text stringlengths 0 299 |
|---|
The present invention relates to telecommunications, digital communications, arti cial intelligence |
governance, trusted computing, cryptographic enforcement, and execution-time authorization |
architectures for next-generation network environments, including 5G, AI-native 6G, IMT-2030, |
Open RAN, AI-RAN, cloud-to-RAN control, satellite communications, and non-terrestrial |
networks. |
fi |
fl |
fi |
fl |
fi |
fl |
fi |
fl |
fl |
fi |
fi |
fl |
fl |
fi |
fi |
fi |
fl |
fl |
fl |
fi |
More particularly, the invention relates to systems and methods for preventing unauthorized |
inbound communications, spam calls, robocalls, automated messages, fraudulent signalling, proxyrouted contact attempts, machine-generated communication abuse, and unauthorized protocol-layer |
delivery through a Capability-Validated Inbound Descriptor (CVID) module. Unlike signaturebased caller authentication frameworks, including STIR/SHAKEN, spam-scoring systems, |
reputation lters, virtual-number masking systems, caller-ID attestation mechanisms, or applicationlayer access policies, which may identify, attest, label, score, or mask a communication without |
structurally preventing protocol-layer delivery, the CVID architecture withholds the cryptographic |
capability required for delivery or effectuation unless session-bound authority, caller or sender |
identity, declared purpose, temporal validity, revocation state, recipient permission, permitted |
communication context, channel scope, usage quota, nonce freshness, jurisdictional condition, and |
any required runtime governance predicate are veri ed inside a protected enforcement domain. |
The CVID module provides consumable, cryptographically bound, non-bearer execution authority |
that is validated before signalling, routing, ringing, delivery, session establishment, packet-core |
actuation, RAN effectuation, inference release, content rendering, satellite relay, cross-border |
transmission, settlement, or other irreversible communication or network effect becomes |
operationally effective. |
In preferred embodiments, the invention is applicable to voice calling, VoIP, SIP-based |
communications, messaging, email, AI-assisted communications, multi-agent communication |
systems, autonomous machine communications, distributed inference outputs, agentic RAN |
management decisions, digital-twin-governed network actions, packet-core actions, OS-embedded |
enterprise connectivity, Network-as-Code environments, physical AI platform communication, and |
digitally mediated reachability systems in which identity, authority, purpose, duration, jurisdiction, |
behavioural logic, and usage scope must remain cryptographically inseparable at the point of |
execution-time enforcement. |
The same hardware-rooted, fail-closed execution-time nality architecture may also be extended to |
satellite communications, non-terrestrial network relay, cross-border data export control, restricted |
content delivery, Central Bank Digital Currency systems, of ine or online digital settlement |
systems, and other infrastructure contexts where unauthorized transmission, inference release, |
content rendering, relay, actuation, or settlement must be denied before irreversible effectuation |
Background |
Problems Existing in the Prior Art |
Problem 1 — Existing revocation-based token approaches do not control communication nality |
Certain prior approaches, including CN110855672A, focus on token validity, token revocation, or |
token-management logic. Such architectures may improve whether a token is regarded as current, |
expired, or revoked within a software system, but they do not solve the telecom problem of predelivery communication nality. They do not transform inbound calling, signaling, or |
communication reachability into a bounded authority object whose use is consumed at the protocol |
path itself. Nor do they ensure that signaling, ringing, routing, message acceptance, or comparable |
communication effects cannot occur unless a protected enforcement boundary releases a valid, |
context-scoped communication capability. |
fi |
fl |
fi |
fi |
fi |
fi |
A revoked token and a non-consumable identi er are not equivalent design objects. In a |
conventional revocation architecture, permission remains conceptually persistent until |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.