Abstract
SpatialScout evaluates vision-language agents on active 3D object mapping, revealing major gaps in precise metric map construction.
Spatial intelligence requires agents to actively acquire visual evidence and integrate observations into a coherent representation of the three-dimensional world. Yet spatial question answering offers limited evidence of whether models can construct accurate metric maps through autonomous exploration. We introduce SpatialScout, a benchmark for evaluating vision-language model (VLM) agents on active object-level 3D mapping. SpatialScout comprises 80 diverse indoor scenes containing 3,140 target objects. Given an object inventory, RGB observations, camera calibration, and camera poses, agents control a camera to explore each scene and estimate object centers in a shared coordinate frame. The task requires coordinating viewpoint selection, cross-view association, geometric estimation, and map revision under bounded interaction budgets. Evaluation jointly measures localization accuracy and target coverage through object-scale overlap scores that penalize missing predictions. Experiments with frontier VLMs reveal substantial limitations: the strongest evaluated model, Claude Opus 5.5, achieves a mean overlap score of 41.71%, with 47.23% of targets exceeding an intersection-over-union (IoU) threshold of 0.5 and only 3.25% exceeding 0.9. These results reveal a substantial gap between recovering coarse object layouts and constructing complete, precise metric maps. SpatialScout provides a quantitative testbed for developing agents that build reliable 3D spatial representations through active perception. Code is available at https://github.com/JesseZZZZZ/SpatialScout.
Community
Can VLM agents actively explore a scene and build an accurate 3D map? ๐งญ
We introduce SpatialScout, a benchmark for evaluating VLM agents on active object-level 3D mapping across 80 diverse indoor scenes.
Given an object inventory, RGB observations, and camera calibration and poses, agents must control a camera, gather visual evidence, and estimate object centers in a shared 3D coordinate frame.
๐ What does SpatialScout test?
- Active exploration: choosing informative viewpoints under limited interaction budgets.
- Spatial mapping: associating objects across views and progressively refining their 3D positions.
- Accuracy and completeness: evaluating localization while penalizing missing objects.
๐ Precise mapping remains challenging: the strongest evaluated model achieves 41.71% mean IoU, with only 3.25% of targets exceeding IoU 0.9.
Our results reveal a substantial gap between recovering coarse object layouts and building complete, precise metric maps.
๐ฌ We welcome feedback and discussion on active perception and spatial intelligence!
๐ป Code: https://github.com/JesseZZZZZ/SpatialScout
This is a benchmark designed to test the basic spatial understanding capability of VLM agents. Now that Astra has shown potential in robotics, none of physical AI will be achieved without the basic spatial-scouting capability.
A VLM controls a camera to explore, think, and localize each object in this environment. We believe this benchmark provides a new test bed for VLM agents that aim to be deployed in the physical world!
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- Are Frontier VLM Agents Ready to Be Robot Generalists? An Empirical Study with the Embodied Agent Arena (2026)
- VABench: Measuring Embodied Spatial Intelligence through Visual Demonstrations, Active Perception, and Metric Control (2026)
- 3DHarnessBench: Probing Agentic 3D-to-Code Capabilities of Frontier Vision-Language Models (2026)
- From Sight to Foresight: Predictive Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language Models (2026)
- EgoPathBench: Evaluating Zero-Shot Egocentric Waypoint Decision-Making in Vision-Language Models (2026)
- DeSpatial: The devil of Agentic Spatial Reasoning Lies in 3D Itself (2026)
- Robo-Harness K1: Harnessing Robot-Use Agents via Perception Augmentation (2026)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2610.26659 Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper
Collections including this paper 0
No Collection including this paper