GENIUS / README.md
HankYang428's picture
Add Gemini leaderboard caption
a0bf543
|
Raw
History Blame Contribute Delete
9.26 kB
metadata
pretty_name: 'GENIUS: Generative Fluid Intelligence Evaluation Suite'
language:
  - en
license: cc-by-nc-4.0
size_categories:
  - n<1K
task_categories:
  - image-to-image
  - text-to-image
tags:
  - image
  - multimodal
  - benchmark
  - image-generation
  - visual-reasoning
  - fluid-intelligence
  - interleaved
  - expert-generated
  - arxiv:2602.11144
configs:
  - config_name: implicit_pattern
    default: true
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: viewer/implicit_pattern.jsonl
  - config_name: symbolic_constraint
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: viewer/symbolic_constraint.jsonl
  - config_name: visual_constraint
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: viewer/visual_constraint.jsonl
  - config_name: prior_conflicting
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: viewer/prior_conflicting.jsonl
  - config_name: multi_semantic
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: viewer/multi_semantic.jsonl

🧠 GENIUS

Generative Fluid Intelligence Evaluation Suite

Paper Code Dataset License

[Paper]   [Code]   [Blog]   [Dataset]

GENIUS task overview

Leaderboard

GENIUS evaluates every generated image on three complementary axes, each scored 0 (fail), 1 (partial), or 2 (perfect):

  • Rule Compliance (RC): follows the newly defined rule, grounded by expert-written evaluation hints.
  • Visual Consistency (VC): preserves required identities, objects, and contextual visual attributes.
  • Aesthetic Quality (AQ): remains visually coherent and avoids obvious generation artifacts.

The Overall score uses the paper's weighted metric ratio RC:VC:AQ = 6:3.5:0.5. The primary Gemini score averages three independent judge runs per sample. Qwen2.5-VL-72B is an independent robustness judge: it assigns lower absolute scores overall, while preserving the main relative performance trends.

Rank by Gemini Model / Method Type Interleaved Gemini-3-Pro Overall Qwen2.5-VL-72B Overall
1 Nano Banana Pro Proprietary βœ“ 57.19 48.35
2 SeeDream 4.5 Proprietary βœ— 52.84 44.17
3 Nano Banana Proprietary βœ“ 50.66 42.88
4 GPT-Image Proprietary βœ— 47.15 40.94
5 Emu3.5-Image Open source βœ— 36.67 28.80
6 FLUX.2-dev Open source βœ— 34.39 27.37
7 Ours (Bagel + attention intervention) Training-free method βœ“ 32.92 23.91
8 Qwen-Image Open source βœ— 30.58 25.67
9 Omini-Gen2 Open source βœ— 27.87 21.12
10 Bagel Open source βœ“ 26.74 18.97
11 GLM-Image Open source βœ— 24.71 17.45
12 SeeDream 4.0 Proprietary βœ— 21.26 17.74
13 NextStep-1 Open source βœ— 10.44 9.90

GENIUS leaderboard judged by Gemini-3-Pro:

GENIUS leaderboard judged by Gemini-3-Pro

What is GENIUS?

Most image-generation benchmarks primarily test crystallized intelligence: whether a model can retrieve and reproduce concepts learned during pre-training. GENIUS instead evaluates **Generative Fluid Intelligence (GFI)**β€”the ability to solve visual-generation problems whose rules are defined entirely by the immediate multimodal context.

GENIUS contains 510 expert-curated test cases with interleaved text and multi-image inputs. Removing either modality makes an instance unsolvable. The benchmark spans three core capabilities:

GFI capability What it tests Tasks Samples
🧩 Implicit Pattern Induction Infer unstated visual preferences and apply them to a new image Implicit Pattern Generation 86
πŸ“ Ad-hoc Constraint Execution Execute newly defined visual or symbolic rules Symbolic Constraint Generation; Visual Constraint Generation 213
🌍 Contextual Knowledge Adaptation Follow contextual knowledge even when it conflicts with familiar semantics or physical priors Prior-Conflicting Generation; Multi-Semantic Generation 211
Total 3 dimensions Β· 5 tasks Β· 20 sub-tasks 510

Dataset composition

Viewer config Dimension Sub-tasks Samples
implicit_pattern Implicit Pattern Induction Overall Style (15), Spatial Relationship (14), Visual Feature (18), Palette (20), Entity (19) 86
symbolic_constraint Ad-hoc Constraint Execution Operation Implementation (27), Visual Metaphor (29), Layout (30), Visual Feature (38), Instance Binding (29) 153
visual_constraint Ad-hoc Constraint Execution Simple Constraint (26), Complex Constraint (34) 60
prior_conflicting Contextual Knowledge Adaptation Abnormal Biological Growth (21), Gravity Anomaly (20), Abnormal Animal Behavior (20), Time Reversal (20), Weather Anomaly (20) 101
multi_semantic Contextual Knowledge Adaptation Noun Phrase (50), Verb Phrase (30), Adjective Phrase (30) 110

Each record contains:

Field Description
id Task-local identifier used to name the generated output
dimension / task GFI capability dimension and benchmark task
sub_dimension Fine-grained capability category
sub_sub_dimension Additional fine-grained category used by some symbolic constraints
context Interleaved context that establishes the new rule or pattern
instruction Image-generation or image-editing request
rc_hint Human-verified gold hint for Rule Compliance evaluation
vc_hint Human-verified gold hint for Visual Consistency, when applicable
image_paths Ordered, de-duplicated repository paths for images referenced by the record

Image placeholders use the form <image:NAME> and resolve to CONFIG/images/NAME.png. For example, <image:space_0> in the implicit_pattern config refers to implicit_pattern/images/space_0.png.

Viewer representation. The five viewer/*.jsonl files are generated from the canonical */test_data.json annotations. They preserve all annotation text while normalizing the occasionally mixed string/list representation of vc_hint into a nullable string, giving the Dataset Viewer a stable schema. Rebuild them with python scripts/build_viewer_data.py after changing the source annotations.

Quick start

Load any of the five task configs directly with πŸ€— Datasets:

from datasets import load_dataset

dataset = load_dataset(
    "HankYang428/GENIUS",
    "implicit_pattern",  # or symbolic_constraint, visual_constraint,
                         # prior_conflicting, multi_semantic
    split="test",
)

print(dataset[0])

Download the full repository, including all reference images:

git lfs install
git clone https://huggingface.co/datasets/HankYang428/GENIUS

Alternative mirrors: Google Drive Β· Baidu Netdisk (password: iek1)

For model-output layout and evaluation commands, see the official code repository.

Intended use and limitations

GENIUS is designed for evaluating multimodal image-generation and image-editing systems on novel, context-defined problems. It is a compact evaluation suite, not a training corpus. Scores measure performance on the benchmark's curated rules and judge protocol; they should not be interpreted as a complete measure of general intelligence or image-generation quality. LMM-as-a-judge evaluation can retain model-specific biases, which is why the paper reports results from two independent judge families and uses expert-written gold hints.

License

GENIUS is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License and is intended for non-commercial research use.

Citation

If GENIUS is useful in your research, please cite:

@misc{an2026geniusgenerativefluidintelligence,
  title         = {GENIUS: Generative Fluid Intelligence Evaluation Suite},
  author        = {Ruichuan An and Sihan Yang and Ziyu Guo and Wei Dai and Zijun Shen and Haodong Li and Renrui Zhang and Xinyu Wei and Guopeng Li and Wenshan Wu and Wentao Zhang},
  year          = {2026},
  eprint        = {2602.11144},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  primaryClass  = {cs.LG},
  url           = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.11144}
}

Contact

Questions and feedback are welcome via GitHub Issues or arctanxarc@gmail.com.