extreme-weather-impacts/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-eventimpact
8B
•
Updated
•
4
Dataset Viewer
Unnamed: 0
int64 29
2.83M
| paragraph
stringlengths 31
32.8k
| event_name
stringclasses 146
values | event_summary
stringclasses 146
values | answer_impact
stringclasses 2
values | answer_eventimpact
stringclasses 2
values | prompt_impact
stringlengths 1.2k
33.9k
| prompt_eventimpact
stringlengths 1.35k
35.1k
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
78,298
|
Item 2.02Results of Operations and Financial Condition.Announcement of Receipt of Quarterly Royalty ReportOn October 28, 2022, Mesabi Trust received the quarterly royalty report of iron ore shipments out of Silver Bay, Minnesota during the quarter ended September 30, 2022 (the “Royalty Report”) from Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (“Cliffs”), the parent company of Northshore Mining Company (“Northshore”). The Royalty Report indicated that, because of the current and ongoing idling of Northshore, the Trust received no royalty payment.Item 7.01Regulation FD.Quarterly Royalty ReportOn October 28, 2022, the Trustees of Mesabi Trust received the Royalty Report from Cliffs, the parent company of Northshore.As reported to Mesabi Trust by Cliffs in the Royalty Report, based on shipments of iron ore products by Northshore during the three months ended September 30, 2022, Mesabi Trust was credited with a base royalty of zero dollars ($0.00). For the three months ended September 30, 2022, Mesabi Trust was also credited with a bonus royalty in the amount of zero dollars ($0.00). No adjustments were taken by Cliffs for the quarter. In addition, because of the current idling of Northshore, a royalty payment of zero dollars ($0.00) was paid to the Mesabi Land Trust. Accordingly, the total royalty payments received by Mesabi Trust on October 28, 2022 from Cliffs was zero dollars ($0.00).The royalties paid to Mesabi Trust are based on the volume of iron ore pellets produced or shipped during the quarter and the year to date, the pricing of iron ore product sales, and the percentage of iron ore pellet shipments from Mesabi Trust lands rather than from non-Mesabi Trust lands. In the third calendar quarter of 2022, Cliffs credited Mesabi Trust with zero (0) tons of iron ore shipped, as compared to 1,169,461 tons shipped during the third calendar quarter of 2021.The volume of iron ore pellets (and other iron ore products) produced and shipped by Northshore varies from quarter to quarter and year to year based on a number of factors, including, among others, Cliffs’ decisions to idle Northshore operations, the requested delivery schedules of customers, general economic conditions in the iron ore industry, production schedules and weather conditions on the Great Lakes. Based on the above factors, and as indicated by Mesabi Trust’s historical distribution payments, the royalties received by Mesabi Trust, and the distributions paid to Unitholders, if any, in any particular quarter are not necessarily indicative of royalties that will be received, or distributions that will be paid, if any, in any subsequent quarter or full year.As previously announced by Cliffs on July 22, 2022, the current idling of Northshore operations was extended until at least April 2023 and maybe beyond.Cliffs’ Royalty Report stated that the reported royalty amounts were based on estimated iron ore pellet prices that are subject to change. It is possible that future negative price adjustments could offset, or even eliminate, royalties or royalty income that would otherwise be payable to Mesabi Trust in any particular quarter, or at year end, thereby potentially reducing cash available for distribution to Mesabi Trust’s Unitholders in future quarters.Forward-looking StatementsThis report contains certain forward-looking statements based on Cliffs’ publicly announced plans with respect to Northshore in the future, which statements are intended to be made under the safe harbor protections of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended. The length of the idling of Northshore operations could differ materially from current expectations due to inherent risks and uncertainties such as general adverse business and industry economic trends, uncertainties arising from war, terrorist events, recession, potential future impacts of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, and other global events, higher or lower customer demand for steel and iron ore, decisions by mine operators regarding
|
Hurricane Fiona (September 2022)
|
Category 1 Hurricane Fiona causes widespread power outage across central and western Puerto Rico. Extreme rainfall (12-18 inches) from an intensifying hurricane resulted in widespread flooding and mudslides causing damage to many homes, businesses, vehicles and other infrastructure. The regional power grid was also significantly impaired.
|
No
|
No
|
You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT.
Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure:
[begin of TEXT]
Item 2.02Results of Operations and Financial Condition.Announcement of Receipt of Quarterly Royalty ReportOn October 28, 2022, Mesabi Trust received the quarterly royalty report of iron ore shipments out of Silver Bay, Minnesota during the quarter ended September 30, 2022 (the “Royalty Report”) from Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (“Cliffs”), the parent company of Northshore Mining Company (“Northshore”). The Royalty Report indicated that, because of the current and ongoing idling of Northshore, the Trust received no royalty payment.Item 7.01Regulation FD.Quarterly Royalty ReportOn October 28, 2022, the Trustees of Mesabi Trust received the Royalty Report from Cliffs, the parent company of Northshore.As reported to Mesabi Trust by Cliffs in the Royalty Report, based on shipments of iron ore products by Northshore during the three months ended September 30, 2022, Mesabi Trust was credited with a base royalty of zero dollars ($0.00). For the three months ended September 30, 2022, Mesabi Trust was also credited with a bonus royalty in the amount of zero dollars ($0.00). No adjustments were taken by Cliffs for the quarter. In addition, because of the current idling of Northshore, a royalty payment of zero dollars ($0.00) was paid to the Mesabi Land Trust. Accordingly, the total royalty payments received by Mesabi Trust on October 28, 2022 from Cliffs was zero dollars ($0.00).The royalties paid to Mesabi Trust are based on the volume of iron ore pellets produced or shipped during the quarter and the year to date, the pricing of iron ore product sales, and the percentage of iron ore pellet shipments from Mesabi Trust lands rather than from non-Mesabi Trust lands. In the third calendar quarter of 2022, Cliffs credited Mesabi Trust with zero (0) tons of iron ore shipped, as compared to 1,169,461 tons shipped during the third calendar quarter of 2021.The volume of iron ore pellets (and other iron ore products) produced and shipped by Northshore varies from quarter to quarter and year to year based on a number of factors, including, among others, Cliffs’ decisions to idle Northshore operations, the requested delivery schedules of customers, general economic conditions in the iron ore industry, production schedules and weather conditions on the Great Lakes. Based on the above factors, and as indicated by Mesabi Trust’s historical distribution payments, the royalties received by Mesabi Trust, and the distributions paid to Unitholders, if any, in any particular quarter are not necessarily indicative of royalties that will be received, or distributions that will be paid, if any, in any subsequent quarter or full year.As previously announced by Cliffs on July 22, 2022, the current idling of Northshore operations was extended until at least April 2023 and maybe beyond.Cliffs’ Royalty Report stated that the reported royalty amounts were based on estimated iron ore pellet prices that are subject to change. It is possible that future negative price adjustments could offset, or even eliminate, royalties or royalty income that would otherwise be payable to Mesabi Trust in any particular quarter, or at year end, thereby potentially reducing cash available for distribution to Mesabi Trust’s Unitholders in future quarters.Forward-looking StatementsThis report contains certain forward-looking statements based on Cliffs’ publicly announced plans with respect to Northshore in the future, which statements are intended to be made under the safe harbor protections of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended. The length of the idling of Northshore operations could differ materially from current expectations due to inherent risks and uncertainties such as general adverse business and industry economic trends, uncertainties arising from war, terrorist events, recession, potential future impacts of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, and other global events, higher or lower customer demand for steel and iron ore, decisions by mine operators regarding
[end of TEXT]
Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No":
- Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)?
Decision Guidelines:
- A company is considered "exposed" only if:
1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT.
2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company.
3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions.
- Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed".
- TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed".
Output Format:
Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No".
Your Output:
|
You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT.
EVENT: "Hurricane Fiona (September 2022)"
EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Category 1 Hurricane Fiona causes widespread power outage across central and western Puerto Rico. Extreme rainfall (12-18 inches) from an intensifying hurricane resulted in widespread flooding and mudslides causing damage to many homes, businesses, vehicles and other infrastructure. The regional power grid was also significantly impaired."
Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure:
[begin of TEXT]
Item 2.02Results of Operations and Financial Condition.Announcement of Receipt of Quarterly Royalty ReportOn October 28, 2022, Mesabi Trust received the quarterly royalty report of iron ore shipments out of Silver Bay, Minnesota during the quarter ended September 30, 2022 (the “Royalty Report”) from Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (“Cliffs”), the parent company of Northshore Mining Company (“Northshore”). The Royalty Report indicated that, because of the current and ongoing idling of Northshore, the Trust received no royalty payment.Item 7.01Regulation FD.Quarterly Royalty ReportOn October 28, 2022, the Trustees of Mesabi Trust received the Royalty Report from Cliffs, the parent company of Northshore.As reported to Mesabi Trust by Cliffs in the Royalty Report, based on shipments of iron ore products by Northshore during the three months ended September 30, 2022, Mesabi Trust was credited with a base royalty of zero dollars ($0.00). For the three months ended September 30, 2022, Mesabi Trust was also credited with a bonus royalty in the amount of zero dollars ($0.00). No adjustments were taken by Cliffs for the quarter. In addition, because of the current idling of Northshore, a royalty payment of zero dollars ($0.00) was paid to the Mesabi Land Trust. Accordingly, the total royalty payments received by Mesabi Trust on October 28, 2022 from Cliffs was zero dollars ($0.00).The royalties paid to Mesabi Trust are based on the volume of iron ore pellets produced or shipped during the quarter and the year to date, the pricing of iron ore product sales, and the percentage of iron ore pellet shipments from Mesabi Trust lands rather than from non-Mesabi Trust lands. In the third calendar quarter of 2022, Cliffs credited Mesabi Trust with zero (0) tons of iron ore shipped, as compared to 1,169,461 tons shipped during the third calendar quarter of 2021.The volume of iron ore pellets (and other iron ore products) produced and shipped by Northshore varies from quarter to quarter and year to year based on a number of factors, including, among others, Cliffs’ decisions to idle Northshore operations, the requested delivery schedules of customers, general economic conditions in the iron ore industry, production schedules and weather conditions on the Great Lakes. Based on the above factors, and as indicated by Mesabi Trust’s historical distribution payments, the royalties received by Mesabi Trust, and the distributions paid to Unitholders, if any, in any particular quarter are not necessarily indicative of royalties that will be received, or distributions that will be paid, if any, in any subsequent quarter or full year.As previously announced by Cliffs on July 22, 2022, the current idling of Northshore operations was extended until at least April 2023 and maybe beyond.Cliffs’ Royalty Report stated that the reported royalty amounts were based on estimated iron ore pellet prices that are subject to change. It is possible that future negative price adjustments could offset, or even eliminate, royalties or royalty income that would otherwise be payable to Mesabi Trust in any particular quarter, or at year end, thereby potentially reducing cash available for distribution to Mesabi Trust’s Unitholders in future quarters.Forward-looking StatementsThis report contains certain forward-looking statements based on Cliffs’ publicly announced plans with respect to Northshore in the future, which statements are intended to be made under the safe harbor protections of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended. The length of the idling of Northshore operations could differ materially from current expectations due to inherent risks and uncertainties such as general adverse business and industry economic trends, uncertainties arising from war, terrorist events, recession, potential future impacts of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, and other global events, higher or lower customer demand for steel and iron ore, decisions by mine operators regarding
[end of TEXT]
Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No":
- Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Hurricane Fiona (September 2022)"?
Decision Guidelines:
- A company is considered "exposed" only if:
1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied.
2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company.
3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions.
- Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed".
- TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed".
Output Format:
Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No".
Your Output:
|
1,087,104
|
Provision for storm damages- recovered either through securitization or retail rates (Note 2 -Storm Cost Recovery Filings with Retail Regulators)
|
Western Drought (2014)
|
Historic drought conditions affected the majority of California for all of 2014 making it the worst drought on record for the state. Surrounding states and parts of Texas, Oklahoma and Kansas also experienced continued severe drought conditions. This is a continuation of drought conditions that have persisted for several years.
|
Yes
|
No
|
You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT.
Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure:
[begin of TEXT]
Provision for storm damages- recovered either through securitization or retail rates (Note 2 -Storm Cost Recovery Filings with Retail Regulators)
[end of TEXT]
Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No":
- Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)?
Decision Guidelines:
- A company is considered "exposed" only if:
1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT.
2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company.
3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions.
- Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed".
- TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed".
Output Format:
Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No".
Your Output:
|
You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT.
EVENT: "Western Drought (2014)"
EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Historic drought conditions affected the majority of California for all of 2014 making it the worst drought on record for the state. Surrounding states and parts of Texas, Oklahoma and Kansas also experienced continued severe drought conditions. This is a continuation of drought conditions that have persisted for several years."
Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure:
[begin of TEXT]
Provision for storm damages- recovered either through securitization or retail rates (Note 2 -Storm Cost Recovery Filings with Retail Regulators)
[end of TEXT]
Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No":
- Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Western Drought (2014)"?
Decision Guidelines:
- A company is considered "exposed" only if:
1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied.
2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company.
3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions.
- Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed".
- TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed".
Output Format:
Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No".
Your Output:
|
78,313
|
rapid adverse changes in markets;
|
Hurricane Fiona (September 2022)
|
Category 1 Hurricane Fiona causes widespread power outage across central and western Puerto Rico. Extreme rainfall (12-18 inches) from an intensifying hurricane resulted in widespread flooding and mudslides causing damage to many homes, businesses, vehicles and other infrastructure. The regional power grid was also significantly impaired.
|
No
|
No
|
You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT.
Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure:
[begin of TEXT]
rapid adverse changes in markets;
[end of TEXT]
Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No":
- Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)?
Decision Guidelines:
- A company is considered "exposed" only if:
1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT.
2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company.
3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions.
- Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed".
- TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed".
Output Format:
Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No".
Your Output:
|
You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT.
EVENT: "Hurricane Fiona (September 2022)"
EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Category 1 Hurricane Fiona causes widespread power outage across central and western Puerto Rico. Extreme rainfall (12-18 inches) from an intensifying hurricane resulted in widespread flooding and mudslides causing damage to many homes, businesses, vehicles and other infrastructure. The regional power grid was also significantly impaired."
Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure:
[begin of TEXT]
rapid adverse changes in markets;
[end of TEXT]
Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No":
- Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Hurricane Fiona (September 2022)"?
Decision Guidelines:
- A company is considered "exposed" only if:
1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied.
2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company.
3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions.
- Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed".
- TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed".
Output Format:
Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No".
Your Output:
|
874,889
|
Due to the natural disasters in Japan that occurred in March 2011, the Company was required to assess the preferred shares and premium for other than temporary impairment. The fair value of the collateral which is the equity value of MY Style, declined due to changes in projected revenue growth rates after the natural disasters. As MY Style is highly leveraged, any change in growth rates has a significant impact on fair value. The estimated fair value was negligible as of March 31, 2011. The Company recorded an other than temporary impairment during the third quarter of fiscal year 2011 for the carrying value of the preferred shares and premium of $3.9 million (326,700,000 Yen) and $5.3 million (435,000,000 Yen), respectively.
|
North Central Severe Weather (July 1 2011)
|
Severe weather causes damage across several north central states. The regions most impacted were southern Minnesota, western Wisconsin and northern Illinois.
|
No
|
No
|
You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT.
Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure:
[begin of TEXT]
Due to the natural disasters in Japan that occurred in March 2011, the Company was required to assess the preferred shares and premium for other than temporary impairment. The fair value of the collateral which is the equity value of MY Style, declined due to changes in projected revenue growth rates after the natural disasters. As MY Style is highly leveraged, any change in growth rates has a significant impact on fair value. The estimated fair value was negligible as of March 31, 2011. The Company recorded an other than temporary impairment during the third quarter of fiscal year 2011 for the carrying value of the preferred shares and premium of $3.9 million (326,700,000 Yen) and $5.3 million (435,000,000 Yen), respectively.
[end of TEXT]
Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No":
- Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)?
Decision Guidelines:
- A company is considered "exposed" only if:
1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT.
2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company.
3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions.
- Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed".
- TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed".
Output Format:
Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No".
Your Output:
|
You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT.
EVENT: "North Central Severe Weather (July 1 2011)"
EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Severe weather causes damage across several north central states. The regions most impacted were southern Minnesota, western Wisconsin and northern Illinois."
Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure:
[begin of TEXT]
Due to the natural disasters in Japan that occurred in March 2011, the Company was required to assess the preferred shares and premium for other than temporary impairment. The fair value of the collateral which is the equity value of MY Style, declined due to changes in projected revenue growth rates after the natural disasters. As MY Style is highly leveraged, any change in growth rates has a significant impact on fair value. The estimated fair value was negligible as of March 31, 2011. The Company recorded an other than temporary impairment during the third quarter of fiscal year 2011 for the carrying value of the preferred shares and premium of $3.9 million (326,700,000 Yen) and $5.3 million (435,000,000 Yen), respectively.
[end of TEXT]
Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No":
- Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "North Central Severe Weather (July 1 2011)"?
Decision Guidelines:
- A company is considered "exposed" only if:
1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied.
2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company.
3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions.
- Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed".
- TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed".
Output Format:
Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No".
Your Output:
|
484,630
|
During the fourth quarter of 2016, we experienced comparable sales increases in all of our product categories, with comparable sales increases above the company average in Appliances, Kitchens, Lawn & Garden, Lumber & Building Materials, and Rough Plumbing & Electrical. Strong brand and service advantages in Appliances as well as our successful Holiday events drove solid comparable sales during the quarter. Performance in Kitchens was driven by our strategy to focus on the entire Kitchen project, investment in project specialists, and targeted promotions. We experienced strength in several outdoor project categories, including Lawn & Garden, Lumber & Building Materials, and Rough Plumbing & Electrical. Warmer weather, particularly in the South and West, drove strong demand for outdoor projects in Lawn & Garden. Lumber & Building Materials benefited from continued recovery efforts from Hurricane Matthew and Louisiana flooding, as well as strong performance with the Pro customer.
|
North Dakota South Dakota and Montana Drought (Spring-Fall 2017)
|
Extreme drought causes extensive impacts to agriculture in North Dakota, South Dakota and Montana. Field crops including wheat were severely damaged and the lack of feed for cattle forced ranchers to sell off livestock. This drought has also contributed to the increased potential for severe wildfires.
|
Yes
|
No
|
You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT.
Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure:
[begin of TEXT]
During the fourth quarter of 2016, we experienced comparable sales increases in all of our product categories, with comparable sales increases above the company average in Appliances, Kitchens, Lawn & Garden, Lumber & Building Materials, and Rough Plumbing & Electrical. Strong brand and service advantages in Appliances as well as our successful Holiday events drove solid comparable sales during the quarter. Performance in Kitchens was driven by our strategy to focus on the entire Kitchen project, investment in project specialists, and targeted promotions. We experienced strength in several outdoor project categories, including Lawn & Garden, Lumber & Building Materials, and Rough Plumbing & Electrical. Warmer weather, particularly in the South and West, drove strong demand for outdoor projects in Lawn & Garden. Lumber & Building Materials benefited from continued recovery efforts from Hurricane Matthew and Louisiana flooding, as well as strong performance with the Pro customer.
[end of TEXT]
Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No":
- Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)?
Decision Guidelines:
- A company is considered "exposed" only if:
1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT.
2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company.
3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions.
- Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed".
- TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed".
Output Format:
Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No".
Your Output:
|
You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT.
EVENT: "North Dakota South Dakota and Montana Drought (Spring-Fall 2017)"
EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Extreme drought causes extensive impacts to agriculture in North Dakota, South Dakota and Montana. Field crops including wheat were severely damaged and the lack of feed for cattle forced ranchers to sell off livestock. This drought has also contributed to the increased potential for severe wildfires."
Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure:
[begin of TEXT]
During the fourth quarter of 2016, we experienced comparable sales increases in all of our product categories, with comparable sales increases above the company average in Appliances, Kitchens, Lawn & Garden, Lumber & Building Materials, and Rough Plumbing & Electrical. Strong brand and service advantages in Appliances as well as our successful Holiday events drove solid comparable sales during the quarter. Performance in Kitchens was driven by our strategy to focus on the entire Kitchen project, investment in project specialists, and targeted promotions. We experienced strength in several outdoor project categories, including Lawn & Garden, Lumber & Building Materials, and Rough Plumbing & Electrical. Warmer weather, particularly in the South and West, drove strong demand for outdoor projects in Lawn & Garden. Lumber & Building Materials benefited from continued recovery efforts from Hurricane Matthew and Louisiana flooding, as well as strong performance with the Pro customer.
[end of TEXT]
Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No":
- Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "North Dakota South Dakota and Montana Drought (Spring-Fall 2017)"?
Decision Guidelines:
- A company is considered "exposed" only if:
1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied.
2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company.
3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions.
- Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed".
- TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed".
Output Format:
Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No".
Your Output:
|
844,971
|
Fluctuations in customer demand for water due to seasonality, restrictions of use, weather, and lifestyle can adversely affect operating results.
|
Houston Flooding (April 2016)
|
A period of extreme rainfall up to 17 inches created widespread urban flooding in Houston and surrounding suburbs. Thousands of homes and businesses were damaged and more than 1,800 high water rescues were conducted. This represents the most widespread flooding event to affect Houston since Tropical Storm Allison in 2001.
|
No
|
No
|
You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT.
Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure:
[begin of TEXT]
Fluctuations in customer demand for water due to seasonality, restrictions of use, weather, and lifestyle can adversely affect operating results.
[end of TEXT]
Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No":
- Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)?
Decision Guidelines:
- A company is considered "exposed" only if:
1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT.
2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company.
3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions.
- Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed".
- TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed".
Output Format:
Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No".
Your Output:
|
You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT.
EVENT: "Houston Flooding (April 2016)"
EVENT DESCRIPTION: "A period of extreme rainfall up to 17 inches created widespread urban flooding in Houston and surrounding suburbs. Thousands of homes and businesses were damaged and more than 1,800 high water rescues were conducted. This represents the most widespread flooding event to affect Houston since Tropical Storm Allison in 2001."
Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure:
[begin of TEXT]
Fluctuations in customer demand for water due to seasonality, restrictions of use, weather, and lifestyle can adversely affect operating results.
[end of TEXT]
Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No":
- Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Houston Flooding (April 2016)"?
Decision Guidelines:
- A company is considered "exposed" only if:
1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied.
2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company.
3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions.
- Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed".
- TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed".
Output Format:
Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No".
Your Output:
|
1,574,600
|
Chile farm asset impairment due to adverse weather conditions
|
Texas and Louisiana Flooding (March 2016)
|
Multiple days of heavy rainfall averaging 15 to 20 inches led to widespread flooding along the Sabine River basin on the Texas and Louisiana border. This prompted numerous evacuations, high-water rescues and destruction, as more than 1,000 homes and businesses were damaged or destroyed.
|
Yes
|
No
|
You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT.
Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure:
[begin of TEXT]
Chile farm asset impairment due to adverse weather conditions
[end of TEXT]
Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No":
- Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)?
Decision Guidelines:
- A company is considered "exposed" only if:
1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT.
2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company.
3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions.
- Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed".
- TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed".
Output Format:
Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No".
Your Output:
|
You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT.
EVENT: "Texas and Louisiana Flooding (March 2016)"
EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Multiple days of heavy rainfall averaging 15 to 20 inches led to widespread flooding along the Sabine River basin on the Texas and Louisiana border. This prompted numerous evacuations, high-water rescues and destruction, as more than 1,000 homes and businesses were damaged or destroyed."
Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure:
[begin of TEXT]
Chile farm asset impairment due to adverse weather conditions
[end of TEXT]
Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No":
- Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Texas and Louisiana Flooding (March 2016)"?
Decision Guidelines:
- A company is considered "exposed" only if:
1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied.
2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company.
3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions.
- Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed".
- TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed".
Output Format:
Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No".
Your Output:
|
438,381
|
CPUC-jurisdictional wildfire-related costs related to the 2017/2018 Wildfire/Mudslide Events are probable of recovery through electric rates.
|
California Flooding (December 2022 - March 2023)
|
Numerous atmospheric rivers in continuous succession caused severe flooding, record snowfall and copious rainfall that significantly reduced drought deficits across California, between late-December and March 2023. Flooding impacted many homes, businesses, levees, agriculture and other infrastructure particularly across central California.
|
Yes
|
No
|
You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT.
Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure:
[begin of TEXT]
CPUC-jurisdictional wildfire-related costs related to the 2017/2018 Wildfire/Mudslide Events are probable of recovery through electric rates.
[end of TEXT]
Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No":
- Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)?
Decision Guidelines:
- A company is considered "exposed" only if:
1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT.
2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company.
3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions.
- Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed".
- TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed".
Output Format:
Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No".
Your Output:
|
You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT.
EVENT: "California Flooding (December 2022 - March 2023)"
EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Numerous atmospheric rivers in continuous succession caused severe flooding, record snowfall and copious rainfall that significantly reduced drought deficits across California, between late-December and March 2023. Flooding impacted many homes, businesses, levees, agriculture and other infrastructure particularly across central California."
Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure:
[begin of TEXT]
CPUC-jurisdictional wildfire-related costs related to the 2017/2018 Wildfire/Mudslide Events are probable of recovery through electric rates.
[end of TEXT]
Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No":
- Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "California Flooding (December 2022 - March 2023)"?
Decision Guidelines:
- A company is considered "exposed" only if:
1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied.
2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company.
3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions.
- Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed".
- TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed".
Output Format:
Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No".
Your Output:
|
697,002
|
use ratiofor corn,as aresult ofweather-relatedshortfalls inproductionand yields,ongoing supplychain disruptionsandthe
|
Central and Eastern Tornadoes and Hail Storms (May 2023)
|
Dozens of tornadoes and severe hail storms from the eastern Rockies and across several central states. The most costly severe hail impacts were focused in Colorado while numerous tornadoes also impacted western Kansas, central Oklahoma and eastern Nebraska. Texas and North Dakota were also impacted from combination of high winds, hail and isolated tornadoes with damage to homes, businesses, vehicles, farms and other infrastructure.
|
No
|
No
|
You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT.
Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure:
[begin of TEXT]
use ratiofor corn,as aresult ofweather-relatedshortfalls inproductionand yields,ongoing supplychain disruptionsandthe
[end of TEXT]
Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No":
- Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)?
Decision Guidelines:
- A company is considered "exposed" only if:
1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT.
2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company.
3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions.
- Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed".
- TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed".
Output Format:
Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No".
Your Output:
|
You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT.
EVENT: "Central and Eastern Tornadoes and Hail Storms (May 2023)"
EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Dozens of tornadoes and severe hail storms from the eastern Rockies and across several central states. The most costly severe hail impacts were focused in Colorado while numerous tornadoes also impacted western Kansas, central Oklahoma and eastern Nebraska. Texas and North Dakota were also impacted from combination of high winds, hail and isolated tornadoes with damage to homes, businesses, vehicles, farms and other infrastructure."
Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure:
[begin of TEXT]
use ratiofor corn,as aresult ofweather-relatedshortfalls inproductionand yields,ongoing supplychain disruptionsandthe
[end of TEXT]
Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No":
- Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Central and Eastern Tornadoes and Hail Storms (May 2023)"?
Decision Guidelines:
- A company is considered "exposed" only if:
1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied.
2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company.
3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions.
- Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed".
- TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed".
Output Format:
Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No".
Your Output:
|
506,295
|
n June 19, 2005, the Attorney General and the Secretary of the Environment of the State of Oklahoma filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma against Tyson Foods, Inc., three subsidiaries and six other poultry integrators. The complaint, which was subsequently amended, asserts a number of state and federal causes of action including, but not limited to, counts under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, and state-law public nuisance theories. Oklahoma alleges that the defendants and certain contract growers who were not joined in the lawsuit polluted the surface waters, groundwater and associated drinking water supplies of the Illinois River Watershed through the land application of poultry litter. Oklahoma’s claims were narrowed through various rulings issued before and during trial and its claims for natural resource damages were dismissed by the district court in a ruling issued on July 22, 2009, which was subsequently affirmed on appeal by the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. A non-jury trial of the remaining claims including Oklahoma’s request for injunctive relief began on September 24, 2009. Closing arguments were held on February 11, 2010. On January 18, 2023, the district court entered Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in favor of the State of Oklahoma and directed the parties to confer in an attempt to reach an agreement on appropriate remedies by March 17, 2023. On March 17, 2023, the parties received a 90-day extension from the district court and continued to confer on appropriate remedies. On June 12, 2023, the Court ordered the parties to mediation. The parties attended an in-person mediation on October 12, 2023, but were unable to reach a resolution. Defendants subsequently filed a post-trial motion to dismiss, which remains pending.
|
Southern Severe Weather (June 2023)
|
Numerous southern states including Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, Tennessee, Arkansas, South Carolina and Florida were impacted by hail, tornadoes and high winds. These storms caused damage to many homes, vehicles and businesses across several days of severe storm activity.
|
No
|
No
|
You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT.
Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure:
[begin of TEXT]
n June 19, 2005, the Attorney General and the Secretary of the Environment of the State of Oklahoma filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma against Tyson Foods, Inc., three subsidiaries and six other poultry integrators. The complaint, which was subsequently amended, asserts a number of state and federal causes of action including, but not limited to, counts under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, and state-law public nuisance theories. Oklahoma alleges that the defendants and certain contract growers who were not joined in the lawsuit polluted the surface waters, groundwater and associated drinking water supplies of the Illinois River Watershed through the land application of poultry litter. Oklahoma’s claims were narrowed through various rulings issued before and during trial and its claims for natural resource damages were dismissed by the district court in a ruling issued on July 22, 2009, which was subsequently affirmed on appeal by the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. A non-jury trial of the remaining claims including Oklahoma’s request for injunctive relief began on September 24, 2009. Closing arguments were held on February 11, 2010. On January 18, 2023, the district court entered Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in favor of the State of Oklahoma and directed the parties to confer in an attempt to reach an agreement on appropriate remedies by March 17, 2023. On March 17, 2023, the parties received a 90-day extension from the district court and continued to confer on appropriate remedies. On June 12, 2023, the Court ordered the parties to mediation. The parties attended an in-person mediation on October 12, 2023, but were unable to reach a resolution. Defendants subsequently filed a post-trial motion to dismiss, which remains pending.
[end of TEXT]
Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No":
- Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)?
Decision Guidelines:
- A company is considered "exposed" only if:
1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT.
2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company.
3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions.
- Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed".
- TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed".
Output Format:
Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No".
Your Output:
|
You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT.
EVENT: "Southern Severe Weather (June 2023)"
EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Numerous southern states including Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, Tennessee, Arkansas, South Carolina and Florida were impacted by hail, tornadoes and high winds. These storms caused damage to many homes, vehicles and businesses across several days of severe storm activity."
Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure:
[begin of TEXT]
n June 19, 2005, the Attorney General and the Secretary of the Environment of the State of Oklahoma filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma against Tyson Foods, Inc., three subsidiaries and six other poultry integrators. The complaint, which was subsequently amended, asserts a number of state and federal causes of action including, but not limited to, counts under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, and state-law public nuisance theories. Oklahoma alleges that the defendants and certain contract growers who were not joined in the lawsuit polluted the surface waters, groundwater and associated drinking water supplies of the Illinois River Watershed through the land application of poultry litter. Oklahoma’s claims were narrowed through various rulings issued before and during trial and its claims for natural resource damages were dismissed by the district court in a ruling issued on July 22, 2009, which was subsequently affirmed on appeal by the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. A non-jury trial of the remaining claims including Oklahoma’s request for injunctive relief began on September 24, 2009. Closing arguments were held on February 11, 2010. On January 18, 2023, the district court entered Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in favor of the State of Oklahoma and directed the parties to confer in an attempt to reach an agreement on appropriate remedies by March 17, 2023. On March 17, 2023, the parties received a 90-day extension from the district court and continued to confer on appropriate remedies. On June 12, 2023, the Court ordered the parties to mediation. The parties attended an in-person mediation on October 12, 2023, but were unable to reach a resolution. Defendants subsequently filed a post-trial motion to dismiss, which remains pending.
[end of TEXT]
Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No":
- Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Southern Severe Weather (June 2023)"?
Decision Guidelines:
- A company is considered "exposed" only if:
1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied.
2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company.
3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions.
- Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed".
- TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed".
Output Format:
Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No".
Your Output:
|
4,858
|
On March 25, 2020, Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC (“DEC”) reached a partial settlement with the Public Staff - North Carolina Utilities Commission (the “Public Staff”) in connection with DEC’s general rate case filed with the North Carolina Utilities Commission (the “NCUC”) on September 30, 2019. In DEC’s initial rate case application, it sought to recover costs related to Hurricanes Florence and Michael and Winter Storm Diego (“Deferred Storm Costs”). Pursuant to the partial settlement, the parties agreed that (1) DEC will remove its request for recovery of its Deferred Storm Costs in the rate case; (2) file a petition for a securitization financing order for its Deferred Storm Costs no later than 120 days from the issuance of an order by the NCUC in the rate case in which the NCUC makes findings and conclusions regarding Deferred Storm Costs and the partial settlement; (3) a recovery rider related to Deferred Storm Costs, initially to be set at $0, will be established in the rate case; and (4) if DEC does not file a petition for a securitization financing order or is unable to recover the Deferred Storm Costs through securitization, DEC may request recovery of Deferred Storm Costs from the NCUC by filing a petition requesting an adjustment to the recovery rider outside a general rate case proceeding. The parties agreed to certain assumptions to demonstrate the quantifiable benefits to customers of a securitization financing. The parties also agreed to certain minor accounting adjustments related to the rate case.
|
Southeast Tornadoes and Northern Storms and Flooding (January 2020)
|
More than 80 tornadoes and severe storms caused damage across many southeastern states (AL, AR, GA, IL, IN, KY, LA, MS, MO, NC, OH, SC, TN, TX, VA, WI). Storms and severe flooding also impacted northern states including Michigan, Wisconsin and New York. Significant damage occurred along the shoreline of Lake Michigan to roads, the foundation of homes and to Port Milwaukee. These powerful waves were generated by high winds and a lack of seasonal ice cover.
|
Yes
|
No
|
You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT.
Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure:
[begin of TEXT]
On March 25, 2020, Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC (“DEC”) reached a partial settlement with the Public Staff - North Carolina Utilities Commission (the “Public Staff”) in connection with DEC’s general rate case filed with the North Carolina Utilities Commission (the “NCUC”) on September 30, 2019. In DEC’s initial rate case application, it sought to recover costs related to Hurricanes Florence and Michael and Winter Storm Diego (“Deferred Storm Costs”). Pursuant to the partial settlement, the parties agreed that (1) DEC will remove its request for recovery of its Deferred Storm Costs in the rate case; (2) file a petition for a securitization financing order for its Deferred Storm Costs no later than 120 days from the issuance of an order by the NCUC in the rate case in which the NCUC makes findings and conclusions regarding Deferred Storm Costs and the partial settlement; (3) a recovery rider related to Deferred Storm Costs, initially to be set at $0, will be established in the rate case; and (4) if DEC does not file a petition for a securitization financing order or is unable to recover the Deferred Storm Costs through securitization, DEC may request recovery of Deferred Storm Costs from the NCUC by filing a petition requesting an adjustment to the recovery rider outside a general rate case proceeding. The parties agreed to certain assumptions to demonstrate the quantifiable benefits to customers of a securitization financing. The parties also agreed to certain minor accounting adjustments related to the rate case.
[end of TEXT]
Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No":
- Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)?
Decision Guidelines:
- A company is considered "exposed" only if:
1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT.
2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company.
3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions.
- Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed".
- TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed".
Output Format:
Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No".
Your Output:
|
You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT.
EVENT: "Southeast Tornadoes and Northern Storms and Flooding (January 2020)"
EVENT DESCRIPTION: "More than 80 tornadoes and severe storms caused damage across many southeastern states (AL, AR, GA, IL, IN, KY, LA, MS, MO, NC, OH, SC, TN, TX, VA, WI). Storms and severe flooding also impacted northern states including Michigan, Wisconsin and New York. Significant damage occurred along the shoreline of Lake Michigan to roads, the foundation of homes and to Port Milwaukee. These powerful waves were generated by high winds and a lack of seasonal ice cover."
Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure:
[begin of TEXT]
On March 25, 2020, Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC (“DEC”) reached a partial settlement with the Public Staff - North Carolina Utilities Commission (the “Public Staff”) in connection with DEC’s general rate case filed with the North Carolina Utilities Commission (the “NCUC”) on September 30, 2019. In DEC’s initial rate case application, it sought to recover costs related to Hurricanes Florence and Michael and Winter Storm Diego (“Deferred Storm Costs”). Pursuant to the partial settlement, the parties agreed that (1) DEC will remove its request for recovery of its Deferred Storm Costs in the rate case; (2) file a petition for a securitization financing order for its Deferred Storm Costs no later than 120 days from the issuance of an order by the NCUC in the rate case in which the NCUC makes findings and conclusions regarding Deferred Storm Costs and the partial settlement; (3) a recovery rider related to Deferred Storm Costs, initially to be set at $0, will be established in the rate case; and (4) if DEC does not file a petition for a securitization financing order or is unable to recover the Deferred Storm Costs through securitization, DEC may request recovery of Deferred Storm Costs from the NCUC by filing a petition requesting an adjustment to the recovery rider outside a general rate case proceeding. The parties agreed to certain assumptions to demonstrate the quantifiable benefits to customers of a securitization financing. The parties also agreed to certain minor accounting adjustments related to the rate case.
[end of TEXT]
Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No":
- Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Southeast Tornadoes and Northern Storms and Flooding (January 2020)"?
Decision Guidelines:
- A company is considered "exposed" only if:
1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied.
2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company.
3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions.
- Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed".
- TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed".
Output Format:
Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No".
Your Output:
|
873,953
|
Natural disasters, such as hurricanes, earthquakes, fires, and floods, could materially adversely affect our operations and financial performance. As further discussed elsewhere in this Annual Report, we expect that the flooding in Thailand will have a material adverse impact on our results of operations, financial condition, and cash flow, as well as on our ability to meet customer demand for our fiber optics products. We have not yet completely assessed the impact of the flooding and may experience consequences that are even more severe than we currently expect. In addition, our business could be further affected by other natural disasters. Such events could result in physical damage to one or more of our facilities, the temporary closure of one or more of our facilities or those of our suppliers, a temporary lack of an adequate work force in a market, a temporary or long-term disruption in the supply of products from some local and overseas suppliers, a temporary disruption in the transport of goods from overseas, and delays in the delivery of goods. Public health issues, whether occurring in the United States or abroad, could disrupt our operations, disrupt the operations of suppliers or customers, or have an adverse impact on customer demand. As a result of any of these events, we may be required to suspend operations in some or all of our locations, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows. These events could also reduce demand for our products or make it difficult or impossible to receive products from suppliers. Although we maintain business interruption insurance and other insurance intended to cover some or all of these risks, such insurance may be inadequate, whether because of coverage amount, policy limitations, the financial viability of the insurance companies issuing such policies, or other reasons.
|
North Central Severe Weather (July 1 2011)
|
Severe weather causes damage across several north central states. The regions most impacted were southern Minnesota, western Wisconsin and northern Illinois.
|
Yes
|
No
|
You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT.
Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure:
[begin of TEXT]
Natural disasters, such as hurricanes, earthquakes, fires, and floods, could materially adversely affect our operations and financial performance. As further discussed elsewhere in this Annual Report, we expect that the flooding in Thailand will have a material adverse impact on our results of operations, financial condition, and cash flow, as well as on our ability to meet customer demand for our fiber optics products. We have not yet completely assessed the impact of the flooding and may experience consequences that are even more severe than we currently expect. In addition, our business could be further affected by other natural disasters. Such events could result in physical damage to one or more of our facilities, the temporary closure of one or more of our facilities or those of our suppliers, a temporary lack of an adequate work force in a market, a temporary or long-term disruption in the supply of products from some local and overseas suppliers, a temporary disruption in the transport of goods from overseas, and delays in the delivery of goods. Public health issues, whether occurring in the United States or abroad, could disrupt our operations, disrupt the operations of suppliers or customers, or have an adverse impact on customer demand. As a result of any of these events, we may be required to suspend operations in some or all of our locations, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows. These events could also reduce demand for our products or make it difficult or impossible to receive products from suppliers. Although we maintain business interruption insurance and other insurance intended to cover some or all of these risks, such insurance may be inadequate, whether because of coverage amount, policy limitations, the financial viability of the insurance companies issuing such policies, or other reasons.
[end of TEXT]
Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No":
- Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)?
Decision Guidelines:
- A company is considered "exposed" only if:
1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT.
2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company.
3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions.
- Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed".
- TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed".
Output Format:
Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No".
Your Output:
|
You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT.
EVENT: "North Central Severe Weather (July 1 2011)"
EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Severe weather causes damage across several north central states. The regions most impacted were southern Minnesota, western Wisconsin and northern Illinois."
Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure:
[begin of TEXT]
Natural disasters, such as hurricanes, earthquakes, fires, and floods, could materially adversely affect our operations and financial performance. As further discussed elsewhere in this Annual Report, we expect that the flooding in Thailand will have a material adverse impact on our results of operations, financial condition, and cash flow, as well as on our ability to meet customer demand for our fiber optics products. We have not yet completely assessed the impact of the flooding and may experience consequences that are even more severe than we currently expect. In addition, our business could be further affected by other natural disasters. Such events could result in physical damage to one or more of our facilities, the temporary closure of one or more of our facilities or those of our suppliers, a temporary lack of an adequate work force in a market, a temporary or long-term disruption in the supply of products from some local and overseas suppliers, a temporary disruption in the transport of goods from overseas, and delays in the delivery of goods. Public health issues, whether occurring in the United States or abroad, could disrupt our operations, disrupt the operations of suppliers or customers, or have an adverse impact on customer demand. As a result of any of these events, we may be required to suspend operations in some or all of our locations, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows. These events could also reduce demand for our products or make it difficult or impossible to receive products from suppliers. Although we maintain business interruption insurance and other insurance intended to cover some or all of these risks, such insurance may be inadequate, whether because of coverage amount, policy limitations, the financial viability of the insurance companies issuing such policies, or other reasons.
[end of TEXT]
Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No":
- Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "North Central Severe Weather (July 1 2011)"?
Decision Guidelines:
- A company is considered "exposed" only if:
1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied.
2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company.
3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions.
- Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed".
- TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed".
Output Format:
Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No".
Your Output:
|
241,015
|
•Sales Volume– Sales volume was relatively flat due to strong global demand, partially offset by the impacts associated with a challenging labor environment, severe weather in the second quarter of fiscal 2021 and the additional week in fiscal 2020.
|
Western Wildfires - California Oregon Washington Firestorms (Fall 2020)
|
A record-breaking U.S. wildfire season burned more than 10.2 million acres. California more than doubled its previous annual record for area burned (last set in 2018) with over 4.1 million acres. Five of the top six largest wildfires on record in California (dating to 1932) burned during August and September. The August Complex was the largest California wildfire, which began as 37 separate wildfires within the Mendocino National Forest, set off after storms caused >10,000 lightning strikes across Northern California. Approximately 10,500 structures were damaged or destroyed across California. Oregon also had historic levels of wildfire damage, as over 2,000 structures burned. These wildfires spread rapidly and destroyed several small towns in California, Oregon and Washington. Colorado also had a severe wildfire season, as its three largest wildfires on record burned during 2020. Dense wildfire smoke also produced hazardous air quality that affected millions of people that also included major cities for weeks. Hundreds of additional wildfires also burned across other Western states.
|
Yes
|
No
|
You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT.
Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure:
[begin of TEXT]
•Sales Volume– Sales volume was relatively flat due to strong global demand, partially offset by the impacts associated with a challenging labor environment, severe weather in the second quarter of fiscal 2021 and the additional week in fiscal 2020.
[end of TEXT]
Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No":
- Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)?
Decision Guidelines:
- A company is considered "exposed" only if:
1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT.
2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company.
3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions.
- Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed".
- TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed".
Output Format:
Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No".
Your Output:
|
You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT.
EVENT: "Western Wildfires - California Oregon Washington Firestorms (Fall 2020)"
EVENT DESCRIPTION: "A record-breaking U.S. wildfire season burned more than 10.2 million acres. California more than doubled its previous annual record for area burned (last set in 2018) with over 4.1 million acres. Five of the top six largest wildfires on record in California (dating to 1932) burned during August and September. The August Complex was the largest California wildfire, which began as 37 separate wildfires within the Mendocino National Forest, set off after storms caused >10,000 lightning strikes across Northern California. Approximately 10,500 structures were damaged or destroyed across California. Oregon also had historic levels of wildfire damage, as over 2,000 structures burned. These wildfires spread rapidly and destroyed several small towns in California, Oregon and Washington. Colorado also had a severe wildfire season, as its three largest wildfires on record burned during 2020. Dense wildfire smoke also produced hazardous air quality that affected millions of people that also included major cities for weeks. Hundreds of additional wildfires also burned across other Western states."
Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure:
[begin of TEXT]
•Sales Volume– Sales volume was relatively flat due to strong global demand, partially offset by the impacts associated with a challenging labor environment, severe weather in the second quarter of fiscal 2021 and the additional week in fiscal 2020.
[end of TEXT]
Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No":
- Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Western Wildfires - California Oregon Washington Firestorms (Fall 2020)"?
Decision Guidelines:
- A company is considered "exposed" only if:
1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied.
2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company.
3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions.
- Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed".
- TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed".
Output Format:
Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No".
Your Output:
|
401,103
|
Our business is dependent on providing our clients with an exceptional digital experience that is fast, efficient, safe, and reliable, every minute of every day. Our services could be disrupted by numerous events, including natural disasters, failure or refusal of our third-party network providers to provide the necessary capacity or access, failure of our software or global network infrastructure and power losses. In addition, we deploy our servers in third-party co-location facilities, and these third-party co-location providers could experience system outages or other disruptions that could constrain our ability to deliver our services.
|
Rockies Hail Storms and Central and Eastern Severe Weather (June 2023)
|
Severe hail storms across Colorado damaged many homes, vehicles and injured approximately 100 people at a large outdoor concert. This multi-day outbreak of severe weather also produced more than 60 tornadoes across portions of Wyoming, Colorado, Minnesota, Indiana, Kentucky and Arkansas that caused damage to homes, businesses, vehicles, agriculture and other infrastructure.
|
No
|
No
|
You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT.
Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure:
[begin of TEXT]
Our business is dependent on providing our clients with an exceptional digital experience that is fast, efficient, safe, and reliable, every minute of every day. Our services could be disrupted by numerous events, including natural disasters, failure or refusal of our third-party network providers to provide the necessary capacity or access, failure of our software or global network infrastructure and power losses. In addition, we deploy our servers in third-party co-location facilities, and these third-party co-location providers could experience system outages or other disruptions that could constrain our ability to deliver our services.
[end of TEXT]
Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No":
- Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)?
Decision Guidelines:
- A company is considered "exposed" only if:
1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT.
2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company.
3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions.
- Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed".
- TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed".
Output Format:
Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No".
Your Output:
|
You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT.
EVENT: "Rockies Hail Storms and Central and Eastern Severe Weather (June 2023)"
EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Severe hail storms across Colorado damaged many homes, vehicles and injured approximately 100 people at a large outdoor concert. This multi-day outbreak of severe weather also produced more than 60 tornadoes across portions of Wyoming, Colorado, Minnesota, Indiana, Kentucky and Arkansas that caused damage to homes, businesses, vehicles, agriculture and other infrastructure."
Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure:
[begin of TEXT]
Our business is dependent on providing our clients with an exceptional digital experience that is fast, efficient, safe, and reliable, every minute of every day. Our services could be disrupted by numerous events, including natural disasters, failure or refusal of our third-party network providers to provide the necessary capacity or access, failure of our software or global network infrastructure and power losses. In addition, we deploy our servers in third-party co-location facilities, and these third-party co-location providers could experience system outages or other disruptions that could constrain our ability to deliver our services.
[end of TEXT]
Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No":
- Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Rockies Hail Storms and Central and Eastern Severe Weather (June 2023)"?
Decision Guidelines:
- A company is considered "exposed" only if:
1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied.
2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company.
3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions.
- Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed".
- TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed".
Output Format:
Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No".
Your Output:
|
651,409
|
During the year ended September 30, 2020, one of the Company’s manufacturing facilities experienced a flood which resulted in damages to certain property, plant and equipment. This facility was covered under the Company’s property and casualty loss and business interruption insurance policies. During the year ended September 30, 2021, the Company settled the related insurance claim and received $15,500of business interruption recovery proceeds related to this incident. The amount was recorded as other income within the consolidated statements of operations for the year ended September 30, 2021.
|
Minnesota Hail Storms (August 2023)
|
Numerous hail storms caused extensive damage across south-central Minnesota. Golf ball to baseball-sized hail caused damage to the windows, siding and roofs of many homes, vehicles and businesses.
|
Yes
|
No
|
You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT.
Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure:
[begin of TEXT]
During the year ended September 30, 2020, one of the Company’s manufacturing facilities experienced a flood which resulted in damages to certain property, plant and equipment. This facility was covered under the Company’s property and casualty loss and business interruption insurance policies. During the year ended September 30, 2021, the Company settled the related insurance claim and received $15,500of business interruption recovery proceeds related to this incident. The amount was recorded as other income within the consolidated statements of operations for the year ended September 30, 2021.
[end of TEXT]
Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No":
- Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)?
Decision Guidelines:
- A company is considered "exposed" only if:
1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT.
2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company.
3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions.
- Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed".
- TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed".
Output Format:
Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No".
Your Output:
|
You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT.
EVENT: "Minnesota Hail Storms (August 2023)"
EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Numerous hail storms caused extensive damage across south-central Minnesota. Golf ball to baseball-sized hail caused damage to the windows, siding and roofs of many homes, vehicles and businesses."
Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure:
[begin of TEXT]
During the year ended September 30, 2020, one of the Company’s manufacturing facilities experienced a flood which resulted in damages to certain property, plant and equipment. This facility was covered under the Company’s property and casualty loss and business interruption insurance policies. During the year ended September 30, 2021, the Company settled the related insurance claim and received $15,500of business interruption recovery proceeds related to this incident. The amount was recorded as other income within the consolidated statements of operations for the year ended September 30, 2021.
[end of TEXT]
Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No":
- Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Minnesota Hail Storms (August 2023)"?
Decision Guidelines:
- A company is considered "exposed" only if:
1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied.
2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company.
3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions.
- Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed".
- TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed".
Output Format:
Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No".
Your Output:
|
1,160,818
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased by $1.1 million or 9% for the twelve months ended December 31, 2014, as compared to the twelve months ended December 31, 2013 from $12.7 million to $11.6 million. Legal and consulting fees decreased approximately $2.1 million, attributable to higher legal fees in 2013 associated with various legal matters, including the Bryanston litigation. Additionally, in 2014 we received a one time insurance settlement payment in the amount of $300,000 pertaining to a legal matter. The decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses was offset by an increase in marketing related expenses of $180,000. Other expenses increased $471,000 due to higher outside director compensation, real estate tax expense, insurance expense and an insurance cash receipt received in 2013 for storm damage. Payroll and related benefits costs increased approximately $326,000 largely due to higher bonus accruals, medical, dental, vision and other benefit related costs.
|
South/Southeast Severe Weather (April 2015)
|
Severe storms across the South and Southeastern states (AL, AR, FL, GA, KS, LA, MS, NC, OK, SC, TN, TX). High winds and severe hail created the most significant damage in Texas.
|
Yes
|
No
|
You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT.
Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure:
[begin of TEXT]
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased by $1.1 million or 9% for the twelve months ended December 31, 2014, as compared to the twelve months ended December 31, 2013 from $12.7 million to $11.6 million. Legal and consulting fees decreased approximately $2.1 million, attributable to higher legal fees in 2013 associated with various legal matters, including the Bryanston litigation. Additionally, in 2014 we received a one time insurance settlement payment in the amount of $300,000 pertaining to a legal matter. The decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses was offset by an increase in marketing related expenses of $180,000. Other expenses increased $471,000 due to higher outside director compensation, real estate tax expense, insurance expense and an insurance cash receipt received in 2013 for storm damage. Payroll and related benefits costs increased approximately $326,000 largely due to higher bonus accruals, medical, dental, vision and other benefit related costs.
[end of TEXT]
Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No":
- Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)?
Decision Guidelines:
- A company is considered "exposed" only if:
1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT.
2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company.
3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions.
- Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed".
- TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed".
Output Format:
Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No".
Your Output:
|
You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT.
EVENT: "South/Southeast Severe Weather (April 2015)"
EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Severe storms across the South and Southeastern states (AL, AR, FL, GA, KS, LA, MS, NC, OK, SC, TN, TX). High winds and severe hail created the most significant damage in Texas."
Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure:
[begin of TEXT]
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased by $1.1 million or 9% for the twelve months ended December 31, 2014, as compared to the twelve months ended December 31, 2013 from $12.7 million to $11.6 million. Legal and consulting fees decreased approximately $2.1 million, attributable to higher legal fees in 2013 associated with various legal matters, including the Bryanston litigation. Additionally, in 2014 we received a one time insurance settlement payment in the amount of $300,000 pertaining to a legal matter. The decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses was offset by an increase in marketing related expenses of $180,000. Other expenses increased $471,000 due to higher outside director compensation, real estate tax expense, insurance expense and an insurance cash receipt received in 2013 for storm damage. Payroll and related benefits costs increased approximately $326,000 largely due to higher bonus accruals, medical, dental, vision and other benefit related costs.
[end of TEXT]
Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No":
- Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "South/Southeast Severe Weather (April 2015)"?
Decision Guidelines:
- A company is considered "exposed" only if:
1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied.
2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company.
3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions.
- Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed".
- TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed".
Output Format:
Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No".
Your Output:
|
19,144
|
Prior to the hurricane, the Registrant was receiving aggregate monthly rent in the approximate amount of $67,200 and $81,300 at Arbor Gate and Waverly, respectively. At this time, the Registrant is not able to predict how long the clean-up and construction process will take at these apartments. The Registrant anticipates that it may not receive most, if not all, of these rents for up to the next several months, so the Registrant’s cash flow will be adversely impacted in the short term at least until such time as the Registrant may receive insurance proceeds for loss of rents.
|
Hurricane Rita (September 2005)
|
Category 3 hurricane hits Texas-Louisiana border coastal region, creating significant storm surge and wind damage along the coast, and some inland flooding in the FL panhandle, AL, MS, LA, AR, and TX. Prior to landfall, Rita reached the third lowest pressure (897 mb) ever recorded in the Atlantic basin.
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT.
Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure:
[begin of TEXT]
Prior to the hurricane, the Registrant was receiving aggregate monthly rent in the approximate amount of $67,200 and $81,300 at Arbor Gate and Waverly, respectively. At this time, the Registrant is not able to predict how long the clean-up and construction process will take at these apartments. The Registrant anticipates that it may not receive most, if not all, of these rents for up to the next several months, so the Registrant’s cash flow will be adversely impacted in the short term at least until such time as the Registrant may receive insurance proceeds for loss of rents.
[end of TEXT]
Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No":
- Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)?
Decision Guidelines:
- A company is considered "exposed" only if:
1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT.
2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company.
3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions.
- Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed".
- TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed".
Output Format:
Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No".
Your Output:
|
You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT.
EVENT: "Hurricane Rita (September 2005)"
EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Category 3 hurricane hits Texas-Louisiana border coastal region, creating significant storm surge and wind damage along the coast, and some inland flooding in the FL panhandle, AL, MS, LA, AR, and TX. Prior to landfall, Rita reached the third lowest pressure (897 mb) ever recorded in the Atlantic basin."
Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure:
[begin of TEXT]
Prior to the hurricane, the Registrant was receiving aggregate monthly rent in the approximate amount of $67,200 and $81,300 at Arbor Gate and Waverly, respectively. At this time, the Registrant is not able to predict how long the clean-up and construction process will take at these apartments. The Registrant anticipates that it may not receive most, if not all, of these rents for up to the next several months, so the Registrant’s cash flow will be adversely impacted in the short term at least until such time as the Registrant may receive insurance proceeds for loss of rents.
[end of TEXT]
Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No":
- Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Hurricane Rita (September 2005)"?
Decision Guidelines:
- A company is considered "exposed" only if:
1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied.
2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company.
3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions.
- Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed".
- TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed".
Output Format:
Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No".
Your Output:
|
198,994
|
A $6 million increase in major storm restoration costs.
|
Oklahoma Kansas and Texas Tornadoes and Severe Weather (May 2010)
|
An outbreak of tornadoes, hail, and severe thunderstorms occurred across Oklahoma, Kansas, and Texas in mid-May. Oklahoma was hardest hit with > $1.5 ($2.2) billion in damages.
|
Yes
|
No
|
You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT.
Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure:
[begin of TEXT]
A $6 million increase in major storm restoration costs.
[end of TEXT]
Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No":
- Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)?
Decision Guidelines:
- A company is considered "exposed" only if:
1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT.
2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company.
3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions.
- Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed".
- TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed".
Output Format:
Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No".
Your Output:
|
You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT.
EVENT: "Oklahoma Kansas and Texas Tornadoes and Severe Weather (May 2010)"
EVENT DESCRIPTION: "An outbreak of tornadoes, hail, and severe thunderstorms occurred across Oklahoma, Kansas, and Texas in mid-May. Oklahoma was hardest hit with > $1.5 ($2.2) billion in damages."
Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure:
[begin of TEXT]
A $6 million increase in major storm restoration costs.
[end of TEXT]
Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No":
- Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Oklahoma Kansas and Texas Tornadoes and Severe Weather (May 2010)"?
Decision Guidelines:
- A company is considered "exposed" only if:
1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied.
2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company.
3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions.
- Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed".
- TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed".
Output Format:
Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No".
Your Output:
|
702,667
|
A tornado struck and damaged the Company’s Mikron facility in Richmond, Kentucky in May 2009. During the second half of fiscal 2009 and the first half of fiscal 2010, the Company received $1.4 million and $0.4 million of proceeds, respectively, from the property insurance claim related to this incident. In fiscal 2009 and in fiscal 2010, the Company spent approximately $1.4 million and $0.4 million, respectively on its repair efforts; this spending is reflected in capital expenditures on the statement of cash flows. The Company’s net overall cash flows from this event was zero as the Company received offsetting insurance proceeds related to the Mikron capital repairs.
|
Texas New Mexico Arizona Wildfires (Summer-Fall 2011)
|
Continued drought conditions and periods of extreme heat provided conditions favorable for a series of historic wildfires across Texas, New Mexico and Arizona. The Bastrop Fire in Texas was the most destructive fire in Texas history destroying over 1,500 homes. The Wallow Fire consumed over 500,000 acres in Arizona making it the largest on record in Arizona. The Las Conchas Fire in New Mexico was also the state's largest wildfire on record scorching over 150,000 acres while threatening the Los Alamos National Laboratory. Over 3 million acres have burned across Texas this wildfire season.
|
Yes
|
No
|
You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT.
Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure:
[begin of TEXT]
A tornado struck and damaged the Company’s Mikron facility in Richmond, Kentucky in May 2009. During the second half of fiscal 2009 and the first half of fiscal 2010, the Company received $1.4 million and $0.4 million of proceeds, respectively, from the property insurance claim related to this incident. In fiscal 2009 and in fiscal 2010, the Company spent approximately $1.4 million and $0.4 million, respectively on its repair efforts; this spending is reflected in capital expenditures on the statement of cash flows. The Company’s net overall cash flows from this event was zero as the Company received offsetting insurance proceeds related to the Mikron capital repairs.
[end of TEXT]
Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No":
- Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)?
Decision Guidelines:
- A company is considered "exposed" only if:
1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT.
2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company.
3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions.
- Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed".
- TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed".
Output Format:
Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No".
Your Output:
|
You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT.
EVENT: "Texas New Mexico Arizona Wildfires (Summer-Fall 2011)"
EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Continued drought conditions and periods of extreme heat provided conditions favorable for a series of historic wildfires across Texas, New Mexico and Arizona. The Bastrop Fire in Texas was the most destructive fire in Texas history destroying over 1,500 homes. The Wallow Fire consumed over 500,000 acres in Arizona making it the largest on record in Arizona. The Las Conchas Fire in New Mexico was also the state's largest wildfire on record scorching over 150,000 acres while threatening the Los Alamos National Laboratory. Over 3 million acres have burned across Texas this wildfire season."
Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure:
[begin of TEXT]
A tornado struck and damaged the Company’s Mikron facility in Richmond, Kentucky in May 2009. During the second half of fiscal 2009 and the first half of fiscal 2010, the Company received $1.4 million and $0.4 million of proceeds, respectively, from the property insurance claim related to this incident. In fiscal 2009 and in fiscal 2010, the Company spent approximately $1.4 million and $0.4 million, respectively on its repair efforts; this spending is reflected in capital expenditures on the statement of cash flows. The Company’s net overall cash flows from this event was zero as the Company received offsetting insurance proceeds related to the Mikron capital repairs.
[end of TEXT]
Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No":
- Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Texas New Mexico Arizona Wildfires (Summer-Fall 2011)"?
Decision Guidelines:
- A company is considered "exposed" only if:
1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied.
2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company.
3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions.
- Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed".
- TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed".
Output Format:
Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No".
Your Output:
|
72,043
|
Certain statements contained in this -K constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements concerning management’s expectations, beliefs, estimates, forecasts, projections and assumptions. You can identify our forward-looking statements by words such as “anticipate”, “believe”, “estimate”, “budget”, “continue”, “potential”, “guidance”, “effort”, “expect”, “forecast”, “goals”, “objectives”, “outlook”, “intend”, “plan”, “predict”, “project”, “seek”, “target”, “begin”, “could”, “may”, “should” or “would” or other similar expressions that convey the uncertainty of future events or outcomes. In accordance with “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, these statements are accompanied by cautionary language identifying important factors, though not necessarily all such factors, which could cause future outcomes to differ materially from those set forth in forward-looking statements. In particular, expressed or implied statements concerning future growth, future actions, the continued effects of the global COVID-19 pandemic on demand, the effects of the continued volatility of commodity prices and the related macroeconomic and political environment, volumes, capital requirements, conditions or events, future operating results or the ability to generate sales, the potential exposure of the Partnership to market risks, and statements relating to the expected amount of cash available for distribution and level of distributions, financial position, estimated revenues and losses, projected cost, prospects, plans and objectives of management are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements represent BPMP’s expectations or beliefs concerning future events, and it is possible that the results described in this news release will not be achieved. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside of BPMP’s control including the effects of storms and hurricanes including Hurricane Ida. Other factors and uncertainties inherent in our business, as discussed in the “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements,” “Risk Factors” and other cautionary statements found in BPMP’s filings with the SEC, including the annual report on -K for the year ended December 31, 2020 filed with SEC on February 25, 2021 and the quarterly report on -Q for the period ended June 30, 2021 filed with SEC on August 5, 2021.
|
Central Severe Storms (July 2021)
|
Severe storms caused considerable hail damage across numerous Central states including Missouri, Nebraska, Iowa, South Dakota, North Dakota, New Mexico and Texas. There was also widespread high wind damage to homes, vehicles and businesses in many other surrounding states.
|
No
|
No
|
You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT.
Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure:
[begin of TEXT]
Certain statements contained in this -K constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements concerning management’s expectations, beliefs, estimates, forecasts, projections and assumptions. You can identify our forward-looking statements by words such as “anticipate”, “believe”, “estimate”, “budget”, “continue”, “potential”, “guidance”, “effort”, “expect”, “forecast”, “goals”, “objectives”, “outlook”, “intend”, “plan”, “predict”, “project”, “seek”, “target”, “begin”, “could”, “may”, “should” or “would” or other similar expressions that convey the uncertainty of future events or outcomes. In accordance with “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, these statements are accompanied by cautionary language identifying important factors, though not necessarily all such factors, which could cause future outcomes to differ materially from those set forth in forward-looking statements. In particular, expressed or implied statements concerning future growth, future actions, the continued effects of the global COVID-19 pandemic on demand, the effects of the continued volatility of commodity prices and the related macroeconomic and political environment, volumes, capital requirements, conditions or events, future operating results or the ability to generate sales, the potential exposure of the Partnership to market risks, and statements relating to the expected amount of cash available for distribution and level of distributions, financial position, estimated revenues and losses, projected cost, prospects, plans and objectives of management are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements represent BPMP’s expectations or beliefs concerning future events, and it is possible that the results described in this news release will not be achieved. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside of BPMP’s control including the effects of storms and hurricanes including Hurricane Ida. Other factors and uncertainties inherent in our business, as discussed in the “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements,” “Risk Factors” and other cautionary statements found in BPMP’s filings with the SEC, including the annual report on -K for the year ended December 31, 2020 filed with SEC on February 25, 2021 and the quarterly report on -Q for the period ended June 30, 2021 filed with SEC on August 5, 2021.
[end of TEXT]
Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No":
- Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)?
Decision Guidelines:
- A company is considered "exposed" only if:
1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT.
2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company.
3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions.
- Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed".
- TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed".
Output Format:
Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No".
Your Output:
|
You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT.
EVENT: "Central Severe Storms (July 2021)"
EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Severe storms caused considerable hail damage across numerous Central states including Missouri, Nebraska, Iowa, South Dakota, North Dakota, New Mexico and Texas. There was also widespread high wind damage to homes, vehicles and businesses in many other surrounding states."
Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure:
[begin of TEXT]
Certain statements contained in this -K constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements concerning management’s expectations, beliefs, estimates, forecasts, projections and assumptions. You can identify our forward-looking statements by words such as “anticipate”, “believe”, “estimate”, “budget”, “continue”, “potential”, “guidance”, “effort”, “expect”, “forecast”, “goals”, “objectives”, “outlook”, “intend”, “plan”, “predict”, “project”, “seek”, “target”, “begin”, “could”, “may”, “should” or “would” or other similar expressions that convey the uncertainty of future events or outcomes. In accordance with “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, these statements are accompanied by cautionary language identifying important factors, though not necessarily all such factors, which could cause future outcomes to differ materially from those set forth in forward-looking statements. In particular, expressed or implied statements concerning future growth, future actions, the continued effects of the global COVID-19 pandemic on demand, the effects of the continued volatility of commodity prices and the related macroeconomic and political environment, volumes, capital requirements, conditions or events, future operating results or the ability to generate sales, the potential exposure of the Partnership to market risks, and statements relating to the expected amount of cash available for distribution and level of distributions, financial position, estimated revenues and losses, projected cost, prospects, plans and objectives of management are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements represent BPMP’s expectations or beliefs concerning future events, and it is possible that the results described in this news release will not be achieved. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside of BPMP’s control including the effects of storms and hurricanes including Hurricane Ida. Other factors and uncertainties inherent in our business, as discussed in the “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements,” “Risk Factors” and other cautionary statements found in BPMP’s filings with the SEC, including the annual report on -K for the year ended December 31, 2020 filed with SEC on February 25, 2021 and the quarterly report on -Q for the period ended June 30, 2021 filed with SEC on August 5, 2021.
[end of TEXT]
Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No":
- Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Central Severe Storms (July 2021)"?
Decision Guidelines:
- A company is considered "exposed" only if:
1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied.
2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company.
3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions.
- Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed".
- TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed".
Output Format:
Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No".
Your Output:
|
530,870
|
Our operations are vulnerable to damage or interruption from computer viruses, human error, natural disasters, telecommunications failures, intentional acts of misappropriation, and similar events. We have not established a formal disaster recovery plan or back-up operations. Additionally, our business interruption insurance may not be adequate to compensate us for losses that occur. A significant business interruption could result in losses or damages and require us to curtail our operations.
|
Southeast Ohio Valley and Northeast Severe Weather (February 2019)
|
Tornadoes, severe weather and flooding in the south (MS, AL, TN) and high-wind damage across many Ohio Valley (IL, IN, OH) and Northeastern states (CT, MD, MA, NJ, NY, PA, VA, WV). This storm system produced heavy rain that caused major flooding along parts of the Ohio, Mississippi and Tennessee rivers.
|
No
|
No
|
You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT.
Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure:
[begin of TEXT]
Our operations are vulnerable to damage or interruption from computer viruses, human error, natural disasters, telecommunications failures, intentional acts of misappropriation, and similar events. We have not established a formal disaster recovery plan or back-up operations. Additionally, our business interruption insurance may not be adequate to compensate us for losses that occur. A significant business interruption could result in losses or damages and require us to curtail our operations.
[end of TEXT]
Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No":
- Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)?
Decision Guidelines:
- A company is considered "exposed" only if:
1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT.
2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company.
3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions.
- Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed".
- TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed".
Output Format:
Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No".
Your Output:
|
You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT.
EVENT: "Southeast Ohio Valley and Northeast Severe Weather (February 2019)"
EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Tornadoes, severe weather and flooding in the south (MS, AL, TN) and high-wind damage across many Ohio Valley (IL, IN, OH) and Northeastern states (CT, MD, MA, NJ, NY, PA, VA, WV). This storm system produced heavy rain that caused major flooding along parts of the Ohio, Mississippi and Tennessee rivers."
Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure:
[begin of TEXT]
Our operations are vulnerable to damage or interruption from computer viruses, human error, natural disasters, telecommunications failures, intentional acts of misappropriation, and similar events. We have not established a formal disaster recovery plan or back-up operations. Additionally, our business interruption insurance may not be adequate to compensate us for losses that occur. A significant business interruption could result in losses or damages and require us to curtail our operations.
[end of TEXT]
Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No":
- Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Southeast Ohio Valley and Northeast Severe Weather (February 2019)"?
Decision Guidelines:
- A company is considered "exposed" only if:
1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied.
2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company.
3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions.
- Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed".
- TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed".
Output Format:
Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No".
Your Output:
|
1,314,319
|
Due to the geographic concentration of our manufacturing operations in our PRC facility and the operations of certain of our suppliers, a disruption resulting from equipment failure, power failures, quality control issues, human error, government intervention or natural disasters, including earthquakes and floods, could interrupt or interfere with our manufacturing operations and consequently harm our business, financial condition and results of operations. Such disruptions would cause significant delays in shipments of our products and adversely affect our operating results. In July 2014, our PRC facility suffered water damage as a result of heavy rain and floods, which forced us to temporarily halt manufacturing at the facility while necessary repairs or replacements were made to the facility and to certain of our manufacturing equipment. This incident caused us to incur additional expenses as we shifted our manufacturing activities to a third-party manufacturing facility in the PRC to enable us to mitigate the disruption in shipments to our customers. While we believe we have contained the disruptions we expect that our relationships with our key customers could be materially harmed if we incur additional manufacturing disruptions in the future. While we were able to favorably resolve our claim with our insurance carrier, similar events could occur in the future and, in such event, we may not be able to secure alternative manufacturing capabilities if manufacturing at our PRC facility is disrupted.
|
Central and Northeast Severe Weather (June 2015)
|
Severe storms across numerous Central and Northeast states (CO, CT, IA, IL, MD, MI, NJ, NY, PA, SD, VA, WI) with widespread hail and high wind damage.
|
Yes
|
No
|
You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT.
Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure:
[begin of TEXT]
Due to the geographic concentration of our manufacturing operations in our PRC facility and the operations of certain of our suppliers, a disruption resulting from equipment failure, power failures, quality control issues, human error, government intervention or natural disasters, including earthquakes and floods, could interrupt or interfere with our manufacturing operations and consequently harm our business, financial condition and results of operations. Such disruptions would cause significant delays in shipments of our products and adversely affect our operating results. In July 2014, our PRC facility suffered water damage as a result of heavy rain and floods, which forced us to temporarily halt manufacturing at the facility while necessary repairs or replacements were made to the facility and to certain of our manufacturing equipment. This incident caused us to incur additional expenses as we shifted our manufacturing activities to a third-party manufacturing facility in the PRC to enable us to mitigate the disruption in shipments to our customers. While we believe we have contained the disruptions we expect that our relationships with our key customers could be materially harmed if we incur additional manufacturing disruptions in the future. While we were able to favorably resolve our claim with our insurance carrier, similar events could occur in the future and, in such event, we may not be able to secure alternative manufacturing capabilities if manufacturing at our PRC facility is disrupted.
[end of TEXT]
Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No":
- Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)?
Decision Guidelines:
- A company is considered "exposed" only if:
1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT.
2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company.
3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions.
- Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed".
- TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed".
Output Format:
Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No".
Your Output:
|
You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT.
EVENT: "Central and Northeast Severe Weather (June 2015)"
EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Severe storms across numerous Central and Northeast states (CO, CT, IA, IL, MD, MI, NJ, NY, PA, SD, VA, WI) with widespread hail and high wind damage."
Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure:
[begin of TEXT]
Due to the geographic concentration of our manufacturing operations in our PRC facility and the operations of certain of our suppliers, a disruption resulting from equipment failure, power failures, quality control issues, human error, government intervention or natural disasters, including earthquakes and floods, could interrupt or interfere with our manufacturing operations and consequently harm our business, financial condition and results of operations. Such disruptions would cause significant delays in shipments of our products and adversely affect our operating results. In July 2014, our PRC facility suffered water damage as a result of heavy rain and floods, which forced us to temporarily halt manufacturing at the facility while necessary repairs or replacements were made to the facility and to certain of our manufacturing equipment. This incident caused us to incur additional expenses as we shifted our manufacturing activities to a third-party manufacturing facility in the PRC to enable us to mitigate the disruption in shipments to our customers. While we believe we have contained the disruptions we expect that our relationships with our key customers could be materially harmed if we incur additional manufacturing disruptions in the future. While we were able to favorably resolve our claim with our insurance carrier, similar events could occur in the future and, in such event, we may not be able to secure alternative manufacturing capabilities if manufacturing at our PRC facility is disrupted.
[end of TEXT]
Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No":
- Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Central and Northeast Severe Weather (June 2015)"?
Decision Guidelines:
- A company is considered "exposed" only if:
1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied.
2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company.
3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions.
- Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed".
- TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed".
Output Format:
Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No".
Your Output:
|
1,139,840
|
Claims Services' catastrophe response strategy is to respond to a significant catastrophic event using its own personnel, enabling it to minimize reliance on independent adjusters and appraisers. The Company has developed a large dedicated catastrophe response team and trained a large Enterprise Response Team of existing employees who can be deployed on short notice in the event of a catastrophe that generates claim volume exceeding the capacity of the dedicated catastrophe response team. In recent years, these internal resources were successfully deployed to respond to a record number of catastrophe claims.
|
Midwest/Ohio Valley Severe Weather (April 2015)
|
Severe storms across the Midwest and Ohio Valley including the states (AR, IA, IL, IN, KS, KY, MI, MO, NC, OH, OK, PA, TN, TX, WI, WV). Large hail and high winds created the most damage across Missouri and Illinois.
|
No
|
No
|
You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT.
Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure:
[begin of TEXT]
Claims Services' catastrophe response strategy is to respond to a significant catastrophic event using its own personnel, enabling it to minimize reliance on independent adjusters and appraisers. The Company has developed a large dedicated catastrophe response team and trained a large Enterprise Response Team of existing employees who can be deployed on short notice in the event of a catastrophe that generates claim volume exceeding the capacity of the dedicated catastrophe response team. In recent years, these internal resources were successfully deployed to respond to a record number of catastrophe claims.
[end of TEXT]
Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No":
- Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)?
Decision Guidelines:
- A company is considered "exposed" only if:
1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT.
2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company.
3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions.
- Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed".
- TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed".
Output Format:
Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No".
Your Output:
|
You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT.
EVENT: "Midwest/Ohio Valley Severe Weather (April 2015)"
EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Severe storms across the Midwest and Ohio Valley including the states (AR, IA, IL, IN, KS, KY, MI, MO, NC, OH, OK, PA, TN, TX, WI, WV). Large hail and high winds created the most damage across Missouri and Illinois."
Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure:
[begin of TEXT]
Claims Services' catastrophe response strategy is to respond to a significant catastrophic event using its own personnel, enabling it to minimize reliance on independent adjusters and appraisers. The Company has developed a large dedicated catastrophe response team and trained a large Enterprise Response Team of existing employees who can be deployed on short notice in the event of a catastrophe that generates claim volume exceeding the capacity of the dedicated catastrophe response team. In recent years, these internal resources were successfully deployed to respond to a record number of catastrophe claims.
[end of TEXT]
Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No":
- Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Midwest/Ohio Valley Severe Weather (April 2015)"?
Decision Guidelines:
- A company is considered "exposed" only if:
1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied.
2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company.
3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions.
- Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed".
- TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed".
Output Format:
Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No".
Your Output:
|
353,391
|
attribute all of these decreases in cartons sold due primarily to weather related issues effecting the quality and quantity of the fruit.Calavo FoodsFiscal 2016 vs. Fiscal 2015:Sales for Calavo Foods for the year ended October 31, 2016, when compared to the same period for fiscal 2015, increased $1.3 million, or 2.2%. This increase is primarily due to an increase in sales of salsa products of approximately $1.4 million, or 66.8%, for the year ended October 31, 2016, when compared to the same prior year period. The increase in sales of salsa was primarily related to an increase in overall pounds sold.Fiscal 2015 vs. Fiscal 2014:Sales for Calavo Foods for the year ended October 31, 2015, when compared to the same period for fiscal 2014, increased $2.9 million, or 4.9%. This increase is due to an increase in sales of prepared guacamole products which increased approximately $2.3 million, or 3.9%, for the year ended October 31, 2015, when compared to the same prior year period. The increase in sales of prepared guacamole was primarily related to an increase in overall pounds sold, which increased 0.7 million pounds, or 2.8%. In addition, sales of salsa products increased approximately $0.6 million, or 41.3%, for the year ended October 31, 2015, when compared to the same prior year period. The increase in sales of salsa was primarily related to an increase in overall pounds sold, which increased 0.4 million pounds, or 47.8%.RFGFiscal 2016 vs. Fiscal 2015:Sales for RFG for the year ended October 31, 2016, when compared to the same period for fiscal 2015, increased $39.5 million, or 13.5%. This increase is due primarily to increased sales from fresh prepared food and fresh-cut fruit and vegetable products. The overall increase in sales is primarily due to an increase in sales volume, which we believe results from an increase in demand for the variety of innovative and convenient products that we offer, as well as our ability to expand retail relationships by providing high-quality, fresh foods solutions from our growing national production footprint.Fiscal 2015 vs. Fiscal 2014:Sales for RFG for the year ended October 31, 2015, when compared to the same period for fiscal 2014, increased $41.7 million, or 16.5%. This increase is due primarily to increased sales from cut fruit and deli products, as well as an increase in sales of cut vegetables. The overall increase in sales is primarily due to an increase in sales volume, partially offset by a decrease in the sales price per unit. Collectively, cut fruit, cut vegetable, and deli product sales increased 8.8 million units, or 31.2%. We believe the overall increase in sales volume is primarily due to an increase in demand for the variety of innovative products that we offer.
|
North/Central Texas Hail Storm (April 2016)
|
Widespread severe hail damage across north and central Texas including the cities of Plano, Wylie, Frisco, Allen and San Antonio. The damage in San Antonio was particularly severe as the National Weather Service verified reports of hail size reaching 4.5 inches in diameter. This ranks as one of the most costly hail events to affect the United States.
|
No
|
No
|
You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT.
Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure:
[begin of TEXT]
attribute all of these decreases in cartons sold due primarily to weather related issues effecting the quality and quantity of the fruit.Calavo FoodsFiscal 2016 vs. Fiscal 2015:Sales for Calavo Foods for the year ended October 31, 2016, when compared to the same period for fiscal 2015, increased $1.3 million, or 2.2%. This increase is primarily due to an increase in sales of salsa products of approximately $1.4 million, or 66.8%, for the year ended October 31, 2016, when compared to the same prior year period. The increase in sales of salsa was primarily related to an increase in overall pounds sold.Fiscal 2015 vs. Fiscal 2014:Sales for Calavo Foods for the year ended October 31, 2015, when compared to the same period for fiscal 2014, increased $2.9 million, or 4.9%. This increase is due to an increase in sales of prepared guacamole products which increased approximately $2.3 million, or 3.9%, for the year ended October 31, 2015, when compared to the same prior year period. The increase in sales of prepared guacamole was primarily related to an increase in overall pounds sold, which increased 0.7 million pounds, or 2.8%. In addition, sales of salsa products increased approximately $0.6 million, or 41.3%, for the year ended October 31, 2015, when compared to the same prior year period. The increase in sales of salsa was primarily related to an increase in overall pounds sold, which increased 0.4 million pounds, or 47.8%.RFGFiscal 2016 vs. Fiscal 2015:Sales for RFG for the year ended October 31, 2016, when compared to the same period for fiscal 2015, increased $39.5 million, or 13.5%. This increase is due primarily to increased sales from fresh prepared food and fresh-cut fruit and vegetable products. The overall increase in sales is primarily due to an increase in sales volume, which we believe results from an increase in demand for the variety of innovative and convenient products that we offer, as well as our ability to expand retail relationships by providing high-quality, fresh foods solutions from our growing national production footprint.Fiscal 2015 vs. Fiscal 2014:Sales for RFG for the year ended October 31, 2015, when compared to the same period for fiscal 2014, increased $41.7 million, or 16.5%. This increase is due primarily to increased sales from cut fruit and deli products, as well as an increase in sales of cut vegetables. The overall increase in sales is primarily due to an increase in sales volume, partially offset by a decrease in the sales price per unit. Collectively, cut fruit, cut vegetable, and deli product sales increased 8.8 million units, or 31.2%. We believe the overall increase in sales volume is primarily due to an increase in demand for the variety of innovative products that we offer.
[end of TEXT]
Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No":
- Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)?
Decision Guidelines:
- A company is considered "exposed" only if:
1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT.
2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company.
3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions.
- Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed".
- TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed".
Output Format:
Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No".
Your Output:
|
You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT.
EVENT: "North/Central Texas Hail Storm (April 2016)"
EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Widespread severe hail damage across north and central Texas including the cities of Plano, Wylie, Frisco, Allen and San Antonio. The damage in San Antonio was particularly severe as the National Weather Service verified reports of hail size reaching 4.5 inches in diameter. This ranks as one of the most costly hail events to affect the United States."
Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure:
[begin of TEXT]
attribute all of these decreases in cartons sold due primarily to weather related issues effecting the quality and quantity of the fruit.Calavo FoodsFiscal 2016 vs. Fiscal 2015:Sales for Calavo Foods for the year ended October 31, 2016, when compared to the same period for fiscal 2015, increased $1.3 million, or 2.2%. This increase is primarily due to an increase in sales of salsa products of approximately $1.4 million, or 66.8%, for the year ended October 31, 2016, when compared to the same prior year period. The increase in sales of salsa was primarily related to an increase in overall pounds sold.Fiscal 2015 vs. Fiscal 2014:Sales for Calavo Foods for the year ended October 31, 2015, when compared to the same period for fiscal 2014, increased $2.9 million, or 4.9%. This increase is due to an increase in sales of prepared guacamole products which increased approximately $2.3 million, or 3.9%, for the year ended October 31, 2015, when compared to the same prior year period. The increase in sales of prepared guacamole was primarily related to an increase in overall pounds sold, which increased 0.7 million pounds, or 2.8%. In addition, sales of salsa products increased approximately $0.6 million, or 41.3%, for the year ended October 31, 2015, when compared to the same prior year period. The increase in sales of salsa was primarily related to an increase in overall pounds sold, which increased 0.4 million pounds, or 47.8%.RFGFiscal 2016 vs. Fiscal 2015:Sales for RFG for the year ended October 31, 2016, when compared to the same period for fiscal 2015, increased $39.5 million, or 13.5%. This increase is due primarily to increased sales from fresh prepared food and fresh-cut fruit and vegetable products. The overall increase in sales is primarily due to an increase in sales volume, which we believe results from an increase in demand for the variety of innovative and convenient products that we offer, as well as our ability to expand retail relationships by providing high-quality, fresh foods solutions from our growing national production footprint.Fiscal 2015 vs. Fiscal 2014:Sales for RFG for the year ended October 31, 2015, when compared to the same period for fiscal 2014, increased $41.7 million, or 16.5%. This increase is due primarily to increased sales from cut fruit and deli products, as well as an increase in sales of cut vegetables. The overall increase in sales is primarily due to an increase in sales volume, partially offset by a decrease in the sales price per unit. Collectively, cut fruit, cut vegetable, and deli product sales increased 8.8 million units, or 31.2%. We believe the overall increase in sales volume is primarily due to an increase in demand for the variety of innovative products that we offer.
[end of TEXT]
Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No":
- Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "North/Central Texas Hail Storm (April 2016)"?
Decision Guidelines:
- A company is considered "exposed" only if:
1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied.
2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company.
3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions.
- Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed".
- TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed".
Output Format:
Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No".
Your Output:
|
1,257,690
|
The slight 2014 decrease of 30 basis points in gross profit as a percentage of revenues was primarily attributable to bad winter weather conditions in North America, as well as costs to prepare to serve a large new customer in Alaska and an important new contract with a major integrated energy company with significant operations in the Canadian oil sands region. Additionally, the Company incurred staffing costs which preceded revenues pertaining to market share gains in France. The cumulative adverse impact of these items aggregated approximately $3 million, approximately $2 million of which reduced gross profit and the remainder increased operating expenses during fiscal 2014.
|
Southern Plains Tornadoes (May 2015)
|
Tornado outbreak across the Southern Plain states (IA, KS, NE, OK, CO, SD, TX) with 122 tornadoes. The most costly damage occurred across Texas and Oklahoma.
|
No
|
No
|
You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT.
Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure:
[begin of TEXT]
The slight 2014 decrease of 30 basis points in gross profit as a percentage of revenues was primarily attributable to bad winter weather conditions in North America, as well as costs to prepare to serve a large new customer in Alaska and an important new contract with a major integrated energy company with significant operations in the Canadian oil sands region. Additionally, the Company incurred staffing costs which preceded revenues pertaining to market share gains in France. The cumulative adverse impact of these items aggregated approximately $3 million, approximately $2 million of which reduced gross profit and the remainder increased operating expenses during fiscal 2014.
[end of TEXT]
Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No":
- Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)?
Decision Guidelines:
- A company is considered "exposed" only if:
1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT.
2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company.
3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions.
- Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed".
- TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed".
Output Format:
Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No".
Your Output:
|
You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT.
EVENT: "Southern Plains Tornadoes (May 2015)"
EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Tornado outbreak across the Southern Plain states (IA, KS, NE, OK, CO, SD, TX) with 122 tornadoes. The most costly damage occurred across Texas and Oklahoma."
Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure:
[begin of TEXT]
The slight 2014 decrease of 30 basis points in gross profit as a percentage of revenues was primarily attributable to bad winter weather conditions in North America, as well as costs to prepare to serve a large new customer in Alaska and an important new contract with a major integrated energy company with significant operations in the Canadian oil sands region. Additionally, the Company incurred staffing costs which preceded revenues pertaining to market share gains in France. The cumulative adverse impact of these items aggregated approximately $3 million, approximately $2 million of which reduced gross profit and the remainder increased operating expenses during fiscal 2014.
[end of TEXT]
Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No":
- Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Southern Plains Tornadoes (May 2015)"?
Decision Guidelines:
- A company is considered "exposed" only if:
1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied.
2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company.
3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions.
- Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed".
- TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed".
Output Format:
Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No".
Your Output:
|
991,636
|
Sources of Revenues and Health Care Reform:Given increasing budget deficits, the federal government and many states are currently considering additional ways to limit increases in levels of Medicare and Medicaid funding, which could also adversely affect future payments received by our hospitals. In addition, the uncertainty and fiscal pressures placed upon the federal government as a result of, among other things, the War on Terrorism, economic recovery stimulus packages, responses to natural disasters, the expansion of a Medicare drug benefit and the federal budget deficit in general may affect the availability of federal funds to provide additional relief in the future. We are unable to predict the effect of future policy changes on our operations.
|
Midwest South and East Severe Weather (June 2009)
|
Sustained outbreak of thunderstorms and high winds from a strong derecho event over the central, southern, and eastern states (TX, OK, MO, NE, KS, AR, AL, MS, TN, NC, SC, KY, PA).
|
No
|
No
|
You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT.
Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure:
[begin of TEXT]
Sources of Revenues and Health Care Reform:Given increasing budget deficits, the federal government and many states are currently considering additional ways to limit increases in levels of Medicare and Medicaid funding, which could also adversely affect future payments received by our hospitals. In addition, the uncertainty and fiscal pressures placed upon the federal government as a result of, among other things, the War on Terrorism, economic recovery stimulus packages, responses to natural disasters, the expansion of a Medicare drug benefit and the federal budget deficit in general may affect the availability of federal funds to provide additional relief in the future. We are unable to predict the effect of future policy changes on our operations.
[end of TEXT]
Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No":
- Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)?
Decision Guidelines:
- A company is considered "exposed" only if:
1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT.
2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company.
3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions.
- Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed".
- TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed".
Output Format:
Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No".
Your Output:
|
You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT.
EVENT: "Midwest South and East Severe Weather (June 2009)"
EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Sustained outbreak of thunderstorms and high winds from a strong derecho event over the central, southern, and eastern states (TX, OK, MO, NE, KS, AR, AL, MS, TN, NC, SC, KY, PA)."
Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure:
[begin of TEXT]
Sources of Revenues and Health Care Reform:Given increasing budget deficits, the federal government and many states are currently considering additional ways to limit increases in levels of Medicare and Medicaid funding, which could also adversely affect future payments received by our hospitals. In addition, the uncertainty and fiscal pressures placed upon the federal government as a result of, among other things, the War on Terrorism, economic recovery stimulus packages, responses to natural disasters, the expansion of a Medicare drug benefit and the federal budget deficit in general may affect the availability of federal funds to provide additional relief in the future. We are unable to predict the effect of future policy changes on our operations.
[end of TEXT]
Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No":
- Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Midwest South and East Severe Weather (June 2009)"?
Decision Guidelines:
- A company is considered "exposed" only if:
1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied.
2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company.
3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions.
- Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed".
- TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed".
Output Format:
Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No".
Your Output:
|
751,907
|
Operating income (loss) for fiscal year 2014 includes approximately $3.7 million in flood-related income related to settlement payments from our insurers and contract manufacturer relating to losses we incurred during the Thailand flooding as more fully discussed in Note 6,Flood-Related (Income) Expense, Net,to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on -K filed on August 28, 2015.
|
Western Wildfires California Firestorm (Summer-Fall 2018)
|
In 2018, California has experienced its costliest, deadliest and largest wildfires to date, with records back to 1933. The Camp Fire is the costliest and deadliest wildfire - destroying more than 18,500 buildings. California also endured its largest wildfire on record - the Medincino Complex Fire - burning over 450,000 acres. Additionally, California was impacted by other destructive wildfires: the Carr Fire in Northern California and the Woolsey Fire in Southern California. The total 2018 wildfire costs in California (with minor costs in other Western states) approach $24.0 ($30.0) billion - a new U.S. record. In total, over 8.7 million acres has burned across the U.S. during 2018, which is well above the 10-year average (2009-2018) of 6.8 million acres. The last 2 years of U.S. wildfire damage has been unprecedented in damage, with losses exceeding $40.0 ($50.0) billion.
|
Yes
|
No
|
You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT.
Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure:
[begin of TEXT]
Operating income (loss) for fiscal year 2014 includes approximately $3.7 million in flood-related income related to settlement payments from our insurers and contract manufacturer relating to losses we incurred during the Thailand flooding as more fully discussed in Note 6,Flood-Related (Income) Expense, Net,to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on -K filed on August 28, 2015.
[end of TEXT]
Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No":
- Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)?
Decision Guidelines:
- A company is considered "exposed" only if:
1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT.
2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company.
3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions.
- Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed".
- TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed".
Output Format:
Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No".
Your Output:
|
You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT.
EVENT: "Western Wildfires California Firestorm (Summer-Fall 2018)"
EVENT DESCRIPTION: "In 2018, California has experienced its costliest, deadliest and largest wildfires to date, with records back to 1933. The Camp Fire is the costliest and deadliest wildfire - destroying more than 18,500 buildings. California also endured its largest wildfire on record - the Medincino Complex Fire - burning over 450,000 acres. Additionally, California was impacted by other destructive wildfires: the Carr Fire in Northern California and the Woolsey Fire in Southern California. The total 2018 wildfire costs in California (with minor costs in other Western states) approach $24.0 ($30.0) billion - a new U.S. record. In total, over 8.7 million acres has burned across the U.S. during 2018, which is well above the 10-year average (2009-2018) of 6.8 million acres. The last 2 years of U.S. wildfire damage has been unprecedented in damage, with losses exceeding $40.0 ($50.0) billion."
Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure:
[begin of TEXT]
Operating income (loss) for fiscal year 2014 includes approximately $3.7 million in flood-related income related to settlement payments from our insurers and contract manufacturer relating to losses we incurred during the Thailand flooding as more fully discussed in Note 6,Flood-Related (Income) Expense, Net,to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on -K filed on August 28, 2015.
[end of TEXT]
Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No":
- Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Western Wildfires California Firestorm (Summer-Fall 2018)"?
Decision Guidelines:
- A company is considered "exposed" only if:
1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied.
2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company.
3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions.
- Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed".
- TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed".
Output Format:
Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No".
Your Output:
|
23,362
|
The Company provides a hurricane update and revises the second quarter earning estimate. A copy of the announcement is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
Hurricane Katrina (August 2005)
|
Category 3 hurricane initially impacts the U.S. as a Category 1 near Miami, FL, then as a strong Category 3 along the eastern LA-western MS coastlines, resulting in severe storm surge damage (maximum surge probably exceeded 30 feet) along the LA-MS-AL coasts, wind damage, and the failure of parts of the levee system in New Orleans. Inland effects included high winds and some flooding in the states of AL, MS, FL, TN, KY, IN, OH, and GA.
|
Yes
|
No
|
You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT.
Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure:
[begin of TEXT]
The Company provides a hurricane update and revises the second quarter earning estimate. A copy of the announcement is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and incorporated herein by reference.
[end of TEXT]
Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No":
- Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)?
Decision Guidelines:
- A company is considered "exposed" only if:
1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT.
2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company.
3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions.
- Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed".
- TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed".
Output Format:
Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No".
Your Output:
|
You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT.
EVENT: "Hurricane Katrina (August 2005)"
EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Category 3 hurricane initially impacts the U.S. as a Category 1 near Miami, FL, then as a strong Category 3 along the eastern LA-western MS coastlines, resulting in severe storm surge damage (maximum surge probably exceeded 30 feet) along the LA-MS-AL coasts, wind damage, and the failure of parts of the levee system in New Orleans. Inland effects included high winds and some flooding in the states of AL, MS, FL, TN, KY, IN, OH, and GA."
Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure:
[begin of TEXT]
The Company provides a hurricane update and revises the second quarter earning estimate. A copy of the announcement is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and incorporated herein by reference.
[end of TEXT]
Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No":
- Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Hurricane Katrina (August 2005)"?
Decision Guidelines:
- A company is considered "exposed" only if:
1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied.
2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company.
3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions.
- Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed".
- TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed".
Output Format:
Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No".
Your Output:
|
45,412
|
Market Outlook: With the recent urbanization and industrialization of PRC, pollution has become a big problem. Air pollution in particular causes several diseases of the pharynx. Researchers believe that approximately 10% of the people who live in cities suffer from pharynx disease, while in some rural areas, the ratio is a lower, though still significant, 5.5%. Until now treatments for upper respiratory tract infections have relied on antibiotics to control acute pharyngitis temporarily. However, no medicine in the market has thus far been effective at treating chronic pharyngitis. Pharyngitis Killer therapy overcomes the deficiencies of other treatments and eradicates the disease.
|
North Central Severe Weather and Tornadoes (August 2006)
|
Severe weather and tornadoes cause impacts across several north central states including Minnesota, Wisconsin, Indiana and Illinois.
|
No
|
No
|
You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT.
Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure:
[begin of TEXT]
Market Outlook: With the recent urbanization and industrialization of PRC, pollution has become a big problem. Air pollution in particular causes several diseases of the pharynx. Researchers believe that approximately 10% of the people who live in cities suffer from pharynx disease, while in some rural areas, the ratio is a lower, though still significant, 5.5%. Until now treatments for upper respiratory tract infections have relied on antibiotics to control acute pharyngitis temporarily. However, no medicine in the market has thus far been effective at treating chronic pharyngitis. Pharyngitis Killer therapy overcomes the deficiencies of other treatments and eradicates the disease.
[end of TEXT]
Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No":
- Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)?
Decision Guidelines:
- A company is considered "exposed" only if:
1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT.
2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company.
3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions.
- Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed".
- TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed".
Output Format:
Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No".
Your Output:
|
You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT.
EVENT: "North Central Severe Weather and Tornadoes (August 2006)"
EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Severe weather and tornadoes cause impacts across several north central states including Minnesota, Wisconsin, Indiana and Illinois."
Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure:
[begin of TEXT]
Market Outlook: With the recent urbanization and industrialization of PRC, pollution has become a big problem. Air pollution in particular causes several diseases of the pharynx. Researchers believe that approximately 10% of the people who live in cities suffer from pharynx disease, while in some rural areas, the ratio is a lower, though still significant, 5.5%. Until now treatments for upper respiratory tract infections have relied on antibiotics to control acute pharyngitis temporarily. However, no medicine in the market has thus far been effective at treating chronic pharyngitis. Pharyngitis Killer therapy overcomes the deficiencies of other treatments and eradicates the disease.
[end of TEXT]
Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No":
- Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "North Central Severe Weather and Tornadoes (August 2006)"?
Decision Guidelines:
- A company is considered "exposed" only if:
1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied.
2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company.
3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions.
- Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed".
- TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed".
Output Format:
Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No".
Your Output:
|
24,162
|
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWASHINGTON, D.C. 20549FORM 8-KCURRENT REPORTPURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OFTHE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934Date of report (Date of earliest event reported)September 26, 2005Republic Services, Inc.(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)Delaware(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)1-1426765-0716904(Commission File Number)(IRS Employer Identification No.)110 SE 6th Street, 28th Floor, Fort Lauderdale, Florida33301(Address of Principal Executive Offices)(Zip Code)(954) 769-2400(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)(Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)Check the appropriate box below if the -K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below):oWritten communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)oSoliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13d-4(c))ITEM 8.01 OTHER EVENTSOn September 26, 2005, Republic Services, Inc. issued a press release to announce information regarding the impact of Hurricane Rita and affirming 2005 earnings guidance, a copy of which is incorporated herein by reference and attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1.ITEM 9.01 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS(C) ExhibitsExhibit No.Description99.1Press Release of the Company dated September 26, 2005 to announce information regarding the impact of Hurricane Rita and affirming 2005 earnings guidance.2SIGNATURESPursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.September 26, 2005REPUBLIC SERVICES, INC.By:/s/ Tod C.
|
Hurricane Wilma (October 2005)
|
Category 3 hurricane hits SW Florida resulting in strong damaging winds and major flooding across southeastern Florida. Prior to landfall, Wilma as a Category 5 recorded the lowest pressure (882 mb) ever recorded in the Atlantic basin.
|
Yes
|
No
|
You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT.
Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure:
[begin of TEXT]
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWASHINGTON, D.C. 20549FORM 8-KCURRENT REPORTPURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OFTHE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934Date of report (Date of earliest event reported)September 26, 2005Republic Services, Inc.(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)Delaware(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)1-1426765-0716904(Commission File Number)(IRS Employer Identification No.)110 SE 6th Street, 28th Floor, Fort Lauderdale, Florida33301(Address of Principal Executive Offices)(Zip Code)(954) 769-2400(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)(Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)Check the appropriate box below if the -K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below):oWritten communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)oSoliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13d-4(c))ITEM 8.01 OTHER EVENTSOn September 26, 2005, Republic Services, Inc. issued a press release to announce information regarding the impact of Hurricane Rita and affirming 2005 earnings guidance, a copy of which is incorporated herein by reference and attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1.ITEM 9.01 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS(C) ExhibitsExhibit No.Description99.1Press Release of the Company dated September 26, 2005 to announce information regarding the impact of Hurricane Rita and affirming 2005 earnings guidance.2SIGNATURESPursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.September 26, 2005REPUBLIC SERVICES, INC.By:/s/ Tod C.
[end of TEXT]
Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No":
- Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)?
Decision Guidelines:
- A company is considered "exposed" only if:
1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT.
2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company.
3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions.
- Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed".
- TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed".
Output Format:
Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No".
Your Output:
|
You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT.
EVENT: "Hurricane Wilma (October 2005)"
EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Category 3 hurricane hits SW Florida resulting in strong damaging winds and major flooding across southeastern Florida. Prior to landfall, Wilma as a Category 5 recorded the lowest pressure (882 mb) ever recorded in the Atlantic basin."
Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure:
[begin of TEXT]
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWASHINGTON, D.C. 20549FORM 8-KCURRENT REPORTPURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OFTHE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934Date of report (Date of earliest event reported)September 26, 2005Republic Services, Inc.(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)Delaware(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)1-1426765-0716904(Commission File Number)(IRS Employer Identification No.)110 SE 6th Street, 28th Floor, Fort Lauderdale, Florida33301(Address of Principal Executive Offices)(Zip Code)(954) 769-2400(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)(Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)Check the appropriate box below if the -K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below):oWritten communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)oSoliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13d-4(c))ITEM 8.01 OTHER EVENTSOn September 26, 2005, Republic Services, Inc. issued a press release to announce information regarding the impact of Hurricane Rita and affirming 2005 earnings guidance, a copy of which is incorporated herein by reference and attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1.ITEM 9.01 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS(C) ExhibitsExhibit No.Description99.1Press Release of the Company dated September 26, 2005 to announce information regarding the impact of Hurricane Rita and affirming 2005 earnings guidance.2SIGNATURESPursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.September 26, 2005REPUBLIC SERVICES, INC.By:/s/ Tod C.
[end of TEXT]
Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No":
- Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Hurricane Wilma (October 2005)"?
Decision Guidelines:
- A company is considered "exposed" only if:
1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied.
2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company.
3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions.
- Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed".
- TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed".
Output Format:
Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No".
Your Output:
|
23,727
|
Management expects continued profitability from the Company's agricultural operations in fiscal year 2006, but at reduced levels from fiscal year 2005 due to the hurricane.
|
Hurricane Wilma (October 2005)
|
Category 3 hurricane hits SW Florida resulting in strong damaging winds and major flooding across southeastern Florida. Prior to landfall, Wilma as a Category 5 recorded the lowest pressure (882 mb) ever recorded in the Atlantic basin.
|
Yes
|
No
|
You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to an extreme weather event based on the TEXT.
Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure:
[begin of TEXT]
Management expects continued profitability from the Company's agricultural operations in fiscal year 2006, but at reduced levels from fiscal year 2005 due to the hurricane.
[end of TEXT]
Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No":
- Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to an extreme weather event (e.g., Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Drought, Wildfire, Coldwave)?
Decision Guidelines:
- A company is considered "exposed" only if:
1. It was directly impacted by an extreme weather event mentioned in the TEXT.
2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company.
3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions.
- Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed".
- TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed".
Output Format:
Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No".
Your Output:
|
You are given a TEXT of a company disclosure, along with an EVENT and its EVENT DESCRIPTION. Your task is to determine whether the company was exposed to the specific EVENT.
EVENT: "Hurricane Wilma (October 2005)"
EVENT DESCRIPTION: "Category 3 hurricane hits SW Florida resulting in strong damaging winds and major flooding across southeastern Florida. Prior to landfall, Wilma as a Category 5 recorded the lowest pressure (882 mb) ever recorded in the Atlantic basin."
Here is the TEXT from the company’s disclosure:
[begin of TEXT]
Management expects continued profitability from the Company's agricultural operations in fiscal year 2006, but at reduced levels from fiscal year 2005 due to the hurricane.
[end of TEXT]
Answer the following questions strictly with "Yes" or "No":
- Based on the TEXT, was the company exposed to the specific EVENT "Hurricane Wilma (October 2005)"?
Decision Guidelines:
- A company is considered "exposed" only if:
1. It was directly impacted by the specific EVENT. Thus, the event is mentioned or directly implied.
2. The impact happened in the past and is explicitly linked to the company.
3. The impact was caused by a clear extreme weather event, not ordinary weather conditions.
- Forward-looking statements, potential future impacts, or potential risks do NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a geographic location does NOT count as "exposed".
- Merely stating a generic or specific list of extreme weather events does NOT count as "exposed".
- TEXTs that are not full sentences do NOT count as "exposed".
Output Format:
Only respond by giving strictly giving a "Yes" or "No".
Your Output:
|
End of preview. Expand
in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 17
Size of downloaded dataset files:
46 MB
Size of the auto-converted Parquet files:
15.3 MB
Number of rows:
7,200