AI & ML interests

Solving everything with diffusion models!

Recent Activity

sayakpaulย  updated a dataset about 5 hours ago
diffusers/mvp-certificates
sayakpaulย  updated a Space about 5 hours ago
diffusers/generate-mvp-certificate
OzzyGTย  updated a Space 1 day ago
diffusers/stable-diffusion-xl-inpainting
View all activity

pcuenqย 
posted an update 8 days ago
view post
Post
2577
๐Ÿ‘‰ What happened in AI in 2025? ๐Ÿ‘ˆ

We prepared the 2025 version of the HF AI Timeline Grid, highlighting open vs API-based model releases, and allowing you to browse and filter by access, modality, and release type!

Play with it here:
2025-ai-timeline/2025-ai-timeline

Here's my personal quarterly TL;DR:

1๏ธโƒฃ Q1 โ€” Learning to Reason
Deepseek not only releases a top-notch reasoning model, but shows how to train them and compete with closed frontier models. OpenAI debuts Deep Research.

Significant milestones: DeepSeek R1 & R1-Zero, Qwen 2.5 VL, OpenAI Deep Research, Gemini 2.5 Pro (experimental)

2๏ธโƒฃ Q2 โ€” Multimodality and Coding
More LLMs embrace multimodality by default, and there's a surge in coding agents. Strong vision, audio, and generative models emerge.

Significant milestones: Llama 4, Qwen 3, Imagen 4, OpenAI Codex, Google Jules, Claude 4

3๏ธโƒฃ Q3 โ€” "Gold" rush, OpenAI opens up, the community goes bananas
Flagship models get gold in Math olympiads and hard benchmarks. OpenAI releases strong open source models and Google releases the much anticipated nano-banana for image generation and editing. Agentic workflows become commonplace.

Significant milestones: Gemini and OpenAI IMO Gold, gpt-oss, Gemini 2.5 Flash Image, Grok 4, Claude Sonnet 4.5

4๏ธโƒฃ Q4 โ€” Mistral returns, leaderboard hill-climbing
Mistral is back with updated model families. All labs release impressive models to wrap up the year!

Significant milestones: Claude Opus 4.5, DeepSeek Math V2, FLUX 2, GPT 5.1, Kimi K2 Thinking, Nano Banana Pro, GLM 4.7, Gemini 3, Mistral 3, MiniMax M2.1 ๐Ÿคฏ

Credits
๐Ÿ™ NHLOCAL for the source data https://github.com/NHLOCAL/AiTimeline

๐Ÿซก @reach-vb for the original idea, design and recipe

๐Ÿ™Œ @ariG23498 and yours truly for compiling and verifying the 2025 edition

๐Ÿฅณ Here's to 2026, wishing it becomes the best year ever for open releases and on-device-first use-cases! ๐Ÿฅ‚
  • 1 reply
ยท
nouamanetaziย 
posted an update 2 months ago
view post
Post
4233
After training ๐’๐ฆ๐จ๐ฅ๐‹๐Œ๐Ÿ‘ on ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ–๐Ÿ’ ๐‡๐Ÿ๐ŸŽ๐ŸŽ๐ฌ for nearly a month, I've come to realize something most people overlook: ๐ข๐ง๐Ÿ๐ซ๐š๐ฌ๐ญ๐ซ๐ฎ๐œ๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ž ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐ฆ๐š๐ค๐ž-๐จ๐ซ-๐›๐ซ๐ž๐š๐ค ๐Ÿ๐š๐œ๐ญ๐จ๐ซ ๐ข๐ง ๐‹๐‹๐Œ ๐ญ๐ซ๐š๐ข๐ง๐ข๐ง๐ . ๐Ÿ”ฅ

Everyone talks about model architecture and data quality. And yes, those matter immensely. But here's what nobody tells you: when your training run fails at 2 AM because of mysterious ๐๐‚๐‚๐‹ ๐ž๐ซ๐ซ๐จ๐ซ๐ฌ, or when your expensive GPU cluster is running at ๐Ÿ”๐ŸŽ% ๐ž๐Ÿ๐Ÿ๐ข๐œ๐ข๐ž๐ง๐œ๐ฒ, the problem isn't your model. It's most probably a ๐ฆ๐ข๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ž ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐ก๐š๐ซ๐๐ฐ๐š๐ซ๐ž. ๐Ÿ› ๏ธ

Questions that seemed simple but had no clear answers: Why is ๐Œ๐จ๐„ ๐ญ๐ซ๐š๐ข๐ง๐ข๐ง๐  ๐ฌ๐ฅ๐จ๐ฐ๐ž๐ซ ๐ญ๐ก๐š๐ง ๐๐ž๐ง๐ฌ๐ž ๐ฆ๐จ๐๐ž๐ฅ๐ฌ? Which ๐๐‚๐‚๐‹ ๐Ÿ๐ฅ๐š๐ ๐ฌ should we actually set? How often should we checkpoint without killing throughput?

That's why we built ๐“๐ก๐ž ๐’๐ฆ๐จ๐ฅ ๐“๐ซ๐š๐ข๐ง๐ข๐ง๐  ๐๐ฅ๐š๐ฒ๐›๐จ๐จ๐ค ๐Ÿ“–: a complete guide covering everything from model architecture and data curation to the SmolLM3 training marathon, post-training techniques, and crucially, the ๐ข๐ง๐Ÿ๐ซ๐š๐ฌ๐ญ๐ซ๐ฎ๐œ๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ž ๐ฅ๐š๐ฒ๐ž๐ซ that most teams get wrong.

We validated real vs theoretical bandwidth across the entire stack: ๐‡๐๐Œ๐Ÿ‘ ๐ก๐ข๐ญ๐ญ๐ข๐ง๐  ๐Ÿ‘ ๐“๐/๐ฌ, ๐๐•๐‹๐ข๐ง๐ค ๐Ÿ’.๐ŸŽ ๐ซ๐ž๐š๐œ๐ก๐ข๐ง๐  ๐Ÿ•๐Ÿ–๐Ÿ” ๐†๐/๐ฌ, ๐๐‚๐ˆ๐ž ๐†๐ž๐ง๐Ÿ’ ๐š๐ญ ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ’.๐Ÿ ๐†๐/๐ฌ. Then we ran collective operations across ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ– ๐†๐๐”๐ฌ (16 nodes, 8xH100s each) and measured how performance degrades at scale: all-reduce drops from ๐Ÿ’๐Ÿ–๐ŸŽ ๐†๐/๐ฌ on a single node to ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ๐ŸŽ-๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ“๐ŸŽ ๐†๐/๐ฌ across 16 nodes.

If you've ever wondered why your training runs are slower than they should be, or you're planning to scale up and want to avoid expensive mistakes, this guide might save you weeks of debugging.

๐“๐ก๐ž ๐’๐ฆ๐จ๐ฅ ๐“๐ซ๐š๐ข๐ง๐ข๐ง๐  ๐๐ฅ๐š๐ฒ๐›๐จ๐จ๐ค: https://lnkd.in/e5MKXUHS

Shared with โค๏ธ by the HuggingFace team