Spaces:
Running
Running
Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -11,4 +11,31 @@ license: mit
|
|
| 11 |
short_description: A simple user-facing interface for the tabular model
|
| 12 |
---
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
short_description: A simple user-facing interface for the tabular model
|
| 12 |
---
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
+
# Flower Color Predictor using AutoGluon
|
| 15 |
+
|
| 16 |
+
This repository contains a trained `TabularPredictor` from the AutoGluon library, which was trained to classify flower colors based on their physical dimensions.
|
| 17 |
+
|
| 18 |
+
## Dataset
|
| 19 |
+
|
| 20 |
+
The model was trained on the `scottymcgee/flowers` dataset, using the synthetic (`augmented`) split for training and the original (`original`) split for final evaluation.
|
| 21 |
+
|
| 22 |
+
## Model
|
| 23 |
+
|
| 24 |
+
The model was borrowed from `https://huggingface.co/its-zion-18/flowers-tabular-autolguon-predictor` model.
|
| 25 |
+
|
| 26 |
+
## Evaluation Results
|
| 27 |
+
|
| 28 |
+
The final performance of the best model on the original dataset is as follows:
|
| 29 |
+
|
| 30 |
+
- **Accuracy**: `1.0000`
|
| 31 |
+
- **Weighted F1**: `1.0000`
|
| 32 |
+
|
| 33 |
+
## Potential Errors
|
| 34 |
+
|
| 35 |
+
Based on the accuracy being so high, I assume there may be data leakage.
|
| 36 |
+
Since the augmented data was created directly from the original data (by adding noise or small variations),
|
| 37 |
+
the model wasn't learning to generalize to new information. It was simply memorizing the patterns it had already been shown.
|
| 38 |
+
This could have led to overfitting, where a model learns the training data so well that it fails to perform on new, unseen data.
|
| 39 |
+
|
| 40 |
+
## Contact
|
| 41 |
+
Feel free to contact me for any questions or concerns: [email protected]
|