Document custom mixing and Chinchilla scaling
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -42,3 +42,47 @@ See `catalog.json` for revisions, upstream URLs, document counts, hashes, and sa
|
|
| 42 |
- `text`
|
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
Use `source_key` or `category` to build a weighted mixture. `chunk_bytes` is the exact UTF-8 size of the row and can be summed for accounting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 42 |
- `text`
|
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
Use `source_key` or `category` to build a weighted mixture. `chunk_bytes` is the exact UTF-8 size of the row and can be summed for accounting.
|
| 45 |
+
|
| 46 |
+
## Build your own mix
|
| 47 |
+
|
| 48 |
+
Load the table, group by `source_key`, and sample rows with weights. This example gives Wikipedia 40%, EUR-Lex 30%, and literature 30%:
|
| 49 |
+
|
| 50 |
+
```python
|
| 51 |
+
from datasets import load_dataset
|
| 52 |
+
from collections import defaultdict
|
| 53 |
+
import random
|
| 54 |
+
|
| 55 |
+
ds = load_dataset("SlayerLab/fabryka-track-polish-mix", split="train", streaming=True)
|
| 56 |
+
weights = {"wikipedia": .40, "eurlex": .30, "wolne_lektury": .15, "wikisource": .15}
|
| 57 |
+
rows = ((r["text"], r["source_key"]) for r in ds if r["source_key"] in weights)
|
| 58 |
+
by_source = defaultdict(list)
|
| 59 |
+
for text, source in rows:
|
| 60 |
+
by_source[source].append(text)
|
| 61 |
+
mix = []
|
| 62 |
+
for source, weight in weights.items():
|
| 63 |
+
n = round(1000 * weight)
|
| 64 |
+
mix.extend(random.choices(by_source[source], k=n))
|
| 65 |
+
random.shuffle(mix)
|
| 66 |
+
```
|
| 67 |
+
|
| 68 |
+
For a streaming pipeline, keep a per-source iterator and draw the next source with `random.choices(..., weights=...)`; this avoids materializing the full corpus. Use `chunk_bytes` to stop at an exact byte-token budget.
|
| 69 |
+
|
| 70 |
+

|
| 71 |
+
|
| 72 |
+
## What can this corpus train?
|
| 73 |
+
|
| 74 |
+
The canonical expanded sources contain **655.4M UTF-8 byte tokens**. With the current byte-token trainer, a useful planning rule is:
|
| 75 |
+
|
| 76 |
+
| Model size | 20:1 budget | Fit in this corpus? |
|
| 77 |
+
|---:|---:|:---:|
|
| 78 |
+
| 8M | 160M tokens | Yes |
|
| 79 |
+
| 16M | 320M tokens | Yes |
|
| 80 |
+
| 32M | 640M tokens | Barely; only ~2.4% remains |
|
| 81 |
+
| 50M | 1B tokens | No |
|
| 82 |
+
| 100M | 2B tokens | No |
|
| 83 |
+
|
| 84 |
+
The 20:1 line is a Chinchilla-style planning heuristic, not a guarantee of model quality. This dataset uses bytes rather than a subword tokenizer, so the equivalent BPE-token count and the best training ratio will differ.
|
| 85 |
+
|
| 86 |
+

|
| 87 |
+
|
| 88 |
+
For a robust 32M run, target at least 800M–1B fresh tokens or allow a documented repeat factor. Larger models require more source text or a larger mix.
|