Predictive Closure: A Set-Level Characterization of JEPA's Feature Selection
Abstract
JEPA feature selection depends on predictive relationships between features rather than individual predictability, allowing unpredictable but relationally useful features to be retained and enabling indirect steering of representations.
In joint-embedding predictive architectures (JEPA), an encoder and a predictor are trained together to produce a representation that minimizes the error in predicting the representation of the next observation. Because the representations of both the current and the next observation are learned, it is unclear which features they will include. Earlier characterizations describe the features JEPA selects in terms of their individual predictability, raising the concern that unpredictable features, like a traffic light, will not be encoded into the representation. However, the prediction error is also affected by the relationships between features, e.g., the light's color helps predict whether the traffic will stop. We propose the predictive closure characterization, which accounts for these relationships. Based on a reformulation of the JEPA training objective, we show that selection depends on properties of feature sets. This view agrees with earlier works when features evolve independently, but makes new predictions when they do not, for instance that a feature like the traffic light can still be retained. We test this characterization in controlled experiments, which show that unpredictable features can become better represented when they help predict other features, and that changing one feature's predictive relationships can affect how well others are represented. We also demonstrate implications for steering feature selection: targeting one feature with an auxiliary objective, or supplying it to the predictor as side information, can strengthen the representation of another feature whose future values it helps predict, so steering can be indirect.
Community
JEPA doesn't just keep features that are predictable on their own. It keeps sets of features that predict each other. We formalize this as predictive closure, show it explains when unpredictable features are represented, and show you can steer what gets encoded indirectly through related features.
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- Adaptive Latent Capacity for World Models (2026)
- LRC-JEPA: Disentangling Dynamics and Residual Context for Efficient World Models (2026)
- One-Step Prediction Fidelity Is a Poor Proxy for Planning Performance in JEPA World Models (2026)
- MotionJEPA: Preventing Temporal Feature Collapse by Capturing Visual Changes in Latent Space (2026)
- Compositional Objectives: Learning Structure in Structure (2026)
- RepFlow: Reciprocal Supervision Improves Generation and Representation in Flow Models (2026)
- ALPS: Visual State Encoders for World Models (2026)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2610.27364 Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper