not a training corpus. Scores measure performance on the benchmark's curated rules and judge protocol; they should not be interpreted as a complete measure of general intelligence or image-generation quality. LMM-as-a-judge evaluation can retain model-specific biases, which is why the paper reports results from two independent judge families and uses expert-written gold hints.
License
GENIUS is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License and is intended for non-commercial research use.
Citation
If GENIUS is useful in your research, please cite:
@misc{an2026geniusgenerativefluidintelligence,
title = {GENIUS: Generative Fluid Intelligence Evaluation Suite},
author = {Ruichuan An and Sihan Yang and Ziyu Guo and Wei Dai and Zijun Shen and Haodong Li and Renrui Zhang and Xinyu Wei and Guopeng Li and Wenshan Wu and Wentao Zhang},
year = {2026},
eprint = {2602.11144},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
primaryClass = {cs.LG},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.11144}
}
Contact
Questions and feedback are welcome via GitHub Issues or arctanxarc@gmail.com.

