--- name: detection-bootstrap description: Bootstrap an object-detection dataset and a small trained detector from images that have NO labels — zero-shot label with Falcon-Perception, validate, convert, then fine-tune a compact Apache-licensed model, all on Hugging Face Jobs. Runs fully autonomously or with human review checkpoints. Use when you have an image collection and want a detector but no annotations exist. --- # Bootstrap a detector from unlabeled images The loop: **zero-shot teacher labels → validate → convert → train a small student → evaluate → publish.** Every step is a self-contained UV script from [`uv-scripts/object-detection`](https://huggingface.co/datasets/uv-scripts/object-detection) on the Hugging Face Hub, or a `hf jobs` command. `--help` works on every script. ## Pick your path Five decisions cover most runs; each routes into the numbered steps below. 1. **Where are the images?** Dataset repo → `falcon-perception.py`. Bucket → `falcon-perception-bucket.py` (reads `.jpg`/`.jpeg`/`.png` only — convert JPEG 2000 / TIFF first). 2. **Transport to the trainer**: build canonical `train.parquet` / `validation.parquet` with `embed-bucket-images.py` (images embedded, gold excluded and asserted). Trainers that take HF datasets read the parquet directly — including straight off a bucket; trainers that want a COCO directory tree get one **generated in-job** with `materialize-coco.py` — onto a bucket mount if more than one job will train on it (a complete tree is reused, not rebuilt). Never hand-assemble or upload directory trees: a tree generated from the parquet cannot have missing-image mismatches. Run `smoke-test.py` first (free, local, ~30 s): it proves these plumbing scripts still produce correct output before a paid job depends on them. 3. **Boxes or masks?** Boxes → the D-FINE default in step 5. Masks → an RF-DETR-Seg-style trainer via `materialize-coco.py` (RLE masks carried through and resized from the teacher's inference frame to the image frame). 4. **Human available?** Show step-1 previews and do the step-6 gold slice. Headless → numeric proxies and say **unreviewed**. 5. **After the first student**: run the step-6 loop — student over the teacher-empty pages at a low threshold, VLM pre-triage, retrain on the corrections. ## Check if a human in the loop You can use the approach outlined in this skill with or without a human in the loop. - **With a human in the loop** (better models): show them the step-1 previews — "is the teacher boxing the right things?" is the highest-value question, and its fix is the cheapest (a better query and a re-run of the teacher). Then train on a small slice first (500–1k images) and show 20 rendered predictions before spending on the full corpus. If corrections are worth collecting at volume, run a review pass with `review-detections.py` (keyboard accept/reject in the browser — quick mode for whole-image verdicts in random order with quotable rates, boxes mode for per-box rejects; pushes a `review` column), fold corrections in and retrain. Diff the corrected set against the first pass (`diff-hf-datasets.py`) to measure how good the zero-shot pass actually was. - **Autonomously** (headless): don't pause for review — use the numeric proxies, and say **unreviewed** in the final report and model card. ## 1. Sense-check the class name before spending GPU money (free) Falcon-Perception queries are **class names, not instructions** ("photograph" works; "the photographs, excluding captions" returns nothing), and **one class per run** (combined queries collapse — run per class and merge on `image_id`). Model details: `hf models card tiiuae/Falcon-Perception`. Check cheaply on 3 images before any full pass. The teacher (Falcon-Perception) is a **0.6B model, 1.3 GB download** — it runs on a CUDA GPU (fast), Apple Silicon (MLX backend auto-selected, about 6 s/image), or plain CPU (slow, but fine for 3 images). Run the check wherever is practical for you: ``` # locally, if your machine can: uv run https://huggingface.co/datasets/uv-scripts/object-detection/raw/main/falcon-perception.py \ --dataset / --limit 3 --query photograph --preview # or the same check as a small job (previews don't persist on Jobs — push a tiny dataset instead). # l4x1 is the cheapest flavor that fits the engine (see step 2's flavor rule): hf jobs uv run --flavor l4x1 --secrets HF_TOKEN \ https://huggingface.co/datasets/uv-scripts/object-detection/raw/main/falcon-perception.py \ --dataset / --limit 3 --query photograph --out /-check --private ``` Judge the result before scaling up: - **If you can view images**, look at the rendered previews (or the pushed check dataset) — are the right things boxed? `render-detections.py` renders any dataset in this schema and **pixel-verifies its own output** (a page with instances whose render equals the source exits nonzero — silent blank-overlay bugs are real and have been shown to humans as "done"). - **If you can't**, compare instance counts across candidate queries (`stats-hf-dataset.py` below works on a pushed check dataset): near-zero instances/image means the class name is wrong for this material — try a synonym (`photograph` / `illustration` / `figure` / `cartoon`). Suspiciously many (more than about 10/image) *can* mean the query is matching layout blocks — but dense plates genuinely carry 10–20 figures, so counts are a fallback signal only; previews are the judge. - Measured on real material, previews judged: | material | worked | partial | dud | |---|---|---|---| | historic newspaper pages (b/w scans) | `photograph`, `illustration` | | | | book / encyclopaedia plates | `illustration` (incl. dense multi-figure plates) | `caption` (good on true plates, grabs whole text columns on text-heavy pages) | `figure` (0 hits on the same pages) | - **No vision at all?** A vision-capable subagent can judge the previews if you can spawn one; otherwise tell the user the check ran unviewed. (Falcon-Perception has a custom architecture, so it can't be served as an OpenAI-compatible endpoint — iterate via the batch script. If you swap in a teacher that vLLM can serve, a temporary hot server on Jobs is the faster way to iterate on queries: see [Serve Models on Jobs](https://huggingface.co/docs/hub/jobs-serving).) ## 2. Teacher pass on Jobs ``` hf jobs uv run --flavor a10g-large --secrets HF_TOKEN --timeout 2h \ https://huggingface.co/datasets/uv-scripts/object-detection/raw/main/falcon-perception.py \ --dataset / --query photograph --out /-photograph --private ``` - Sizing: expect a few images per second, not tens — the pass is decode-bound, so a bigger GPU changes little; to go faster, shard the file list across several jobs writing to the same output bucket. `--limit` on either script caps a run. - Flavor rule (all three failures measured): the engine needs a **24 GB-VRAM GPU** (16 GB T4s CUDA-OOM during prefill) and **more than 15 GB host RAM** (the engine sizes itself from the GPU and ignores host RAM, so `t4-small` and `a10g-small` are OOMKilled before the first image). `hf jobs hardware --json` lists every flavor's `ram`, accelerator and price — `l4x1` is the cheapest fit (fine for the step-1 check); `a10g-large` is faster for a corpus pass. - One job per class (step 1's rule). Every run labels its boxes `category` 0 in a single-name `ClassLabel`, so a naive concat collapses the classes — renumber each run to its index in a combined `ClassLabel` when merging. Rows align on `image_id` (every run contains every image): ```python from datasets import ClassLabel, Sequence, load_dataset names = ["illustration", "map"] parts = [load_dataset(f"/-{n}", split="train") for n in names] extra = [dict(zip(ds["image_id"], ds["objects"])) for ds in parts[1:]] def merge(row): o = {k: list(v) for k, v in row["objects"].items()} for i, run in enumerate(extra, start=1): r = run[row["image_id"]] o["bbox"] += r["bbox"]; o["area"] += r["area"] o["rectangularity"] += r["rectangularity"] o["category"] += [i] * len(r["bbox"]) return {"objects": o, "n_instances": len(o["bbox"])} feats = parts[0].features.copy() feats["objects"]["category"] = Sequence(ClassLabel(names=names)) merged = parts[0].map(merge, features=feats) ``` (`masks_rle` concatenates the same way if you need the masks.) - Output schema: `objects.bbox` in **YOLO format** (normalized center x, y, w, h), `objects.category` (a `ClassLabel` named after the query), `objects.area`, `objects.rectangularity`, plus `image`, `image_id`, `width`, `height`. - There are **no confidence scores** (the model has none). `rectangularity` (mask area ÷ box area) is the triage proxy: values near 0 are usually junk, 0.785 is a circle, 1.0 a full rectangle. - Submit with `--detach` (returns the job id immediately), then block on completion with `hf jobs wait [ ...] --timeout 2h` — it exits 0 only if every job succeeded, so it chains cleanly into the next step. `hf jobs logs ` / `hf jobs inspect ` for progress and errors. - A job can sit in SCHEDULING while the flavor queue drains — that is a queue, not a failure. **Don't resubmit**: a second copy racing to the same `--out` just doubles the bill. If you do switch (`hf jobs hardware` for alternatives), cancel the queued copy first (`hf jobs cancel `). - For images in a [storage bucket](https://huggingface.co/docs/hub/storage-buckets) instead of a dataset, use `falcon-perception-bucket.py` — it writes resumable parquet parts back to a bucket (kill and re-run the same command; done keys are skipped). It reads `.jpg` / `.jpeg` / `.png` only — convert JPEG 2000 or TIFF scans first, or it will silently find zero images: ``` hf jobs uv run --flavor a10g-large --secrets HF_TOKEN --timeout 2h --detach \ https://huggingface.co/datasets/uv-scripts/object-detection/raw/main/falcon-perception-bucket.py \ --src / --prefix \ --out / --query illustration ``` Publish once at the end so the parts feed the rest of this loop (parquet stores `category` as bare ints; the cast attaches the class name): ```python from datasets import ClassLabel, Image, Sequence, load_dataset ds = load_dataset("parquet", data_files="hf://buckets///part-*.parquet", split="train") feats = ds.features.copy() feats["objects"]["category"] = Sequence(ClassLabel(names=[ds[0]["query"]])) if "image" in feats: # parts written with --embed-images: make the bytes a decodable Image column feats["image"] = Image() ds.cast(feats).push_to_hub("/") ``` The bucket path's output is **annotations-only** by default — there is no `image` column, and the step-5 trainer and `review-detections.py` both need embedded images. `embed-bucket-images.py` (same repo) joins the bytes back in, drops the teacher's error rows, excludes and asserts the gold slice, splits train/validation, and writes the final schema exactly once — to a dataset repo, or as `train.parquet`/`validation.parquet` in a bucket. (`--embed-images` on the teacher pass writes the bytes into the parts instead — storage is cheap, and the join step then skips its re-fetch; the cost is a copy of the corpus in the output bucket.) Trainers that want a COCO directory tree get one generated from that parquet by `materialize-coco.py` — once, onto a bucket mount if several jobs will train on it — never hand-assemble or upload directory trees. ## 3. Validate the labels (free, local) ``` uv run https://huggingface.co/datasets/uv-scripts/object-detection/raw/main/validate-hf-dataset.py \ /-photograph --bbox-format yolo uv run https://huggingface.co/datasets/uv-scripts/object-detection/raw/main/stats-hf-dataset.py \ /-photograph --bbox-format yolo ``` Expect **VALID** with 0 out-of-bounds and 0 zero-area boxes. `W001` warnings on empty images are normal and worth keeping as training signal — but treat them as **unverified negatives**: zero-shot teachers miss real instances on a meaningful fraction of "empty" pages (a third, on one measured corpus). The step-6 loop is how you find and flip them. Drop obvious junk before training: degenerate slivers (extreme aspect ratio + tiny area) and near-duplicate boxes (IoU > 0.9 within one image). ## 4. Convert YOLO → COCO for training (free, local) Trainers expect COCO `xywh` pixels; the teacher emits YOLO normalized. One command: ``` uv run https://huggingface.co/datasets/uv-scripts/object-detection/raw/main/convert-hf-dataset.py \ /-photograph /-coco --from yolo --to coco_xywh ``` ## 5. Train a small detector A known-good default: fine-tune [`ustc-community/dfine-small-coco`](https://huggingface.co/ustc-community/dfine-small-coco) (D-FINE small, 10.4M params, Apache-2.0, in `transformers`) on the step-4 COCO dataset — 800 images, 30 epochs, `t4-medium`, about 48 minutes (`hf jobs hardware` shows current prices). Training needs only a T4: step 2's 24 GB-VRAM rule is the teacher's engine, not the student's. The [**`huggingface-vision-trainer`**](https://github.com/huggingface/skills/tree/main/skills/huggingface-vision-trainer) skill runs the training end to end (dataset validation, augmentation, mAP eval, Hub persistence) — install it with `hf skills add huggingface-vision-trainer` if you don't have it, and follow its object-detection path with the `/-coco` dataset and the settings above. Hold out the validation split — and the step-6 gold slice — BEFORE training, and never train on either. Write checkpoints **continuously to the synced `/data` mount**, not `/tmp` or a local output dir: Jobs can be SIGTERM'd at any time (node reclaim, requeue), anything outside the mount dies with the job, and durable checkpoints are also what make stopping at a plateau safe. Other trainers work — the dataset is plain COCO. [RT-DETRv2](https://huggingface.co/PekingU/rtdetr_v2_r18vd) is a comparable compact Apache-2.0 pick; [RF-DETR](https://github.com/roboflow/rf-detr) (Apache-2.0, DINOv2 backbone) is a good starter, and its Seg variant can learn from the teacher's `masks_rle` masks. Check the license fits the use — `hf models card ` shows it; flag restrictive licenses (e.g. ultralytics/YOLO is AGPL) to the user rather than deciding for them. Explore further: [transformers object-detection models](https://huggingface.co/models?pipeline_tag=object-detection&library=transformers&sort=trending) · [ultralytics-library models](https://huggingface.co/models?library=ultralytics). Decode `masks_rle` like this — each RLE lives in its own frame, which never matches the recorded width/height: ```python import json, numpy as np from PIL import Image from pycocotools import mask as mask_utils for rle in json.loads(row["masks_rle"]): seg = mask_utils.decode({**rle, "counts": rle["counts"].encode()}) # frame = rle["size"] if seg.shape != (row["height"], row["width"]): seg = np.asarray(Image.fromarray(seg).resize((row["width"], row["height"]), Image.NEAREST)) ``` ## 6. Evaluate honestly - Report mAP on the held-out slice. Be clear about what it measures: **agreement with the teacher**, not accuracy against human truth — no human labels exist in this loop unless you make some (next bullet). - **Gold slice** (with a human in the loop): hold out about 100 random images BEFORE training — keyed on a **stable image id** that is identical in every dataset you build (path prefixes from different runs silently break the match) — and **assert the exclusion** before submitting any training job: train count = total − gold, overlap = 0. Then have the human verify every box on them with `review-detections.py --mode boxes --order random`, then correct any misses (the tool flags them with M; drawing the missing boxes is manual for now). Then report TWO numbers: mAP vs teacher labels AND mAP vs the human gold. They differ, and the gap is the finding — in the validation run of this skill: 0.84 vs teacher labels but 0.44 vs human gold, both mAP@50 on held-out pages. That gap is the teacher's systematic divergence from human annotators, which teacher-agreement alone cannot see. - The student can at best match its teacher (measured on a comparable loop: student 97.4% vs teacher 95.0% human-acceptable on the same sample). The point of distilling is **throughput and cost** (10–100× cheaper per image than the teacher), not accuracy gains. - Evaluate with the model card's decode contract, and write that contract INTO the card (input padding, score handling — with one class use the raw logit/sigmoid, never softmax). This is load-bearing: a standard decode against a padded-square model measured 0.03 mAP where the documented decode measured 10× higher. (Evaluating locally on Apple Silicon: pass the trainer's eval a CPU device — the COCO eval path uses float64, which MPS lacks.) - Spot-check 20 or so predictions visually before calling it done — or, if running without a human and you cannot view images, state prominently in the report that the model is **unreviewed**. - It can make sense to run this process in a loop: predict → review (a human, or a vision-capable agent, via `review-detections.py`) → retrain on the corrections → review again, until the acceptance rate stops improving. Two things make the loop cheap: point the student at the **teacher-empty pages at a low threshold** first (that is where the teacher's false negatives concentrate, and flipping them from negative to positive is the biggest training-signal win), and **pre-triage candidates with a VLM judge** (one crop per instance, mask highlighted) so the human only reviews the uncertain residue rather than every candidate. ## 7. Publish with honest provenance Push the model and dataset — ask the user whether public or private; if you can't ask, default to private and say so. Build each dataset's **final schema in memory and push once** — never stage an intermediate push to the repo you will publish. A second push with different columns leaves the repo's stored features stale and `load_dataset` fails with a cast error; if the schema must change, push to a new repo id. The cards must state: labels are **zero-shot weak labels** from Falcon-Perception (name the script + date), which filters ran, and that **recall is unmeasured** unless you measured it against an independent source. Say what the model is for and what it was trained on. A model trained this way is a first pass. The review loop above is how it gets better.