id string | source_id string | base_id string | split string | domain string | family string | subset string | semantics string | semantic_contract dict | closed_predicates list | facts_positive list | facts_negative list | rules_natural list | predicate_glossary unknown | vocabulary_predicates list | query_atom string | target_statement string | gold_reason_type string | symbolic dict | gold_truth_value string | gold_action string | gold_missing_predicate string | gold_missing_entity string | gold_missing_atom string | gold_question_to_ask string | prompt string |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
hospital_access_0018_closed_derived_missing_antecedent__cwa__ask_act | hospital_access_0018_closed_derived_missing_antecedent__cwa | hospital_access_0018_closed_derived_missing_antecedent | train | hospital_access | closed_derived_missing_antecedent | core_contrastive | cwa | {
"name": "Closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false."
} | [
"assigned_to_trial",
"completed_training",
"has_clearance",
"may_enter_lab",
"needs_supervisor_review"
] | [
"Ava has completed safety training."
] | [] | [
"If a staff member has security clearance and has completed safety training, then that staff member may enter Lab A."
] | {
"completed_training": "has completed safety training",
"has_clearance": "has security clearance",
"assigned_to_trial": "is assigned to the clinical trial",
"may_enter_lab": "may enter Lab A",
"needs_supervisor_review": "needs supervisor review"
} | [
"assigned_to_trial",
"completed_training",
"has_clearance",
"may_enter_lab",
"needs_supervisor_review"
] | may_enter_lab::Ava | Ava may enter Lab A. | global_closed_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"completed_training::Ava"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [
{
"antecedents": [
"completed_training::Ava",
"has_clearance::Ava"
],
"conclusion": "may_enter_lab::Ava",
"text": "If a staff member has security clearance and has completed safety... | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
cloud_deployment_0279_explicit_negative_open__cwa__ask_act | cloud_deployment_0279_explicit_negative_open__cwa | cloud_deployment_0279_explicit_negative_open | train | cloud_deployment | explicit_negative_open | control_explicit_negative | cwa | {
"name": "Closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false."
} | [
"has_deployment_approval",
"has_incident_note",
"may_deploy",
"needs_sre_review",
"passed_unit_tests"
] | [
"Service F passed unit tests."
] | [
"Service D does not has an incident note."
] | [] | {
"passed_unit_tests": "passed unit tests",
"has_deployment_approval": "has deployment approval",
"has_incident_note": "has an incident note",
"may_deploy": "may deploy to production",
"needs_sre_review": "needs SRE review"
} | [
"has_deployment_approval",
"has_incident_note",
"may_deploy",
"needs_sre_review",
"passed_unit_tests"
] | has_incident_note::Service D | Service D has an incident note. | explicit_negative_fact | {
"positive_atoms": [
"passed_unit_tests::Service F"
],
"negative_atoms": [
"has_incident_note::Service D"
],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_incident_note::Service D",
"closure_atoms": [
"passed_unit_tests::Service F"
]
} | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
university_registration_0078_explicit_negative_open__lcwa__ask_act | university_registration_0078_explicit_negative_open__lcwa | university_registration_0078_explicit_negative_open | test | university_registration | explicit_negative_open | control_explicit_negative | lcwa | {
"name": "Locally closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown."
} | [
"has_advising_clearance",
"may_register"
] | [
"Lena passed the qualifying exam."
] | [
"Mia does not has an external scholarship."
] | [] | {
"passed_exam": "passed the qualifying exam",
"has_advising_clearance": "has advising clearance",
"has_external_scholarship": "has an external scholarship",
"may_register": "may register for the seminar",
"needs_manual_audit": "needs a manual audit"
} | [
"has_advising_clearance",
"has_external_scholarship",
"may_register",
"needs_manual_audit",
"passed_exam"
] | has_external_scholarship::Mia | Mia has an external scholarship. | explicit_negative_fact | {
"positive_atoms": [
"passed_exam::Lena"
],
"negative_atoms": [
"has_external_scholarship::Mia"
],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_external_scholarship::Mia",
"closure_atoms": [
"passed_exam::Lena"
]
} | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
hospital_access_0015_open_missing_with_closed_distractor__cwa__ask_act | hospital_access_0015_open_missing_with_closed_distractor__cwa | hospital_access_0015_open_missing_with_closed_distractor | train | hospital_access | open_missing_with_closed_distractor | core_contrastive | cwa | {
"name": "Closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false."
} | [
"assigned_to_trial",
"completed_training",
"has_clearance",
"may_enter_lab",
"needs_supervisor_review"
] | [
"Elena has completed safety training.",
"Elena has security clearance."
] | [] | [] | {
"completed_training": "has completed safety training",
"has_clearance": "has security clearance",
"assigned_to_trial": "is assigned to the clinical trial",
"may_enter_lab": "may enter Lab A",
"needs_supervisor_review": "needs supervisor review"
} | [
"assigned_to_trial",
"completed_training",
"has_clearance",
"may_enter_lab",
"needs_supervisor_review"
] | assigned_to_trial::Dylan | Dylan is assigned to the clinical trial. | global_closed_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"completed_training::Elena",
"has_clearance::Elena"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "assigned_to_trial::Dylan",
"closure_atoms": [
"completed_training::Elena",
"has_clearance::Elena"
]
} | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
cloud_deployment_0240_closed_missing_direct__lcwa__ask_act | cloud_deployment_0240_closed_missing_direct__lcwa | cloud_deployment_0240_closed_missing_direct | train | cloud_deployment | closed_missing_direct | core_contrastive | lcwa | {
"name": "Locally closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown."
} | [
"has_deployment_approval"
] | [
"Service A passed unit tests."
] | [] | [] | {
"passed_unit_tests": "passed unit tests",
"has_deployment_approval": "has deployment approval",
"has_incident_note": "has an incident note",
"may_deploy": "may deploy to production",
"needs_sre_review": "needs SRE review"
} | [
"has_deployment_approval",
"has_incident_note",
"may_deploy",
"needs_sre_review",
"passed_unit_tests"
] | has_deployment_approval::Service A | Service A has deployment approval. | local_closed_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"passed_unit_tests::Service A"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_deployment_approval::Service A",
"closure_atoms": [
"passed_unit_tests::Service A"
]
} | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
university_registration_0062_open_derived_missing_antecedent__lcwa__ask_act | university_registration_0062_open_derived_missing_antecedent__lcwa | university_registration_0062_open_derived_missing_antecedent | train | university_registration | open_derived_missing_antecedent | core_contrastive | lcwa | {
"name": "Locally closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown."
} | [
"has_advising_clearance",
"may_register"
] | [
"Lena passed the qualifying exam."
] | [] | [
"If a student has an external scholarship, then that student needs a manual audit."
] | {
"passed_exam": "passed the qualifying exam",
"has_advising_clearance": "has advising clearance",
"has_external_scholarship": "has an external scholarship",
"may_register": "may register for the seminar",
"needs_manual_audit": "needs a manual audit"
} | [
"has_advising_clearance",
"has_external_scholarship",
"may_register",
"needs_manual_audit",
"passed_exam"
] | needs_manual_audit::Lena | Lena needs a manual audit. | local_open_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"passed_exam::Lena"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [
{
"antecedents": [
"has_external_scholarship::Lena"
],
"conclusion": "needs_manual_audit::Lena",
"text": "If a student has an external scholarship, then that student needs a manual audit."
}... | unknown | request_information | has_external_scholarship | Lena | has_external_scholarship::Lena | Is it true that Lena has an external scholarship? | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
library_services_0209_closed_missing_with_open_distractor__cwa__ask_act | library_services_0209_closed_missing_with_open_distractor__cwa | library_services_0209_closed_missing_with_open_distractor | dev | library_services | closed_missing_with_open_distractor | core_contrastive | cwa | {
"name": "Closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false."
} | [
"has_active_membership",
"has_borrowing_clearance",
"has_special_request",
"may_borrow_archive_item",
"needs_librarian_review"
] | [
"Reader F has an active membership.",
"Reader A has a special request."
] | [] | [] | {
"has_active_membership": "has an active membership",
"has_borrowing_clearance": "has borrowing clearance",
"has_special_request": "has a special request",
"may_borrow_archive_item": "may borrow an archive item",
"needs_librarian_review": "needs librarian review"
} | [
"has_active_membership",
"has_borrowing_clearance",
"has_special_request",
"may_borrow_archive_item",
"needs_librarian_review"
] | has_borrowing_clearance::Reader F | Reader F has borrowing clearance. | global_closed_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"has_active_membership::Reader F",
"has_special_request::Reader A"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_borrowing_clearance::Reader F",
"closure_atoms": [
"has_active_membership::Reader F",
"has_special_request::Reader A"
]
} | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
library_services_0210_closed_missing_with_open_distractor__owa__ask_act | library_services_0210_closed_missing_with_open_distractor__owa | library_services_0210_closed_missing_with_open_distractor | train | library_services | closed_missing_with_open_distractor | core_contrastive | owa | {
"name": "Open-world assumption",
"instruction": "Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown."
} | [] | [
"Reader A has an active membership.",
"Reader B has a special request."
] | [] | [] | {
"has_active_membership": "has an active membership",
"has_borrowing_clearance": "has borrowing clearance",
"has_special_request": "has a special request",
"may_borrow_archive_item": "may borrow an archive item",
"needs_librarian_review": "needs librarian review"
} | [
"has_active_membership",
"has_borrowing_clearance",
"has_special_request",
"may_borrow_archive_item",
"needs_librarian_review"
] | has_borrowing_clearance::Reader A | Reader A has borrowing clearance. | open_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"has_active_membership::Reader A",
"has_special_request::Reader B"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_borrowing_clearance::Reader A",
"closure_atoms": [
"has_active_membership::Reader A",
"has_special_request::Reader B"
]
} | unknown | request_information | has_borrowing_clearance | Reader A | has_borrowing_clearance::Reader A | Is it true that Reader A has borrowing clearance? | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
finance_controls_0138_closed_derived_missing_antecedent__cwa__ask_act | finance_controls_0138_closed_derived_missing_antecedent__cwa | finance_controls_0138_closed_derived_missing_antecedent | dev | finance_controls | closed_derived_missing_antecedent | core_contrastive | cwa | {
"name": "Closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false."
} | [
"has_compliance_clearance",
"has_manual_exception",
"may_receive_wire",
"needs_compliance_review",
"passed_kyc"
] | [
"Account 12 passed KYC checks."
] | [] | [
"If an account passed KYC checks and has compliance clearance, then that account may receive a wire transfer."
] | {
"passed_kyc": "passed KYC checks",
"has_compliance_clearance": "has compliance clearance",
"has_manual_exception": "has a manual exception",
"may_receive_wire": "may receive a wire transfer",
"needs_compliance_review": "needs compliance review"
} | [
"has_compliance_clearance",
"has_manual_exception",
"may_receive_wire",
"needs_compliance_review",
"passed_kyc"
] | may_receive_wire::Account 12 | Account 12 may receive a wire transfer. | global_closed_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"passed_kyc::Account 12"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [
{
"antecedents": [
"passed_kyc::Account 12",
"has_compliance_clearance::Account 12"
],
"conclusion": "may_receive_wire::Account 12",
"text": "If an account passed KYC checks and has... | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
hospital_access_0033_explicit_negative_closed__owa__ask_act | hospital_access_0033_explicit_negative_closed__owa | hospital_access_0033_explicit_negative_closed | train | hospital_access | explicit_negative_closed | control_explicit_negative | owa | {
"name": "Open-world assumption",
"instruction": "Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown."
} | [] | [
"Farid has completed safety training."
] | [
"Dylan does not has security clearance."
] | [] | {
"completed_training": "has completed safety training",
"has_clearance": "has security clearance",
"assigned_to_trial": "is assigned to the clinical trial",
"may_enter_lab": "may enter Lab A",
"needs_supervisor_review": "needs supervisor review"
} | [
"assigned_to_trial",
"completed_training",
"has_clearance",
"may_enter_lab",
"needs_supervisor_review"
] | has_clearance::Dylan | Dylan has security clearance. | explicit_negative_fact | {
"positive_atoms": [
"completed_training::Farid"
],
"negative_atoms": [
"has_clearance::Dylan"
],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_clearance::Dylan",
"closure_atoms": [
"completed_training::Farid"
]
} | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
cloud_deployment_0255_open_missing_with_closed_distractor__lcwa__ask_act | cloud_deployment_0255_open_missing_with_closed_distractor__lcwa | cloud_deployment_0255_open_missing_with_closed_distractor | train | cloud_deployment | open_missing_with_closed_distractor | core_contrastive | lcwa | {
"name": "Locally closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown."
} | [
"has_deployment_approval",
"may_deploy"
] | [
"Service E has deployment approval.",
"Service E passed unit tests."
] | [] | [] | {
"passed_unit_tests": "passed unit tests",
"has_deployment_approval": "has deployment approval",
"has_incident_note": "has an incident note",
"may_deploy": "may deploy to production",
"needs_sre_review": "needs SRE review"
} | [
"has_deployment_approval",
"has_incident_note",
"may_deploy",
"needs_sre_review",
"passed_unit_tests"
] | has_incident_note::Service D | Service D has an incident note. | local_open_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"has_deployment_approval::Service E",
"passed_unit_tests::Service E"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_incident_note::Service D",
"closure_atoms": [
"has_deployment_approval::Service E",
"passed_unit_tests::Service E"
]
} | unknown | request_information | has_incident_note | Service D | has_incident_note::Service D | Is it true that Service D has an incident note? | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
library_services_0239_explicit_negative_open__lcwa__ask_act | library_services_0239_explicit_negative_open__lcwa | library_services_0239_explicit_negative_open | test | library_services | explicit_negative_open | control_explicit_negative | lcwa | {
"name": "Locally closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown."
} | [
"has_borrowing_clearance",
"may_borrow_archive_item"
] | [
"Reader B has an active membership."
] | [
"Reader F does not has a special request."
] | [] | {
"has_active_membership": "has an active membership",
"has_borrowing_clearance": "has borrowing clearance",
"has_special_request": "has a special request",
"may_borrow_archive_item": "may borrow an archive item",
"needs_librarian_review": "needs librarian review"
} | [
"has_active_membership",
"has_borrowing_clearance",
"has_special_request",
"may_borrow_archive_item",
"needs_librarian_review"
] | has_special_request::Reader F | Reader F has a special request. | explicit_negative_fact | {
"positive_atoms": [
"has_active_membership::Reader B"
],
"negative_atoms": [
"has_special_request::Reader F"
],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_special_request::Reader F",
"closure_atoms": [
"has_active_membership::Reader B"
]
} | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
hospital_access_0009_closed_missing_with_open_distractor__lcwa__ask_act | hospital_access_0009_closed_missing_with_open_distractor__lcwa | hospital_access_0009_closed_missing_with_open_distractor | test | hospital_access | closed_missing_with_open_distractor | core_contrastive | lcwa | {
"name": "Locally closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown."
} | [
"has_clearance"
] | [
"Elena is assigned to the clinical trial.",
"Dylan has completed safety training."
] | [] | [] | {
"completed_training": "has completed safety training",
"has_clearance": "has security clearance",
"assigned_to_trial": "is assigned to the clinical trial",
"may_enter_lab": "may enter Lab A",
"needs_supervisor_review": "needs supervisor review"
} | [
"assigned_to_trial",
"completed_training",
"has_clearance",
"may_enter_lab",
"needs_supervisor_review"
] | has_clearance::Dylan | Dylan has security clearance. | local_closed_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"assigned_to_trial::Elena",
"completed_training::Dylan"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_clearance::Dylan",
"closure_atoms": [
"assigned_to_trial::Elena",
"completed_training::Dylan"
]
} | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
procurement_review_0287_open_missing_direct__cwa__ask_act | procurement_review_0287_open_missing_direct__cwa | procurement_review_0287_open_missing_direct | train | procurement_review | open_missing_direct | core_contrastive | cwa | {
"name": "Closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false."
} | [
"has_risk_note",
"has_vendor_approval",
"may_receive_purchase_order",
"needs_procurement_review",
"submitted_tax_form"
] | [
"Vendor F submitted a tax form."
] | [] | [] | {
"submitted_tax_form": "submitted a tax form",
"has_vendor_approval": "has vendor approval",
"has_risk_note": "has a risk note",
"may_receive_purchase_order": "may receive a purchase order",
"needs_procurement_review": "needs procurement review"
} | [
"has_risk_note",
"has_vendor_approval",
"may_receive_purchase_order",
"needs_procurement_review",
"submitted_tax_form"
] | has_risk_note::Vendor F | Vendor F has a risk note. | global_closed_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"submitted_tax_form::Vendor F"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_risk_note::Vendor F",
"closure_atoms": [
"submitted_tax_form::Vendor F"
]
} | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
library_services_0205_open_missing_direct__cwa__ask_act | library_services_0205_open_missing_direct__cwa | library_services_0205_open_missing_direct | train | library_services | open_missing_direct | core_contrastive | cwa | {
"name": "Closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false."
} | [
"has_active_membership",
"has_borrowing_clearance",
"has_special_request",
"may_borrow_archive_item",
"needs_librarian_review"
] | [
"Reader B has an active membership."
] | [] | [] | {
"has_active_membership": "has an active membership",
"has_borrowing_clearance": "has borrowing clearance",
"has_special_request": "has a special request",
"may_borrow_archive_item": "may borrow an archive item",
"needs_librarian_review": "needs librarian review"
} | [
"has_active_membership",
"has_borrowing_clearance",
"has_special_request",
"may_borrow_archive_item",
"needs_librarian_review"
] | has_special_request::Reader B | Reader B has a special request. | global_closed_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"has_active_membership::Reader B"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_special_request::Reader B",
"closure_atoms": [
"has_active_membership::Reader B"
]
} | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
hospital_access_0035_explicit_negative_closed__lcwa__ask_act | hospital_access_0035_explicit_negative_closed__lcwa | hospital_access_0035_explicit_negative_closed | train | hospital_access | explicit_negative_closed | control_explicit_negative | lcwa | {
"name": "Locally closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown."
} | [
"has_clearance"
] | [
"Ben has completed safety training."
] | [
"Farid does not has security clearance."
] | [] | {
"completed_training": "has completed safety training",
"has_clearance": "has security clearance",
"assigned_to_trial": "is assigned to the clinical trial",
"may_enter_lab": "may enter Lab A",
"needs_supervisor_review": "needs supervisor review"
} | [
"assigned_to_trial",
"completed_training",
"has_clearance",
"may_enter_lab",
"needs_supervisor_review"
] | has_clearance::Farid | Farid has security clearance. | explicit_negative_fact | {
"positive_atoms": [
"completed_training::Ben"
],
"negative_atoms": [
"has_clearance::Farid"
],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_clearance::Farid",
"closure_atoms": [
"completed_training::Ben"
]
} | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
finance_controls_0134_open_missing_with_closed_distractor__cwa__ask_act | finance_controls_0134_open_missing_with_closed_distractor__cwa | finance_controls_0134_open_missing_with_closed_distractor | train | finance_controls | open_missing_with_closed_distractor | core_contrastive | cwa | {
"name": "Closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false."
} | [
"has_compliance_clearance",
"has_manual_exception",
"may_receive_wire",
"needs_compliance_review",
"passed_kyc"
] | [
"Account 48 has compliance clearance.",
"Account 48 passed KYC checks."
] | [] | [] | {
"passed_kyc": "passed KYC checks",
"has_compliance_clearance": "has compliance clearance",
"has_manual_exception": "has a manual exception",
"may_receive_wire": "may receive a wire transfer",
"needs_compliance_review": "needs compliance review"
} | [
"has_compliance_clearance",
"has_manual_exception",
"may_receive_wire",
"needs_compliance_review",
"passed_kyc"
] | has_manual_exception::Account 35 | Account 35 has a manual exception. | global_closed_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"has_compliance_clearance::Account 48",
"passed_kyc::Account 48"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_manual_exception::Account 35",
"closure_atoms": [
"has_compliance_clearance::Account 48",
"passed_kyc::Account 48"
]
} | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
library_services_0239_explicit_negative_open__cwa__ask_act | library_services_0239_explicit_negative_open__cwa | library_services_0239_explicit_negative_open | test | library_services | explicit_negative_open | control_explicit_negative | cwa | {
"name": "Closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false."
} | [
"has_active_membership",
"has_borrowing_clearance",
"has_special_request",
"may_borrow_archive_item",
"needs_librarian_review"
] | [
"Reader B has an active membership."
] | [
"Reader F does not has a special request."
] | [] | {
"has_active_membership": "has an active membership",
"has_borrowing_clearance": "has borrowing clearance",
"has_special_request": "has a special request",
"may_borrow_archive_item": "may borrow an archive item",
"needs_librarian_review": "needs librarian review"
} | [
"has_active_membership",
"has_borrowing_clearance",
"has_special_request",
"may_borrow_archive_item",
"needs_librarian_review"
] | has_special_request::Reader F | Reader F has a special request. | explicit_negative_fact | {
"positive_atoms": [
"has_active_membership::Reader B"
],
"negative_atoms": [
"has_special_request::Reader F"
],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_special_request::Reader F",
"closure_atoms": [
"has_active_membership::Reader B"
]
} | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
manufacturing_quality_0083_closed_missing_direct__cwa__ask_act | manufacturing_quality_0083_closed_missing_direct__cwa | manufacturing_quality_0083_closed_missing_direct | train | manufacturing_quality | closed_missing_direct | core_contrastive | cwa | {
"name": "Closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false."
} | [
"has_release_approval",
"has_supplier_note",
"may_ship",
"needs_engineer_review",
"passed_visual_check"
] | [
"Part F passed the visual check."
] | [] | [] | {
"passed_visual_check": "passed the visual check",
"has_release_approval": "has release approval",
"has_supplier_note": "has a supplier note",
"may_ship": "may ship to customers",
"needs_engineer_review": "needs engineer review"
} | [
"has_release_approval",
"has_supplier_note",
"may_ship",
"needs_engineer_review",
"passed_visual_check"
] | has_release_approval::Part F | Part F has release approval. | global_closed_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"passed_visual_check::Part F"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_release_approval::Part F",
"closure_atoms": [
"passed_visual_check::Part F"
]
} | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
library_services_0211_closed_missing_with_open_distractor__owa__ask_act | library_services_0211_closed_missing_with_open_distractor__owa | library_services_0211_closed_missing_with_open_distractor | test | library_services | closed_missing_with_open_distractor | core_contrastive | owa | {
"name": "Open-world assumption",
"instruction": "Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown."
} | [] | [
"Reader B has an active membership.",
"Reader C has a special request."
] | [] | [] | {
"has_active_membership": "has an active membership",
"has_borrowing_clearance": "has borrowing clearance",
"has_special_request": "has a special request",
"may_borrow_archive_item": "may borrow an archive item",
"needs_librarian_review": "needs librarian review"
} | [
"has_active_membership",
"has_borrowing_clearance",
"has_special_request",
"may_borrow_archive_item",
"needs_librarian_review"
] | has_borrowing_clearance::Reader B | Reader B has borrowing clearance. | open_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"has_active_membership::Reader B",
"has_special_request::Reader C"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_borrowing_clearance::Reader B",
"closure_atoms": [
"has_active_membership::Reader B",
"has_special_request::Reader C"
]
} | unknown | request_information | has_borrowing_clearance | Reader B | has_borrowing_clearance::Reader B | Is it true that Reader B has borrowing clearance? | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
library_services_0214_open_missing_with_closed_distractor__lcwa__ask_act | library_services_0214_open_missing_with_closed_distractor__lcwa | library_services_0214_open_missing_with_closed_distractor | train | library_services | open_missing_with_closed_distractor | core_contrastive | lcwa | {
"name": "Locally closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown."
} | [
"has_borrowing_clearance",
"may_borrow_archive_item"
] | [
"Reader F has an active membership.",
"Reader F has borrowing clearance."
] | [] | [] | {
"has_active_membership": "has an active membership",
"has_borrowing_clearance": "has borrowing clearance",
"has_special_request": "has a special request",
"may_borrow_archive_item": "may borrow an archive item",
"needs_librarian_review": "needs librarian review"
} | [
"has_active_membership",
"has_borrowing_clearance",
"has_special_request",
"may_borrow_archive_item",
"needs_librarian_review"
] | has_special_request::Reader E | Reader E has a special request. | local_open_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"has_active_membership::Reader F",
"has_borrowing_clearance::Reader F"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_special_request::Reader E",
"closure_atoms": [
"has_active_membership::Reader F",
"has_borrowing_clearance::Reader F"
]
} | unknown | request_information | has_special_request | Reader E | has_special_request::Reader E | Is it true that Reader E has a special request? | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
robotics_operations_0178_closed_derived_missing_antecedent__lcwa__ask_act | robotics_operations_0178_closed_derived_missing_antecedent__lcwa | robotics_operations_0178_closed_derived_missing_antecedent | train | robotics_operations | closed_derived_missing_antecedent | core_contrastive | lcwa | {
"name": "Locally closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown."
} | [
"has_shift_clearance",
"may_start_shift"
] | [
"Rover 5 passed diagnostics."
] | [] | [
"If a robot passed diagnostics and has shift clearance, then that robot may start its shift."
] | {
"passed_diagnostics": "passed diagnostics",
"has_shift_clearance": "has shift clearance",
"has_field_note": "has a field note",
"may_start_shift": "may start its shift",
"needs_operator_review": "needs operator review"
} | [
"has_field_note",
"has_shift_clearance",
"may_start_shift",
"needs_operator_review",
"passed_diagnostics"
] | may_start_shift::Rover 5 | Rover 5 may start its shift. | local_closed_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"passed_diagnostics::Rover 5"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [
{
"antecedents": [
"passed_diagnostics::Rover 5",
"has_shift_clearance::Rover 5"
],
"conclusion": "may_start_shift::Rover 5",
"text": "If a robot passed diagnostics and has shi... | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
university_registration_0076_explicit_negative_open__lcwa__ask_act | university_registration_0076_explicit_negative_open__lcwa | university_registration_0076_explicit_negative_open | test | university_registration | explicit_negative_open | control_explicit_negative | lcwa | {
"name": "Locally closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown."
} | [
"has_advising_clearance",
"may_register"
] | [
"Mia passed the qualifying exam."
] | [
"Iris does not has an external scholarship."
] | [] | {
"passed_exam": "passed the qualifying exam",
"has_advising_clearance": "has advising clearance",
"has_external_scholarship": "has an external scholarship",
"may_register": "may register for the seminar",
"needs_manual_audit": "needs a manual audit"
} | [
"has_advising_clearance",
"has_external_scholarship",
"may_register",
"needs_manual_audit",
"passed_exam"
] | has_external_scholarship::Iris | Iris has an external scholarship. | explicit_negative_fact | {
"positive_atoms": [
"passed_exam::Mia"
],
"negative_atoms": [
"has_external_scholarship::Iris"
],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_external_scholarship::Iris",
"closure_atoms": [
"passed_exam::Mia"
]
} | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
procurement_review_0297_closed_derived_missing_antecedent__lcwa__ask_act | procurement_review_0297_closed_derived_missing_antecedent__lcwa | procurement_review_0297_closed_derived_missing_antecedent | train | procurement_review | closed_derived_missing_antecedent | core_contrastive | lcwa | {
"name": "Locally closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown."
} | [
"has_vendor_approval",
"may_receive_purchase_order"
] | [
"Vendor D submitted a tax form."
] | [] | [
"If a vendor submitted a tax form and has vendor approval, then that vendor may receive a purchase order."
] | {
"submitted_tax_form": "submitted a tax form",
"has_vendor_approval": "has vendor approval",
"has_risk_note": "has a risk note",
"may_receive_purchase_order": "may receive a purchase order",
"needs_procurement_review": "needs procurement review"
} | [
"has_risk_note",
"has_vendor_approval",
"may_receive_purchase_order",
"needs_procurement_review",
"submitted_tax_form"
] | may_receive_purchase_order::Vendor D | Vendor D may receive a purchase order. | local_closed_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"submitted_tax_form::Vendor D"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [
{
"antecedents": [
"submitted_tax_form::Vendor D",
"has_vendor_approval::Vendor D"
],
"conclusion": "may_receive_purchase_order::Vendor D",
"text": "If a vendor submitted a ta... | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
hospital_access_0022_open_derived_missing_antecedent__lcwa__ask_act | hospital_access_0022_open_derived_missing_antecedent__lcwa | hospital_access_0022_open_derived_missing_antecedent | train | hospital_access | open_derived_missing_antecedent | core_contrastive | lcwa | {
"name": "Locally closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown."
} | [
"has_clearance",
"may_enter_lab"
] | [
"Elena has completed safety training."
] | [] | [
"If a staff member is assigned to the clinical trial, then that staff member needs supervisor review."
] | {
"completed_training": "has completed safety training",
"has_clearance": "has security clearance",
"assigned_to_trial": "is assigned to the clinical trial",
"may_enter_lab": "may enter Lab A",
"needs_supervisor_review": "needs supervisor review"
} | [
"assigned_to_trial",
"completed_training",
"has_clearance",
"may_enter_lab",
"needs_supervisor_review"
] | needs_supervisor_review::Elena | Elena needs supervisor review. | local_open_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"completed_training::Elena"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [
{
"antecedents": [
"assigned_to_trial::Elena"
],
"conclusion": "needs_supervisor_review::Elena",
"text": "If a staff member is assigned to the clinical trial, then that staff member need... | unknown | request_information | assigned_to_trial | Elena | assigned_to_trial::Elena | Is it true that Elena is assigned to the clinical trial? | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
finance_controls_0129_closed_missing_with_open_distractor__owa__ask_act | finance_controls_0129_closed_missing_with_open_distractor__owa | finance_controls_0129_closed_missing_with_open_distractor | train | finance_controls | closed_missing_with_open_distractor | core_contrastive | owa | {
"name": "Open-world assumption",
"instruction": "Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown."
} | [] | [
"Account 59 has a manual exception.",
"Account 48 passed KYC checks."
] | [] | [] | {
"passed_kyc": "passed KYC checks",
"has_compliance_clearance": "has compliance clearance",
"has_manual_exception": "has a manual exception",
"may_receive_wire": "may receive a wire transfer",
"needs_compliance_review": "needs compliance review"
} | [
"has_compliance_clearance",
"has_manual_exception",
"may_receive_wire",
"needs_compliance_review",
"passed_kyc"
] | has_compliance_clearance::Account 48 | Account 48 has compliance clearance. | open_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"has_manual_exception::Account 59",
"passed_kyc::Account 48"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_compliance_clearance::Account 48",
"closure_atoms": [
"has_manual_exception::Account 59",
"passed_kyc::Account 48"
]
} | unknown | request_information | has_compliance_clearance | Account 48 | has_compliance_clearance::Account 48 | Is it true that Account 48 has compliance clearance? | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
cloud_deployment_0272_explicit_negative_closed__owa__ask_act | cloud_deployment_0272_explicit_negative_closed__owa | cloud_deployment_0272_explicit_negative_closed | train | cloud_deployment | explicit_negative_closed | control_explicit_negative | owa | {
"name": "Open-world assumption",
"instruction": "Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown."
} | [] | [
"Service E passed unit tests."
] | [
"Service C does not has deployment approval."
] | [] | {
"passed_unit_tests": "passed unit tests",
"has_deployment_approval": "has deployment approval",
"has_incident_note": "has an incident note",
"may_deploy": "may deploy to production",
"needs_sre_review": "needs SRE review"
} | [
"has_deployment_approval",
"has_incident_note",
"may_deploy",
"needs_sre_review",
"passed_unit_tests"
] | has_deployment_approval::Service C | Service C has deployment approval. | explicit_negative_fact | {
"positive_atoms": [
"passed_unit_tests::Service E"
],
"negative_atoms": [
"has_deployment_approval::Service C"
],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_deployment_approval::Service C",
"closure_atoms": [
"passed_unit_tests::Service E"
]
} | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
cloud_deployment_0253_open_missing_with_closed_distractor__cwa__ask_act | cloud_deployment_0253_open_missing_with_closed_distractor__cwa | cloud_deployment_0253_open_missing_with_closed_distractor | train | cloud_deployment | open_missing_with_closed_distractor | core_contrastive | cwa | {
"name": "Closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false."
} | [
"has_deployment_approval",
"has_incident_note",
"may_deploy",
"needs_sre_review",
"passed_unit_tests"
] | [
"Service C has deployment approval.",
"Service C passed unit tests."
] | [] | [] | {
"passed_unit_tests": "passed unit tests",
"has_deployment_approval": "has deployment approval",
"has_incident_note": "has an incident note",
"may_deploy": "may deploy to production",
"needs_sre_review": "needs SRE review"
} | [
"has_deployment_approval",
"has_incident_note",
"may_deploy",
"needs_sre_review",
"passed_unit_tests"
] | has_incident_note::Service B | Service B has an incident note. | global_closed_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"has_deployment_approval::Service C",
"passed_unit_tests::Service C"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_incident_note::Service B",
"closure_atoms": [
"has_deployment_approval::Service C",
"passed_unit_tests::Service C"
]
} | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
library_services_0215_open_missing_with_closed_distractor__lcwa__ask_act | library_services_0215_open_missing_with_closed_distractor__lcwa | library_services_0215_open_missing_with_closed_distractor | train | library_services | open_missing_with_closed_distractor | core_contrastive | lcwa | {
"name": "Locally closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown."
} | [
"has_borrowing_clearance",
"may_borrow_archive_item"
] | [
"Reader A has an active membership.",
"Reader A has borrowing clearance."
] | [] | [] | {
"has_active_membership": "has an active membership",
"has_borrowing_clearance": "has borrowing clearance",
"has_special_request": "has a special request",
"may_borrow_archive_item": "may borrow an archive item",
"needs_librarian_review": "needs librarian review"
} | [
"has_active_membership",
"has_borrowing_clearance",
"has_special_request",
"may_borrow_archive_item",
"needs_librarian_review"
] | has_special_request::Reader F | Reader F has a special request. | local_open_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"has_active_membership::Reader A",
"has_borrowing_clearance::Reader A"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_special_request::Reader F",
"closure_atoms": [
"has_active_membership::Reader A",
"has_borrowing_clearance::Reader A"
]
} | unknown | request_information | has_special_request | Reader F | has_special_request::Reader F | Is it true that Reader F has a special request? | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
manufacturing_quality_0089_closed_missing_with_open_distractor__lcwa__ask_act | manufacturing_quality_0089_closed_missing_with_open_distractor__lcwa | manufacturing_quality_0089_closed_missing_with_open_distractor | dev | manufacturing_quality | closed_missing_with_open_distractor | core_contrastive | lcwa | {
"name": "Locally closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown."
} | [
"has_release_approval"
] | [
"Part A has a supplier note.",
"Part F passed the visual check."
] | [] | [] | {
"passed_visual_check": "passed the visual check",
"has_release_approval": "has release approval",
"has_supplier_note": "has a supplier note",
"may_ship": "may ship to customers",
"needs_engineer_review": "needs engineer review"
} | [
"has_release_approval",
"has_supplier_note",
"may_ship",
"needs_engineer_review",
"passed_visual_check"
] | has_release_approval::Part F | Part F has release approval. | local_closed_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"has_supplier_note::Part A",
"passed_visual_check::Part F"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_release_approval::Part F",
"closure_atoms": [
"has_supplier_note::Part A",
"passed_visual_check::Part F"
]
} | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
robotics_operations_0184_entailed_closed_conclusion__cwa__ask_act | robotics_operations_0184_entailed_closed_conclusion__cwa | robotics_operations_0184_entailed_closed_conclusion | train | robotics_operations | entailed_closed_conclusion | control_entailed | cwa | {
"name": "Closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false."
} | [
"has_field_note",
"has_shift_clearance",
"may_start_shift",
"needs_operator_review",
"passed_diagnostics"
] | [
"Rover 5 has shift clearance.",
"Rover 5 passed diagnostics."
] | [] | [
"If a robot passed diagnostics and has shift clearance, then that robot may start its shift."
] | {
"passed_diagnostics": "passed diagnostics",
"has_shift_clearance": "has shift clearance",
"has_field_note": "has a field note",
"may_start_shift": "may start its shift",
"needs_operator_review": "needs operator review"
} | [
"has_field_note",
"has_shift_clearance",
"may_start_shift",
"needs_operator_review",
"passed_diagnostics"
] | may_start_shift::Rover 5 | Rover 5 may start its shift. | entailed_by_fact_or_rule | {
"positive_atoms": [
"has_shift_clearance::Rover 5",
"passed_diagnostics::Rover 5"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [
{
"antecedents": [
"passed_diagnostics::Rover 5",
"has_shift_clearance::Rover 5"
],
"conclusion": "may_start_shift::Rover 5",
"text": "If a ... | true | approve | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
procurement_review_0293_open_missing_with_closed_distractor__lcwa__ask_act | procurement_review_0293_open_missing_with_closed_distractor__lcwa | procurement_review_0293_open_missing_with_closed_distractor | train | procurement_review | open_missing_with_closed_distractor | core_contrastive | lcwa | {
"name": "Locally closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown."
} | [
"has_vendor_approval",
"may_receive_purchase_order"
] | [
"Vendor A has vendor approval.",
"Vendor A submitted a tax form."
] | [] | [] | {
"submitted_tax_form": "submitted a tax form",
"has_vendor_approval": "has vendor approval",
"has_risk_note": "has a risk note",
"may_receive_purchase_order": "may receive a purchase order",
"needs_procurement_review": "needs procurement review"
} | [
"has_risk_note",
"has_vendor_approval",
"may_receive_purchase_order",
"needs_procurement_review",
"submitted_tax_form"
] | has_risk_note::Vendor F | Vendor F has a risk note. | local_open_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"has_vendor_approval::Vendor A",
"submitted_tax_form::Vendor A"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_risk_note::Vendor F",
"closure_atoms": [
"has_vendor_approval::Vendor A",
"submitted_tax_form::Vendor A"
]
} | unknown | request_information | has_risk_note | Vendor F | has_risk_note::Vendor F | Is it true that Vendor F has a risk note? | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
hospital_access_0009_closed_missing_with_open_distractor__cwa__ask_act | hospital_access_0009_closed_missing_with_open_distractor__cwa | hospital_access_0009_closed_missing_with_open_distractor | test | hospital_access | closed_missing_with_open_distractor | core_contrastive | cwa | {
"name": "Closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false."
} | [
"assigned_to_trial",
"completed_training",
"has_clearance",
"may_enter_lab",
"needs_supervisor_review"
] | [
"Elena is assigned to the clinical trial.",
"Dylan has completed safety training."
] | [] | [] | {
"completed_training": "has completed safety training",
"has_clearance": "has security clearance",
"assigned_to_trial": "is assigned to the clinical trial",
"may_enter_lab": "may enter Lab A",
"needs_supervisor_review": "needs supervisor review"
} | [
"assigned_to_trial",
"completed_training",
"has_clearance",
"may_enter_lab",
"needs_supervisor_review"
] | has_clearance::Dylan | Dylan has security clearance. | global_closed_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"assigned_to_trial::Elena",
"completed_training::Dylan"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_clearance::Dylan",
"closure_atoms": [
"assigned_to_trial::Elena",
"completed_training::Dylan"
]
} | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
cloud_deployment_0249_closed_missing_with_open_distractor__cwa__ask_act | cloud_deployment_0249_closed_missing_with_open_distractor__cwa | cloud_deployment_0249_closed_missing_with_open_distractor | train | cloud_deployment | closed_missing_with_open_distractor | core_contrastive | cwa | {
"name": "Closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false."
} | [
"has_deployment_approval",
"has_incident_note",
"may_deploy",
"needs_sre_review",
"passed_unit_tests"
] | [
"Service E has an incident note.",
"Service D passed unit tests."
] | [] | [] | {
"passed_unit_tests": "passed unit tests",
"has_deployment_approval": "has deployment approval",
"has_incident_note": "has an incident note",
"may_deploy": "may deploy to production",
"needs_sre_review": "needs SRE review"
} | [
"has_deployment_approval",
"has_incident_note",
"may_deploy",
"needs_sre_review",
"passed_unit_tests"
] | has_deployment_approval::Service D | Service D has deployment approval. | global_closed_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"has_incident_note::Service E",
"passed_unit_tests::Service D"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_deployment_approval::Service D",
"closure_atoms": [
"has_incident_note::Service E",
"passed_unit_tests::Service D"
]
} | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
robotics_operations_0185_entailed_closed_conclusion__lcwa__ask_act | robotics_operations_0185_entailed_closed_conclusion__lcwa | robotics_operations_0185_entailed_closed_conclusion | train | robotics_operations | entailed_closed_conclusion | control_entailed | lcwa | {
"name": "Locally closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown."
} | [
"has_shift_clearance",
"may_start_shift"
] | [
"Rover 6 has shift clearance.",
"Rover 6 passed diagnostics."
] | [] | [
"If a robot passed diagnostics and has shift clearance, then that robot may start its shift."
] | {
"passed_diagnostics": "passed diagnostics",
"has_shift_clearance": "has shift clearance",
"has_field_note": "has a field note",
"may_start_shift": "may start its shift",
"needs_operator_review": "needs operator review"
} | [
"has_field_note",
"has_shift_clearance",
"may_start_shift",
"needs_operator_review",
"passed_diagnostics"
] | may_start_shift::Rover 6 | Rover 6 may start its shift. | entailed_by_fact_or_rule | {
"positive_atoms": [
"has_shift_clearance::Rover 6",
"passed_diagnostics::Rover 6"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [
{
"antecedents": [
"passed_diagnostics::Rover 6",
"has_shift_clearance::Rover 6"
],
"conclusion": "may_start_shift::Rover 6",
"text": "If a ... | true | approve | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
university_registration_0068_entailed_open_conclusion__owa__ask_act | university_registration_0068_entailed_open_conclusion__owa | university_registration_0068_entailed_open_conclusion | test | university_registration | entailed_open_conclusion | control_entailed | owa | {
"name": "Open-world assumption",
"instruction": "Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown."
} | [] | [
"Lena has an external scholarship."
] | [] | [
"If a student has an external scholarship, then that student needs a manual audit."
] | {
"passed_exam": "passed the qualifying exam",
"has_advising_clearance": "has advising clearance",
"has_external_scholarship": "has an external scholarship",
"may_register": "may register for the seminar",
"needs_manual_audit": "needs a manual audit"
} | [
"has_advising_clearance",
"has_external_scholarship",
"may_register",
"needs_manual_audit",
"passed_exam"
] | needs_manual_audit::Lena | Lena needs a manual audit. | entailed_by_fact_or_rule | {
"positive_atoms": [
"has_external_scholarship::Lena"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [
{
"antecedents": [
"has_external_scholarship::Lena"
],
"conclusion": "needs_manual_audit::Lena",
"text": "If a student has an external scholarship, then that student needs a manual ... | true | approve | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
library_services_0204_open_missing_direct__cwa__ask_act | library_services_0204_open_missing_direct__cwa | library_services_0204_open_missing_direct | train | library_services | open_missing_direct | core_contrastive | cwa | {
"name": "Closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false."
} | [
"has_active_membership",
"has_borrowing_clearance",
"has_special_request",
"may_borrow_archive_item",
"needs_librarian_review"
] | [
"Reader A has an active membership."
] | [] | [] | {
"has_active_membership": "has an active membership",
"has_borrowing_clearance": "has borrowing clearance",
"has_special_request": "has a special request",
"may_borrow_archive_item": "may borrow an archive item",
"needs_librarian_review": "needs librarian review"
} | [
"has_active_membership",
"has_borrowing_clearance",
"has_special_request",
"may_borrow_archive_item",
"needs_librarian_review"
] | has_special_request::Reader A | Reader A has a special request. | global_closed_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"has_active_membership::Reader A"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_special_request::Reader A",
"closure_atoms": [
"has_active_membership::Reader A"
]
} | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
procurement_review_0308_entailed_open_conclusion__owa__ask_act | procurement_review_0308_entailed_open_conclusion__owa | procurement_review_0308_entailed_open_conclusion | test | procurement_review | entailed_open_conclusion | control_entailed | owa | {
"name": "Open-world assumption",
"instruction": "Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown."
} | [] | [
"Vendor C has a risk note."
] | [] | [
"If a vendor has a risk note, then that vendor needs procurement review."
] | {
"submitted_tax_form": "submitted a tax form",
"has_vendor_approval": "has vendor approval",
"has_risk_note": "has a risk note",
"may_receive_purchase_order": "may receive a purchase order",
"needs_procurement_review": "needs procurement review"
} | [
"has_risk_note",
"has_vendor_approval",
"may_receive_purchase_order",
"needs_procurement_review",
"submitted_tax_form"
] | needs_procurement_review::Vendor C | Vendor C needs procurement review. | entailed_by_fact_or_rule | {
"positive_atoms": [
"has_risk_note::Vendor C"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [
{
"antecedents": [
"has_risk_note::Vendor C"
],
"conclusion": "needs_procurement_review::Vendor C",
"text": "If a vendor has a risk note, then that vendor needs procurement review."
}
... | true | approve | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
library_services_0233_explicit_negative_closed__cwa__ask_act | library_services_0233_explicit_negative_closed__cwa | library_services_0233_explicit_negative_closed | train | library_services | explicit_negative_closed | control_explicit_negative | cwa | {
"name": "Closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false."
} | [
"has_active_membership",
"has_borrowing_clearance",
"has_special_request",
"may_borrow_archive_item",
"needs_librarian_review"
] | [
"Reader B has an active membership."
] | [
"Reader F does not has borrowing clearance."
] | [] | {
"has_active_membership": "has an active membership",
"has_borrowing_clearance": "has borrowing clearance",
"has_special_request": "has a special request",
"may_borrow_archive_item": "may borrow an archive item",
"needs_librarian_review": "needs librarian review"
} | [
"has_active_membership",
"has_borrowing_clearance",
"has_special_request",
"may_borrow_archive_item",
"needs_librarian_review"
] | has_borrowing_clearance::Reader F | Reader F has borrowing clearance. | explicit_negative_fact | {
"positive_atoms": [
"has_active_membership::Reader B"
],
"negative_atoms": [
"has_borrowing_clearance::Reader F"
],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_borrowing_clearance::Reader F",
"closure_atoms": [
"has_active_membership::Reader B"
]
} | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
robotics_operations_0171_closed_missing_with_open_distractor__owa__ask_act | robotics_operations_0171_closed_missing_with_open_distractor__owa | robotics_operations_0171_closed_missing_with_open_distractor | train | robotics_operations | closed_missing_with_open_distractor | core_contrastive | owa | {
"name": "Open-world assumption",
"instruction": "Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown."
} | [] | [
"Rover 5 has a field note.",
"Rover 4 passed diagnostics."
] | [] | [] | {
"passed_diagnostics": "passed diagnostics",
"has_shift_clearance": "has shift clearance",
"has_field_note": "has a field note",
"may_start_shift": "may start its shift",
"needs_operator_review": "needs operator review"
} | [
"has_field_note",
"has_shift_clearance",
"may_start_shift",
"needs_operator_review",
"passed_diagnostics"
] | has_shift_clearance::Rover 4 | Rover 4 has shift clearance. | open_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"has_field_note::Rover 5",
"passed_diagnostics::Rover 4"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_shift_clearance::Rover 4",
"closure_atoms": [
"has_field_note::Rover 5",
"passed_diagnostics::Rover 4"
]
} | unknown | request_information | has_shift_clearance | Rover 4 | has_shift_clearance::Rover 4 | Is it true that Rover 4 has shift clearance? | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
finance_controls_0131_closed_missing_with_open_distractor__cwa__ask_act | finance_controls_0131_closed_missing_with_open_distractor__cwa | finance_controls_0131_closed_missing_with_open_distractor | train | finance_controls | closed_missing_with_open_distractor | core_contrastive | cwa | {
"name": "Closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false."
} | [
"has_compliance_clearance",
"has_manual_exception",
"may_receive_wire",
"needs_compliance_review",
"passed_kyc"
] | [
"Account 12 has a manual exception.",
"Account 61 passed KYC checks."
] | [] | [] | {
"passed_kyc": "passed KYC checks",
"has_compliance_clearance": "has compliance clearance",
"has_manual_exception": "has a manual exception",
"may_receive_wire": "may receive a wire transfer",
"needs_compliance_review": "needs compliance review"
} | [
"has_compliance_clearance",
"has_manual_exception",
"may_receive_wire",
"needs_compliance_review",
"passed_kyc"
] | has_compliance_clearance::Account 61 | Account 61 has compliance clearance. | global_closed_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"has_manual_exception::Account 12",
"passed_kyc::Account 61"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_compliance_clearance::Account 61",
"closure_atoms": [
"has_manual_exception::Account 12",
"passed_kyc::Account 61"
]
} | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
procurement_review_0296_closed_derived_missing_antecedent__owa__ask_act | procurement_review_0296_closed_derived_missing_antecedent__owa | procurement_review_0296_closed_derived_missing_antecedent | test | procurement_review | closed_derived_missing_antecedent | core_contrastive | owa | {
"name": "Open-world assumption",
"instruction": "Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown."
} | [] | [
"Vendor C submitted a tax form."
] | [] | [
"If a vendor submitted a tax form and has vendor approval, then that vendor may receive a purchase order."
] | {
"submitted_tax_form": "submitted a tax form",
"has_vendor_approval": "has vendor approval",
"has_risk_note": "has a risk note",
"may_receive_purchase_order": "may receive a purchase order",
"needs_procurement_review": "needs procurement review"
} | [
"has_risk_note",
"has_vendor_approval",
"may_receive_purchase_order",
"needs_procurement_review",
"submitted_tax_form"
] | may_receive_purchase_order::Vendor C | Vendor C may receive a purchase order. | open_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"submitted_tax_form::Vendor C"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [
{
"antecedents": [
"submitted_tax_form::Vendor C",
"has_vendor_approval::Vendor C"
],
"conclusion": "may_receive_purchase_order::Vendor C",
"text": "If a vendor submitted a ta... | unknown | request_information | has_vendor_approval | Vendor C | has_vendor_approval::Vendor C | Is it true that Vendor C has vendor approval? | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
procurement_review_0316_explicit_negative_open__owa__ask_act | procurement_review_0316_explicit_negative_open__owa | procurement_review_0316_explicit_negative_open | test | procurement_review | explicit_negative_open | control_explicit_negative | owa | {
"name": "Open-world assumption",
"instruction": "Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown."
} | [] | [
"Vendor A submitted a tax form."
] | [
"Vendor E does not has a risk note."
] | [] | {
"submitted_tax_form": "submitted a tax form",
"has_vendor_approval": "has vendor approval",
"has_risk_note": "has a risk note",
"may_receive_purchase_order": "may receive a purchase order",
"needs_procurement_review": "needs procurement review"
} | [
"has_risk_note",
"has_vendor_approval",
"may_receive_purchase_order",
"needs_procurement_review",
"submitted_tax_form"
] | has_risk_note::Vendor E | Vendor E has a risk note. | explicit_negative_fact | {
"positive_atoms": [
"submitted_tax_form::Vendor A"
],
"negative_atoms": [
"has_risk_note::Vendor E"
],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_risk_note::Vendor E",
"closure_atoms": [
"submitted_tax_form::Vendor A"
]
} | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
procurement_review_0303_open_derived_missing_antecedent__cwa__ask_act | procurement_review_0303_open_derived_missing_antecedent__cwa | procurement_review_0303_open_derived_missing_antecedent | train | procurement_review | open_derived_missing_antecedent | core_contrastive | cwa | {
"name": "Closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false."
} | [
"has_risk_note",
"has_vendor_approval",
"may_receive_purchase_order",
"needs_procurement_review",
"submitted_tax_form"
] | [
"Vendor D submitted a tax form."
] | [] | [
"If a vendor has a risk note, then that vendor needs procurement review."
] | {
"submitted_tax_form": "submitted a tax form",
"has_vendor_approval": "has vendor approval",
"has_risk_note": "has a risk note",
"may_receive_purchase_order": "may receive a purchase order",
"needs_procurement_review": "needs procurement review"
} | [
"has_risk_note",
"has_vendor_approval",
"may_receive_purchase_order",
"needs_procurement_review",
"submitted_tax_form"
] | needs_procurement_review::Vendor D | Vendor D needs procurement review. | global_closed_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"submitted_tax_form::Vendor D"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [
{
"antecedents": [
"has_risk_note::Vendor D"
],
"conclusion": "needs_procurement_review::Vendor D",
"text": "If a vendor has a risk note, then that vendor needs procurement review."
... | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
procurement_review_0313_explicit_negative_closed__cwa__ask_act | procurement_review_0313_explicit_negative_closed__cwa | procurement_review_0313_explicit_negative_closed | test | procurement_review | explicit_negative_closed | control_explicit_negative | cwa | {
"name": "Closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false."
} | [
"has_risk_note",
"has_vendor_approval",
"may_receive_purchase_order",
"needs_procurement_review",
"submitted_tax_form"
] | [
"Vendor D submitted a tax form."
] | [
"Vendor B does not has vendor approval."
] | [] | {
"submitted_tax_form": "submitted a tax form",
"has_vendor_approval": "has vendor approval",
"has_risk_note": "has a risk note",
"may_receive_purchase_order": "may receive a purchase order",
"needs_procurement_review": "needs procurement review"
} | [
"has_risk_note",
"has_vendor_approval",
"may_receive_purchase_order",
"needs_procurement_review",
"submitted_tax_form"
] | has_vendor_approval::Vendor B | Vendor B has vendor approval. | explicit_negative_fact | {
"positive_atoms": [
"submitted_tax_form::Vendor D"
],
"negative_atoms": [
"has_vendor_approval::Vendor B"
],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_vendor_approval::Vendor B",
"closure_atoms": [
"submitted_tax_form::Vendor D"
]
} | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
library_services_0213_open_missing_with_closed_distractor__lcwa__ask_act | library_services_0213_open_missing_with_closed_distractor__lcwa | library_services_0213_open_missing_with_closed_distractor | train | library_services | open_missing_with_closed_distractor | core_contrastive | lcwa | {
"name": "Locally closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown."
} | [
"has_borrowing_clearance",
"may_borrow_archive_item"
] | [
"Reader E has an active membership.",
"Reader E has borrowing clearance."
] | [] | [] | {
"has_active_membership": "has an active membership",
"has_borrowing_clearance": "has borrowing clearance",
"has_special_request": "has a special request",
"may_borrow_archive_item": "may borrow an archive item",
"needs_librarian_review": "needs librarian review"
} | [
"has_active_membership",
"has_borrowing_clearance",
"has_special_request",
"may_borrow_archive_item",
"needs_librarian_review"
] | has_special_request::Reader D | Reader D has a special request. | local_open_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"has_active_membership::Reader E",
"has_borrowing_clearance::Reader E"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_special_request::Reader D",
"closure_atoms": [
"has_active_membership::Reader E",
"has_borrowing_clearance::Reader E"
]
} | unknown | request_information | has_special_request | Reader D | has_special_request::Reader D | Is it true that Reader D has a special request? | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
cloud_deployment_0260_open_derived_missing_antecedent__cwa__ask_act | cloud_deployment_0260_open_derived_missing_antecedent__cwa | cloud_deployment_0260_open_derived_missing_antecedent | train | cloud_deployment | open_derived_missing_antecedent | core_contrastive | cwa | {
"name": "Closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false."
} | [
"has_deployment_approval",
"has_incident_note",
"may_deploy",
"needs_sre_review",
"passed_unit_tests"
] | [
"Service C passed unit tests."
] | [] | [
"If a service has an incident note, then that service needs SRE review."
] | {
"passed_unit_tests": "passed unit tests",
"has_deployment_approval": "has deployment approval",
"has_incident_note": "has an incident note",
"may_deploy": "may deploy to production",
"needs_sre_review": "needs SRE review"
} | [
"has_deployment_approval",
"has_incident_note",
"may_deploy",
"needs_sre_review",
"passed_unit_tests"
] | needs_sre_review::Service C | Service C needs SRE review. | global_closed_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"passed_unit_tests::Service C"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [
{
"antecedents": [
"has_incident_note::Service C"
],
"conclusion": "needs_sre_review::Service C",
"text": "If a service has an incident note, then that service needs SRE review."
... | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
university_registration_0066_entailed_closed_conclusion__cwa__ask_act | university_registration_0066_entailed_closed_conclusion__cwa | university_registration_0066_entailed_closed_conclusion | train | university_registration | entailed_closed_conclusion | control_entailed | cwa | {
"name": "Closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false."
} | [
"has_advising_clearance",
"has_external_scholarship",
"may_register",
"needs_manual_audit",
"passed_exam"
] | [
"Mia has advising clearance.",
"Mia passed the qualifying exam."
] | [] | [
"If a student passed the qualifying exam and has advising clearance, then that student may register for the seminar."
] | {
"passed_exam": "passed the qualifying exam",
"has_advising_clearance": "has advising clearance",
"has_external_scholarship": "has an external scholarship",
"may_register": "may register for the seminar",
"needs_manual_audit": "needs a manual audit"
} | [
"has_advising_clearance",
"has_external_scholarship",
"may_register",
"needs_manual_audit",
"passed_exam"
] | may_register::Mia | Mia may register for the seminar. | entailed_by_fact_or_rule | {
"positive_atoms": [
"has_advising_clearance::Mia",
"passed_exam::Mia"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [
{
"antecedents": [
"passed_exam::Mia",
"has_advising_clearance::Mia"
],
"conclusion": "may_register::Mia",
"text": "If a student passed the qualifying e... | true | approve | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
hospital_access_0037_explicit_negative_open__cwa__ask_act | hospital_access_0037_explicit_negative_open__cwa | hospital_access_0037_explicit_negative_open | test | hospital_access | explicit_negative_open | control_explicit_negative | cwa | {
"name": "Closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false."
} | [
"assigned_to_trial",
"completed_training",
"has_clearance",
"may_enter_lab",
"needs_supervisor_review"
] | [
"Dylan has completed safety training."
] | [
"Ben is not assigned to the clinical trial."
] | [] | {
"completed_training": "has completed safety training",
"has_clearance": "has security clearance",
"assigned_to_trial": "is assigned to the clinical trial",
"may_enter_lab": "may enter Lab A",
"needs_supervisor_review": "needs supervisor review"
} | [
"assigned_to_trial",
"completed_training",
"has_clearance",
"may_enter_lab",
"needs_supervisor_review"
] | assigned_to_trial::Ben | Ben is assigned to the clinical trial. | explicit_negative_fact | {
"positive_atoms": [
"completed_training::Dylan"
],
"negative_atoms": [
"assigned_to_trial::Ben"
],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "assigned_to_trial::Ben",
"closure_atoms": [
"completed_training::Dylan"
]
} | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
cloud_deployment_0256_closed_derived_missing_antecedent__cwa__ask_act | cloud_deployment_0256_closed_derived_missing_antecedent__cwa | cloud_deployment_0256_closed_derived_missing_antecedent | test | cloud_deployment | closed_derived_missing_antecedent | core_contrastive | cwa | {
"name": "Closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false."
} | [
"has_deployment_approval",
"has_incident_note",
"may_deploy",
"needs_sre_review",
"passed_unit_tests"
] | [
"Service E passed unit tests."
] | [] | [
"If a service passed unit tests and has deployment approval, then that service may deploy to production."
] | {
"passed_unit_tests": "passed unit tests",
"has_deployment_approval": "has deployment approval",
"has_incident_note": "has an incident note",
"may_deploy": "may deploy to production",
"needs_sre_review": "needs SRE review"
} | [
"has_deployment_approval",
"has_incident_note",
"may_deploy",
"needs_sre_review",
"passed_unit_tests"
] | may_deploy::Service E | Service E may deploy to production. | global_closed_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"passed_unit_tests::Service E"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [
{
"antecedents": [
"passed_unit_tests::Service E",
"has_deployment_approval::Service E"
],
"conclusion": "may_deploy::Service E",
"text": "If a service passed unit tests and h... | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
cloud_deployment_0257_closed_derived_missing_antecedent__owa__ask_act | cloud_deployment_0257_closed_derived_missing_antecedent__owa | cloud_deployment_0257_closed_derived_missing_antecedent | train | cloud_deployment | closed_derived_missing_antecedent | core_contrastive | owa | {
"name": "Open-world assumption",
"instruction": "Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown."
} | [] | [
"Service F passed unit tests."
] | [] | [
"If a service passed unit tests and has deployment approval, then that service may deploy to production."
] | {
"passed_unit_tests": "passed unit tests",
"has_deployment_approval": "has deployment approval",
"has_incident_note": "has an incident note",
"may_deploy": "may deploy to production",
"needs_sre_review": "needs SRE review"
} | [
"has_deployment_approval",
"has_incident_note",
"may_deploy",
"needs_sre_review",
"passed_unit_tests"
] | may_deploy::Service F | Service F may deploy to production. | open_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"passed_unit_tests::Service F"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [
{
"antecedents": [
"passed_unit_tests::Service F",
"has_deployment_approval::Service F"
],
"conclusion": "may_deploy::Service F",
"text": "If a service passed unit tests and h... | unknown | request_information | has_deployment_approval | Service F | has_deployment_approval::Service F | Is it true that Service F has deployment approval? | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
manufacturing_quality_0115_explicit_negative_closed__lcwa__ask_act | manufacturing_quality_0115_explicit_negative_closed__lcwa | manufacturing_quality_0115_explicit_negative_closed | test | manufacturing_quality | explicit_negative_closed | control_explicit_negative | lcwa | {
"name": "Locally closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown."
} | [
"has_release_approval"
] | [
"Part D passed the visual check."
] | [
"Part B does not has release approval."
] | [] | {
"passed_visual_check": "passed the visual check",
"has_release_approval": "has release approval",
"has_supplier_note": "has a supplier note",
"may_ship": "may ship to customers",
"needs_engineer_review": "needs engineer review"
} | [
"has_release_approval",
"has_supplier_note",
"may_ship",
"needs_engineer_review",
"passed_visual_check"
] | has_release_approval::Part B | Part B has release approval. | explicit_negative_fact | {
"positive_atoms": [
"passed_visual_check::Part D"
],
"negative_atoms": [
"has_release_approval::Part B"
],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_release_approval::Part B",
"closure_atoms": [
"passed_visual_check::Part D"
]
} | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
finance_controls_0131_closed_missing_with_open_distractor__lcwa__ask_act | finance_controls_0131_closed_missing_with_open_distractor__lcwa | finance_controls_0131_closed_missing_with_open_distractor | train | finance_controls | closed_missing_with_open_distractor | core_contrastive | lcwa | {
"name": "Locally closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown."
} | [
"has_compliance_clearance"
] | [
"Account 12 has a manual exception.",
"Account 61 passed KYC checks."
] | [] | [] | {
"passed_kyc": "passed KYC checks",
"has_compliance_clearance": "has compliance clearance",
"has_manual_exception": "has a manual exception",
"may_receive_wire": "may receive a wire transfer",
"needs_compliance_review": "needs compliance review"
} | [
"has_compliance_clearance",
"has_manual_exception",
"may_receive_wire",
"needs_compliance_review",
"passed_kyc"
] | has_compliance_clearance::Account 61 | Account 61 has compliance clearance. | local_closed_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"has_manual_exception::Account 12",
"passed_kyc::Account 61"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_compliance_clearance::Account 61",
"closure_atoms": [
"has_manual_exception::Account 12",
"passed_kyc::Account 61"
]
} | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
library_services_0218_closed_derived_missing_antecedent__lcwa__ask_act | library_services_0218_closed_derived_missing_antecedent__lcwa | library_services_0218_closed_derived_missing_antecedent | test | library_services | closed_derived_missing_antecedent | core_contrastive | lcwa | {
"name": "Locally closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown."
} | [
"has_borrowing_clearance",
"may_borrow_archive_item"
] | [
"Reader C has an active membership."
] | [] | [
"If a reader has an active membership and has borrowing clearance, then that reader may borrow an archive item."
] | {
"has_active_membership": "has an active membership",
"has_borrowing_clearance": "has borrowing clearance",
"has_special_request": "has a special request",
"may_borrow_archive_item": "may borrow an archive item",
"needs_librarian_review": "needs librarian review"
} | [
"has_active_membership",
"has_borrowing_clearance",
"has_special_request",
"may_borrow_archive_item",
"needs_librarian_review"
] | may_borrow_archive_item::Reader C | Reader C may borrow an archive item. | local_closed_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"has_active_membership::Reader C"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [
{
"antecedents": [
"has_active_membership::Reader C",
"has_borrowing_clearance::Reader C"
],
"conclusion": "may_borrow_archive_item::Reader C",
"text": "If a reader has an ... | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
procurement_review_0319_explicit_negative_open__lcwa__ask_act | procurement_review_0319_explicit_negative_open__lcwa | procurement_review_0319_explicit_negative_open | train | procurement_review | explicit_negative_open | control_explicit_negative | lcwa | {
"name": "Locally closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown."
} | [
"has_vendor_approval",
"may_receive_purchase_order"
] | [
"Vendor D submitted a tax form."
] | [
"Vendor B does not has a risk note."
] | [] | {
"submitted_tax_form": "submitted a tax form",
"has_vendor_approval": "has vendor approval",
"has_risk_note": "has a risk note",
"may_receive_purchase_order": "may receive a purchase order",
"needs_procurement_review": "needs procurement review"
} | [
"has_risk_note",
"has_vendor_approval",
"may_receive_purchase_order",
"needs_procurement_review",
"submitted_tax_form"
] | has_risk_note::Vendor B | Vendor B has a risk note. | explicit_negative_fact | {
"positive_atoms": [
"submitted_tax_form::Vendor D"
],
"negative_atoms": [
"has_risk_note::Vendor B"
],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_risk_note::Vendor B",
"closure_atoms": [
"submitted_tax_form::Vendor D"
]
} | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
hospital_access_0002_closed_missing_direct__owa__ask_act | hospital_access_0002_closed_missing_direct__owa | hospital_access_0002_closed_missing_direct | train | hospital_access | closed_missing_direct | core_contrastive | owa | {
"name": "Open-world assumption",
"instruction": "Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown."
} | [] | [
"Cora has completed safety training."
] | [] | [] | {
"completed_training": "has completed safety training",
"has_clearance": "has security clearance",
"assigned_to_trial": "is assigned to the clinical trial",
"may_enter_lab": "may enter Lab A",
"needs_supervisor_review": "needs supervisor review"
} | [
"assigned_to_trial",
"completed_training",
"has_clearance",
"may_enter_lab",
"needs_supervisor_review"
] | has_clearance::Cora | Cora has security clearance. | open_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"completed_training::Cora"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_clearance::Cora",
"closure_atoms": [
"completed_training::Cora"
]
} | unknown | request_information | has_clearance | Cora | has_clearance::Cora | Is it true that Cora has security clearance? | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
cloud_deployment_0258_closed_derived_missing_antecedent__lcwa__ask_act | cloud_deployment_0258_closed_derived_missing_antecedent__lcwa | cloud_deployment_0258_closed_derived_missing_antecedent | train | cloud_deployment | closed_derived_missing_antecedent | core_contrastive | lcwa | {
"name": "Locally closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown."
} | [
"has_deployment_approval",
"may_deploy"
] | [
"Service A passed unit tests."
] | [] | [
"If a service passed unit tests and has deployment approval, then that service may deploy to production."
] | {
"passed_unit_tests": "passed unit tests",
"has_deployment_approval": "has deployment approval",
"has_incident_note": "has an incident note",
"may_deploy": "may deploy to production",
"needs_sre_review": "needs SRE review"
} | [
"has_deployment_approval",
"has_incident_note",
"may_deploy",
"needs_sre_review",
"passed_unit_tests"
] | may_deploy::Service A | Service A may deploy to production. | local_closed_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"passed_unit_tests::Service A"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [
{
"antecedents": [
"passed_unit_tests::Service A",
"has_deployment_approval::Service A"
],
"conclusion": "may_deploy::Service A",
"text": "If a service passed unit tests and h... | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
manufacturing_quality_0099_closed_derived_missing_antecedent__owa__ask_act | manufacturing_quality_0099_closed_derived_missing_antecedent__owa | manufacturing_quality_0099_closed_derived_missing_antecedent | dev | manufacturing_quality | closed_derived_missing_antecedent | core_contrastive | owa | {
"name": "Open-world assumption",
"instruction": "Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown."
} | [] | [
"Part D passed the visual check."
] | [] | [
"If a part passed the visual check and has release approval, then that part may ship to customers."
] | {
"passed_visual_check": "passed the visual check",
"has_release_approval": "has release approval",
"has_supplier_note": "has a supplier note",
"may_ship": "may ship to customers",
"needs_engineer_review": "needs engineer review"
} | [
"has_release_approval",
"has_supplier_note",
"may_ship",
"needs_engineer_review",
"passed_visual_check"
] | may_ship::Part D | Part D may ship to customers. | open_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"passed_visual_check::Part D"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [
{
"antecedents": [
"passed_visual_check::Part D",
"has_release_approval::Part D"
],
"conclusion": "may_ship::Part D",
"text": "If a part passed the visual check and has release... | unknown | request_information | has_release_approval | Part D | has_release_approval::Part D | Is it true that Part D has release approval? | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
robotics_operations_0178_closed_derived_missing_antecedent__owa__ask_act | robotics_operations_0178_closed_derived_missing_antecedent__owa | robotics_operations_0178_closed_derived_missing_antecedent | train | robotics_operations | closed_derived_missing_antecedent | core_contrastive | owa | {
"name": "Open-world assumption",
"instruction": "Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown."
} | [] | [
"Rover 5 passed diagnostics."
] | [] | [
"If a robot passed diagnostics and has shift clearance, then that robot may start its shift."
] | {
"passed_diagnostics": "passed diagnostics",
"has_shift_clearance": "has shift clearance",
"has_field_note": "has a field note",
"may_start_shift": "may start its shift",
"needs_operator_review": "needs operator review"
} | [
"has_field_note",
"has_shift_clearance",
"may_start_shift",
"needs_operator_review",
"passed_diagnostics"
] | may_start_shift::Rover 5 | Rover 5 may start its shift. | open_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"passed_diagnostics::Rover 5"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [
{
"antecedents": [
"passed_diagnostics::Rover 5",
"has_shift_clearance::Rover 5"
],
"conclusion": "may_start_shift::Rover 5",
"text": "If a robot passed diagnostics and has shi... | unknown | request_information | has_shift_clearance | Rover 5 | has_shift_clearance::Rover 5 | Is it true that Rover 5 has shift clearance? | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
robotics_operations_0172_open_missing_with_closed_distractor__owa__ask_act | robotics_operations_0172_open_missing_with_closed_distractor__owa | robotics_operations_0172_open_missing_with_closed_distractor | train | robotics_operations | open_missing_with_closed_distractor | core_contrastive | owa | {
"name": "Open-world assumption",
"instruction": "Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown."
} | [] | [
"Rover 6 has shift clearance.",
"Rover 6 passed diagnostics."
] | [] | [] | {
"passed_diagnostics": "passed diagnostics",
"has_shift_clearance": "has shift clearance",
"has_field_note": "has a field note",
"may_start_shift": "may start its shift",
"needs_operator_review": "needs operator review"
} | [
"has_field_note",
"has_shift_clearance",
"may_start_shift",
"needs_operator_review",
"passed_diagnostics"
] | has_field_note::Rover 5 | Rover 5 has a field note. | open_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"has_shift_clearance::Rover 6",
"passed_diagnostics::Rover 6"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_field_note::Rover 5",
"closure_atoms": [
"has_shift_clearance::Rover 6",
"passed_diagnostics::Rover 6"
]
} | unknown | request_information | has_field_note | Rover 5 | has_field_note::Rover 5 | Is it true that Rover 5 has a field note? | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
university_registration_0078_explicit_negative_open__owa__ask_act | university_registration_0078_explicit_negative_open__owa | university_registration_0078_explicit_negative_open | test | university_registration | explicit_negative_open | control_explicit_negative | owa | {
"name": "Open-world assumption",
"instruction": "Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown."
} | [] | [
"Lena passed the qualifying exam."
] | [
"Mia does not has an external scholarship."
] | [] | {
"passed_exam": "passed the qualifying exam",
"has_advising_clearance": "has advising clearance",
"has_external_scholarship": "has an external scholarship",
"may_register": "may register for the seminar",
"needs_manual_audit": "needs a manual audit"
} | [
"has_advising_clearance",
"has_external_scholarship",
"may_register",
"needs_manual_audit",
"passed_exam"
] | has_external_scholarship::Mia | Mia has an external scholarship. | explicit_negative_fact | {
"positive_atoms": [
"passed_exam::Lena"
],
"negative_atoms": [
"has_external_scholarship::Mia"
],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_external_scholarship::Mia",
"closure_atoms": [
"passed_exam::Lena"
]
} | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
finance_controls_0132_open_missing_with_closed_distractor__cwa__ask_act | finance_controls_0132_open_missing_with_closed_distractor__cwa | finance_controls_0132_open_missing_with_closed_distractor | train | finance_controls | open_missing_with_closed_distractor | core_contrastive | cwa | {
"name": "Closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false."
} | [
"has_compliance_clearance",
"has_manual_exception",
"may_receive_wire",
"needs_compliance_review",
"passed_kyc"
] | [
"Account 27 has compliance clearance.",
"Account 27 passed KYC checks."
] | [] | [] | {
"passed_kyc": "passed KYC checks",
"has_compliance_clearance": "has compliance clearance",
"has_manual_exception": "has a manual exception",
"may_receive_wire": "may receive a wire transfer",
"needs_compliance_review": "needs compliance review"
} | [
"has_compliance_clearance",
"has_manual_exception",
"may_receive_wire",
"needs_compliance_review",
"passed_kyc"
] | has_manual_exception::Account 12 | Account 12 has a manual exception. | global_closed_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"has_compliance_clearance::Account 27",
"passed_kyc::Account 27"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_manual_exception::Account 12",
"closure_atoms": [
"has_compliance_clearance::Account 27",
"passed_kyc::Account 27"
]
} | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
finance_controls_0127_open_missing_direct__cwa__ask_act | finance_controls_0127_open_missing_direct__cwa | finance_controls_0127_open_missing_direct | test | finance_controls | open_missing_direct | core_contrastive | cwa | {
"name": "Closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false."
} | [
"has_compliance_clearance",
"has_manual_exception",
"may_receive_wire",
"needs_compliance_review",
"passed_kyc"
] | [
"Account 27 passed KYC checks."
] | [] | [] | {
"passed_kyc": "passed KYC checks",
"has_compliance_clearance": "has compliance clearance",
"has_manual_exception": "has a manual exception",
"may_receive_wire": "may receive a wire transfer",
"needs_compliance_review": "needs compliance review"
} | [
"has_compliance_clearance",
"has_manual_exception",
"may_receive_wire",
"needs_compliance_review",
"passed_kyc"
] | has_manual_exception::Account 27 | Account 27 has a manual exception. | global_closed_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"passed_kyc::Account 27"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_manual_exception::Account 27",
"closure_atoms": [
"passed_kyc::Account 27"
]
} | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
manufacturing_quality_0118_explicit_negative_open__lcwa__ask_act | manufacturing_quality_0118_explicit_negative_open__lcwa | manufacturing_quality_0118_explicit_negative_open | train | manufacturing_quality | explicit_negative_open | control_explicit_negative | lcwa | {
"name": "Locally closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown."
} | [
"has_release_approval",
"may_ship"
] | [
"Part A passed the visual check."
] | [
"Part E does not has a supplier note."
] | [] | {
"passed_visual_check": "passed the visual check",
"has_release_approval": "has release approval",
"has_supplier_note": "has a supplier note",
"may_ship": "may ship to customers",
"needs_engineer_review": "needs engineer review"
} | [
"has_release_approval",
"has_supplier_note",
"may_ship",
"needs_engineer_review",
"passed_visual_check"
] | has_supplier_note::Part E | Part E has a supplier note. | explicit_negative_fact | {
"positive_atoms": [
"passed_visual_check::Part A"
],
"negative_atoms": [
"has_supplier_note::Part E"
],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_supplier_note::Part E",
"closure_atoms": [
"passed_visual_check::Part A"
]
} | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
manufacturing_quality_0086_open_missing_direct__owa__ask_act | manufacturing_quality_0086_open_missing_direct__owa | manufacturing_quality_0086_open_missing_direct | train | manufacturing_quality | open_missing_direct | core_contrastive | owa | {
"name": "Open-world assumption",
"instruction": "Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown."
} | [] | [
"Part C passed the visual check."
] | [] | [] | {
"passed_visual_check": "passed the visual check",
"has_release_approval": "has release approval",
"has_supplier_note": "has a supplier note",
"may_ship": "may ship to customers",
"needs_engineer_review": "needs engineer review"
} | [
"has_release_approval",
"has_supplier_note",
"may_ship",
"needs_engineer_review",
"passed_visual_check"
] | has_supplier_note::Part C | Part C has a supplier note. | open_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"passed_visual_check::Part C"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_supplier_note::Part C",
"closure_atoms": [
"passed_visual_check::Part C"
]
} | unknown | request_information | has_supplier_note | Part C | has_supplier_note::Part C | Is it true that Part C has a supplier note? | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
university_registration_0048_closed_missing_with_open_distractor__owa__ask_act | university_registration_0048_closed_missing_with_open_distractor__owa | university_registration_0048_closed_missing_with_open_distractor | dev | university_registration | closed_missing_with_open_distractor | core_contrastive | owa | {
"name": "Open-world assumption",
"instruction": "Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown."
} | [] | [
"Noah has an external scholarship.",
"Mia passed the qualifying exam."
] | [] | [] | {
"passed_exam": "passed the qualifying exam",
"has_advising_clearance": "has advising clearance",
"has_external_scholarship": "has an external scholarship",
"may_register": "may register for the seminar",
"needs_manual_audit": "needs a manual audit"
} | [
"has_advising_clearance",
"has_external_scholarship",
"may_register",
"needs_manual_audit",
"passed_exam"
] | has_advising_clearance::Mia | Mia has advising clearance. | open_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"has_external_scholarship::Noah",
"passed_exam::Mia"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_advising_clearance::Mia",
"closure_atoms": [
"has_external_scholarship::Noah",
"passed_exam::Mia"
]
} | unknown | request_information | has_advising_clearance | Mia | has_advising_clearance::Mia | Is it true that Mia has advising clearance? | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
university_registration_0067_entailed_closed_conclusion__lcwa__ask_act | university_registration_0067_entailed_closed_conclusion__lcwa | university_registration_0067_entailed_closed_conclusion | test | university_registration | entailed_closed_conclusion | control_entailed | lcwa | {
"name": "Locally closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown."
} | [
"has_advising_clearance",
"may_register"
] | [
"Noah has advising clearance.",
"Noah passed the qualifying exam."
] | [] | [
"If a student passed the qualifying exam and has advising clearance, then that student may register for the seminar."
] | {
"passed_exam": "passed the qualifying exam",
"has_advising_clearance": "has advising clearance",
"has_external_scholarship": "has an external scholarship",
"may_register": "may register for the seminar",
"needs_manual_audit": "needs a manual audit"
} | [
"has_advising_clearance",
"has_external_scholarship",
"may_register",
"needs_manual_audit",
"passed_exam"
] | may_register::Noah | Noah may register for the seminar. | entailed_by_fact_or_rule | {
"positive_atoms": [
"has_advising_clearance::Noah",
"passed_exam::Noah"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [
{
"antecedents": [
"passed_exam::Noah",
"has_advising_clearance::Noah"
],
"conclusion": "may_register::Noah",
"text": "If a student passed the qualify... | true | approve | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
library_services_0227_entailed_closed_conclusion__owa__ask_act | library_services_0227_entailed_closed_conclusion__owa | library_services_0227_entailed_closed_conclusion | train | library_services | entailed_closed_conclusion | control_entailed | owa | {
"name": "Open-world assumption",
"instruction": "Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown."
} | [] | [
"Reader F has an active membership.",
"Reader F has borrowing clearance."
] | [] | [
"If a reader has an active membership and has borrowing clearance, then that reader may borrow an archive item."
] | {
"has_active_membership": "has an active membership",
"has_borrowing_clearance": "has borrowing clearance",
"has_special_request": "has a special request",
"may_borrow_archive_item": "may borrow an archive item",
"needs_librarian_review": "needs librarian review"
} | [
"has_active_membership",
"has_borrowing_clearance",
"has_special_request",
"may_borrow_archive_item",
"needs_librarian_review"
] | may_borrow_archive_item::Reader F | Reader F may borrow an archive item. | entailed_by_fact_or_rule | {
"positive_atoms": [
"has_active_membership::Reader F",
"has_borrowing_clearance::Reader F"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [
{
"antecedents": [
"has_active_membership::Reader F",
"has_borrowing_clearance::Reader F"
],
"conclusion": "may_borrow_archive_item::Read... | true | approve | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
finance_controls_0157_explicit_negative_open__cwa__ask_act | finance_controls_0157_explicit_negative_open__cwa | finance_controls_0157_explicit_negative_open | train | finance_controls | explicit_negative_open | control_explicit_negative | cwa | {
"name": "Closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false."
} | [
"has_compliance_clearance",
"has_manual_exception",
"may_receive_wire",
"needs_compliance_review",
"passed_kyc"
] | [
"Account 48 passed KYC checks."
] | [
"Account 27 does not has a manual exception."
] | [] | {
"passed_kyc": "passed KYC checks",
"has_compliance_clearance": "has compliance clearance",
"has_manual_exception": "has a manual exception",
"may_receive_wire": "may receive a wire transfer",
"needs_compliance_review": "needs compliance review"
} | [
"has_compliance_clearance",
"has_manual_exception",
"may_receive_wire",
"needs_compliance_review",
"passed_kyc"
] | has_manual_exception::Account 27 | Account 27 has a manual exception. | explicit_negative_fact | {
"positive_atoms": [
"passed_kyc::Account 48"
],
"negative_atoms": [
"has_manual_exception::Account 27"
],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_manual_exception::Account 27",
"closure_atoms": [
"passed_kyc::Account 48"
]
} | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
library_services_0219_closed_derived_missing_antecedent__cwa__ask_act | library_services_0219_closed_derived_missing_antecedent__cwa | library_services_0219_closed_derived_missing_antecedent | train | library_services | closed_derived_missing_antecedent | core_contrastive | cwa | {
"name": "Closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false."
} | [
"has_active_membership",
"has_borrowing_clearance",
"has_special_request",
"may_borrow_archive_item",
"needs_librarian_review"
] | [
"Reader D has an active membership."
] | [] | [
"If a reader has an active membership and has borrowing clearance, then that reader may borrow an archive item."
] | {
"has_active_membership": "has an active membership",
"has_borrowing_clearance": "has borrowing clearance",
"has_special_request": "has a special request",
"may_borrow_archive_item": "may borrow an archive item",
"needs_librarian_review": "needs librarian review"
} | [
"has_active_membership",
"has_borrowing_clearance",
"has_special_request",
"may_borrow_archive_item",
"needs_librarian_review"
] | may_borrow_archive_item::Reader D | Reader D may borrow an archive item. | global_closed_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"has_active_membership::Reader D"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [
{
"antecedents": [
"has_active_membership::Reader D",
"has_borrowing_clearance::Reader D"
],
"conclusion": "may_borrow_archive_item::Reader D",
"text": "If a reader has an ... | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
university_registration_0056_closed_derived_missing_antecedent__lcwa__ask_act | university_registration_0056_closed_derived_missing_antecedent__lcwa | university_registration_0056_closed_derived_missing_antecedent | dev | university_registration | closed_derived_missing_antecedent | core_contrastive | lcwa | {
"name": "Locally closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown."
} | [
"has_advising_clearance",
"may_register"
] | [
"Lena passed the qualifying exam."
] | [] | [
"If a student passed the qualifying exam and has advising clearance, then that student may register for the seminar."
] | {
"passed_exam": "passed the qualifying exam",
"has_advising_clearance": "has advising clearance",
"has_external_scholarship": "has an external scholarship",
"may_register": "may register for the seminar",
"needs_manual_audit": "needs a manual audit"
} | [
"has_advising_clearance",
"has_external_scholarship",
"may_register",
"needs_manual_audit",
"passed_exam"
] | may_register::Lena | Lena may register for the seminar. | local_closed_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"passed_exam::Lena"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [
{
"antecedents": [
"passed_exam::Lena",
"has_advising_clearance::Lena"
],
"conclusion": "may_register::Lena",
"text": "If a student passed the qualifying exam and has advising clearance,... | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
finance_controls_0121_closed_missing_direct__owa__ask_act | finance_controls_0121_closed_missing_direct__owa | finance_controls_0121_closed_missing_direct | train | finance_controls | closed_missing_direct | core_contrastive | owa | {
"name": "Open-world assumption",
"instruction": "Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown."
} | [] | [
"Account 27 passed KYC checks."
] | [] | [] | {
"passed_kyc": "passed KYC checks",
"has_compliance_clearance": "has compliance clearance",
"has_manual_exception": "has a manual exception",
"may_receive_wire": "may receive a wire transfer",
"needs_compliance_review": "needs compliance review"
} | [
"has_compliance_clearance",
"has_manual_exception",
"may_receive_wire",
"needs_compliance_review",
"passed_kyc"
] | has_compliance_clearance::Account 27 | Account 27 has compliance clearance. | open_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"passed_kyc::Account 27"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_compliance_clearance::Account 27",
"closure_atoms": [
"passed_kyc::Account 27"
]
} | unknown | request_information | has_compliance_clearance | Account 27 | has_compliance_clearance::Account 27 | Is it true that Account 27 has compliance clearance? | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
hospital_access_0017_closed_derived_missing_antecedent__owa__ask_act | hospital_access_0017_closed_derived_missing_antecedent__owa | hospital_access_0017_closed_derived_missing_antecedent | dev | hospital_access | closed_derived_missing_antecedent | core_contrastive | owa | {
"name": "Open-world assumption",
"instruction": "Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown."
} | [] | [
"Farid has completed safety training."
] | [] | [
"If a staff member has security clearance and has completed safety training, then that staff member may enter Lab A."
] | {
"completed_training": "has completed safety training",
"has_clearance": "has security clearance",
"assigned_to_trial": "is assigned to the clinical trial",
"may_enter_lab": "may enter Lab A",
"needs_supervisor_review": "needs supervisor review"
} | [
"assigned_to_trial",
"completed_training",
"has_clearance",
"may_enter_lab",
"needs_supervisor_review"
] | may_enter_lab::Farid | Farid may enter Lab A. | open_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"completed_training::Farid"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [
{
"antecedents": [
"completed_training::Farid",
"has_clearance::Farid"
],
"conclusion": "may_enter_lab::Farid",
"text": "If a staff member has security clearance and has complete... | unknown | request_information | has_clearance | Farid | has_clearance::Farid | Is it true that Farid has security clearance? | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
hospital_access_0028_entailed_open_conclusion__lcwa__ask_act | hospital_access_0028_entailed_open_conclusion__lcwa | hospital_access_0028_entailed_open_conclusion | test | hospital_access | entailed_open_conclusion | control_entailed | lcwa | {
"name": "Locally closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown."
} | [
"has_clearance",
"may_enter_lab"
] | [
"Elena is assigned to the clinical trial."
] | [] | [
"If a staff member is assigned to the clinical trial, then that staff member needs supervisor review."
] | {
"completed_training": "has completed safety training",
"has_clearance": "has security clearance",
"assigned_to_trial": "is assigned to the clinical trial",
"may_enter_lab": "may enter Lab A",
"needs_supervisor_review": "needs supervisor review"
} | [
"assigned_to_trial",
"completed_training",
"has_clearance",
"may_enter_lab",
"needs_supervisor_review"
] | needs_supervisor_review::Elena | Elena needs supervisor review. | entailed_by_fact_or_rule | {
"positive_atoms": [
"assigned_to_trial::Elena"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [
{
"antecedents": [
"assigned_to_trial::Elena"
],
"conclusion": "needs_supervisor_review::Elena",
"text": "If a staff member is assigned to the clinical trial, then that staff member needs... | true | approve | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
robotics_operations_0183_open_derived_missing_antecedent__cwa__ask_act | robotics_operations_0183_open_derived_missing_antecedent__cwa | robotics_operations_0183_open_derived_missing_antecedent | test | robotics_operations | open_derived_missing_antecedent | core_contrastive | cwa | {
"name": "Closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false."
} | [
"has_field_note",
"has_shift_clearance",
"may_start_shift",
"needs_operator_review",
"passed_diagnostics"
] | [
"Rover 4 passed diagnostics."
] | [] | [
"If a robot has a field note, then that robot needs operator review."
] | {
"passed_diagnostics": "passed diagnostics",
"has_shift_clearance": "has shift clearance",
"has_field_note": "has a field note",
"may_start_shift": "may start its shift",
"needs_operator_review": "needs operator review"
} | [
"has_field_note",
"has_shift_clearance",
"may_start_shift",
"needs_operator_review",
"passed_diagnostics"
] | needs_operator_review::Rover 4 | Rover 4 needs operator review. | global_closed_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"passed_diagnostics::Rover 4"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [
{
"antecedents": [
"has_field_note::Rover 4"
],
"conclusion": "needs_operator_review::Rover 4",
"text": "If a robot has a field note, then that robot needs operator review."
}
],... | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
robotics_operations_0177_closed_derived_missing_antecedent__owa__ask_act | robotics_operations_0177_closed_derived_missing_antecedent__owa | robotics_operations_0177_closed_derived_missing_antecedent | train | robotics_operations | closed_derived_missing_antecedent | core_contrastive | owa | {
"name": "Open-world assumption",
"instruction": "Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown."
} | [] | [
"Rover 4 passed diagnostics."
] | [] | [
"If a robot passed diagnostics and has shift clearance, then that robot may start its shift."
] | {
"passed_diagnostics": "passed diagnostics",
"has_shift_clearance": "has shift clearance",
"has_field_note": "has a field note",
"may_start_shift": "may start its shift",
"needs_operator_review": "needs operator review"
} | [
"has_field_note",
"has_shift_clearance",
"may_start_shift",
"needs_operator_review",
"passed_diagnostics"
] | may_start_shift::Rover 4 | Rover 4 may start its shift. | open_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"passed_diagnostics::Rover 4"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [
{
"antecedents": [
"passed_diagnostics::Rover 4",
"has_shift_clearance::Rover 4"
],
"conclusion": "may_start_shift::Rover 4",
"text": "If a robot passed diagnostics and has shi... | unknown | request_information | has_shift_clearance | Rover 4 | has_shift_clearance::Rover 4 | Is it true that Rover 4 has shift clearance? | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
cloud_deployment_0246_open_missing_direct__owa__ask_act | cloud_deployment_0246_open_missing_direct__owa | cloud_deployment_0246_open_missing_direct | train | cloud_deployment | open_missing_direct | core_contrastive | owa | {
"name": "Open-world assumption",
"instruction": "Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown."
} | [] | [
"Service A passed unit tests."
] | [] | [] | {
"passed_unit_tests": "passed unit tests",
"has_deployment_approval": "has deployment approval",
"has_incident_note": "has an incident note",
"may_deploy": "may deploy to production",
"needs_sre_review": "needs SRE review"
} | [
"has_deployment_approval",
"has_incident_note",
"may_deploy",
"needs_sre_review",
"passed_unit_tests"
] | has_incident_note::Service A | Service A has an incident note. | open_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"passed_unit_tests::Service A"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_incident_note::Service A",
"closure_atoms": [
"passed_unit_tests::Service A"
]
} | unknown | request_information | has_incident_note | Service A | has_incident_note::Service A | Is it true that Service A has an incident note? | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
robotics_operations_0170_closed_missing_with_open_distractor__lcwa__ask_act | robotics_operations_0170_closed_missing_with_open_distractor__lcwa | robotics_operations_0170_closed_missing_with_open_distractor | train | robotics_operations | closed_missing_with_open_distractor | core_contrastive | lcwa | {
"name": "Locally closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown."
} | [
"has_shift_clearance"
] | [
"Rover 4 has a field note.",
"Rover 3 passed diagnostics."
] | [] | [] | {
"passed_diagnostics": "passed diagnostics",
"has_shift_clearance": "has shift clearance",
"has_field_note": "has a field note",
"may_start_shift": "may start its shift",
"needs_operator_review": "needs operator review"
} | [
"has_field_note",
"has_shift_clearance",
"may_start_shift",
"needs_operator_review",
"passed_diagnostics"
] | has_shift_clearance::Rover 3 | Rover 3 has shift clearance. | local_closed_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"has_field_note::Rover 4",
"passed_diagnostics::Rover 3"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_shift_clearance::Rover 3",
"closure_atoms": [
"has_field_note::Rover 4",
"passed_diagnostics::Rover 3"
]
} | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
library_services_0232_explicit_negative_closed__lcwa__ask_act | library_services_0232_explicit_negative_closed__lcwa | library_services_0232_explicit_negative_closed | test | library_services | explicit_negative_closed | control_explicit_negative | lcwa | {
"name": "Locally closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown."
} | [
"has_borrowing_clearance"
] | [
"Reader A has an active membership."
] | [
"Reader E does not has borrowing clearance."
] | [] | {
"has_active_membership": "has an active membership",
"has_borrowing_clearance": "has borrowing clearance",
"has_special_request": "has a special request",
"may_borrow_archive_item": "may borrow an archive item",
"needs_librarian_review": "needs librarian review"
} | [
"has_active_membership",
"has_borrowing_clearance",
"has_special_request",
"may_borrow_archive_item",
"needs_librarian_review"
] | has_borrowing_clearance::Reader E | Reader E has borrowing clearance. | explicit_negative_fact | {
"positive_atoms": [
"has_active_membership::Reader A"
],
"negative_atoms": [
"has_borrowing_clearance::Reader E"
],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_borrowing_clearance::Reader E",
"closure_atoms": [
"has_active_membership::Reader A"
]
} | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
library_services_0213_open_missing_with_closed_distractor__cwa__ask_act | library_services_0213_open_missing_with_closed_distractor__cwa | library_services_0213_open_missing_with_closed_distractor | train | library_services | open_missing_with_closed_distractor | core_contrastive | cwa | {
"name": "Closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false."
} | [
"has_active_membership",
"has_borrowing_clearance",
"has_special_request",
"may_borrow_archive_item",
"needs_librarian_review"
] | [
"Reader E has an active membership.",
"Reader E has borrowing clearance."
] | [] | [] | {
"has_active_membership": "has an active membership",
"has_borrowing_clearance": "has borrowing clearance",
"has_special_request": "has a special request",
"may_borrow_archive_item": "may borrow an archive item",
"needs_librarian_review": "needs librarian review"
} | [
"has_active_membership",
"has_borrowing_clearance",
"has_special_request",
"may_borrow_archive_item",
"needs_librarian_review"
] | has_special_request::Reader D | Reader D has a special request. | global_closed_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"has_active_membership::Reader E",
"has_borrowing_clearance::Reader E"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_special_request::Reader D",
"closure_atoms": [
"has_active_membership::Reader E",
"has_borrowing_clearance::Reader E"
]
} | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
cloud_deployment_0251_closed_missing_with_open_distractor__lcwa__ask_act | cloud_deployment_0251_closed_missing_with_open_distractor__lcwa | cloud_deployment_0251_closed_missing_with_open_distractor | train | cloud_deployment | closed_missing_with_open_distractor | core_contrastive | lcwa | {
"name": "Locally closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown."
} | [
"has_deployment_approval"
] | [
"Service A has an incident note.",
"Service F passed unit tests."
] | [] | [] | {
"passed_unit_tests": "passed unit tests",
"has_deployment_approval": "has deployment approval",
"has_incident_note": "has an incident note",
"may_deploy": "may deploy to production",
"needs_sre_review": "needs SRE review"
} | [
"has_deployment_approval",
"has_incident_note",
"may_deploy",
"needs_sre_review",
"passed_unit_tests"
] | has_deployment_approval::Service F | Service F has deployment approval. | local_closed_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"has_incident_note::Service A",
"passed_unit_tests::Service F"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_deployment_approval::Service F",
"closure_atoms": [
"has_incident_note::Service A",
"passed_unit_tests::Service F"
]
} | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
cloud_deployment_0262_open_derived_missing_antecedent__cwa__ask_act | cloud_deployment_0262_open_derived_missing_antecedent__cwa | cloud_deployment_0262_open_derived_missing_antecedent | train | cloud_deployment | open_derived_missing_antecedent | core_contrastive | cwa | {
"name": "Closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false."
} | [
"has_deployment_approval",
"has_incident_note",
"may_deploy",
"needs_sre_review",
"passed_unit_tests"
] | [
"Service E passed unit tests."
] | [] | [
"If a service has an incident note, then that service needs SRE review."
] | {
"passed_unit_tests": "passed unit tests",
"has_deployment_approval": "has deployment approval",
"has_incident_note": "has an incident note",
"may_deploy": "may deploy to production",
"needs_sre_review": "needs SRE review"
} | [
"has_deployment_approval",
"has_incident_note",
"may_deploy",
"needs_sre_review",
"passed_unit_tests"
] | needs_sre_review::Service E | Service E needs SRE review. | global_closed_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"passed_unit_tests::Service E"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [
{
"antecedents": [
"has_incident_note::Service E"
],
"conclusion": "needs_sre_review::Service E",
"text": "If a service has an incident note, then that service needs SRE review."
... | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
library_services_0219_closed_derived_missing_antecedent__lcwa__ask_act | library_services_0219_closed_derived_missing_antecedent__lcwa | library_services_0219_closed_derived_missing_antecedent | train | library_services | closed_derived_missing_antecedent | core_contrastive | lcwa | {
"name": "Locally closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown."
} | [
"has_borrowing_clearance",
"may_borrow_archive_item"
] | [
"Reader D has an active membership."
] | [] | [
"If a reader has an active membership and has borrowing clearance, then that reader may borrow an archive item."
] | {
"has_active_membership": "has an active membership",
"has_borrowing_clearance": "has borrowing clearance",
"has_special_request": "has a special request",
"may_borrow_archive_item": "may borrow an archive item",
"needs_librarian_review": "needs librarian review"
} | [
"has_active_membership",
"has_borrowing_clearance",
"has_special_request",
"may_borrow_archive_item",
"needs_librarian_review"
] | may_borrow_archive_item::Reader D | Reader D may borrow an archive item. | local_closed_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"has_active_membership::Reader D"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [
{
"antecedents": [
"has_active_membership::Reader D",
"has_borrowing_clearance::Reader D"
],
"conclusion": "may_borrow_archive_item::Reader D",
"text": "If a reader has an ... | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
hospital_access_0011_closed_missing_with_open_distractor__owa__ask_act | hospital_access_0011_closed_missing_with_open_distractor__owa | hospital_access_0011_closed_missing_with_open_distractor | train | hospital_access | closed_missing_with_open_distractor | core_contrastive | owa | {
"name": "Open-world assumption",
"instruction": "Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown."
} | [] | [
"Ava is assigned to the clinical trial.",
"Farid has completed safety training."
] | [] | [] | {
"completed_training": "has completed safety training",
"has_clearance": "has security clearance",
"assigned_to_trial": "is assigned to the clinical trial",
"may_enter_lab": "may enter Lab A",
"needs_supervisor_review": "needs supervisor review"
} | [
"assigned_to_trial",
"completed_training",
"has_clearance",
"may_enter_lab",
"needs_supervisor_review"
] | has_clearance::Farid | Farid has security clearance. | open_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"assigned_to_trial::Ava",
"completed_training::Farid"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_clearance::Farid",
"closure_atoms": [
"assigned_to_trial::Ava",
"completed_training::Farid"
]
} | unknown | request_information | has_clearance | Farid | has_clearance::Farid | Is it true that Farid has security clearance? | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
manufacturing_quality_0103_open_derived_missing_antecedent__cwa__ask_act | manufacturing_quality_0103_open_derived_missing_antecedent__cwa | manufacturing_quality_0103_open_derived_missing_antecedent | train | manufacturing_quality | open_derived_missing_antecedent | core_contrastive | cwa | {
"name": "Closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false."
} | [
"has_release_approval",
"has_supplier_note",
"may_ship",
"needs_engineer_review",
"passed_visual_check"
] | [
"Part B passed the visual check."
] | [] | [
"If a part has a supplier note, then that part needs engineer review."
] | {
"passed_visual_check": "passed the visual check",
"has_release_approval": "has release approval",
"has_supplier_note": "has a supplier note",
"may_ship": "may ship to customers",
"needs_engineer_review": "needs engineer review"
} | [
"has_release_approval",
"has_supplier_note",
"may_ship",
"needs_engineer_review",
"passed_visual_check"
] | needs_engineer_review::Part B | Part B needs engineer review. | global_closed_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"passed_visual_check::Part B"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [
{
"antecedents": [
"has_supplier_note::Part B"
],
"conclusion": "needs_engineer_review::Part B",
"text": "If a part has a supplier note, then that part needs engineer review."
}
... | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
university_registration_0053_open_missing_with_closed_distractor__lcwa__ask_act | university_registration_0053_open_missing_with_closed_distractor__lcwa | university_registration_0053_open_missing_with_closed_distractor | test | university_registration | open_missing_with_closed_distractor | core_contrastive | lcwa | {
"name": "Locally closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown."
} | [
"has_advising_clearance",
"may_register"
] | [
"Mia has advising clearance.",
"Mia passed the qualifying exam."
] | [] | [] | {
"passed_exam": "passed the qualifying exam",
"has_advising_clearance": "has advising clearance",
"has_external_scholarship": "has an external scholarship",
"may_register": "may register for the seminar",
"needs_manual_audit": "needs a manual audit"
} | [
"has_advising_clearance",
"has_external_scholarship",
"may_register",
"needs_manual_audit",
"passed_exam"
] | has_external_scholarship::Theo | Theo has an external scholarship. | local_open_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"has_advising_clearance::Mia",
"passed_exam::Mia"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_external_scholarship::Theo",
"closure_atoms": [
"has_advising_clearance::Mia",
"passed_exam::Mia"
]
} | unknown | request_information | has_external_scholarship | Theo | has_external_scholarship::Theo | Is it true that Theo has an external scholarship? | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
finance_controls_0136_closed_derived_missing_antecedent__lcwa__ask_act | finance_controls_0136_closed_derived_missing_antecedent__lcwa | finance_controls_0136_closed_derived_missing_antecedent | test | finance_controls | closed_derived_missing_antecedent | core_contrastive | lcwa | {
"name": "Locally closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown."
} | [
"has_compliance_clearance",
"may_receive_wire"
] | [
"Account 59 passed KYC checks."
] | [] | [
"If an account passed KYC checks and has compliance clearance, then that account may receive a wire transfer."
] | {
"passed_kyc": "passed KYC checks",
"has_compliance_clearance": "has compliance clearance",
"has_manual_exception": "has a manual exception",
"may_receive_wire": "may receive a wire transfer",
"needs_compliance_review": "needs compliance review"
} | [
"has_compliance_clearance",
"has_manual_exception",
"may_receive_wire",
"needs_compliance_review",
"passed_kyc"
] | may_receive_wire::Account 59 | Account 59 may receive a wire transfer. | local_closed_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"passed_kyc::Account 59"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [
{
"antecedents": [
"passed_kyc::Account 59",
"has_compliance_clearance::Account 59"
],
"conclusion": "may_receive_wire::Account 59",
"text": "If an account passed KYC checks and has... | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
hospital_access_0008_closed_missing_with_open_distractor__lcwa__ask_act | hospital_access_0008_closed_missing_with_open_distractor__lcwa | hospital_access_0008_closed_missing_with_open_distractor | test | hospital_access | closed_missing_with_open_distractor | core_contrastive | lcwa | {
"name": "Locally closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown."
} | [
"has_clearance"
] | [
"Dylan is assigned to the clinical trial.",
"Cora has completed safety training."
] | [] | [] | {
"completed_training": "has completed safety training",
"has_clearance": "has security clearance",
"assigned_to_trial": "is assigned to the clinical trial",
"may_enter_lab": "may enter Lab A",
"needs_supervisor_review": "needs supervisor review"
} | [
"assigned_to_trial",
"completed_training",
"has_clearance",
"may_enter_lab",
"needs_supervisor_review"
] | has_clearance::Cora | Cora has security clearance. | local_closed_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"assigned_to_trial::Dylan",
"completed_training::Cora"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_clearance::Cora",
"closure_atoms": [
"assigned_to_trial::Dylan",
"completed_training::Cora"
]
} | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
university_registration_0072_explicit_negative_closed__lcwa__ask_act | university_registration_0072_explicit_negative_closed__lcwa | university_registration_0072_explicit_negative_closed | test | university_registration | explicit_negative_closed | control_explicit_negative | lcwa | {
"name": "Locally closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown."
} | [
"has_advising_clearance"
] | [
"Lena passed the qualifying exam."
] | [
"Mia does not has advising clearance."
] | [] | {
"passed_exam": "passed the qualifying exam",
"has_advising_clearance": "has advising clearance",
"has_external_scholarship": "has an external scholarship",
"may_register": "may register for the seminar",
"needs_manual_audit": "needs a manual audit"
} | [
"has_advising_clearance",
"has_external_scholarship",
"may_register",
"needs_manual_audit",
"passed_exam"
] | has_advising_clearance::Mia | Mia has advising clearance. | explicit_negative_fact | {
"positive_atoms": [
"passed_exam::Lena"
],
"negative_atoms": [
"has_advising_clearance::Mia"
],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_advising_clearance::Mia",
"closure_atoms": [
"passed_exam::Lena"
]
} | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
procurement_review_0288_closed_missing_with_open_distractor__cwa__ask_act | procurement_review_0288_closed_missing_with_open_distractor__cwa | procurement_review_0288_closed_missing_with_open_distractor | train | procurement_review | closed_missing_with_open_distractor | core_contrastive | cwa | {
"name": "Closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false."
} | [
"has_risk_note",
"has_vendor_approval",
"may_receive_purchase_order",
"needs_procurement_review",
"submitted_tax_form"
] | [
"Vendor B has a risk note.",
"Vendor A submitted a tax form."
] | [] | [] | {
"submitted_tax_form": "submitted a tax form",
"has_vendor_approval": "has vendor approval",
"has_risk_note": "has a risk note",
"may_receive_purchase_order": "may receive a purchase order",
"needs_procurement_review": "needs procurement review"
} | [
"has_risk_note",
"has_vendor_approval",
"may_receive_purchase_order",
"needs_procurement_review",
"submitted_tax_form"
] | has_vendor_approval::Vendor A | Vendor A has vendor approval. | global_closed_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"has_risk_note::Vendor B",
"submitted_tax_form::Vendor A"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_vendor_approval::Vendor A",
"closure_atoms": [
"has_risk_note::Vendor B",
"submitted_tax_form::Vendor A"
]
} | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
procurement_review_0289_closed_missing_with_open_distractor__lcwa__ask_act | procurement_review_0289_closed_missing_with_open_distractor__lcwa | procurement_review_0289_closed_missing_with_open_distractor | train | procurement_review | closed_missing_with_open_distractor | core_contrastive | lcwa | {
"name": "Locally closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown."
} | [
"has_vendor_approval"
] | [
"Vendor C has a risk note.",
"Vendor B submitted a tax form."
] | [] | [] | {
"submitted_tax_form": "submitted a tax form",
"has_vendor_approval": "has vendor approval",
"has_risk_note": "has a risk note",
"may_receive_purchase_order": "may receive a purchase order",
"needs_procurement_review": "needs procurement review"
} | [
"has_risk_note",
"has_vendor_approval",
"may_receive_purchase_order",
"needs_procurement_review",
"submitted_tax_form"
] | has_vendor_approval::Vendor B | Vendor B has vendor approval. | local_closed_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"has_risk_note::Vendor C",
"submitted_tax_form::Vendor B"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_vendor_approval::Vendor B",
"closure_atoms": [
"has_risk_note::Vendor C",
"submitted_tax_form::Vendor B"
]
} | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
robotics_operations_0169_closed_missing_with_open_distractor__owa__ask_act | robotics_operations_0169_closed_missing_with_open_distractor__owa | robotics_operations_0169_closed_missing_with_open_distractor | dev | robotics_operations | closed_missing_with_open_distractor | core_contrastive | owa | {
"name": "Open-world assumption",
"instruction": "Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown."
} | [] | [
"Rover 3 has a field note.",
"Rover 2 passed diagnostics."
] | [] | [] | {
"passed_diagnostics": "passed diagnostics",
"has_shift_clearance": "has shift clearance",
"has_field_note": "has a field note",
"may_start_shift": "may start its shift",
"needs_operator_review": "needs operator review"
} | [
"has_field_note",
"has_shift_clearance",
"may_start_shift",
"needs_operator_review",
"passed_diagnostics"
] | has_shift_clearance::Rover 2 | Rover 2 has shift clearance. | open_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"has_field_note::Rover 3",
"passed_diagnostics::Rover 2"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_shift_clearance::Rover 2",
"closure_atoms": [
"has_field_note::Rover 3",
"passed_diagnostics::Rover 2"
]
} | unknown | request_information | has_shift_clearance | Rover 2 | has_shift_clearance::Rover 2 | Is it true that Rover 2 has shift clearance? | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
robotics_operations_0172_open_missing_with_closed_distractor__lcwa__ask_act | robotics_operations_0172_open_missing_with_closed_distractor__lcwa | robotics_operations_0172_open_missing_with_closed_distractor | train | robotics_operations | open_missing_with_closed_distractor | core_contrastive | lcwa | {
"name": "Locally closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown."
} | [
"has_shift_clearance",
"may_start_shift"
] | [
"Rover 6 has shift clearance.",
"Rover 6 passed diagnostics."
] | [] | [] | {
"passed_diagnostics": "passed diagnostics",
"has_shift_clearance": "has shift clearance",
"has_field_note": "has a field note",
"may_start_shift": "may start its shift",
"needs_operator_review": "needs operator review"
} | [
"has_field_note",
"has_shift_clearance",
"may_start_shift",
"needs_operator_review",
"passed_diagnostics"
] | has_field_note::Rover 5 | Rover 5 has a field note. | local_open_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"has_shift_clearance::Rover 6",
"passed_diagnostics::Rover 6"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_field_note::Rover 5",
"closure_atoms": [
"has_shift_clearance::Rover 6",
"passed_diagnostics::Rover 6"
]
} | unknown | request_information | has_field_note | Rover 5 | has_field_note::Rover 5 | Is it true that Rover 5 has a field note? | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
robotics_operations_0195_explicit_negative_closed__lcwa__ask_act | robotics_operations_0195_explicit_negative_closed__lcwa | robotics_operations_0195_explicit_negative_closed | train | robotics_operations | explicit_negative_closed | control_explicit_negative | lcwa | {
"name": "Locally closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown."
} | [
"has_shift_clearance"
] | [
"Rover 6 passed diagnostics."
] | [
"Rover 4 does not has shift clearance."
] | [] | {
"passed_diagnostics": "passed diagnostics",
"has_shift_clearance": "has shift clearance",
"has_field_note": "has a field note",
"may_start_shift": "may start its shift",
"needs_operator_review": "needs operator review"
} | [
"has_field_note",
"has_shift_clearance",
"may_start_shift",
"needs_operator_review",
"passed_diagnostics"
] | has_shift_clearance::Rover 4 | Rover 4 has shift clearance. | explicit_negative_fact | {
"positive_atoms": [
"passed_diagnostics::Rover 6"
],
"negative_atoms": [
"has_shift_clearance::Rover 4"
],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_shift_clearance::Rover 4",
"closure_atoms": [
"passed_diagnostics::Rover 6"
]
} | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
robotics_operations_0196_explicit_negative_open__cwa__ask_act | robotics_operations_0196_explicit_negative_open__cwa | robotics_operations_0196_explicit_negative_open | train | robotics_operations | explicit_negative_open | control_explicit_negative | cwa | {
"name": "Closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false."
} | [
"has_field_note",
"has_shift_clearance",
"may_start_shift",
"needs_operator_review",
"passed_diagnostics"
] | [
"Rover 1 passed diagnostics."
] | [
"Rover 5 does not has a field note."
] | [] | {
"passed_diagnostics": "passed diagnostics",
"has_shift_clearance": "has shift clearance",
"has_field_note": "has a field note",
"may_start_shift": "may start its shift",
"needs_operator_review": "needs operator review"
} | [
"has_field_note",
"has_shift_clearance",
"may_start_shift",
"needs_operator_review",
"passed_diagnostics"
] | has_field_note::Rover 5 | Rover 5 has a field note. | explicit_negative_fact | {
"positive_atoms": [
"passed_diagnostics::Rover 1"
],
"negative_atoms": [
"has_field_note::Rover 5"
],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_field_note::Rover 5",
"closure_atoms": [
"passed_diagnostics::Rover 1"
]
} | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
procurement_review_0291_closed_missing_with_open_distractor__owa__ask_act | procurement_review_0291_closed_missing_with_open_distractor__owa | procurement_review_0291_closed_missing_with_open_distractor | train | procurement_review | closed_missing_with_open_distractor | core_contrastive | owa | {
"name": "Open-world assumption",
"instruction": "Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown."
} | [] | [
"Vendor E has a risk note.",
"Vendor D submitted a tax form."
] | [] | [] | {
"submitted_tax_form": "submitted a tax form",
"has_vendor_approval": "has vendor approval",
"has_risk_note": "has a risk note",
"may_receive_purchase_order": "may receive a purchase order",
"needs_procurement_review": "needs procurement review"
} | [
"has_risk_note",
"has_vendor_approval",
"may_receive_purchase_order",
"needs_procurement_review",
"submitted_tax_form"
] | has_vendor_approval::Vendor D | Vendor D has vendor approval. | open_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"has_risk_note::Vendor E",
"submitted_tax_form::Vendor D"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_vendor_approval::Vendor D",
"closure_atoms": [
"has_risk_note::Vendor E",
"submitted_tax_form::Vendor D"
]
} | unknown | request_information | has_vendor_approval | Vendor D | has_vendor_approval::Vendor D | Is it true that Vendor D has vendor approval? | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
manufacturing_quality_0117_explicit_negative_open__lcwa__ask_act | manufacturing_quality_0117_explicit_negative_open__lcwa | manufacturing_quality_0117_explicit_negative_open | train | manufacturing_quality | explicit_negative_open | control_explicit_negative | lcwa | {
"name": "Locally closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown."
} | [
"has_release_approval",
"may_ship"
] | [
"Part F passed the visual check."
] | [
"Part D does not has a supplier note."
] | [] | {
"passed_visual_check": "passed the visual check",
"has_release_approval": "has release approval",
"has_supplier_note": "has a supplier note",
"may_ship": "may ship to customers",
"needs_engineer_review": "needs engineer review"
} | [
"has_release_approval",
"has_supplier_note",
"may_ship",
"needs_engineer_review",
"passed_visual_check"
] | has_supplier_note::Part D | Part D has a supplier note. | explicit_negative_fact | {
"positive_atoms": [
"passed_visual_check::Part F"
],
"negative_atoms": [
"has_supplier_note::Part D"
],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_supplier_note::Part D",
"closure_atoms": [
"passed_visual_check::Part F"
]
} | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
robotics_operations_0180_open_derived_missing_antecedent__owa__ask_act | robotics_operations_0180_open_derived_missing_antecedent__owa | robotics_operations_0180_open_derived_missing_antecedent | train | robotics_operations | open_derived_missing_antecedent | core_contrastive | owa | {
"name": "Open-world assumption",
"instruction": "Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown."
} | [] | [
"Rover 1 passed diagnostics."
] | [] | [
"If a robot has a field note, then that robot needs operator review."
] | {
"passed_diagnostics": "passed diagnostics",
"has_shift_clearance": "has shift clearance",
"has_field_note": "has a field note",
"may_start_shift": "may start its shift",
"needs_operator_review": "needs operator review"
} | [
"has_field_note",
"has_shift_clearance",
"may_start_shift",
"needs_operator_review",
"passed_diagnostics"
] | needs_operator_review::Rover 1 | Rover 1 needs operator review. | open_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"passed_diagnostics::Rover 1"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [
{
"antecedents": [
"has_field_note::Rover 1"
],
"conclusion": "needs_operator_review::Rover 1",
"text": "If a robot has a field note, then that robot needs operator review."
}
],... | unknown | request_information | has_field_note | Rover 1 | has_field_note::Rover 1 | Is it true that Rover 1 has a field note? | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
library_services_0238_explicit_negative_open__cwa__ask_act | library_services_0238_explicit_negative_open__cwa | library_services_0238_explicit_negative_open | test | library_services | explicit_negative_open | control_explicit_negative | cwa | {
"name": "Closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false."
} | [
"has_active_membership",
"has_borrowing_clearance",
"has_special_request",
"may_borrow_archive_item",
"needs_librarian_review"
] | [
"Reader A has an active membership."
] | [
"Reader E does not has a special request."
] | [] | {
"has_active_membership": "has an active membership",
"has_borrowing_clearance": "has borrowing clearance",
"has_special_request": "has a special request",
"may_borrow_archive_item": "may borrow an archive item",
"needs_librarian_review": "needs librarian review"
} | [
"has_active_membership",
"has_borrowing_clearance",
"has_special_request",
"may_borrow_archive_item",
"needs_librarian_review"
] | has_special_request::Reader E | Reader E has a special request. | explicit_negative_fact | {
"positive_atoms": [
"has_active_membership::Reader A"
],
"negative_atoms": [
"has_special_request::Reader E"
],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_special_request::Reader E",
"closure_atoms": [
"has_active_membership::Reader A"
]
} | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
procurement_review_0285_open_missing_direct__lcwa__ask_act | procurement_review_0285_open_missing_direct__lcwa | procurement_review_0285_open_missing_direct | train | procurement_review | open_missing_direct | core_contrastive | lcwa | {
"name": "Locally closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown."
} | [
"has_vendor_approval",
"may_receive_purchase_order"
] | [
"Vendor D submitted a tax form."
] | [] | [] | {
"submitted_tax_form": "submitted a tax form",
"has_vendor_approval": "has vendor approval",
"has_risk_note": "has a risk note",
"may_receive_purchase_order": "may receive a purchase order",
"needs_procurement_review": "needs procurement review"
} | [
"has_risk_note",
"has_vendor_approval",
"may_receive_purchase_order",
"needs_procurement_review",
"submitted_tax_form"
] | has_risk_note::Vendor D | Vendor D has a risk note. | local_open_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"submitted_tax_form::Vendor D"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_risk_note::Vendor D",
"closure_atoms": [
"submitted_tax_form::Vendor D"
]
} | unknown | request_information | has_risk_note | Vendor D | has_risk_note::Vendor D | Is it true that Vendor D has a risk note? | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.