Split (1)

train · 34.9k rows

messages listlengths 3 3
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\" A few days later NASA unveiled the image for all to see. The caption noted a \"huge rock formation . . . which resembles a human head . . . formed by shadows giving the illusions of eyes, nose, and mouth. \" Many of you believe that this face on Mars was created by an alien, but really it's just a natural landform. It is a natural landform because a better image was on the JPL web site, you can discern things in a digital image 3 times bigger than the pixel size, and it shows the Martian equivalent of a butte or mesa. First, there was a better image on the JPL web site. In paragraph 7 it states how the MOC team took a picture 10 times better than the original Viking photo. This phot reveals a natural landform with no Martian activity. There was no Martian monument to be found. Second, you can discern things in a digital 3 times bigger than the pixel size. For example if there were objects on the ground you would not be able to see them. So the camera wouldnt be able to catch anything else if there were something else with the face, which is just a natural landform. Lastly, it shows the Martian equivalent of a butte or mesa. These are landforms commonly found around the American West. In paragraph 12 Garvin says, \" Thats a lava dome that takes the form of an isolated mesa abouth the same height as the Face on Mars.\" In conclusion, it is a natural landform because a better image was on the JPL website , you can discern things in a digital image 3 times bigger than the pixel size, and it shows the martian equivalent of a butte or mesa. In paragraph 1 it says how Viking 1 was taking pictures of possible landing spots for Viking 2. Then it was fgured it was just another Martian mesa. Which was very common in Cydonia.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\" A study last year found that driving by young people decreased 23 percent between 2001 and 2009\". Limiting the use of cars from people is a great thing to consider. Cutting down the use of cars would reduce harmful toxins in the air that hurt our enviroment and help people save money. Reduceing the car use of people today would help out our enviroment. To illistrate, smog is a seriosu problem, \"cold nights and warm days caused the warm layer of air to trap car emissions\"(Duffer, 15). The smog is not good for our enviroment, therefore we should cut down the use of cars to cut down the amouhnt of smog produced. If we maintain our Earth the way it needs to stay healthy then it wouldnt have lots of issues. Keeping up with the no car use \"sociologist believe it will-it will have benifical implications for carbon emissions and the enviroment\"( Rosenthal ,34). America's second largest cause for emissions is transportation. We should completely stop or dirastically reduce the amount of car use. These new changes will help our enviroment stay clean and save our Earth. Another example of why we should controll the car use is because it will save people money. Now that \"118 miles of bicycle paths\" (Selsky, 27) have been made people wont have to drive cars. Cars cost a lot more money than a simple bicycle does. You also dont have to maintain a bicycle as much as you do a car.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\" All of our development since World War 2 has been centered on the car...\" Now and days alot of countries are limiting car usage to go into a day of free car day, which basically means that no one is allowed to drive their motor running cars for a day. If they disobey the law they will be charge a fine. Its like a when a police officer stops you for passing a red light or for speeding on a no speeding zone. Still these countries are getting advantages over these days because there will be less smog, less traffic, and more people buying bicycles rather than a expensive car. \" Congestion was down 60 percent in the capital of France, after five-days of intensifying smog.\" one of the advantages for limiting car use is there will be less smog to deal with in the air. this can harm not only us but our environment we live in, which is the air we breath. In france they decide to do a car ban day. The result of this event was that the \" Cold nights and warm days caused the warmer layer of air to trap car emissions\". If someone was brave enough to drive a car than they will be fined 22-euro which is $31. \" Almost 4,000 drivers were fined according to Reuters, people had their cars impounded for thier reaction to the fine\". Less traffic was on the streets due this ban of cars, which allowed the people with bicycles to go on the streets and ride them. In Bogota,Colombia they also did this ban but they gained more advantages over limiting car usage, only buses and taxis were permitted to drive on the streets. their goal was to promote alternative transportation. Due to this event, parks and sports centers were packed throughout the city, and pitted sidewalks have been replaced by smooth sidewalks for the skateboards and bikes. \" What most intrigues me is that rates of car ownerships per household and per person started to come down two to three years before downturn said Micheal Sivak\". As a result of car ban people have stop buying cars which is atrocius for car companies but at the same time there is a up side to this also and is that people will now walk or ride bicycles to get to where they need. Which also leads to people being more atlethic and less people being obese or overweight. These countries are gaining alot because of these car ban which is good for removing these dark clouds in the air, less traffic, and people riding bicycles rather than cars. Its obviusly that some people think that this rule is selfish or not needed but its helps more than you think it does. And some people are just mad because of what they are getting charged or fine for driving in the streets even though you can't due to the law.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\" All of our development since World War II has been centered on the car, and that will have to change. \" As an official of the Transportation for America, David Goldberg is a credible source for information regarding transportation in America. However there are places all around the world were automobiles are causing problems. Limiting car usage could help solve many of those issues. In America, the topic of alternative transportation has been discussed many times, but in previous bills, 80% of appropriations have by law gone to highways and only 20% to other transport. This can be found in paragraph 9 of the first source as the fifth line. Sadly America is not the only country having problems. In Paris, France , diesel cars make up 67% of the vehicles and the diesel feul is blamed for the smog accumulation in the city. In Paris, A warmer layer of air caused by cold nights and warm days, trapped the car emissions which then caused a five day period of intensifying smog. France's smog build-up rivaled that of Beijing, China , which is claimed to be one of the most polluted cities in the world. This problem also exists in the States, as transportation is the second largest cause of America's emissions, right behind power plants. To ensure safety anyone who was still driving their car was fined 22- euros or $31. Bogota, Columbia followed France in their violation fee and charged any violater $25. Bogota has created a Day Without Cars , in which no cars are used, to promote alternative transport and the reduction of smog levels. Another positive effect no cars can have would be a more peaceful enviroment, as stated in sources 1 and 3. In America, recent studies show that Americans have been buying fewer cars, driving less, and getting fewer licenses. Although it may be far in the future, America may soon follow the lead of Vauban, Germany , where it is completely car-free. This probably won't happen anytime in the near future, but the use of automobiles has gone down in the United States. Bill Ford, chairman of the Ford Motor company, proposed a city in which, pedestrians, bicycles, private cars, etc. are used to save time, lower emissions and improve safety. He sees this future, hopefully others will too. Although America might not be exactly like Vauban, it is good to hope that it will get there someday. No cars would result in a calmer atmosphere and a more peaceful lifestyle. Also, it would lower the emissions made by vehicles, which in turn would save the atmosphere, thus saving life on earth. No cars would also help improve safety, both of animals and of people. We may not be completely there yet, but the world will someday have no need for cars and that will be the first step into the future.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\" All of our devolpment since World War II has been centered on the car and that will have to change ,\" said David Golberg. Now this is true, cars have been a fluenctal idea for transportation. Cars is known to be the fastest way of transportatin, but maybe limiting car usage can be helpful. Theres thousands of alternatives like bicking, skating, running, ridding a bus, or even a train. limiting car usage would save the money you use on gas, reduce the ammount of polution in our atmosphere, and is more healthy for your body. Heres my explanation to why limiting car usage would be a productive idea. Our nation spends millons on gas each week, limiting car usage would save that money. The amount of money people spend on gas is astonishing. Limiting car usage by taking a buss or even using a bike could save that money. In my community there is this parking lot for buss takers, this way people can save money on gas and still get to there destination on time. Another advantage to limiting car usage is that it will reduce polution. Polution is a huge problem not just for Europe or North America, but for the entire world. According to source 2 \"Congestion was down 60 percent in the capital of France, after five-days of intensifying smog.\" In France they use diesel fuel which is the most polluted fuel there is. Paris put a banned on ussages of their cars, this led to 4,000 driveres being fined.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\" An enormous head nealy two miles from end to end seemed to be staring back at the cameras fro a regioan of the Red Planet called Cydonia.\" Although scientists might think the face-like civilization was created by aliens, but that is not the case. The Face is just a natural landform because landforms like this are common around Cydonia , and also because NASA unveiled an image stating that it was a rock formation giving the illusion of a face. First off, mesas and other rock formations are commonly found around Cydonia. The text states \" Scientists figured it was just another Martian mesa, common enough around Cydonia, only this one had unusual shadows that made it look like an Egyptian Pharaoh. \" , meaning it most like is a Martian mesa of some sort. This also means that NASA still has other mesas and other landforms to explore on Mars. Secondly, pictures were taken of the foreign area and the text states, \" huge rock formation . . . which resembles a human head . . . formed by shadows givng the illusion of eyes, nose, and mouth. \" , which means it resembles a face but most likely indicates a natural landform. In conclusion, the Face is just a natural landform because they are common in this area and also because th pictures resembled a rock formation that only had the illusion of a face. Therefore , the Face is a natural landform.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\" Can you imagine a time in te future when no one buys cars because no one needs them anymore?\" From the passage that i've read they've predicted that driverless cars will first be issued around 2020 thats just 4 years away! I believe driverless cars could severely lower the percentage of an accident happening. The odds of a teenager crashing with driverless cars could go down nearly an astonishing 68%. The police force would have to watch out for distracted drivers that are on there cellular devices or even doing there make-up in the car. Would you like to see driverless cars in the future. There are a handful of companies developing prototypes and concept cars, such as Toyota, BMW, Google, GM, Tesla and even apple has attempted at it before, but havent had as much success compared to the brands listed before apple. GM has had Computer driven cars since the 1950's. In 1950 GM created a concept car that could run on a special test track. Of course that didnt suceed due to the expenses the government would have to pay for new roads with sensors and electrical cables which was way too expensive to be practical. In 2013, BMW created a development called \"traffic Jam Assistant.\" The car could handle driving functions of speeds up to 25 MPH. I would love to drive everyday, but i do understand when parents say it's boring after so many years you just have to change up stuff such as a new car. Why would anyone want a driverless car? It would be interesting to show off your driverless new car, but in the end everyone would get bored just sitting in the drivers seat while the car takes you wherever you want to go. Even if a driverless car was created certain states wouldn't let you drive it on their roads. In states such as California, Nevada, and even Florida doesnt allow people to test a computer driven car without a human driver at the wheel. Would you want a driverless car to take you everywhere? Tesla has projected a 2016 release for a car capable of driving on autopilot 90 percent of the time. Back in the 1950's none of this was possible without costing millions of dollars just for a simple car now that we have all the sensors the prices of that manufacturing rates will go down if we ever continue are dream of creating a driverless car. in the 1980's, automakers used speed sensors at the wheels in the creation of the antilock brakes. Antilock brakes have helped prevent millions of accidents in our world today that could have led to thousands of deaths. So do you believe we should keep on striving for driverless cars.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\" DRIVELESS CARS \" Driveless cars are cars that drive for you . But still needs your asistance on somethings while driving . It developed a vibration in the seat to alarm you when the car is in danger . While the driver is watching the road the car is watching the driver. Am i against this creative idea ? Yes i am , its too risky in my opinion, technology isnt always good , and then to have a car that runs off of it is dangerous . they should just stick to regular cars. And for this car you would probably have learn a whole new drivers test to handle the car . Which is doing the most . You should be able to enjoy the car you want without having to take something you may have taken years ago. Your safety could even be at risk having this car . Also if you have kids you have to think about how it would effect them . Your children should come first to any and everything , and getting this car in my opinion they would come last . This car could end up getting a glech in it . It could mess up and take over your car like a angry robot or something and you could get injured or somebody else could . Also just to imagine the cost of this car is ridiculous , it would probably be over 200,000 dollars and thats just too much money to spend on a car that you almost literally have no control over .\" Because it drives for you\". So just think about how this car would affect your life as well as others . Its not worth it stick to regular cars . It's ways too risky to get this car so be careful about the decisions you make . It will help you out in the long run not to get it . save more money , everybody stays safe and happy . Driveless cars should not come out !", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\" During the 2000 campaign, seventeen states didn't see the candidates at all, including Rhode Island and South Carolina, and voters in 25 of the largest media markests didn't get to see the candidates at all.\"-Bradford Plumer. Are society is relaying on this electoral college system, when we don't even know who are those electors. I agree, that we should change our election to a popular vote because people get often confuse to whom their voting for, and it might lead to picking the wrong person that would be helping leading this country. On the other hand, the people that agree on keeping the electoral college system say that \" when you vote for a presidential candidate you're actually voting for a slate of electors.\" The majoredy of citizens don't even know who their voting for, imagine their going to be more lost and eventually ending up voting for the wrong person. The electoral college should be remove for good which will allows to have a stable society. The Electoral college dosen't allow the candidates to come and visit the states. So, you don't even now who you're voting for.\" In 1960, segregationists in the Louisiana legislature nearly suceeded in replacing the Democratic electors with new electors who would oppose John F. Kennedy.\" What's the point of having privileges to vote, when the segregationist who elect electors are against the president you voted for. What's happen to having free rights, and be able to vote for who you want, and knowing that he or she would suceed and lead our country to the right path. By having the electoral college system it is getting rid of those rights. Also the \"2000 fiasco\" was known as the biggest problems we had in the century. Are goal is improving our country not deteriorating it. If we change our election to a popular vote we wouldn't even be in this mess. Citizen who agree on keeping the electoral college system say that \"electoral votes induces the candidates as we saw in 2012's election to focus their campaign efforts on the toss-up states.\" What wrong with all the states? Are we not part of this country to? Their focusing all their attention on the states that they would be recieving their votes from. Their not even giving other states an opportunity of getting to know their candidates and what their offering to are country on improving it. Another, example is that the electoral college votes relay on larger states. They do that because they know that all their votes are going to come from the bigger states but that's incorrect they should relay on the whole country completely of getting their votes from. In conclusion, the", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\" I cant believe that the face was made by real life aliens its unbelievable! \" Jim said \" Dont tell me you believe that the fae was made by aliens. \" i said \" Actually yes i do. I believe aliens are truly real and don't care what anyone says. \" Jim said \" Jim there is no such thing as aliens maybe they may be real, but we have no sign or evidence that aliens are truly real. You watch to many Sci-Fi movies jim you need to lay them off for a while. \" I said \" Well if you think aliens don't exist then tell me prove to me how the the face was made then. \" Jim said \" Ok i will let me just go and get the picture. \" I said In my head i am thinking jim is nuts there is no way an alien had made the face. \" I'm telling you jim aliens did not create this. \" I said \" If aliens didn't creat this explain to me why or how this was probably formed from the picture. \" Jim said I look at jim right in the eye and was glad to show him with confidence that i was right and he was wrong. \" Look jim in 1998 when Michael Malin and his Mars Orbiter Camera team flew over cyndonia for the first time Michael and his team to ten pictures sharper than then the ones that the viking's photos took. When we all saw the photos it revealed a natural landform and no alien monument. \" I said \" I still don\"t believe you. \" Jim said \" So you want to me to explain more? \" I said \" Go right ahead. \" Jim said \" Garvin said that it reminded him of the Middle Butte in the Snakes River Plain of Idaho. Thats a lava dome that takes the form of an isolated mesa about the same height as the Face on Mars. \" I said \" Well i guess you have a point there, but that doesn't change the fact that i believe in aliens. \" Jim said \" Ok you can believe in whatever you want, but i was just simply telling you what we told to other people that also believed it was made by aliens. \" i said", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\" Im telling you it was created by aliens\" said george ( we recently discovered a land form that looks like a face on mars and george is one of those scienist who think that it was created by aliens). \" George I will prove to you that it is not made by aliens\" I said. \" Porve it then\" replied george in a sarcastic attitude as he let out a small laugh.\" \" The first reason i have is that we have the best HD ( high definition) cameras money can buy so when we take a picture of mars we should see everything such as houses veichals and animals or creatures or aliens. But, we dont see any of that cause its a simple land formation.\" \" Malin's team captured an extraordinary photo useing the cameras absolute maximum resolution.\" \" The second reason i know that it is not an alien made object but, a land form is the first time we saw the face we thought it was a face or an acient alien artifact beacause our cameras only took photos useing pixels. But, our cameras today dont use just pixels. So we can see better and we would be ble to see sighns of life on the planet.\" \" As a rule of thumb, you can discern things in a digital image 3 times bigger than the pixel size so if there were objects in this picture like airplanes on the ground or Egyptian-style pyramids or even small shacks, you could see what they were!\" \" For my third and final reason I know it's a land form is we already know what it is. Its a Martian equivalent of a buttle or mesa.( A type of landform ) \" What the picture really is is a buttle or mesa-landforms common around The American West.\" \"Oh... You make a good point\" sais george with a frown on his face. \" Wait, but how do you know that the clouds didnt just cover up the camera linse and make it impossiable to see the artifacts? Cause mars is a dusty planet.\" asked george. \" We took a photo on a nice summer day on mars with no dust or smoke in the air. It was on April 8, 2001 it wasnt dusty out or anything.\" i said in an instant. \" Well i guess alein life on other planets were to good to be true.\" he said with a smle. \" Ya well maybe one day we will find life on other planets. But for now lets just stick to looking at faces on mars\". I said with a smile and i patted him on the back and walked out of the room into my office across the hall. \" Maybe one day...just maybe....\" i mumbled under my breath.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\" Its All Sience\" Have you ever wanted to know more about the face on mars? Well if you do then hi, my name is STUDENT_NAME and I am a sientist. I have been working on the \"Face on Mars\", and I am here to tell you that there is all a sientific way to explain how there is a face on this place on Mars called Cydonia. Well the reasons I want to tell you why there is a face on the side of mars are, there is wind a it might have blown wind to make that kind of ground work, Mars is a planet just like Earth, so it might have shifting plates under the top layer of ground, and last but not least it might just be frozen in place. So I hope you learn something new! Do you like to run your fingers through you hair on a breezy day? Well on Mars there is wind. You can't just run your fingers through you hair there, but dirt can be moved and shifted. No, its not like a sand storm type of move, but the dirt can gradually move into what I would like to say \"Natural Art\". The magazine people, movie producers, and book writers love to say it was made by aliens, but nope it was possably made by simple wind. Did you know we have shifting plates underneath our feet? Well they are always moving, and they caused moutains, hills, and cliffs. That's what Mars has too. Well not as extream as mountains, hills, and cliffs, but can make simple land marks, mabye like the one known as \"The Face on Mars\". This simple little shift of underneath the ground can make a huge difference on sifferent planets such like Mars, and make a life changing peace of work. Do you like the weather to be hot or cold? Well Mars like to be cold. Well the planet doesn't really have a choice. The planet Mars isn't as close to the sun as Earth, so it is much colder. Mars used to have water many billion years ago, but now that its all gone all thats left is the frozen land marks. So, the face on Mars mabye just frozen old dirt. So, do you still believe in aliens? Well, I can't tell you what to believe, but no aliens made the \"Face on Mars\". The magazine people, book wirters, or movie producers are wrong. The face on Mars is just a simple land mark. I'm glad I got to give you all this information. Now will you study a little bit about Mars? The End", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\" Natural land form\" In 1976 NASA's Viking 1 spacecraft passed by something strange a human face? It drew attention around the globe, but was it a natural land form or a alien monument depicting a Egyptian pharoh? I dissagree with the alien theory and here is why. First off, Back in 1976 there was a lot of hype about UFO's and aliens, people stating that they were abducted. So when NASA released this photo, which actully is a land formation, people went crazy, it became a pop icon. Movies, books magazines, and talk radio shows starring the famous \"Face of Mars\" when in reality it was just a landformation that they did not understand, until 1998. My secound reason is, in 1998( eighteen years after findings) people were still talking about the alien face on Mars, but NASA was about to put those rumors to rest. When Mars Global Surveyor arrived at mars the got the fist pictures they could get feeling it important to the taxpayers and yet when the picture went online alien fanatics were shocked it was indead a natural land form. No alien monument here. But some people still didn't the believe, that in fact it was a natural land formation. Another reason was that NASA could prove that it was just a natural land form . In 1976 the pixels on a camera were only 43 meters compared to the 1.56 meters in 2001. Even though some might say that when they took the picture there was a lot of dust and debri of the plants natural elements that they could have missed other monuments a round the gigantic to what looks like a river landform. so it turns out that the iconic face was just actually a natural land form which kinda looked like the \"Snake River Plain up in idaho.\" Overall I think the people at NASA did a good job at debunking this.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\" One nation under god\", they say, so why do we still have other people determine our nations future? we should be able to have say over our country, atleast when it comes to picking the president. Yeah, We vote for the Electorals that are going to vote for our president, but how do we really know if they are. There are alot of schemes now a days regarding the government, our Electorals can just get paid off to promote one president but then vote for another. On source 2 \" The Indefensible Electoral College: Why even the best laid defenses of the system are wrong\" Bradford plumer says\" Can voters control whom their electors vote for? Not always. Do voters sometimes get confused about the electors and vote for the wrong canidate? Sometimes.\" I mean not only is the Electoral college unreliable but it is also confusing to some. At the end of the day even if we have some say in picking our president if he doesn't have enough electoral votes, he is still going to lose. It doesn't even matter if we vote anymore. On source 2 \"what's wrong with the electoral college?\" Bradford explains \" in the Louisiana legislature nearly succeeded in replacing the demcratic electors with new electors who would oppose John F. Kennedy. (So that a popular vote for Kenneddy would not have actually gone to Kennedy.)\" This, is what I mean by unreliable, we can't trust our Electorals, we should be able to vote directly! who we want as our president and not some shady second party. Another thing i would like to address in source 3 \"Big States\" Richard says \" A large state gets more attention from presidential candidates in a campaign than a small state doess...\" Exactly, if we do popular votes, candidates can just go to states and try to win them over as oppossed to Electorals taking claim of one state . Also if we approve popular votes, that one smalll state , could just make a difference on who wins so in other words, every state counts and every vote counts.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\" THE CHALLENGE OF EXPLORING VENUS\" This topic is about our solar system, we are talking about VENUS. We will learn things about venus. Venus is a planet with a whorty pursuit despite the dangers.All the planets have differents dangerous, we have the responsability to care our planets that is EARTH. It is about the challenge of exploring venus, changes, things founded and other more things. Venus is the second planet from our solar system. Venus, somethings is called the \" evening star\" because is one of the brightest points of light in the night sky. While venus is simple to see from the distant, but safe vantage point of EARTH. Venus is something right around the corner in space. Venus has proved a very challenge place to examine more closely. This planet is the closest planet to Earth in terms of density and size, and accasionaly the closest in distance too. Our solar system is form by 8 plants that are( mercury, venus, earth, mars, jupiter, saturn, uran, neptune ). Each previous mission was unmanned, and for good reason, since no space craft survived the landing for more than a few hours. Numerous factors contribute to venus is reoulations as a changening plantes for humans to study.This isuue explain why not a single spaceship has touched down on venus in more than three decades. Venus has the hottles surface temperature of any planet in our solar system, also mercury because these planet is closely to our sun. On the planet is surface, temperatures average over 800 degrees Fahrenheit, and the atmospheric pressure is 90 times greater. A thick atmosphere of almost 97 percent carbon dioxide blankets Venus. Astronomers are fascinated by venus because it may well once have been the most Earth -like planet in our solar system.The planet has a surface of rocky sediment and includes features, mountains, and craters. In this writting we look about the planet venus. Also know that the (NASA) has a particular idea for sending humans to study venus. We are know that in venus is not easy conditions, but survivable for humans. Other important things that we learn is that all is relationed with the planets, for example la technology, the natural disaster. Also we know that one of the all stars that are in the sky one of these is venus.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\" The \"Face on Mars\" has since become a pop icon. it has starred in hollywood film, apperes in books magazines, radio talks shows-even haunted grocery store cheakout lines for 25 years! Some peole think the Face is bona fide evidence of life on Mars- evidence that NASA would rather hide, say conpiracy theorists.\" siad NASA. The face on mars was not made by aliens beacuse it was illusion, shadows, and camera\"s. The face on mars was not made by aliens beacuse it was an illusion. The crises on the eyes was an illsion beacuse the shadows a cused by the hole and how the light is hitting it. \" A few days later NASA unveiled the image for all to see. The caption noted a \" huge rock formation. . . whic resenbles a human head. . . formed by shadows giving the illusion of eyes, nose, and mouth.\" said the author. illision was caused by how our eyes sees it. our brian is capitbal to form faces on anything that has a human characteristics. The face on mars was not made by aliens beacuse it was shadows.\" when it , viking 2, spotted the shadowy likeness of a human face.\" the shadows made the faces but in realtiy the is just a rock there not a face. \" The Face on Mars is located at 41 ddegres north martian laditue where it was winter, in April 98- a clody time of the year.\" said th author. Where the rock is located it make a shade that looks like a face it is always cloudy there. The Face on Mars was not made by aliens beacuse of the camer's. \" Malin 's team captured an extaordinary photo using the camera's absoulte maximum resolution, eac pixel in 2001 image spans 1.56 meters, compared to 43 meters per pixel in the best 1976 viking photo.\" the photo matter they took another picture on a cloudyness day and the face was kinda gone and the camera ws also the key. the camers couldhave caused a big differance in the picture. The face was not made by aliens beacuse it was and illusion by the shadows and the camera. The camers was a big part. the shadows was caused by clouds. The illusion was a brain game. The face on Mars was not made by aliens beacuse it was an illusion, shadows, and camer's.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\" The Challenge of Exploring Venus\" is a list of facts, reasons, and statements about Venus. The author believes that exploring Venus would be a good idea. He talks about how \" Long ago, Venus was probably covered largely with oceans and could have supported various forms of life\". That would be the closest thing to Earth in our solar sytem that we may be able to explore. Now the challenges of exploring Venus are that there is a constant temperature of around 800 degrees Fahrenheit always on the surface of the planet. There are clouds covering Venus that have high amount of sulfuric acid in them, the planets surface is covered in 97 percent carbon dioxide. If we want to explore this planet we're going to need to find materials that can withstand those horrible conditions. The last recorded spacecraft on Venus only lasted 3 hours. Despite the dangers that come with all of this planet, if we could find a way to explore this planet safely and get gas and rock samples that could tell us a lot about this planets past and if it was similiar to Earth. The technology that we need to explore this planet with we are still yet to find a perfect solution to, we are chipping away at it slowly and finding new ideas that could get us there eventually. This new material that is made out of silicon carbide has been tested in the chamber and has lasted three weeks in conditions like Venus's, That is just getting one step closer to something that could last a long time on the surface of that planet. The harsh temperatures and gases are something that a human can survive through but we need our technology to get through it too. We've used electronic computers in space travel since they would have been able to be used in spacecrafts. The idea is to use a older device that runs off of gears and bearings that can with stand the elements because electronic computers are so delicate they wouldn't last very long in those enviroments. If we are able to find materials that can last long enough to try and get samples that would be our best bet, our first idea is to stay at around 30 miles above the surface of the planet. Temperatures would still be around 170 degrees Fahrenheit but we have materials that can withstand those temps. Since the surface of Venus is so cloudy our photograpy methods won't work to really see the surface of that planet. We need to find all the materials and new technology before trying to do something that we havent been able to do successfully yet. I think that looking at everything we want to accomplish with Venus as a many many steps so we can accomplish it succesfully and be prepared for anything that were to come at us in a mission. I do believe that with the right amount of thought, time, innovation, and energy put into this that it could be something that would be accomplishable. Having the technology to be able to land on Venus and take gas, rock, and sediment samples we can learn a lot about the planets past and maybe find something new. I do not believe that this idea is farfetched i believe that it is something accomplishable.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\" The Challenge of Exploring Venus\" is an article about Venus. The article gives us infromation about venus and the conditions of it as well. It also includes infromation from NASA (The National Aeronautics and Space Administartion). Even though after reading the passage, Venus sounds like a huge death trap, the author still suggetsts that Venus is a planet worth investing in and gathering informationon. However, the author doesn't include enough deatil about why Venus should be explored and researched. In this essay, I will use evidence and or informtion to suggest that the author does a poor job with naming reasons why Venus should be looked at. To begin, the author states that Venus would be a challenge to study. \" While Venus is simple to see from the distant but safe vantage point of Earth, it has proved a very challenging place to examine more closely.\" This statement suggests that Venus could result in seroius injuries if one was to make its way over to the planet. Also stated in the article, \"no spacecraft has survived the landing for more than a few hours,\" meaning that death would occur more often than not at all. Also, the environment of Venus indicates that there would be trouble if someone actually managed to survived the landing. Erupting volcanoes, earthquakes, and lightning strikes as well as a temperature of 800 degrees fahrenheit provides us with enough information that humans wouldn't be able to stand the extreme conditions. In conclusion the author did a poor job. The author did a poor job with explaining how worthy the pursuit of Venus would be to explore. The author offers more reason as to why Venus should be left untouched. Venus is really challenging planet to explore. The conditions are far too extreme for any human. And the percentage on losing your life is high. Think about it, is Venus really worth it?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\" The Electoral College is a process, not a place.\" retorted by the Office of the Federal Register. The Electoral College was established by our founding fathers. The main reason it was established was because it was a compromise between electing the President by a vote in Congress and electing the President by a popular vote of qualified citizens. The Electoral College is a timely and outdated process that consists of selecting the electors, the meeting of the electors where they vote for the President and Vice President, and counting of the electoral votes by Congress. Yes, the Electoral College has helped the United States of America but it has also caused us many major conflicts that no citizen can change. Many Americans are not heard and by demolishing the Electoral College and bringing our \"old friend\" popular vote back in majority of Americans will be heard. This is a free country right? Do we have the right to be heard and vote for ourselves? I strongly believe we do. I vehemetly feel that the United States of America should use popular vote due to the fact Electors can turn sides, in reality voters are not even voting for the President they're voting for the electors, and there is often a major conflict also known as the \"disaster factor\". \"...electors could always defy the will of the people.\" Stated by author, Bradford Plumer. Once Electors are voted for they have our trust and votes in the center of their palms. They could either listen to the people or break our trust. Majority of times more than 15% of electors turn sides and vote for the opposing party. In a survey taken in 2000 more than 60% voted for popular vote by citizens because they were unwilling to put they're vote in the electors hands. Looking at the correct statistics don't you believe it's only fair to the American people that we use popular vote? More than half of America believes it is only right to use popular vote. What about the other half? Well, thinking about the situation, in the end, they will still get what they want and what is needed. But the real question here is, what do you think? Lets take a quick look at reality here! When voting for the President of the United States of America you are technically voting for electoral votes. Majority of America does not realize that because of the Electoral College you are voting for their votes. As an citizen of the United States we have the freedom to speak and vote for whoever we want. When voting we are basically putting our votes in the hands of the electors so if sides are turned doesn't that basically mean our freedoms/rights are being violated? I advocatly believe it does and the only way we could possibly fix it is by establising popular vote. So why are we waisting time? Last but never least, popular vote should be established because almost every four years the Electoral college runs into major problems whether sides being turned on or just the system running low. Believe it or not voting is not supposed to be such a chaotic process. Assertions are made with not much basis which causes majority of the problems we face. If we get rid of the Electoral college entirely all the conflicts will vanish. Our founding father would be proud to know that we got rid of the system that was giving America major problems even if we much appriciate our founding fathers. In conclusion, I vehemetly feel that the United states of America should use popular vote due to the fact Electors can turn sides, in reality voters are not even voting for the president they are voting for the electors, and there is often a major conflict also known as \" disaster factors\".", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\" The advantages of the limiting cars usages \" Time ago cars where just a little aspect to people use . But now cars are an obsesion, a way to go anywhere without walk , the car has become the foot of society in adiction of it . Streets parking , driveways and home garages are generally forbidden in this experiment new distric on the outskirts of freiburg, near the French and Swiss borders. Vauban's streets are completely \"car-free\", except the main thoroughfare, where the tram to downtown Freiburg runs and a few streets on one edge of community. That is one of the mainly reason why cars are becoming the food of society. But people don't know that they are wrong because it has become an obsesion and we all are making our future and if we still like this is not going to be good, because in 2006 is a good example os growing trend in Europe ,the United States and elsewhere to separate suburban life from auto use , as a component of a movement called \"smart planning.\" Another situation that comes to this theme is the reduce of greenhouse gas emmission from tailpipes cause to by the ecsecive use of cars in society . The passenger cars are responsible for 12 percent of greenhouse gas emission in Europe what some peoples should say is't that much of greenhouse gas emission but believed or not it's and no body make sence of it that's why is an adventage the limiting cars usage in any place not just in one , because here in the Unite States is up to 50 persent in some car-intencive areas and that is someting to really worry about. Vauban , home to 5,500 recidents within a rectangular square mile ,may be the most advance experiment in low car suburban life. David Goldberg , an official of transportation for america , a fast growing coalition of hungreds of groups in the United States ,who are promoting new communities thhat are less dependent on cars what is good in so many aspects less greenhouse gas emission ,more fisicly effors by people and less adiction to cars that is what society has now like Mr. Goldberg added :\"How much you drive is as important as whether you have a hybrid.\"", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\" This program has been a very good experiance, ''luke has said. I got to learn how to feed the animals and keep watch. It? even better since Don is with me. I think that this Seagoing Cowboy is a great program. Since this is such a great progam I should convince other people that they should join. There are many reasons why. People should join us. People should join the Seagoing Cowboys. The first reason why is that there could be more people feeding the animals,water them two or three times a day. They could make sure thet there was hay for the animals. Also the people can be a watchmen or two. The people could also be night watchman. They could just help others. Some people could go on an other ship and do other jobs there. They can have some animals in a pen. They can have a person to care for them. They could have the same jobs on the first ship but be on another ship so they can deliver the animals and get more done and be able to deliver them at the same rate. \"If I asked more people to come and help it would be a huge opportuinity for them to take. they would get the experiance to serve the ship and do what has to be done,\" said Luke. Everyone who took the chance or job would be a huge help. We could have many ships go out. They could get the job done. So explorers, if you would like to have an adventure this is the job you may want to try. People will realize or they will be aware of people in their countries and their needs. As a group effort people make a difference. This job would be good for you. This job isn't all about hard work. There are some fun things too. You would get to meet other people as well.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\" What have Richard Nixon, Jimmy Carter, Bob Dole, the U.S Chamber of Commerce, and the AFL-CIO all, in their time, agreed on? Answer: Abolishing the electoral college! Well i think otherwise. Electoral College is a process, not a place , which the election of the President is by a vote in Congress and election of the president by a popular vote of qualified citizens. The Electoral College do consists of choosing the electors, reasons to keep the Electoral College method of choosing the president. The start of the Electoral College is well handingly choosing the electors, which consists of 538 electors each of course must be qualified. Most of 270 electoral votes are required to elect the president. The number of members in its Congressional delegation is equal to the entitled allotment of electors in your state, one is for each member in the house of Representatives plus two for the Senators. For the purposes of Electoral College, Columbia District is allowed 3 electors and is treat like a state. and when i say \"state\" for this topic i mean the District of Columbia. Well backed up reasons to keep the Electoral College method of choosing the president, A outcome of an Electoral College vote is possible, just look back at the year 2000 it was less likely then a come over the popular vote the Reason for that is the winning candidate's share of the Electioral College expanded his share of the popular vote. For example, Obama received 61.7 percent of the electoral vote compared to only 51.3 percent of the popular votes cast for him and Romney. \"Electoral College is a process, not a place \" each and every step of the Electoral college method comes out to be a well handed system. Its more then enough fairness included when choosing the Presisent and Vice President. Popular vote is more based on \"winner-take-all\" System thats awards all electors to the winning presidential candidate, unlike the Electoral College which is a process that consists of choosing the electors, reasons to keep the Electoral College method of choosing the president.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\" What's wrong with the Electoral College?\" To be honest, have you ever thought where our vote goes. Just in case you forgot, when we vote we're not voting for the President. We're voting for slate electors who would vote for the President, but how could we be sure that they make the right decision for all Americn Citizens. I write this letter in favor to inform you that the electoral college is an unfair advantage for American citizens. I see how from a stand point you may trust the electoral college due to abundance of knowledge and critique they have. Yes, I can tell why you'd chose them in a way that they may have strong critique. But how can you trust them with a decision held in their hands with willing citizens to think about. \" At the most basic level, the electoral college is unfair to voters. Because of the winner take all system in each state, candidates don't spend time in states they know they have no chance of winning, focusing only on the tight races in the \" swing\" states\". Why is it continuing base it off of this knowing how American's feel about this matter? Which brings me back to why Americans have to feel like they have an unfair say on who the President can or could be? Perhaps reasoning is the EC( Electoral College) knows whats best for the American future. Thinking about the effects of the EC voting for the President could possibly vary in results and mat be right. But shine a little light on the situation, it should be in America's people hands and hearts who the president should be.\"... candidates don't spend time in states they know they have no cahnce of winning...\" Why should we feel like that? American's sould have the right to vote for our leader not people who vote for our leader. Hold on, I'm not finished yet. Another reason why is when American's vote how could we be sure who to vote for. I agree that Americans can make and exercise their decisions when voting for the Eletoral College. American's are depended on voting , another fact I agree on. But American's sometimes dont know better when voting. \" The American people should consider themselves lucky that the two - thousand fiasco was the biggest election crisis in a century; the system allows for much worse. Consider the state legislatures are technically responsible for picking electors , and that those electors could always defy the will of the people.\" Sometimes it would be the Americans that throw off the vote for the EC, but in other perspective that wouldn't be the case. Americans should vote wisly upon the information given. but yet the electoral college shouldn't vote for the citizens of the United States, Info should be viewed. I can visaulize someone else perspective it could be with different electorsl parties. But in reverse think about the the biggest election crisis in 2000.\" Consider the state legislatures are technically responsible for picking electors, and that those electors could always defy the will of the people\". Keeping in mind that we should still vote for our President but at the same keep in mind who citizens are voting for so another voting crisis wouldn't happen again. In conclusion, I hope you clearly thought it through and thorough. Its hard to rely on other's with a big responsiblity like this. So the Government should let us trust our instincts and but at the same time think them out.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\" the Electoral college have been discovred by our founding fathers in the constitution\" why distroy something that was given to us? over time we have been voting for the Electoral College not the president. I personally think we should be able to vote based on popular vote, Over years, we voted for the Electoral College it consits of voting for President and Vice President and the counting of the electoral votes by congress, sounds diffict right? well this is how they run things, personally I think we should vote based on popular votes because according to source 2 under \" what's wrong with the electoral college\" many people get confused about the electors and vote for the wrong candidate, yikes! not always do we get control whom we vote for , it all depends on the state. We should be equal, Electoral college is unfair to voters. in the same source they state that the electoral college is unfair, outdated and irrational harsh words? but its true. Lets take a look at the present. President Obama who won the vote, got 29 electoral votes since were a large state we get more votes. take a look at map where its shows the breakdown of the number of electoral votes, it shows each state. many small state have less than 5 electoral votes simply because its not huge, but yet again you're voting for a presidential candidate you're actually voting for a slate of electors. Popular votes have many benfits such as equallty and justice's. In source 3: \"In Defense of the Electoral College:Five reasons to keep our despised method of choosing the president\" paragraph 21 popular vote was very close in Florida (2012) . It have been said that the Electoral College method of selecting the president may turn off a potential voters for a candidate who has no hope of carrying their states. popular votes have a chance and will be picked based on popular vote. In source 3: states that they is no pressure for run-off elections ,It's provided a clear winner , sounds good doesn't it? One single vote can decide an election sounds stressful. Popular votes are bascially stress free and in the Democrats in Texas ,Republicans in california their vote have no effect they leave it to the popular vote. In conclusion, popular votes have such great benfits and had more justice and give better oppourity to those who bascially are in a sticky sitution. Electoral College have so much to do with the voce president and is indirect.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\" the challenge of exploring venus\" is a text that tell you that venus is a worthy pursuit, how venus is dangerous and some difference between venus and our own planet ,i'm going to tell you some of them to suppor the author's idea. the science say that venus is the second planet from our sun in the univers, they also called venus \"evenig star\" because venus is one of the bightest point of light in the night sky, venus is like the earth twin in terms of density and size but venus is also a dangerous planet . venus have the hottest surface temperature of any planet because venus is so close to the sun ,that is one of the all difference that exist between our planet and venus. in the paragraph 3 the author say that venus have different condition of weather and additionnal empediments like powerful earthquakes frequent lightning strickes and eruptine volcanoes that is a reason that human cannot go and live in venus. the national aeronautics and space administration (NASA) has one particucaly idea for sending humans to study venus for some reason they didn't do it but now the NASA working on it ,they use some machanical parts that can be made more resistant to pressure,heat, and other forces. in coclusion , i think the idea to go to venus is a bad idea because this planet is very close to the sun and people can lost their life but if the NASA can fabrique a machine that can go to venus sna take the infomation that we need to know about this planet that will be a great thing.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"'All of our development since World War II has been centered on the car, and that will have to change,'said David Goldberg, an official of Transportation for America..\"(para.7).There's so many advantages if we limit care usage. For instence, more money saved,more space,pollution, and no traffic. To start off, in the article\"In German suburb, life goes on without cars\", by Elisabeth Rosenthal,it states \"car ownership is allowed but there are only two places to park-large garages at the edge of development, where a car-owner buys a space, for $40,000, along with a home.\" (para2) in other words its expensive. Then it goes on and says, \"'when I had a car I was always tense. I'm much more happier this way,' said Heidrun Walter, a media trainer and mother of two, as she walked verdant streets where the swish of bicycles ...\" (para3).Ms. Walter is more calm now that she doesnt have a car. In paragraph 5 more reasons come up. \"...is a huge impediment to current efforts to drastically reduce greenhouse gas emissions from tailpipes....Passenger cars are responsible for 12 percent of greenhouse gas emissions in Europe...and up to 50 percent in some car-intensive areas in the United States.\" One of many causes of greeenhouse gas is cars. Next, \"in previous bills, 80 percent of appropriations have by law gone to highays and only 20 percent to other transport.\"(para9)which means that its expensive and most of this things money is wasted on is things that cars need. To continue, the author, Robert Duffer, of \"Paris bans driving due to smog\", he states \"after days of near-record pollution, Paris enforced a partial driving ban to clear the air of the global city.\"(para. 10) this tells us that cars are dameging the air we breath. Smog gets around fast,\"Congestion was down 60 percent in the capital of France,after five-days of intensifying smog...[The smog] rivaled Beijing, China, which is known as one of the most polluted cities in the world.\"(para 14) To add on, Andrew Selsky which wrote,\"Car-free day is spinning into a big hit in Bogota\", says \"...leaving the streets of this capital city eerily devoid of traffic jams\"(para20) basically theres traffic. In paragraph 24, \"' It's a good opportunity to take away stress and lower air pollution,' said businessman Carlos Arturo Plaza as he rode a two-seat bicycle with his wife\". The Selsky states, \"parks and sports centers also have bloomed throughout the city; uneven, pitted sidewalks have be replaced by broad, smoth sidewalks; rush-hour restrictions have dramatically cut traffic;and new restaurants and upscale shopping districts have cropped up\" now you can get to your places faster with no traffic and its a smoth trip and good for business. Furthermore, Elisabeth Rosenthal writes in her article, \"the end of car culture\" some advantages. \"president Obama's ambitious goals to curb the United States' greenhouse gas emissions, unveiled last week, will get fortuitour assist from an incipient shift in American behavior: recent studies suggest that Americans are buying fewer cars,driving less and getting fewer licenses as each year goes by.\"(para29) In other words not many people are driving anymore its not \"cool\" anymore ,if you dont drive you'll fit in more. To summarize,there are so many advantages if you limit car use, such as money saved,more space in the streets,and help keep our air clean.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"A Cowboy Who Rode The Waves\" has a boy named Luke Bomberger in it and he is a Seacowboy. Seacowboys are people who travel over seas to help people after the affects of world war two, but Luke was on that helped with live stock while on the ship. So if you want to be like them and help join the Seagoing Cowboys program. You can help the affects of world war two with the live stock you take care of. in this matter I will give you more reasons to join. One of the best and caring things about this job is that of helping the people so you know you are doing good to many. Also a nice benefit is that of sight seeing which in the habit of this job is common. For example what Luke says about the sights he has seen he also enjoys the benefit, \"I had the side benefit of seeing Europe and China. But seeing the Acropolis in Greece was special. So was taking a gondola ride in Venice, Italy, a city with streets of water.\" those were some lines from paragraph 5, telling about the sights Luke saw on his travals. When being on the ship ride home that takes weeks or mounths it can be very fun to make the time go by from playing games,or activities with crew meabers. this part of the excerpt will show what and when the crew played games,\" The cowboys played baseball and volleyball games in the empty holds where animals had been housed. Table-tennis tournaments, fencing, boxing, reading, whittling, and games also helped pass the time.\" I believe that the lines from paragraph 8 stood out the most to explaine my reasoning for the games on bord. To conclude my reasoning for you joining the Seagoing Cowboys program I would like to tell you that it is a very fun and exciting program. Eventhough at times it can be dangerous at sea, but I believe that helping those in need is more important. So come and sign up for the Seagoing Cowboys program it so you can help out to.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"A Cowboy Who Rode the Waves \" If i were Luke I would tell people or kids to join because you can earn money and not be boared at home doing nothing and beeing lazy also to have some fun time working if you'd like.It also showes you responsabilities and how to do a good job so when you get older and it's your chance of having a job then you would have alot of expirience and how to do stuff corectly.If you have friends you would like to invite then when they get there you can show them around and how to do the work and that way they would tell you that you have alot of expirience of doing the work. In the story like it said Luke Bomberger went to go see Europe and China but seeing the Acroplois in Greece was also fun. Also he got to take the gondola ride in Venice,Italy a city with streets of wate .Luke also toured an axcavatated castle in Crete and marveled at the Panama Canal on his way to China. So that is why i would convince people to go and work as a Seagoing Cowboys program. By Luke Bomberger", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"A classroom computer could recognize when a student is beomcing confused or bored, then it could modify the lesson, like an effective instructor\" Dr. Huang stated. If the software runs effectivly it could possibly help kids learn better in the classroom or simply cheer them up if they are sad. This could be the next big advancement in schools, since it could increase the want for a child to learn. I stated that the computers could increase the want for the child to learn. I did not say that it will make the child smarter instintly, but it could increase their want. The reason I say this is because you can not put in a software and all sudden every student is a genius. Although, you can put a software in and it change the students attitude. For example, there is a student who is having a terrible day, he is: upset, mad, and sad. He/she does not want to do his homework on the computer, he/she just wants to go home. This new computer software realizes that this student is upset, so what does it do. It pulls up an encouraging quote or a funny picture/video. By doing this the computer might change his/her mood and now the student may want to do his/her homework. That is how I see how this new technoogly can be effective in the classroom. On the other hand this technology can be dangerous to bring into a classroom. A student may be trying his best to pay attention and learn, then all a sudden the computer changes his lesson or brings up an ad. This could be a big dirstration to students trying to learn. Not only might it be a distraction, but it might bring a lot of frustion to the students becaus they have no control over it. Overall, my opinion about this new technology is I believe it is a great idea and has a chance to be very successful. Even though I love the idea, I think that the technology needs to be tested at work businesses and other places before it is brought into the education system. Just incase it backfires and does what it is not suppose to do.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"A classroom computer could recongnize when a student is becoming confused or bored,\" said Dr. Huang and also predicts. \"Then it could modify the lesson, like an effective human instructor.\" This would be ground breaking if children, high schoolers, and even audlts coould use this techonology. It would change how everyone on this plant learns everything. This is very vauble because the computer will be able to tell if you are happy, sad, confused, angry and other emothions. The computer could change its lesson around you and not what it is just programed to do like computers right now. Everyone human on this earth learns differently. Some students are more visual than others and some get distracted more. This program would help everyone equaily. Everyone on this planet learns differently and that is why this program would be so helpful to our education and future on earth. This product would be so valuable to our society today. We need something like this for our education. Everyone would be able to learn how they want to learn and everyone would be given a fare and even learning expericne.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"A classroom computer could reconize when a student is becoming confused or bored.' I personally do not like this idea at all, It is just creepy. There would literally be someone staring at you through a web cam and you wouldnt be able to see them. It would be like a one sided window, the windows the police use when questioning someone. Technology is getting to out of hand and its getting carried away. Teachers should be trained to see when students emotions change about the class. Students get stressed out becasuse teachers over load us with school work and it just gets hard for us. Sometimes the stress turns to being upset with yourself. Teachers should know when we feel this way there is signs already ect. If we are missing alot of work then we are most likely stressed out. Computers should not be talking to us about our feelings. Technology is getting to advanced, soon we will not be able to control it. Computers will be able to reconize sutle facial movements we humans use to express how we feel. The world will turn into a bunch of lazy people if they make it to where we can start talking to a computer, that is just crazy. They need to get technology out of schools,what is the point of going if your just gonna be on a computer all day, you might as well just be home schooled. Teachers will become lazy and not wanna teach because they will rely on the computer to teach students. Making technology teach students is not the greatest idea because they will have no skills in the social life. Is a computer gonna teach them how to do everything? Students will just sit there not do anythng because a computer cannot physicaly punish you. We will get no where in life with a computer telling you what to do. We need to bring back school books and get rid of these computers, some students dont even know how to write checks or pay bills. We need a human to teach us how to do these things or other wise we will have no clue what we are doing. Technoolgy will ruin the world.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"A new president, really, How many votes did they win by?\" If someone were to ask you this what would you say, thirty electoral votes? The \"Winner-Takes-All\" system is flawed and needs to be either fixed or completly taken down, and here are two reasons why. First a president should be chosen by the people, seeing our county is a democracy meaning that we elect representatives to rule for us, a popular vote fits the sene a bit more than an electoral vote. Secondly if there was every a tie in the electoral college it would catostropic because intead if being in the peoples hand it be in the representatives hands, aslo known as the ones who already have power. \"At the most basic level, the electoral college is unfair to voters. because of the winner-takes-all system in each state canidates dont spend time in states they spend no time in stats the know thy wont win.\" Some states can get no canidates out and its because the electoral college is unfair. \"It`s official: The electoral college is unfair, outdated, and irrational. The best argumants in favor of it are mostly assertions without much basis in reality. And the arguments against direct election ar spurios at best. Its hard to say but Bob Dole was right: Abolish the electoral college!\" This Quote states that the electoral college is not fair and down right rediculus. You may say since its getting the job done and there has been no ties whats wrong? there are manny thing wrong startign with popular votes can lose to electoral votes, also some states can get on people to come and campagne. \" In 1968 a sift of just 41,971 could have cause a tie in the polls.\" in this article just that many people and the representatives could have chosen a president and the reason this is bad is because they will get a president that will do what ever they want. \"If there were just 5,559 voters in ohio and 3,687 voters in hawaii that went the other way the electoral college would have tied making a representative choose.\" \" in this article just that many people and the representatives could have chosen a president and the reason this is bad is because they will get a president that will do what ever they want. So to finalize The \"Winner-Takes-All\" system is flawed and needs to be either fixed or completly taken down, and here are two reasons why. First a president should be chosen by the people, seeing our county is a democracy meaning that we elect representatives to rule for us, a popular vote fits the sene a bit more than an electoral vote. Secondly if there was every a tie in the electoral college it would catostropic because intead if being in the peoples hand it be in the representatives hands, aslo known as the ones who already have power.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"A thick atmosphere of almost 97 percent carbon dioxide blankets Venus with even more challenging clouds that are highly corrosive sulfuric acid in Venus's atmosphere\". Venus is very dangerous for humans to step foot on and could not have spacecrafts to last more than a few hours due to the temperatures and atmospheric pressure. In the article \"The Challenge of Exploring Venus,\" the author implies that exploring Venus is worth the risk by explaining the dangers and the motivation of human curiosity. To understand Venus clearly, NASA wants to explore Venus on their own. They can either consider the exploration as a risk, or the exploration can be thought out as a challenge that people are willing to take despite the dangers. \"On the planet's surface, temperatures average over 800 degrees Fahrenheit, and the atmospheric pressure is 90 times greater than what we experience on our own planet\". Humans cannot undergo, let alone survive stepping foot on Venus with these extreme conditions. Earth's \"twin\" planet also has \"the hottest surface temperature of any planet in our solar system\". Although there are many dangers to explore Venus, astronomers are fascinated by the idea that Venus has been the most Earth-like planet in our solar system. Human curiosity has motivated NASA to send other humans to study Venus. One way of doing so is by \"allowing scientists to float above the fray\". Floating above the fray would allow humans to avoid the harsh ground conditions. Miles away from the surface will still be \"170 degrees Fahrenheit, but the air pressure would be close to that of sea level on Earth\". These conditions will not be easy, but will be survivable for humans. To contribute to the knowledge of Venus, researchers are are working on different task that will allow the machines to last long enough on Venus. In conclusion, Venus presents a great amount of reasons that can be dangerous for humans to explore. Since Venus is the most Earth-like planet in our solar system, Venus was probably covered with large oceans and could have supported many forms of life. Predictions like these cause people to want to meet the very end of imagination and innovation to finally see the true value of Venus to make the exploration a worthy pursuit.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"Abolish the elcetoral college!\" said Bob Dole. Not only I, but 60% of the United States eligible voters agree wtih him. There are manny reason why the voter population doesn't want the elctoral college. The bigger the state's population the more votes they receive, the voter's votes really do not count so the feel as they are not thought about, even when they vote for the college their vote may be betrayed becuase they cant control who the college elects. The person running for president do not want to waste time. They want to secure as many votes as possible. That even means skipping useless stops. For instance if the candidate is from a southern region they mostly have all the votes they need from their region. THey soon move onto the next important area of voters. Places like Florida, texas, and Los Angeles. States that have a huge population. The candidates think smart but irrational at the same time. They know if the have the majortiy of voters in a state with a large population they most likely will win the vote from the elctoral college. The candidate will not even think about small states like South Carolina and Rhode island. During the 2000 campaign there were seventeen states that didnt get to see the candidates beucase they are smaller in population. Even some of the largest media markets didnt see any campaign ads. It is unfair and unjust to do that to people who are willing to vote. Then the small state voters wont know much about the candidates which most likely will lead to irrational votes taken over by the elctoral college. Voters in certain areas will not even attempt to make a vote because in their state they are overwhelmeed by the people who vote for other parties. Since the electoral college has a majority rule in effect in every state but Nebraska and Maine, in the other states sometimes its not even worth a try to vote. The citizens may think that their vote doenst matter compared to the other numbers of voters which basically its true. Thanks to the electoral college.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"Abolish the electoral college!\" is a famous statement that was made by Bob Dole on whether or not it would be a good idea to keep the electoral college. Though others may disagree and say that our founding fathers established the Electoral College. Also that it was established with the mindset of helping the American people, but i would like to think otherwise. I believe that the we should change the system by which we vote the president of the United States into election by popular vote. For many years we have been using the concept of the Electoral College and for many years, it has lead to unfair calls and the placing of bad leadership in our country. In the article titled, \"The Indefensible Electoral College: Why even the best-laid defenses of the system are wrong\", the author defines what the electoral collage system really is, the author states, \" Under the electoral collage system, voters vote not for the president, but for a slate of electors, who in turn elect the president.\" This system is an unfair system, and can not be trusted. It time for change. The electoral collage is a dishonesty to voters, it is an unfair system. In \"The Indefensible Electoral College: Why even the best-laid defenses of the system are wrong\", the author makes a good claim. He or she talks about the winner takes all system that is affiliated with the electoral college. In the 13th paragraph the author specifically says, \" Because of the winner-take-all system in each tate, candidates don't spend time in states they know have no chance of winning, focusing only on the tight races \"swing\" state.\" That shows how unfair it is to us as the American people. Certain states may not get a chance to see who their choices are. They are forced to make a decision based on the little we know and the majority of the knowledge comes form the media which is a very unreliable source. \" During the2000 campaign, seventeen states didn't see the candidates at all.\" That shows how little our voices are heard in a desion that is crutial for how we go about and make decisions in our everyday lives. We the American people have to rely on states such as Ohio for who our president will be. There is dishonesty every where you go. More so in the electoral college. When the electors are chosen we have no say so. The state legislatures are the ones responsible for picking the electors. In paragraph 11 of \"The indefinsible Electoral College\", the author makes a remark that everyone should put into regards. It says \"That those electors could always defy the will of the people.\" Just like people can lie about their age, electors san also fib about their position or party in which they are representing. The author also mentions in paragraph 11, : In the same vein, \"faithless\" electors have occasionally refused to vote for their party's candidate and cast a deciding vote for whomever the please.\"Not everyone can be trusted, and the dishonesty is another reason why we should do away with the electoral college and change to election by popular vote. With the election by popular, we are assured that there is fair play even though some of us may not get our voice heard completely. People who are for the concept of the electoral college may argue other wise. For instance, in the article called, \"In Defense of the Electoral College\", the author argues that \" The Electoral College despite its lack of democratic pedigree; all are practical reasons, not liberal or conservative reasons\", meaning its idea of support. I believe the Electoral College is an overrated nor practical. I am in favor of abolishing the electoral collage amd changing to election of by popular vote. With the system of election of popular vote, you will be sure that the system is fair,honest, and speakes the voices of the American people. As a sentor you should take the best interest of the American people to heart.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"After completing high school, many students face a dilemma regarding their future path. The debate revolves around the choice between pursuing higher education at a university or college and entering the workforce immediately after graduating. This essay supports the view that further education is essential and will elucidate the reasons behind this stance. Undeniably, opting for university or college education significantly enhances one's chances of securing a high-paying job. Higher education equips students with crucial knowledge and skills required for their future careers. Moreover, students acquire essential soft skills, including social skills, time management, and self-discipline, which prove invaluable in their professional lives. These competencies not only facilitate future career progression but also lead to salary increases. Furthermore, individuals with higher qualifications are more likely to be sought after by potential employers. For example, individuals with recognized qualifications tend to earn higher incomes compared to those without such credentials. Conversely, there is an argument in favor of entering the workforce immediately after high school. This approach is advocated based on the belief that early employment offers a unique opportunity to gain practical life experiences, fostering maturity and independence. Additionally, engaging in the workforce provides individuals with a platform to interact with diverse individuals, thus enhancing their social skills. Students who choose this path typically have more real-world experience than those pursuing higher education. Nonetheless, it is important to acknowledge that certain high-paying job opportunities may only be accessible to those with advanced degrees. In conclusion, this essay supports the idea that further education is a superior choice compared to entering the workforce immediately following high school graduation. By pursuing higher education, students have the opportunity to acquire a broad range of skills and qualifications that will undoubtedly contribute to their future career prospects.\"", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"After days of near-record pollution, Paris enforced a partial driving ban to clear the air of the global city.\"(source 2). Cars have been a great help to people but now their boarding the line of help and hurt. The advantages of limiting car usage almost never end. There's always a way for you to limit your use of your car. It's great for the plant. Also it brings ease to you. Then last is that it brings people together. To began with is that it's great for there plant. For example in Bogota, Colombia every year for three years they would have a car free day. That is when everyone would leave their cars at home and use a bike or some alternative transportation to get to were they have to be. If you choose to do the opposite then you would be fined a $25 fee for using your car. The goal was to promote alternative transportation and reduce smog. This also happens in Paris, were they banned cars because of smog. Even if the fee was $31 dollar Almost 4,ooo drivers were fined. In addition to that is that it brings ease to you. Stated in the first source, \"When I had a car I was always tense. I'm much happier this way.\" Heidrun Walter said that. When you don't have to think about any car problem you worry less. Even now there has been a decline in the percentage of 16- to 39-year-old's getting a licenses. It's not a priority anymore. With cars comes worries, and people today don't want any worries. Last but not last is that it brings people together. Usual when we are driving in our cars we hardly look to see who's driving next to us. But if you take out the cars you can really see wants around you. Meet people while you ride your bicycles. You would see the world in a different way. In conclusion, limiting cars would benefit you in so many way. One like bringing you closer to the people around you. Also without as many cars it would help the plant. Last it would bring ease to you. Overall the less the cars the better everyone and everything should feel.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"Against Driverless Cars\" In the future we will need our own cars it's not neccesary to have that types of cars or traportations car like those kind. Everybody needs their own traportation to go to work,store,hospital,etc. For some reason it would be a good idea because it would save fuel because they will only used half the fuel of today's taxis and offer more far flexibility. But,instead why don't they do they same cars now days people used and do it as the driveless cars it would be the same only thing that would be differnt is that everybody would have one it would be much easier and it wouldn't be public they would have to ride with other peopl or go all squish together because it's full. Driverless Cars can be dangerous,How? well it couold cause accidents it can lose it's control anything can happen because their are that 100% reliable,plus google cars aren't truly driverless;they still alert the driver to take over when pulling in and out of drivewaysor dealing with complicated traffic issues. My opinion is no. I don't want for the future to have public cars like those.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"All of our developement since world war II has been centered on the car, and that will have to change\" Said David Goldberg. Nowadays Cars are our main Source when it comes to transportation. Limiting your car usage should absolutely be more important in todays society. It's Plently of things going on around us that most are unaware about, And limiting your car usage can be one thing to start helping to prevent these issues. Most cars give off alot of Pollution in the cities you live in an that effects animals. For example: The oil spill was a major problem in the ocean and that killed alot of animals an Demolished most of the sea life environmental foodchains. The capital of France had an intensifying amount of smog, but car traffic tended to decreased 60% after 5 days. Beijing China was known as the most polluted cities in the world. Diesel Fuel was the blame. You could even try those cars that dont require gas so the cities could be less polluted, But theres disadvantages to those cars as well. At one point of time gas prices were sky high and people weren't really satisfied with it. Now Gas prices have decreased an people are even more satisfied an happy to get gas. Saving up on gas would help out alot to in todays world as well. How? Because Everything in life has a Big Fat Price tag on it so to help save up to get better things or things you need you can probably go for not paying for Gas as much. Everyday around 5:00 or 5:30 there's something called 5:00 traffic. When everyone is just about getting off work, headed to night school, going to the store, or whatever the case may be. This is the craziest time of the day to drive an your just ready to get home an dont feel like dealing with traffic.... you can take the City bus, Subway, or maybe even walk if its not far. Some people may call you crazy but it reduces the amount of money being spent on gas. its only maybe like 10cents to ride the city bus i believe...But the point is your saving money. Then by the time you finally decide \"Oh i would like to drive my car\" your tank would be full cause you havent been driving it so you wouldnt have to stop for gas. The Environmental Protection Agency is promoting \" Car Reduced\" Communities, and Legislators are starting to act. Many Experts expect public transportation to play a Larger Role in a new 6 year federal transportation bill approved this year, Said Mr. Goldberg. Walking isnt always quite bad. Look on the bright side your Burning Calories, shedding pounds, and if you run your building you Endurance. Instead of having to drive to a gym far away walk to a nearest one an have a pre workout by jogging or running there. Same thing applies to Bicycling. Nowadays since majority of the United States own cars Traffic is horrible at certain hours of the day. Most people are too impatient for the wait or become aggressive drivers which is most likely to cause accidents. Maybe your ready to get home after a horrible day or your really tired from work an you realize your about to run into 5:00 Traffic an it'll be forever until you finally get home. If taking the City Buses or subways you won't have to deal with all that pressure. On a City bus you can just have a seat chit chat with other people as they hop on or just relax until you get to your destination. If your really tired you could just tell someone to wake you up when its time to. At least it'll be better then you being behind the wheel. If your workplace is Walking or Bicycling distance then you should feel even better to just scroll past all the people having to deal with the traffic. \"Its a Good opportunity to take away stress and Lower Air pollution\" Said businessman Carlos Arturo Plaza as he rode a two-seat Bicycle with his wife. Fellow Citizens should understand the Advantages of limiting their car usage because of the Pollution, To Save up on gas, and Less stress to deal with Traffic. Maybe one day cities would take more action an save up on gas for these reasons.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"All of our development since World War II has been centered around the car, and that will have to change,\" said David Goldberg, an official of Transportation for America. David Goldberg says this in means of trying to decrease car usage, such as in Vauban, Germany. Car usage after World War II continued increasing for a long period of time until 2005 in the United States the number of miles driven started to decrease. In the year 2013, the miles driven in the United States decreased nearly 9% since 2005 and was equal to the amount of miles driven in 1995. Throughout the whole world people have been experiencing problems with air pollution and due to that many have been trying to decrease the usage of cars in different ways to slow this air pollution. To start off, pollution from cars has been a large factor of the air pollution today. In the United States, 50 percent of the greenhouse emissions in the United States is caused by passenger cars. Then there is Paris who has been experiencing heavy smog. Recently, it has had days of near-record pollution. Reason for such high levels of smog or air pollution can be attributed to a tax policy that favors diesel over gasoline. Diesel makes up 67% of vehicles in France. Then in the rest of Western Europe 53.3% of the vehicles are diesel. Next, is how some people attempt to slow the car pollution. The first example of a community trying to decrease the usage of cars is Vauban, Germany. In Vaubaun street parking, driveways, and home garages are generally forbidden. For the most part, Vauban is car free. The only way to use cars in Vauban is to carpool because there is only two places to park in the whole city and they are two large parking garages on the edge of development. Then you have to pay $40,000 to keep a spot. 70% of the people in Vaubaun do not own cars. Anoter example is Paris, who is one of the biggest air pollutants next to Beijing. They have been trying to decrease the smog in their area through slowing the amount of cars on the road. What they did is make it so only cars wih even-numbered license plates could drive one day and odd-numbered license plates the next. Almost 4,000 drivers were fined due to this policy, which showed some reluctance in following the plan. This did not matter though because the smog cleared enough to where the polcy only lasted for one day. Another attempt in lowering the usage of cars was Bogota's car-free day. In this program it is quite obvious that it was just a day of no car usage at all. During this event Colombians hiked, biked, skated or took buses to work. Even in the rain people of Bogota participated in this event. Then there is one other case of lowering the usage of cars, which is the natural way, having people just grow away from the car. This is currently happening in the United States, one of if not the largest car users. Like I said earlier since 2005 the usage of cars has decreased. Whether this trend stays in motion or not depends on the idealism of the current and future generations. To conclude, the use of cars is creating problems in air pollution and due to this there have been attempt to slow this usage. Then back to what David Goldberg said the development of the car needs to stop being the center of attention. So instead what we have to do is take our attention away from using the car to ways of finding ways to limit the cars use.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"All of our development since World War II has been centered on a car, and that will have to change,\" said David Goldberg, an official of Transportation for America. To some or most a stament like this may seem outlandish or absurd. We use cars for daily life, to make it through this world, whether its to work, school, the store, it seems almost impossible to live without one. Vauban, Germany is an upscale community of suburban pioneers who have simply given up their vehicles. As many as 70 percent of Vauban's famalies do not own cars. Heidrun Walter, a resident and mother of two, says she is \"much happier this way\". So what it is that has caused many communites like Vauban to take the advantage of living without a car? Green House gases better known as smog, that is polluting our air that we breathe. In some places like the beloved Paris, home of the Eiffel Tower, smog has gotten out of hand. Paris has even enforced a partial driving ban to clear the air of the global city. After 4,000 drivers were fined and twenty seven had their cars impounded for their claimed reaction to the fine, the congestion was finally down 60 percent. Beijing, China, known for being the most polluted cities in the world the smog rivals. You might even see people wearing masks in Beijing for their own health and safety. Bogota, Colombia has caught on and spread this idea to other countries as well. For the third straight year cars have been banned with only buses and taxis allowed for a Day Without Cars. Not even rain or shine stopped Colombians from traveling accordingly. Instead of being pessimistic about traveling alternatively most Colombian see it as a good opprutunity to take away stress and lower smog. So, imagine a day without cars in the bustling city of our own, maybe like Detroit. Well it seems that President Obama is catching on. Recent studies suggest a drop in Americans getting licenses', buying cars, and driving all together as years pass. The number of miles driven in the United States peaked in 2005 and is dropping from there steadily. Could it be that Americans love for cars is simply not what it used to be? Or is it that more alternate and practical ways of travel are now being provided and accepted widely? Either way if our country keeps up the good work sociologist believe it will have \"beneficical implications for carbon emissions and the enviroment\". Meaning we are one step closer to riding our home planet of dirty air.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"All of our development since World War II has been centered on the car, and that will have to change\" (Rosenthal source 1) said Transportation of America official David Goldberg in Elisabeth Rosenthal's article \"In German Suburb, Life Goes On Without Cars.\" With air pollution, smog, and greenhouse gas emissions rising all around the world, officials have announced that cars are to blame. With this, many are resorting to making changes in their communities by offering alternate means of transportation and bringing homes and stores closer together. The advantages of limiting car usage include fuel will no longer pollute the air, alternate transportation is available and cheaper, and it would enforce goodwill and communionship. To begin, a benifit of limiting our car usage is fuel pollutes the air by circulating green house gasses that can cause a dangerous enviroment to form and by limiting cars we limit this pollution. With President Obama's issue to decrease the amount of air pollution caused by cars, many have realized that car usage is not as common as it used to be. If the number of cars on the road continues to deplete- \"and many sociologists believe it will-it will have benificial implications for carbon emissions and the enviroment, since transportation is the second largest source of America's emissions, just behind power plants\" (Rosenthal source 4) says Rosenthal in her article \"The End of Car Culture.\" By keeping track and trying to deplete the time you spend driving your car the trend of putting air pollution to an end will increase. Additionally, a benifit of limiting our car usage is being able to use the cheaper and more efficient alternate means of transportation. By using alternate means of transportation such as buses, trains, and car pooling services you are saving gas money and supporting community business'. There is a rise in car pooling that has \"facilitated more flexable commuting arrangements, including the evolution of shared van services for getting to work\" (Rosenthal source 4) says Rosenthal. As these changes manifest many people are chosing not to switch back to driving themselvs. Finally, a benifit of limiting our car usage can be found in the better communionship that will result as cities will make their stores closer together and communities more closley knit. In Bogota, Colombia people are practicing \"car-free days\" and relying solely on public transportation. As this happens author of article \"Care-free day is spinning into a big hit in Bogota,\" Andrew Selsy, says \"parks and sports centers [are] bloom[ing] throughout the city; uneven, pitted sidewalks have been replaced by broad, smooth sidewalks; rush-hour restrictions have dramatically cut traffic; and new restaurants and upscale shopping districts have cropped up\" (Selsky source 3). Other places implementing car-free districts will never hear the roars of engines drowning out the chirping of the birds or childrens laughter. Infact, stores and public transportation is stratigically placed a walking distance away thus promoting social and physical benifits (Rosenthal source 1). The advantages of limiting car usage include fuel will no longer pollute the air, alternate transportation is available and cheaper, and it would enforce goodwill and communionship. With greenhouse gasses rapidly circulating and polluting the globe it would be acceptional to decrease this by not driving as often. Furthermore, by using alternate transportation such as car pooling or taking a bus money is saved on gas and car repairs. Finally, goodwill and good social habits would increase as towns would become more closley knit as everything would only be a walk away. With this it we should limit our car usage to \"save time, conserve resources, lower emissions and improve saftey\" (Rosenthal source 4). Work Cited: Duffer, Robert. \"Paris Bans Driving Due to Smog.\" Chicago Tribune . Chicago Tribune, 2014. Print. 10 February 2015. Rosenthal, Elisabeth. \"In German Suburb, Life Goes On Without Cars.\" New York Times . New York Times Company, 2009. Print. 10 February 2015. Rosenthal, Elisabeth. \"The End of Car Culture.\" New York Times . New York Times Company, 2013. Print. 10 February 2015. Selsky, Andrew. \"Car-free Day is Spinning Into a Big Hit in Bogota.\" Seattle Times . The Seattle Times Company, 2002. Print. 10 February 2015.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"All of our development since World War II has been centered on the car, and that will have to change.\" (David Goldberg). Automobiles have been a major impact on today's technology. The creation of the car was a huge turning point in history. Even though this machine has been such an amazing creation, it still causes a lot of damage in society. Cars affect both the environment and humans. The limit of car usage would be great because then the amount of pollution would decrease, less traffic would occur, and it makes way for alternative transportation opportunities. In the United States, the Environmental Protection Agency is promoting \"car reduced\" communities. The reduction of cars can lead to the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. According to Elisabeth Rosenthal, cities are choking due to the increase number of emissions. Paris had hit near-record pollution which lead to an enforced ban of partial driving to clear the air of the global city. Acoording to Robert Duffer, Paris typically has more smog than other European capital. In Bogota, Colombia there is a day called Day Without Cars, there they only let buses and taxis drive around and their goal is to promote alternative transportation and reduce smog. If anybody goes against this, they would have to pay $25. \"It's a good opportunity to take away stress and lower air pollution,\" said businessman Carlos Arturo Plaza. This day became really big in Colombia and improved their cities' overall look. Furthermore, the limitation of car usage would decrease the amount of traffic. Traffic is an on-going issue in everyday life. People arrive late to work or school or wherever they need to go due to traffic or an accident. During the Day Without Cars in Colombia, millions of Colombians hiked, biked, skated, or took buses, leaving the city devoid of traffic jams. Traffic jams are usually stressful so if that gets reduced with the limitation of car usage, then stress levels get reduced as well, causing mentally healthier people. Traffic jams also occur due to accidents. Car accidents are one of the many reasons why people end up in hospitals, get sued, get hurt, or loose money. With the limitation of car usage, all these issues will be resolved. Moreover, new alternative transportation vehicles can come into play with the reduction on car usage. There is a plan where they want suburbs to play a much larger role in a new six-year federal transportation bill to be approved. Also, during the Day Without Cars, the goal is to promote alternative transportation. Lately, new transportation vehicles have been discovered and created. Some include, a flying car, an elevated train that gets you from point A to point B in seconds, and new hybrid cars. Technology keeps progressing every single day. Today people may be driving their normal SUVs but by tomorrow, they could be drivng the new high-speed flying Ferrari. People are always keeping in mind while creating these machines about how it will affect the community and the consumers. Since it is obvious that the environment isn't as healthy as it was before, they must make sure that these machines limit pollution and emissions that affect the world negatively. Overall, the limit of car usage would be a good thing. As time goes on people may not even need cars anymore to move from place to place. If everyone works together to solve these issues then the world would become a much better place. The final goal is to get rid of all the bad emissions and issues and just stick to what is best for the environment. When the environment is healthy, the humans are healthy.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"All of our development since World War ll has been centered on the car and that would have to change' said David Goldberg, an official of Transportation of America. It is imperative that our fellow citizens take the initiative to limit car usage for the whole purpose of saving time,conserving resources,lowering emissions and improving safety for ourselves and others . Limiting car usage is an effective way in reducing our air pollution(smog).Most of our greenhouses gases are the result from the use of car or fuel engineered automobiles. Source 1:In Geman Suburb,Life Goes On Without Cars states that \"passenger cars are responsible for 12 percent of the grennhouse gas emissions in Europe.. and up to 50 percent in some carintensive area in the United States\", this means that most of our greenhouse gases are resulting from the overusage of cars that emit an abundance of CO2 into the atmosphere which generally has a negative effect on the enviroment. If car usage were to be limited that would mean the greenhouse gas emissions would be reduced which will then lead to a reduction in air pollution. Implementing the reduction of car usage would have beneficial implications for carbon emissions and the enviroment,since transporatation is the second largest source of America's emissions,just behind power plants. Car usage has contributed to cities low safety level. This is because cities are more denser with the use of more and more cars. If car usage were to be limited that would mean that these cities would be better to walk around in and other alternative transporatation methods such as bicycling and public transit have an easier way of getting around to save time according to Source 4: The End of Car Culture. This implication may have a negative result in lost revenue in the car industry,but which is more important the world we live in or money? There are many more alternatives than using cars that emit greenhouse gases such as plug-in cars,hybrids, and cars carrying three or more passengers as stated in Source 2: Paris Bans Driving due to Smog. With the reduction in car usage that would mean that the resources that were needed to support the vehicle would be conserved because there would only be a small amoun of it being used. With the reduction in the usage of the fuels then the the remaing amount would be for other purposes that would need it or be saved over time if the US were to need it in the future. To conclude if limiting car usage would be in then it would just have a positive efeect in the worl we live in. Not only will limiting car use would reduce the amount of smog being produced but it will also increase the United States safety level and conseverve the resources as well.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"All of our development since world war II has been centered on the car, and that will have to change\". People love cars but also love money some love money more than cars people could save a lot of money on gas if they didn't have a car or cut low on they're mileage and use another type of transportation.\"when I had a car I was always tense, I'm much happier this way\" said heidrun walter a media trainer and mother of two. in the united states, the environmental protection agency is promoting \"car reduced\" communities. If more people tried the \"car reduced\" program the air we breathe would be much better then it is right now. More places are trying to reduce car rates which I highly doubt but it never hurts to try. Even paris bans driving; paris bans driving because they want to cleant the air of the global city. \"even-numbered license plates were ordered to leace their cars at home or suffer a 22-euro fine ($31)\". Also Diesel fuel was blamed for the smog in France because 67% of the vehicles in France is made for Diesel. The smog cleared enough on monday but there's no saying that the smog is not going to come back... the plan to ban even and odd numbers plate licenses was a great idea for people of French they should do that every couple months so they could avoid the Smog. In Bogota, Colombia people are also having car-free day which is outstading for the community and for the the people in Bogota, Colombia.\"it was the third straight year cars have been banned with only buses and taxis permitted for the day wtihout cars in this capital city of 7 million\". the goal of banning cars is to promote alternative transportation and redcue smog. the more we use alternative transportation is more money the goverment and the people that doing they're jobs as alternate drivers.\"It's a good oppurtinity totake away stress and lower air pollution\", said businessman Carlos Arturo Plaza as he rode a two-seat bicycle with his wife. Also the event was doing so well that two other Colombian cities joined such as Cali, and Valledupar. \"What most intrigues me is that rates of car ownership per household and per person started to come down two to three years befoe the downturn\" said Micheal sivak who studied the trend and who is aresearc proffesor at the university of Michigan's transportation research Institute. the downturn must be now because as I see now almost everybody has a car these days old cars,recent cars, brand new cars, and all types of cars. \" i think that means something more fundamental is going on\". if the pattern persists and many sociologists believe it will have beneficial implicants for carbon emissions and the environment, since transportation is the second lagest source of America's emissions. Also more car companies are trying to make cars that are eco friendly like hybrid,Tesla, and the volt. the volt is an electric car that does not any gas run.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"All of our development since world war II has been centered on the car, and that will have to change.\" Mr. Goldberg an official of transportation for America, a growing coalition to promote car frees communities said. The world is changing for the better and one of the machines man created, that is one of the world changing invenions of it's time is coming down for it's throne is the car. So what are the reasons for not getting a car? lets find out. In Germany, that is coming faster than people think. An idea called \"Smart planning' is taking hold in an exprimental town bulit in 2006 named Vauban. A place were cars are a thing of the past. People everyday are not driving to school or work they are walking, bicycling, or taking the tram into the town from the suburb. Smart planning is revoultionary buliding towns to not be dependent on driving. 70% of Vauban's famlies do not own car and are much happier to not have the everyday anxiteys of driving a motor engine car everyday. 57% sold there car just to move into the small town of Vauban. Car free suburbs and town are a growing trend all across Europe, the united states and many more nations. These efforts have been making cities, towns, and suburbs denser so you don't have to go far to get some milk and eggs. The global warning is a huge part of the fight to make the earth our home more better and healthier for generations and generations to come. Cars emit gas emissions that make up 12% of the greenhouse gases in our enviroment, up to 50% percent in car-intensive areas in the United States and around the world. France, Paris having heavy smog decided to have a partial ban on driving making even numbered license plates not drive or fear a fine. Congestion went down after the experiment. What was to blame for the smog was the Diesel fuel being used in most cars because of the fact that a tax policy favors diesel fuel over gasoline. Paris having more smog than the typical capital had a decrease in congestion and the citiy after enormous victory decided to go at it again and do odd numbered license cars. The car culture is one the has had enormous effect on the everyday lives citizens around the world. In the United states, \"Recent studies suggest that americans are buying fewer cars, driving less and getting fewer licenses as each year goes by.\" In America where the car culture has turned us into the number one place in the world to find the history of one of the planets world changing innventions. People want a greener earth and benifits of not owning a car because everybody knows the stress of having a car no matter ho much it helps you. The car in which you have to have insurance, life insurance, car payments, you have to keep up with your car, the dangers associated with having a car and stress plus anxiety that comes with a car. The cons outweight the pros but those pros have an enormous effect. People are changing and the percentile of teenagers and young adults have droped ten fold in getting or renewing a license. The new trend is that people are no longer getting cars or licenses so why should you. The people of planet earth understand the pros or cons of a car the benifits of not diving and are making for that change. One of the worlds greatest innventions is stepping off there throne. So why will you not get a car?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"America for the people, by the people\". Dear senators in which who favor keeping the Electoral College of the United States. Ask yourself this question \"if this country was made for the people, by the people, why aren't we allowed to vote for our own president\"? The electoral college is unfair, outdated, and irrational. It's time for change. To begin with, the principles of America were made under the intention to create a country of equality. This electoral college has created a boundary between the people and it's government. Under the electoral college system, voters vote for not the president, but for a slate elector, who in turn elects the president. By this doing are voice aren't being heard. It's like giving a homeless person five-dollars, we don't know where are money is going. This system needs to be replaced by the popular vote, so that are voice could be heard. To continue, this system is extremely outdated. The fact that our founding fathers established it in the Constitution, as a comprimse between election of the president, is living proof how outdated this system is. This system runs like zombie after the crash of a 5 hours energy drink. Heck, this system is so old, my grandma remebers the day it was established, like it was yesterday. Although this rustbucket is old, the worrying is the prospect of a tie in the electoral vote. In that case, the election would be thrown to the House of Representatives, and still not by the hands of \"the people\". We demand change! Although some may say, this systems prevents a bunch of yahoo's from voting. Everyone desevere their take on the subject of matter. There's an adge saying \" the one's you don't expects to learn from, can teach you the most\". After all it is our right to vote, as it is promise in the Constitution. The electoral system is an irrational system. It's basically like a slap in the face. A way of the government saying we're a bunch of dodo birds, that are incapable of voting. In conclusion, It's official, the electoral college is unfair, extremely outdated, and irrational. The world is changing around us and it's time to adapt. Instead of \"pointing guns at eachother\", we need to assemble. \"Give me freedom or give me death\". Bob Dole was right: Abolish the electoral college!", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"And that is the composition of the typical human.\", the Biology teacher wraps up her lecture in a rather slow, drawn out, manner. The poor students, trapped in the classroom with nothing to entertain them, but boredom. How will the teacher know when to cease this unbearable tourture? FACS may be the answer. If it could accurately give the teacher information on her students' feelings about the lecture, this could be extremely valuable information to help make the lecture more entertaining, and fun, for the students. My personal opinion, one that has been developed through experience, is students maintain the information, presented in the lecture, better if the teacher makes the lesson interesting and entertaining. As mentioned in the paragraph above, I believe having a FACS in classrooms would be a useful asset for teachers across the country, or even the world. You see, the muscles in the human face move a certain way when expressing certain emotions. The six basic emotions, as described in the third paragraph, are happiness,surprise, anger, disgust, fear, and sadness. The problem is some of the emotions can not be read by the naked eye. Allow me to explain. Have you ever heard of masking emotions? A fine example would be an individual forcing a smile at someone they do not care for. Different muscles are used in a forced smile, in comparision to a natural smile. Some people have perfected the art of \"fake smiling\",and the human eye can have problems noticing the person is actually doing a fake smile. The FACS, however, notices the muscles being used to make the facial expression. The FACS can see small details the human eye would miss. Having this program in classrooms would help teachers to make their lectures a little bit more fun, you could say, for the students. In conclusion, I am on the side that says we should allow this technology to be utilized in classrooms. This could be a game-changer for teachers. With this technology, teachers will be able to read the students' expressions with accuracy. Also, if the lectures are not dull, students seem to maintain the information being taught to them better. Will this technology ever be used in classrooms? I do not kinow. All we can do is wait!", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"Are driverless cars coming?\" I'm against driverless cars because of saftey, cost, and law. To begin, i'm against the driverless car because of the saftey issues. In the article it says that \"if the technology fails and someone is injured, who is at fault-the driver or the manufacture\". Also in the article it points out, driverless cars have light signals to indicate traffic jams and other saftey issues.(What if a person is on a phone or is not paying attention and a car comes out in front of them and the signals dont show in time and someone is hurt).Another saftey problem is the antilock breaks. As you can see their are many things that can go wrong with this car showing that it's not yet saftey to be on the road. Secondly, the driverless car is a long way from being perfect because of the cost. The cars need smart roads to function. So the cost will fly up because of the updates to support the car. An supporting detail from the article is, \"These smart roads systems worked surprisingly well, but they required massive upgrades to existing roads, something that was simply too expensive to be practical.\" People that is less fortunate that wants to by the \"eco saving\" car would have to pay a enormous amount of money to get this brain car. Another detail from the passage is, Without the option of smarter roads, manufactures turned to smarter cars...\" If the manufactures didn't upgrade the roads they had to upgrade the car but it's still a major amount of money going in these cars. So this means what they paid to upgrade the car is going to double when someone wnats to buy it. The expens of this so called smart car is not worth buying. Next, laws are prohibiting the use of smartcars in some staes. Some laws for the smart car staes that, \"...a human driver in control at all time\". This law shows that even if the driverless car is developed complety it must have someone controling it, not it controling the driver. This shows that some states believe this law is good because they think a human driver is more safe then being driven around by a robot car. A supporting detail is, \" states will follw as soon as the cars are proven reliably safe\". This quote shows that the states that have these laws don't trust the driverless car ideal yet. As you can see some laws will never trust the smart car because of the problems and safetey issues it might cause. Laslty, I was against the driverless car because of safety, cost, and laws. Why would someone get a car coslty car that thats not yet proven to be ready to hurt themsleves? Or are people today just getting lazy?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"As a result, 70 percent of Vauban's families do not own cars, and 57 percent sold a car to move here. 'When I had a car I was always tense. I'm much happier this way,' said Heidrun Walter, a media trainer and mother of two, as she walked verdant streets where the swish of bicycles and the chatter of wandering children drown out the occasional distant motor\" (Rosenthal paragraph 2). Heidrun Walter is the typical mother of two that has a job as a media trainer. Unlike most people, Heidrun lives in the city of Vauban, Germany. Vauban is a one of a kind district that cracks down on car use and promotes walking and public transportation. Heidrun describes this life as a happier one and that cars make things tense. There are advantages to this way of life such as a rexaled lifestyle and fewer pollutions. Not having a car makes one persons life less stressful by making the internet a better way to communicate, having funner ways to transport yourself, and making it easier to access stores. Getting in a car to go to a freinds house is in most cases is a long stressful process that can be eliminated through a culture without cars that opens up Internet use to communicate instead. \"She cites various factors: the Internet makes telecommuting possible and allows people to feel more connected without driving to meet friends\" (Rosenthal paragraph 35). Mimi Sheller is explaining how you don't have to get into a car to be with your friends and that the Internet is a simplier option. Instead of using a car to get to work, it may be a healthier and funner option for people to start walking or riding a bike. \" 'It's a good opportunity to take away stress and lower air pollution,' said businessman Carlos Arturo Plaza as he rode a two-seat bicycle with his wife\" (Rosenthal paragraph 24). In the quote, Carlos describes how stress is relieved by lower pollution and opening yourself up to activities that you and someone you love could enjoy while getting to work. Stress can be driven by simple things in life such as trying to find a parking spot to access the market. \"In this new approach, stores are placed a walk away, on a main street, rather than in malls along some distant highway\" (Rosenthal paragraph 6). To have less stress in your life it could be easier to live in a no cqar community that makes any store you need only a walk away from your house leaving you free of the harshness of finding a parking spot. Internet communication, alternate transportation, and walk ways to stores make a happier and healthier life for the average person. Cars in most countrioes are the leading pollutants and it could be wise for people to try and reduce smog, greenhouse emissions and diesel use by not picking up tthe keys to your car. Smog in some place has gotten so bad that car use had to be stopped completely. \"Congestion was down 60 percent in the capital of France, after five-days of intensifying smog . . .[The smog] rivaled Beijing, China, which is known as one of the most polluted cities in the world\" (Rosenthal paragraph 14). Paris went through major smog that makes them reconsidering the use of automobiles.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"BOOM, CRASH!\" That is the sound of 2 cars crashing together. The first queston asked will be \"How did this happen?\" The answer, Driverless Cars. People believe that if all cars are driverless they wont have to pay attention to the roads. Why should they have to? The car they are driving will do everything for them. Drivers today barely pay attention to the road as it is now they wanna give them a reason why they don't have to. There are alot of distractions now a days for example, text messages,a phone call, car radio, women applying make up, an adult late for work, etc. If they have driverless cars they will think being distracted is okay. BMW says that the car will alert the driver when the driver needs to take over control is a smart idea but, you can't expect someone to drops what they're doing just to take over the wheel. If they are distracted they might not even see the signal. The next question to be asked is who is to be blamed for the accident. Technically the person was not driving, the car was. So what will the other person have to do sue the company? Or will the driver still be responsible because they were in the driver seat? Would that person have had the abilitiy to stop the car even if they seen the accident about to happen? There are so many questions that come along with the driverless car. As oppsed to that the normal car that has been around for years is easier to understand. The driver must pay attention to the roads at all times and self opperate the vehicle. If there was to be and accident where the driver crashed into another driver, the driver will be responsible for all the damages and fines because they were opperating that vehicle. Why change what is safer and traditional to something dangerous and that people would hve to try to adjust to something new? Driverless cars are not something that should be put out into he public.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"Being a Seagoing Cowboy is an amazing and fun experience. You get to see a lot of new things maybe you've never seen before. When I started doing this, I started in Greece when I was 18 which was the age you had to be to be drafted in the military for 2 years. But the Greek Government said I had to join the military for 2 years, or be a Seagoing Cowboy so I decided to be a Seagoing Cowboy for 2 years. Being a Seagoing Cowboy is a lot better than joining the military, and it is a lot more fun if you do this with a friend. I enjoyed seeing a lot of new places, especially China and Italy. The fun part about being Seagoing Cowboy is when you're not on a ship you're on a farm. While you're on a farm you can explore around and look at all the animals and feed them. There is also fun you can have on a ship. You can play sports such as, baseball, volleyball, table-tennis, fencing, boxing, and many others. Being a Seagoing Cowboy more than just fun and exploring. It opened me up to the world. I can't begin to explain how grateful I am to have been given this oppurtunity. It made me realize that there are people out there in other countries that have needs. So after being a Seagoing Cowboy, I decided to lead my family to host a lot of international students and exchange visitors for many years. If you decide to become a Seagoing Cowboy enjoy the experience, because I know I did.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"Boom!\", was the the first thing I saw when I looked up from the passengers seat.Two cars had crached into each other.We were on route 33 going to Fort Wayne.The speed limit there is about 55 mph or 60 mph. Both of the cars were destroyed.On the road there were so many pieces of each car.The crash was extremely bad.The people inside were in a dangorous situation.We called 911 then the police arrived and a helicopter had to get a person and took them. since then the only thing that I think about is driverless cars.Driverless cars development would be be much safer because they would stop before you crashed,they would accelerate alone, and people wouldn't have to worry about drunk drivers. Driverless cars would help so many people out.The best thing is that they will stop before you crash into something.The article said that there are cars that can brake themselves.But the driver has to remain alert for when a situation requires it so they are still not that safe.With driverless cars you wouldn't have to be so scared because you would never know when you needed to stop the car.That would help teens out so much.In the TV I always see commercials on teens getting into car accidents and sending there last message to their father or mother.And that does happen because thousands of teens die from car accidents.I also read in an article that every person will get in a car accident sometime in their lifetime.It's really frightning.That's why driverless cars will save alot of people. Driverless cars would be able to accelerate by themselves and that would be of much help.In the place I live their are alot of deer and there are alot of car accidents due to deer crossing the roads. And if the car could accelerate by itself then we would be able to have less deer accidents.the firt instinct that I have when we saw a deer when we were driving was to tell my dad to hit the break.He ignored me because he read an article that the best thing to do when your going to hit something is to accelerate not stop.But to many of us we only think on hitting the break not accelerating.Driverless cars are just the best way to go. There are many times when families die because the person that crashed into them was drunk.So driverless cars would make it safer for us and for them because if a person is drunk they wouldn't have to drive.That would make roads alot safer.The article said that maybe by 2020 some car brands like Nissan will have driveless cars which will be better for all of us.That way no one is in harms way becasue of drunk people.An example could be my cousin he was in a really bad car accident because the friend that was driving was drunk.He was in comma for 2 weeks and the had to do a brain surgey because he was in a very critical condition.The driver only broke a hand but my cousin got the worst.That happens so much these days becasue people are not responsible.I know that with driverless cars those type of accidents will be a thing of the past. That is why driverless car development would be a better way to go becasue they would stop on there own,accelerate alone and people wouldn't have to worry about drunk drivers.It is something that every country should consider becasue all the gadgets people create are for a better future and I know that driverless cars are going to be the best thing created for the future.That way we will all be safer.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"Boys and girls of every age, wouldn't you like to see something strange?\" After hundreds of years with the Electoral College working just fine, it would be very strange for Americans to just give it up in the name of convenience. The Electoral College should stay in place because our founding fathers created it, it keeps socialism and communism out, and it is in the constitution. Our founding fathers did many things that would ensure the United States is in safe position for centuries to come. We have the freedom of speech, religion, press, to bear arms, and of privacy. These are just as important as the Electoral College. The founding fathers of the United States wanted to make sure Americans didn't vote for communist or socialist presidents by popular vote. So they created the Electoral College, a system of voting in which each state has a certain number of points based on the amount of Senators and Congressmen representing tha state. If a presidential candidate has a majority of votes in the state, the candidate wins all the points from the state. According to the first source, there is a current total of 538 points in America and it takes 270 for a candidate to win. There is not one thing the founding fathers did that harmed the United States; America should have faith in these men and not charismatic candidates who plan to go against the constitution. Furthermore, the Electoral college keeps socialism and communism out of our capitalist democracy. Sometimes people don't fully understand politics and vote to simply make their voice count somehow. It may sound illogical, but everyone makes wrong decisions sometimes. The Electoral College is in place to keep people from falling into traps and voting for socialist candidates who plan to rid the U.S. of its freedom. According to the second source, Jimmy Carter, one of the worst presidents America has ever had, and Bob Dole, a prsidential candidate who lost to Bill Clinton, were in favor of getting rid of the Electoral College. If popular vote were in place, the one with the most votes overall wins. That would make it a popularity contest and anyone who has witnessed one of those in high school knows they never end well. America has not had a socialist president with the Electoral college; who is to say there will not be one without it? Additionally, the Electoral College is written in the constitution. According to the first source, the Electoral College in the constitution and is briefly mentioned in the 23rd amendment, which allows District of Colombia to participate in the Electoral College and gives it 3 electors. Getting rid of a law, or in this case a system of voting, from the constitution is never a logical decision. For example, the 8th amendment,\"no cruel and unusual punishment\", is not a wise choice to get rid of and nor is the 2nd amendment \"the right to bear arms\". Why? Because it would turn America into something it isn't; it provides more government control over its citizens. Without the Electoral College, everyone's vote is seen and counted, even the independent ones and the votes of the elderly. The constitution is a guide for the people from those who fought and died for the country and it should never be altered for convinience. In conclusion, the Electoral College should stay where it is because it was created by the founding fathers, it keeps communism and socialism out, and it is in the constitution. If the United States were to rely on anyone, it should be the founders of the country itself, for they were the ones who fought for the freedom of the country.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"But America's love affair with its vehicles seems to be cooling\", quote from the excerpt \"The End of Car Culture\", explains that people in the United States have started to become less dependent on cars. Not only Americans, but people all around the world such as people from Germany, France, etc. Reasonings for the recent drop in car usage is that there are problems with air pollution, bikes and other transportations that do not involve the use of cars also give place more space to make more town centers and sports complexes, and cars can be a very difficult machine that causes many problems for people everyday. Smog has become a very big problem for France. France has blamed diesel fuel as the reason for the smog problems. Diesel is favored more than gasonline due to a tax policy, diesel makes up over 67 percent of vehicles in France. The smog in France was so heavy that it, \"rivaled Beijing, China, which is known as one of the most polluted cities in the world\" according to an article by Robert Duffer. Smog is a very big issue that should not be taking place it can cause many health problems. France decided that the smog was getting out of hand so they began a \"Car-free day\", this meant that people would not be using their cars for a whole day and some people would not agree with this idea. France started these \"Car-free days\" with the people who had even numbered license plates and then the next day would have cars with odd numbered license plate would not drive their cars. The consequence for not following this rule was a $31.00 or 22-euro fine. Many people were fined the next few days and twenty seven people had their cars impounded due to their reaction of the fine. This \"Car-free day\" helped to reduce the smog problem in France. When people use any type of transportation other than a car they would be able to have many more places to go and have a good time. When people are using cars and other motor vehicles they are also causing more and more construction for new roads and places for cars to be able to park. If people rode bikes and walked more than we would have more places for people to build shops and complexes that are all together and easy to get to. In Vauban, Germany most residents there live a life without the use of cars. \"The streets of Vauban are completely \"car-free\"- except the main thoroughfare\", stated in the Article by Elisabeth Rosenthal. Only 30 percent of people in Vauban's familys own cars, the other 70 percent do not own cars. More than half of that 70 percent sold their cars just to live in Vauban. In Vauban they have begun to create more sidewalks that are better accesible for bikes and walking. This has created more room for people to construct new stores and places that are walkable distance for citizens, so less car usage could lead to many new places such as shops, stores and even new sports complexes. Cars can be very difficult machines that cause many problems for people everyday. They can just stop in a matter of seconds and people would not know what happened, causing people to get their cars checked out at a car-shop and paying more money to get the problem fixed. If people began walking or using bikes as transportation they would not only be saving money but would lower the problems they would be having getting to and from places. Not using cars can save so much money for people because they would not have to pay much gas and they would not have to go to get their cars fixed almost every year. Even with bikes there might be a problem such as getting a flat tire or the chain popping off, even those little things would cost only a few dollars where as a trip to the car-shop would cost a least $100.00 out of pocket. Limiting the use of cars can potentially save places from smog and more air pollution. Not using cars as much can leave more space for places to be built, instead of using the space as a parking lot people could use that space as a place for shopping or sports complex. Car-free day could even be a very helpful idea that might change the peoples minds to use other types of transportations besides a car. Having no cars could save a numerous amount of money for a lot of people. They will save money by not having to get a lot of gas and they will save money on not having to fix their cars almost every year. So limiting the use of cars could become a potential idea that can help people around the world.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"CRASH!\" The driverless automobile hits another vehicle. The wreck is capable of being prevented if there is a driver in control. \"Driverless Cars Are Coming\" is an article that depicts driverless cars. The advanced vehicle is helpful in various situations, but it can also have its unfortunate moments. The invention is not supported. The independent automobile is in danger of a technical problem, and the possibility of someone being injured is very high. The new technology is expensive too, and frequent problems with the law can occur. The independent vehicle has many disadvantages. Driverless cars put everyone at an even higher risk of being injured or killed. There are not any natural instincts or feelings that can easily adapt to adversity. If the driverless automobile is confused, damage can possibly occur. \"For starters, they needed a whole lot of sensors,\" is a quote that displays the importance of human feelings and reactions. \"The combination of all this input is necessary for the driverless car to mimic the skill of a human at the wheel,\" is another detail from the passage that shows the emotionless car's disadvantage. The advanced automobiles do not have instinct, intelligence, or reasoning of a human being. The driverless vehicle is also very expensive. There is no point in paying more money for this irrelevant toy when there are cheaper options. \"Radar was a device on a hilltop that cost two hundred million dollars. It wasn't something you could buy at Radio Shack,\" is a clear example of the uneccessary payments. \"These smart-road systems worked surprisingly well but they required massive upgrades to existing roads, something that was simply too expensive to be practical,\" is another quote that depicts the financial aspects. The computer-driven cars cost too much money. Disputes with the law can occur. The driver and the manufacturer are mostly like going to get in many quarrels. \"If the technology fails and someone is injured, who is at fault-the driver or the manufacturer?\" is a question from the passage that explains the confusion. \"Still, even if traffic laws change, new laws will be needed in order to cover liability in the case of an accident,\" is a detail that also explains the uncertain responsibilities. Problems with the law are likely to happen. The idea of driverless cars roaming around does not sound like a fantastic idea. Someone is at a higher risk of getting hurt. The modern invention is expensive; disputes are likely to happen with the law. People are capable of changing the world in a better and safer way. The creation of the driverless car is definitely not a way to improve the world.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"Can you imagine a time in the future when no one buys a car because no one needs them anymore?\" What a beautiful question to think about, isn't it? I love the thought of a fleet of driverless car for public transportaion at any moment having a car at your fingertips to go anywhere you desire. Yes while it may seem to be years away it truely isn't anymore. Many car manufactuer companies believe that they can produce a fully autonomus car by 2020. first of all think bout the pros. Saftey, One of the most important issues while on the road but now with semi or full autonomus car there are two driver at the wheel. Ahuman and a computer both working together. Both able to help and make up for what each other can not do. Even now simple things such as antilock brakes and driver assistance in cars are the corner stone for the path to autonomus cars.Also with autonomus cars you can be more aware and alert of your surrondings while feeling more at peace than ever before while driving. Now as always ther are going to be cons, but there are always cons to new future technologies in the beginning stages. That's how we as humans evolve, overcome, and move to the future by trial and error. We can't hold ourselves and our future generations back because of simple concernsa for early bugs. The sooner we discover the problems the sooner we can fix them and the sooner we can move towards a brighter and better future as a whole. Now with all that being said I don't expect you to jump right on board with me and my veiwpoints. Rather quite the opposite actually it's better to form you own thoughts and opinions and be a free thinker than to let someone directly afffect your thoughts. I only hope to help push or better yet motivate you to side with a better and brighter future. Not only for yourself but for your childern's genertation and their childern. This is something that is bigger than yourself it's humanity's future.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"Can you imagine a time in the future when no one buys cars because no one needs them anymore\"? As said in the being of \"Driverless Cars Are Coming\" the question is simple. I can say without a doubt that I can invision diverless cares in the future. Although I can hope for sooner rather than later that is one aspect I can not yet answer. As I have already stated in the previous paragraph that I can invision this future, but I also support this future. The era of perfectly calculating autonomous cars would be an era of complete safety on roads. The driverless cars not being subjected to human errors would not make the foolish mistakes that a human might make in situations like slick roads, alcoholic influence, and peer preasure. The only flaw with autonomous car that I can visualize is the possible glitches in it's programing that could be prevented with annual mantainance. As said in the article \"The cars he foresees would use half the fuel of todays taxis and offer far more flexibility than a bus\" Although I do not see a public transport system being the only use of these cars I can agree with the amount of options and the decrease of polution put into our daily life styles. In the end I fully agree with the use of driverless cars no matter what the primary use is for. With only minimum tolerance for errors in todays technology I do not see the likelyhood of an accident due to the fualt of the car. Although, as the article states, \"If the technology fails and someone is injured, who is at fault\". I refute this statement just as the article did it's self by saying \"Automakers are continuing their work on the assumption that the problems ahead will be solved\".", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"Can you imagine a time in the future when no one buys cars because no one needs them anymore\"? Yes but I wish I couldn't. My reason for that is because we live in a world where everything is done for us. Oh dont worry, you don't have to get up and move cause we have delivery! Oh don't worry, you don't have to go out and get that! You can just get on your nearest celluar device, or laptop and order it. Then we can bring it to you! Now don't get me wrong that's nice and all. But don't you think we should take some responsibility, and stop being so lazy, and do it ourselves? I know you've heard that saying \"If you want something done right, do it yourself\". That's what I mean! Driverless cars seem so nice, and so safe, but are they really? I personally think they are scary, risky, and un-dependable. If your in the car and something comes up out of no where your in full control. You know what your doing, you know what your using, so there's no confusion. You get what I'm saying? If we have driverless cars were not gonna know what it's doing. It'll do it on its own, and not know what the consequence will be because it is NOT a human. It's time for us Americans to stop being so lazy, to stop texting while driving, to stop letting everyone else do our job, but time for US humans to start doing it ourselves. The right way.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"Can you imagine a time in the future when no one buys cars because no one needs them anymore?\" Google cofounder, Sergey Brin, stated. I am all for driverless cars. I believe that driverless cars will be our transportation in the near future. In paragraph one, Goofle cofounder, Sergey Brin, stated \"He believes such cars would fundamentally change the world.\" I think it would be good thing, because the driverless cars would use less fuel. \"This means the human driver must remain alert and be ready to take over when the situation requires.\" The driverless cars would not be completly driverless. The driver would have to stay alert through traffic jams, road construction, bad weather, and accidents. The car would give off a signal like a beeping noise when the driver needs to be in alert. \"Gm has developed driver's seats that vibrate when the vehicle is in danger of backing into an object\" \"Manufacturers are also considering using cameras to watch that drivers are remaining focused on the road.\" \"While the driver watches the road, the car watches the drivers.\" I think that is a great idea to put that kind of camera in a driverless car. Just incase an accident happen they could tell if the driver was paying attention, or if the car just didn't give any signal that the driver needed to take control. \"Most driving laws focus on keeping drivers, passengers, and pedestrians safe, and lawmakers know that safety is best achieved with alert drivers.\" Some people may think that driverless cars are dangerous. Others may think that the driverless cars may cause more accidents. \"If the technology fails and someone is injured, who is at fault-the driver or the manufacturer?\" Some people may feel like it was the manufacturers fault, and not theirs. I belive that our future transportation will be driverless cars. I just think the drivers must pay attention at all times, even if no one was arround. I feel like it'd be a great thing. It would save money, and would take less fuel. I think driverless cars would be something for each state to think about for the near future.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"Can you imagine a time in the future when no one buys cars because no one needs them anymore?\" Our world today is far more advanced than that of the earlier generations. Many believe we are nearing a breaking point in which cars will be completely self driven. However, there are many issues that have been come acrossed dealing with these driverless cars. The issues of who would be to blame for accidents. Many see issues on how to move the projects along and get them working properly. Another issues dealt with these cars is the expense of the car and or the roads required for the cars to run. Cars are not advanced enough for us to be making fully driverless cars. We have semi-automatic cars today that will drive themselves part of the time but not in tough situations. An issue being dealt with now is the danger of them. Driverless cars haven't been proven to be reliable in dangerous situations like work zones. \"If the technology fails and someone is injured, who is at fault- the driver or the manufacturer?\" The cars cannot stop themselves and move efficiently within tough situations. If the cars fail people will be hurt and companies may even be sewed. We have come along way in automative technology from Model-T to sports cars like the Mustang. However, the world isn't fully ready and advanced enough to manufacture driverless cars yet. We have cars that can drive, brake, and accelerate on their own but not completely drive themselves. \"They can steer, accelerate, and brake themselves, but all are designed to notify the driver when the road ahead requires human skills, such as navigating through work zones and around accidents. This means the human driver must remain alert and be ready to take over when the situation requires.\" This shows that we are not advanced enough in how to make cars that can do it all by themselves, without driver assistance. Even if the technology was there, the money to manufacture and distribute them isn't there. Smart roads and cars are far to expensive to make world wide yet. They have shown to require far more money than we can put into them, assuming that they will even work on a larger scale then what has been tested efficiently. \"These smart-road systems worked surprisingly well, but they required massive upgrades to existing roads, something that was simply too expensive to be practical.\" To make up for the roads being to expensive, they attempted to make the cars smarter in which has still proven to be too expensive. Howerever, many believe that these smart cars are nearing us in the future. Many believe we are on the vurge of a breakthrough and that we can pull it off. \"Tesla has projected a 2016 release for a car capable of driving on autopilot 90 percent of the time.\" Although, this car sounds like it is near, we are far from the release of it. The technology hasn't been developed well enough to ensure that this car will be released, reliable, and or safe for the real world. Our world is becoming more and more advanced and equiped for today's society than ever before. Even with cars that are semi-automatic, fully automatic cars are still a long ways away. There are simply to many issues with them that still need to being figured out before we will actually have them. Issues with the expenses of smart cars and smart roads, the reliability and responsibilty of them, as well as the technology needed to manufature them is not there. Roads and car manufacturing simply cost to much for it to be within full reach of us. Who would be to blame for accidents is still within questioning. The simply fact is, we are not ready for fully automatic cars yet. \"Can you imagine a time in the future when no one buys cars because no one needs them anymore?\"", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"Can you imagine a time in the future when no one buys cars because no one needs them anymore?\" This is a question from the article \"Driverless Cars Are Coming.\" My answer to that question is no. When reading in the article, it states that the car can drive on its own until there are certain roadblocks. Not everyday on the road will be the same. There may be animals crossing, slow people, buses, or even construction that changes the road. How will the car know all of this? I understand that it takes control and alerts you when there is ongoing construciton or a car crash, but what about all of the others? There are many problems that could happen. Another point would be, what if the driver falls asleep? In paragraph 7, the author states that GM has develped seats that vibrate when the vehicle is in danger of backing up. That is something good to have, I won't disagree with that. On the other hand, will it vibrate for more than just that? You would think that there would be an alert like that for if the driver is to fall asleep, or if they aren't paying attention and there is a pedestrian walking across the road. \"The Google car simply announces when the driver should be prepared to take over.\" This statement proves that there really is no point to the driverless car. If the driver have to be prepared to take over and they have to be alert at all time, what is the point? There could be people that don't research the car or read an article like this that would be disappointed if they bought it. Reason being because of the name. Driverless. The dream car would let you know how things are going and have a GPS telling where to go and how to get through detours. In the Google car, it tells you to drive for yourself to get through the rough part. Most people that drive, don't like to through the construction zones or get through a crash area. As a matter of fact, a lot of people would rather not drive at all through those sections if they could. But the Google car still makes them so they might as well be driving a normal car. \"Wouldn't drivers get bored waiting for their turn to drive?\" That's a good question to think about. You might as well take the bus or have someone else drive you somewhere if you don't want to drive. It would save you gas and from being bored or driving through construciton zones. I have a question for the creators, what will you do about the pedestrians, slow cars going under 25 mph, or if the technology messes up? Is there a backup mode to turn off the computer system? The roads are getting closer and closer to being filled with these cars. What will you be thinking when all you see are moving false advertisements? Why would you want a \"driverless\" car that still needs a driver?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"Can you imagine a time in the future when no one buys cars because no one needs them anymore?\" This seems to me like a bad idea. The driverless car, while having some good qualities, is overwhelmed with bad qualities. The risk and danger of driving would greatly increase due to the cars being more in control. Not only is this dangerous, but the cost of the vehicle will increase because the product is new and \"advanced\". When adding up the time being taken to drive a car rather than take a taxi, the taxi takes a greater amount of time to deal with. Some of the negative aspects of the driverless car are much greater in numbers than the positive. The risk of the driverless car is much greater than the risk of simply driving oneself everywhere. Like taxis, putting your life in someone elses hands is always a greater risk. The driverless taxis just double the chances out wrecks considering that the car still has more kinks than anyone cares to recognize. In the reading, it was stated that the car can brake on it's own. While that could be seen as a convienience, it can also be seen as a danger. The car may brake when it's is not supposed to which could cause a wreck. The driverless cars are still not totally able to navigate through traffic with ease. Having a regular car seems to be the safer option, because the driver is in complete control. The driverless car is much more costly to manage than a car controlled by the driver. The product is new, so the initial cost will be much higher. Also, the technology is supposed to be more convienient and user friendly. These positive aspects always seem to cost more than a regular car. The driverless car will have such a large initial cost, the owner of the car will be owing the company in which he bought it money for a long time. It always seems more convienient to take a taxi rather than drive yourself in a big city. In larger cities, taxi services are found everywhere, but in smaller towns the number of taxi's are much smaller. It is unneccisary to take a taxi in smaller town because the traffic is more manageable. The taxi services are only needed for large cities to handle all of the traffic. The new driverless cars are still not managable on their own in high areas of traffic. The number of cons seems to outweigh the pros. Safety is always a big issue to everyone because it is important that everyone is safe at all times. As the world progresses money seems to be more of an issue. Driverless cars are seemingly too expensive to buy in the first place, let alone the price of gas being a taxi service. The convienience of a taxi is always so pleasant until they are unneccisary, like in smaller areas. Personally, the driverless cars just seem to have too many negative qualities to be worth production.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"Can you imagine a time in the future when no one buys cars because no one needs them anymore?\" This statement is from paragraph one of the story. No future up ahead will be without cars. What other way would people get around. People will always need a type of car to drive around. Wheither its horse and buggie or a motor vehicle of some sort. People will always need something to get up and go in to get somewhere faster than walking. Driverless vehicles could help though. Unless asensor goes out and your car drives off a cliff. Thats why there should be no driverless cars anytime or anyplace. Tv, movies, and people over exagerate the phrase driverless car. People think that makes you be able to lean back a relax if you're driving a long way and need a nap. Maybe even play the license plate game with your family and not have to stare at the road so you don't hit someone. Well these people would be wrong. In paragraph seven it says,\" the car can handle driving functions at speed up to 25 mph, but special touch sensors make sure the driver keeps hold of the wheel.\" So say good bye to the idea of turning around to the people in the back seat and have a chat. Don't even think about taking a nap, because that wont happen either. People excpect to much out of these self drive smart cars in our day in age. Right now you still have to drive them in unknow situatiouns. In paragraph seven it mentions that the car will alert the driver when a situation involves \"human skill\". That could be at any moment. Rather just wait for it to alert people on when human skill is needed, just use it all the time. People know how to drive. People have drove since the early nineteen hundreds. It may not have been cars always ,but people where driving buggies and horses. With driverless cars it just seems really boring. People like to drive. People like getting behind the wheel and driving places. Its like an adventure. Going out and just driving not even noing where your going just that home is in the opposite dirrection. That is something people would miss with driverless cars. Dont get people started on the laws and insurance that would be involved with these things. In paragraph nine it says,\"Presently, traffic laws are written with the assumption that only the safe car has a human driver in controll at all times. As a result, in most states it is illegal even to test computer driven cars\" Driverless cars should be outlawed. Yes, there are some peple on the road that make you ask yourself,\" How did they get their licsences and do is there faith in humanity anymore.\" With driverless cars people would be texting and figuring out ways to text with both hands on the stearing wheel. People are just to useed to certain laws they are supposed to obey while on the roads. With driverless cars you might as well throw those down the toliet and flush. All the laws would have to change and it would probably take years to do so. Driverless cars should not be allowed any where at anypoint in time. Not now, not in the future, never. People wouldnt change their ways. People are to old fashioned when it comes to things like this. It would take people ages to get use to new laws. Lets admit it, most people dont drive with two hands on the wheel. If people do its most likely not the ten and two position. People like driving, it gives them something to do. It could just be the only fun and productive thing people do sometimes, especially on Mondays. So people need to ask themselves,\" Would I get in a driveless car and trust a peace of machinary instead of myself, and if so at what cost.\"", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"Can you imagine a time in the future where no one buys cars because no one needs them anymore?\" Well yes I can see this happening one day in the future where you will not need to have a driver to menuver a car and get from point A to point B. I belive that i see in the next 10 years this actually starting to possibly happen look at how things are being made right now in the year 2016. We now have so much technology that lots of people never thought could actually be made. I belive that there may be some incidents with driverless cars but there would end up being less crashes happening. But also one oposing point that comes to mind is the cost of something like this, we would need new roads and money to test and make these cars actually work. People when they drive are sometimes very reckless while driving, I see if lots of people are able to start using driverless cars the rate of crashes would go down so much. becuase computers nowadays seem so much more accuatue at stuff then us humans doing it ourselfs would do. Why do you thing that when you go into a factory you see mostly robots doing stuff, its because they are more effienceint, can work for no pay, and also can do it nicer then humans can. There is only one thing i see that may possibly push this back a few years is the cost, because if you think about it this is possibly a muti-billion dollar project we are talking about and i dont know how much people are going to be up to the fact of wasting so much money on new roads and the actual process of making these cars. So that brings us back to the question, \"Can you imagine a time in the future where no one buys cars because no one needs them anymore?\" Well lets see now, most things nowadays dont even need humans to help them so i belive this will happen one day and i mean soon this will actually eventually happen. But also can be pushed back quite a few years because of road constrution they need to do to make sure these cars can have a smooth and safe ride from point A to point B without any issues at all, would be extremely hard, but with the technology us humans are making at such a constant speed is see it happening faster then most people think still with the money factor involved with it.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"Car-Free Cities\" gave the reader a broad perspective on the advantages of limiting car usage. The world would become a more eco-friendly and overall good place if we were to make this change happen all over the world. The passages give great reasoning to why this change should happen. Limiting our usage on cars would help the enviroment completely. The amount of pollution would have a massive decrease. \"After days of near-record pollution, Paris enforced partial driving ban to clear the air.\" This statement comes from the passage, \"Paris bans driving due to smog\" and gives an example on how having driving restrictions would make the world more healthy for the economy. Using other ways for transportation could help prevent the enormous amount of pollutants in the air, like bicycles or car pooling. \"They organize their summer jobs and social life around where they can walk or take public tranportation or car-pool with friends.\" This example shows ways we can have transportaion instead everyone individually using cars and causing more pollution. Instead of driving, riding a bike or walking to the places you need to go could be a huge stress reliever. People need to go outside and get fresh air, this can happen if we decrease the use of our cars or vehicles. \"It's a good opportunity to take away stress and lower air pollution.\" This statement was said in the passage, \"Car-free day is spinning into a big hit in Bogota\" and gives a perfect example on how using diferent types of transportation can relieve one's stress and lower the pollution on the world and the economy. When no longer using so many cars, and vehicles the traffic would decrease majorly. Not as many people would be driving if car-pooling or using other ways of transportation like bikes. This will also make the number of wrecks or accidents go down since not as many people would be in the situation for this to happen. Having less accidents would also save lots of lives, so many people die or get severly injured from car accidents and this can be a way to keep so many deaths or injuries from happening. The idea of having a car-free environment is a great plan for the future and would be a positive change for the world and the environment we live in.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"Car-free\" Many drivers around the world are deciding to take a break from driving and have now decided to \"think green.\" Although some may disagree that this could be helpful toward the enviroment there is evidence that says it is helpful. Some may not see the point and think that this new epidemic is inconvienient but maybe they just are not educated about these new ideas. Throughout the globe multiple cities have found ways to use some forms of public transportation, riding bicycles, and even walking to get themselves where they need to go. For example, Bogota, Colombia has a \"car-free\" day every year where only public transportation is avalible. Like Enrique Riera said in paragraph 26 the people of this city in Colombia are a part of this great change that encourages others to join in. The author also states in paragraph 28 that there is new parks and sidewalks which would have a positive affect on the attractiveness of their city. Imagine having a \"car-free\" day everyday of the year. That is exactly what a new city in German has done. Vauban, German was built in 2006 as a suburb with no real streets or parking spaces. Citizen of this new city only have to places to park their cars, in a large garages outside of town with a space costing $40,000 or in their home. As said in paragraph 3 most of the families in Vauban do not own a car and more than half sold their cars to move into the \"car-free\" city. Most of the citizens feel less stressed and more relaxed about no longer having a car also. Surely you're thinking \"What about the U.S.? They're one of the most powerful countries in the world they must have some insite on this new trend.\" As a matter of fact they do. The U.S. has slowly started to take a break from the automobile. More and more of the new generations have decided to not get their driver's licenses. In most big cities in the U.S. such as New York most of their citizens do not own a car and rather just walk or use other transportation due to traffic. It can be easier just to walk somewhere rather than to sit in a car thats bascially parked due to such bad traffic. In other parts of the U.S., there is a new trend of car-pooling which can not only have a positive impact on the enviroment but can also save you money. In paragraph 43, even Bill Ford, executive chairman of the Ford Motor Company, agrees that less use of a car can have a positive impact. Overall, the reduction of private vehicle transportation can help reduce the negative affects on the enviroment and on other aspects of life such as stress level. Multiple countries have started to join in this new world-wide idea of how to make this world a better enviroment for the future and most all of them have contrirbuted having others try it out. If we all are willing to give up a little for one thing it can make a big difference for everyone in the world's future.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"Challenge in Life and its Risks\" Humans have always been interested on exploring planets, countries depending on where you are going, islands, no matter the dangers or risks that can be present there. Then people talk and write about their experiences and what they discovered in there. Exploring Venus can be dangerous, interesting, and scary but excited at the same time. In \"The Challenge of Exploring Venus\", the author says that it presents dangers study Venus, but is also a worthy pursuit. Venus and Mars are one of the closet planets to Earth. \"Earth, Venus, and Mars, our planetary neighbor, orbit the sun at different speeds.\". The atmospheric pressure is 90 times greater than what we had experience in our planet. \"Also notable, Venus has the hottest surface temperature of any planet in our solar system, even though Mercury is closer to our sun\".\"Beyond high pressure and heat , Venusian geology and weather present additional impediments like erupting volcanoes, powerful earthquakes, and frequent lightning strikes to probes seeking to land on its surface\" But for some people it is still interesting to know more about Venus. Astronomers are fascinated about Venus, for what is there and what was there long ago. \"\"Astronomers are fascinated by Venus because it may well once have been the most Earth-like planet in our solar system\". Venus, long ago could be covered largely with oceans and had supported forms of life. \" The planet has a surface of rocky sediment and includes familiar features such as valleys, montains, and craters\". So, that can be scary but still for some people is excited to know a a different planet. People already went to the Moon, Venus sometimes is te=he nearest option for a planetary visit despite Mars. Venus once was probabably covered by oceans and could have supported various forms of life. \"Today, Venus still has some features that are analogous to those on Earth\". In Venus the tempetures average over 800 degrees Fahrenheit.\" These conditions are far more extreme than anything humans encounter on Earth: such an envirionment would crush even a submarine accustomed to diving to the deepest parts of our oceans and would liquefy many metals\". But anyways NASA is working and having ideas for sending humans to study Venus.\" Another project is looking back to an old technology called mechanical computers\". It is good that people propuse themselves challenge, and not be afraid of wanting to know more about the world and people should not be limited by its dangers and risks, or the thinking that you cannot do it. If you propuse something and you really want it, you can get it or at least try and work hard on it.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"Congestionwas down 60% in the capital of france after five days of intensifying smog\" (duffer par.14). have you ever thought how bad cars are for this planet? \"Its a good opportunity to take away stress and lower air polution\"(plaza par.24). I think it is a good idea to banned cars for a few days. This is my opinion because if we take cars away then people will see how much more clear the air is, how much easier it is to breath, what good excersie it is for you, it will open some peoples minds about how the enviroment works and how bad cars are for our economy. \"These people are generating a revolutionary change and this is crossing borders\"(riera par.26). It is good because there is so much fog and pollution in the air that it is bad for society and how it is bad for us and the planet that we live on. \"amaeicas love affair with its vehicles seems to be cooling. when ajusting to the population growth\" (rosenthal par.32).people are realizing that their love with their cars isnt as big as their love for their own life and for their friends and familys lives.\"as of april 2013, the number of miles driven per person was nearly 9% below the peak and equal to where the country was in january 1995. Part of the explanation certainly lines in the recession, because cash-strapper amaericans could not afford new cars, and the unemployed werent going to work anyway\"(rosenthal par.32). people now a days dont have enough money to by a car for themselves because there arent enough jobs for all the people becayuse of the big population growth of america. people are using technology to talk to people, and this means that people dont have to drive as often to go talk to someone. \"demographic shifts in the driving population suggest that the trend may accelerste. there hasa been a large drop in the percentage of 16- to 39-year-olds gettin a license\"(sivak par.38). younger people dont really want to drive to places if they can just talk to people on the phone. some people of this society are lazy because they dont want to get up and go places when they have their phones, but sometimes its for a good reason even if they dont know it they are not polluting the air as much as they would be if they drove to their friends/familys house. how do you feel about how cars are affecting this planet and the way it works. these ideas and actions people are taking are going around the globe and it is saving the earth one day at a time with one little idea.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"Crash!\" That's the sound a driveless car would make when you least expect it. Imagine if you fell asleep and you didn't hear the car tell you to take over the wheel. Next second later, you wake up to find you've been hurt in a car accident or someone else has because of you. Would it be the cars fault or yous? Yours because you fell asleep behind your cars wheel. How would you feel? I know i'd feel bad. Even though, a driveless car would be awesome, it could hurt you or someone else. In the mornings when you are on your way to workor school, driving a car helps wake you up because it makes you think and your brain alert. While it makes your brain alert it will help improve your activity at work or at school, because you will be wide awake and know whats going on. But making you alert isn't the only reason not to have driveless cars. If you make it to where they can do anything by theirselves. Then why do we need a lincense? And if we dont have a lincense to drive a driveless car, before you know it kids will be on the road. And we don't need little kids on the road. Yes, driving a driveless car would be awesome because it would be something out of a movie! But I feel we shouldn't be lazy and drive ourselves. I mean if we have driveless cars, what's next? Cars that can fly?! I don't feel like we need that. Driverless cars can really hurt someone or hurt you. And just think about that. Do you really wanna take that chance?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"Different things are converging which suggest that we witnessing a long term cultural shift,\" said Mimi Sheller. As technology advances the world will start to get rid of things we use to use before, so that those new advancements could come and take their place, as time flies we might not need cars anymore, even though they are the most useful thing to get us from one place to another, they are also devastating for our community, and our environment. Now knowing that most people would never let go of there cars due to the amount of money people spend to buy them, that giving them up isn't going to be so easy. However giving up your car will have a major benefit to our everyday life, also there are many other alternatives that you could use instead of your car that will not only benefit you but also the people around you, such as bikes, busses, trains, and subways. Now that most companies are going green, they are developing ways to not let harmful gasses produced by vehicles that burn fossil fuels to stop damaging the earths atmosphere, so the air we breath isn't toxic and life threatening so maybe one day everyone can live in a much cleaner safer place. In a suburb in Germany, the residents have given up their cars completely as to where street parking, driveways and home garages are a thing of the past. There are now only two known ways of parking which is having to buy a parking garage space for $40,000, and your house. It has been working very well because 70% of the towns families don't own cars, and 57% of the people sold their cars to move there. Now being in a car is where the true form of someone comes out, you don't need to even be a driver but you still will experience \"Road rage,\" thats when someone else gets so mad that they will start saying things they dont need, or want to say, but it just comes out with anger that they dont care about what they said. Being to angry is bad for someone because it causes stress and anger issues that will later lead on to heath problems and car accidents, now if we reduce the number of drivers, or even come to a point where driving a car doesn't even exist anymore, the amount of angry people will be reduced, thus making the world a little bit nicer than it already is. Now bringing the topic back reducing cars will reduce the amount of accidents followed by them. Think about everyone you know, now picture those you love who have died by a car accident, Now whether they died by texting, drinking or someone else hit them", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"Do voters really control whom thier elector picks for\"(9)we should switch to a direct voting system. With electoral college going voters dont always have control on who the electors from their state pick. In some instanses the electoral voters vote is more valued than the peoples vote. Over 60% of voters would prefer a direct vote not an electoral vote. the electoral vote weighs more than the popular vote, this in unfair because if a mass of people vote for one president and a few electoral voters choose the other president the people dont get the president they wanted, the electoral voters do. So we could expect that a popular vote winner couid yet again lose presidency to the electoral vote. But electoral votes blance out the states say in the vote, if a big state all votes against a small state the big one will win the electoral college balances that, but the popular vote is everyones say not a couple of peoples say. 60% of voters would prefer a direct vote. a direct vote would give the people more voice in the election instead of the few in the electoral college. If we abolish the electoral college the popular vote will be the main vote counted and there will be not more electoral college. Using a direct voting system the people will get the president that they want and voted for(ex. Al Gore) If the elecrotal vote goes to a tie then it goes to the house of representatives and there each state has one representataive, that one person is voting for thousands of people. That one representative can go against their states wishes and vote for whom ever they choose,So this could lead to bribing the rep into voting for some one else. So the popular vote doesnt help the president get selected. This is why we should swich to a direct voting system. So the people have more say in who gets to be their president for the next four years. The popular vote cannot be bribed or altered. And the popular vote is everyones vote, not a few or even one persons decision.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"Do you really think there could be life on mars?\" i asked \"In 1976 a viking 1 photo was taken of what looked like a face on mars. Scientist say that it was just a land form the whole time. Others say they are holding back and it is a face. Another picture was taken in 1998 by a Mars Global Surveyor or MSG, and again in 2001. Finnaly a 3D image that showed what it realy was. A mesa.\" I was disscusing the face on mars with a guy who still thinks it was created by aliens. \"so if this is really a face how do you know?' I questioned him. \"Its simple\" he said \"there is no way that is natural. We have never seen another thing like it.\" Although this was true he had no evidence so i gave some of mine. \"With improved technology and cameras we are able to see it is not a face after all. People see faces on the moon ot shapes in the clouds all the time.\" I persuaded him \"so what makes this any different\" Giving some of my evidence i was hoping we were getting close to resolving the situation. We have done enough research and taken enough pictures to prove it is not actually a face. Yes, there could have been life on mars but this is not a piece of evidence and it is not created by aliens. Finally he starts to understand \"So if it is not created by aliens and you seem to know more than what i do then what do you guys seem to think it might be ?\" \"With the data collected it looks to be a butte or a mesa. These land forms are found here on earth.\" With enough research it is not that hard to figure it out. Everyone will have there own beliefs on the situation. This is just what we have found to be correct. We have collected all this information i gave you here at NASA. With the pictures, and studies it should be enough to prove whats right. We are not holding back on anything or changing stuff up. If you seem to think the same thing as him take this in. It is a mesa just like we have here.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"Do you want to be apart of a Electoral College\" Electoral colleges. Do you know what this means? An electoral college is a process of multiple facts. Not a place. As everyone thinks Electoral College sounds decieving because the word \"college\" in the name but apparentley thats not true. The founding fathers established it in the constitution as a compromise between election of the President and votes by the people of America. Dear Senator, this is where I begin rambling on and on about how the electoral college is wonderful and great. But I am just going to let you in to alittle bit of knowledge behind the thinking, before you get your fingers in a knot. I propose that we shall keep the Electoral college in order to keep things fair amoung the country. Lets get talking shall we..... The Electoral college is all high and mighty and is a process that consists of the selection of the electors. During the meeting of the electors, they discuss the presidents and vice presidents that are trying out for there 'role' in society. They also align the counting of the electoral votes by the Congress men. If you did not know Senator the Electoral College or as we call it \"EC\" consists of 538 electors in the so called 'pole'. A majority of those electors are 270 votes that are required to elect the President. There is one allotment for each member of the House of Representatives adding an extra 2 for your senators, like you! As you can see the \"EC\" has alot to offer and your even included. Why would you want to get rid of something that your apart of! Wait a second you don't know the rest of the story do you. Well now I understand why you wouldn't want them to just be another organization. Am I Right? Each canidate running for the high quality name known as \"The Presdident\" in your state has his or hers own group of electors. They are usually chosen by the political party, but the state laws vary from time to time. Fun Fact for Mr. Senator- did you know this is in the 23rd Amendment? Oh silly me your the senator you should know this! Continuing on with our little debate here there is an important part of the Electoral colleges that you must know. Every tuesday after the first monday in November is when these elections occur. And if you didn't think that the citizens have a say in this at all, well you are mistaken! The citizens help choose the your states electors because when you vote for President your actually voting for your canidates electors. So they do have a say in this partake. \"Winner Take All\" sound familiar to you. Maybe not but I am going to explain it anyway. The Winner Takes All System awards all electors to the winning presidential canidate. Except for the unlucky ones like Maine, and Nebraska they have something called the \"Proportional Representation\". All said and done the \"certificate of Ascertainment\" is introduced after the elction has partaken in. This lists all of the canidates who ran for President in your state choosen along with the names of there \"side kick\" the electors. This shows who will be in your country running for president and elector for the next 4 years until the next election. Of course the \"EC\" has some problems which of course you would like to hear so I will state them as well. Jimmy Carter, Bob Dole, and the US Chamber of Commerce want to abolish the \"EC\"! They are not alone on this one. Whats wrong with the electoral college you say? Under the \"EC\" voters vote for something other than the president but for the slate of electors, who then turn over andelect who \"THEY\" want to be the president. This is why we have the voting we have today so each person can vote on who they want and still be treated the same. But it can also make a crisis to. Allowing the people to vote for whoever they want to is not a good idea. It can lead to bigger problems and issues. Voting for yourself can be very, very stressful. Adding on top of more strees. Of course its easier this way but your electing who is going to be the \"President\". Someone who controlls your country, tells YOU what to do, and makes new laws. It shouldn't be as easy as writting on a piece of paper who you want to be president. There should be some type of way to make it alittle more precise. This is why there is the Electoral College. All you have to do is get with someone you trust and vote for them to be apart of the canidates electors. Then all they have to do is vote for who they want to be president and see what happens. Its just as easy as what we have now but alittle bit more neat/clean. I Know I am spilling alot of information onto you about the \"EC\". And the advantages and disadvantages of having it. But I ask you to read this letter and think about what role YOU play in this election. Write back to me in your response of the actions you are going to be risking. Sincerely, Yours truly(Ms. Schoenthaler)", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"Don Reist invited him to go to Europe on a cattle boat. Luke couldn't say no. He new it was an opportunity of a lifetime.\" \"The cattle-boat trips were an unbelievable opportunity for a small-town boy,\" he says. \"Besides helping people , I has the side benefit of seeing Europe and China. But seeing the Acropolis in Greece was special,\" he says. \"So was taking a gondola ride in Venice, Italy, a city with streets of water.\" \"Luke also found time to have fun on board, especialy on return trips after the animals had been unloaded. The coyboys played baseball, voleyball games in the empty holds where animals had housed. Table-tennis tornaments, fencing, boxing, reading, whittiling , and games also healped pass the time.\" \"But being a Seagoing Cowboy was much more the an adventure for Luke Bomberger. It opened up the world to him. \"I'm greatful for the opportunity,\" he says. \"It made me more aware of people of other countries and their needs.\" Some good reasons to join are you get to have fun once in a while, your helping people in need, and your helping animals. Also you get to go on your own adventure with others of course, but you can see some other countries and see stuff you never saw before. Being a Seagoing Cowboy can be fun because you can play games and time will fly when your having fun. You can be the one to take care of helpless animals and feed and water then as well. That is why you should be a Seagoing Cowboy.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"Driveless Cars Are Coming\" this article gives information about the future of \"Driveless Cars\". Driveless cars can be a bad thing for society. But it can also be a good thing for society. I believe, yes the develpoment of driveless cars can be a negative aspect on people and the enviroment around them. Driveless cars can be a dangerous thing in a specific situation. The cars aren't fully developed yet to act in human-like situations on the road. Therefore if an construction site is ahead the car wouldn't know how to react. In the seventh paragraph it states how a driver must be alert due to the lack of skill the car has. \"This means the human driver must remain alert and be ready to take over when the situation requires.\" That lets the reader know that the \"Driveless Car\" still needs assistance. \"Driveless Cars\" are non-reliable. They are not fully driveless because the driver stills need to take control of the wheel. They aren't fully developed for all traffic and other driving situations a human would be ready for. In the seventh paragraph it states, \"The google car simply announces when the driver should be prepared to take over.\" This quotes summarizes why driveless cars are not fully reliable. Because people shouldnt have to take control at any time if its meant to be \"Driveless\". Driveless cars are also a challenging type of technology. Its requires many sensors. But it isn't on the level of a human reaction or skill level. It gives good signals on when a person needs to take control. But why waste your money on something so expensive that isn't doing the job you wanted it to. In the eighth paragraph Dr. Werner Huber admits \"'The psychological aspects of a automation are really a challenge.'\" Therfore \"Drivelss Cars\" aren't a good development. You cant fully rely on them. You never know when you need to take the wheel. You might just want to relax and take a nap in the car, all of sudden BOOM your in accident because you closed your eyes and the car didnt know how to react in that situation. Don't be lazy and watse your money. Just buy a car and YOU drive just like your supposed to.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"Driveless cars are coming.\" I think driveless cars are not good for us. Driveless cars can have many munfuctions. They could hurt the drivers saftey. Sales would go down. Maybe not all people would be able to buy them. The drivers driving skills could be forgotten any time. Many accidents can occur. Many things can happen with driveless cars. To begin with, driveless cars can hurt the drivers saftey. Drivers saftey can be hurt buy not focusing when the car is driving itself. The car can have a munfuction by itself without the driver even knowing. That would be dangerous for the driver. In one munfuction a big saftey issue can happen . The driver gets hurt and not only the driver will get hurt. Other drivers would be involved in getting hurt as well. To continue, Car sales would be uncorrectly. Many people would try to buy the car but they won't be able to because it could be out of there budget. With the cars being expensive the body parts or engine many things a car has, could be expensive. Or once again out of there budget. Maybe some people would be able to afford them. But possibly only a few. The car sales would be out of hand. Ruining many company sales. Finally, it could affect the drivers driving skills. If the driver has to drive once again. After a long while and has to drive all of the sudden againout of no where. It could affect the driver by forgetting what to do. Within the driver forgetting how to drive can cause an accident. By the driver getting out of control or the car getting out of control. One driveless person can affect alot. Driveless cars can be bad for us. Many people might like them in there own ways. But they can be danger to the driver, other people driving, munfuctions,accidents and saftey. Many things can change. One car can change many things. Therefore in my opinion i think driveless cars are not good for us. They can affect us and many others. In many different ways.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"Driverless Cars Are Coming!\" \"Television and movies have long been fasinated with cars that could drive themselves.\" Driverless cars are always something people thought as futeristic and almost unreal to have but in todays age car inovaters are slowly doing it as technology progresses. Having a driverless car would be something modern and cool. Google has resently had a car that they said \" Had driven more than half a million miles without crashing.\" Google's cars arent complatly driverless so to say; they still need a human to take over when road conditions arent clear or are to complicated or to complex. For example google said \" They still alert the driver to take over when pulling in and out of driveways or dealing with complicathed traffic issues.\" In saying this the cars are only somewhat driverless.This is good and bad but having a car that basically dose everthing for its owner driving wiseis pretty amazing. Only having to drive or help navigate the car whenever there is complex traffic jams or pulling in or out of a driveway is a big leapfrom what it was five or ten years ago. In the late 1950's, General Motors created a car that could run on a special track. The track General Motors created was embedded with an eletrical cable that sent signals to the car.\"engineers at Barkeley tried something similar, but they used magenets with alternating polarity.\" They car they made read the positive and negitive polarity as messages in \"Binary Code.\" They said these road worded very well but it required massive upgrades to all of the roads for the cars to even work and it was to costly.Changing roads was to costly so they changed their thinking to smarter cars not smarter roads. Smart cars need a lot of sensors, GPS recivers,and inertial motin sensors.\"The most important bit of technology in this system is the spinning sensor in the roof.Dubbed LIDAR, it uses laser beams to form a constantly updating 3-D model of the car's surroundings. \"in 2013,BMW announced the development of \"TrafficJam Assistant.\"\" This car can handle driving at up to 25 mph, but special \"touch sensors\" make sure the driver keeps a hold of the wheel. None of the cars that they have developed so far have been completly driverless. They all need a human to be in the drivers seat with hands on the wheel as if they were the ones driving. Yet they are not if the driver wanted to they could turn of certian features of the car so they could drive, but the only time the car its self need help is when it notifies the human. \"GM has developed driver's seat that viberate when the vihical is in danger of baking into an object.\"On the other hand the Google car \"Simply announces when the driver should be prepared to take over.\" They are still considering other features such as flashinglights on the windshield and other heads-up warnings. How long will it truly be before cars can drive themselves? With the progression we have now it may be sooner than later. They went from having it to be just a dream to smart roads to smart cars, then from there Google and GM ran with the idea and now they are closer than ever to having a \"Driverless Car.\" This would be a huge part of history is they made a car that could drive its self. GM and Google are truly amazing people with the progress they have made over a few short years. This is why \"driverless Cars\" are an amazing and positive thing of the era.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"Driverless Cars Are Coming\" Can you imagine a time in the future when no one buys cars because no one needs them anymore ? They started coming up with new ideas on how to make cars work better. Most people like me are fascinated with cars that can drive themselves . Who wouldn't want a car that could do that? It sounds like a good idea but there are some things most people wouldn't like about these cars. The cars that already have been created are not completely driverless. That means you still have to pay full attention when the car is working by itself. Google had a car that could drive half a million miles without crashing but it still wasn't driverless . The driver gets notified when pulling in and out of driveways. The Google cars would also alert the driver incase of a accident or roadwork . Some of the cars made had sensors in them. The sensors would allow a much better respond than the human drivers . BMW \"Traffic Jam Assistant\" had a sensor that would make sure the driver had hold of the wheel. Most of the cars developed so far couldn't really do much but steer,accelerate, and brake themselves. The human driver still had to remain alert incase they had to take over and start driving in case of an accident or roadwork ahead . So why would anyone want a driveless car that still needs a driver? They think the idea of it is fun , which it is . Most laws about driving are focused on keeping the people in the vehicle safe. New laws will be made incase there is an accident . They will have to see whos fault is it- the driver or the manufacturer . Would you still want a car that you had to drive? Doesn't really sound like a good idea to me . Sounds fun but it's a lot of work .", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"Driverless Cars Are Coming\" What do you think the world will be if the cars were driverless? Will there be more danger? Or, will this benefit us? There are many things that you can say about having driverless cars, some main things would be having that type of money for it, the different dangers that can occur, and as well on how it will benefit us, humans, and our lifestyle. With all this technology advancing anytime soon there will be cars like these that will be driving themselves without having an actual person driving them and this is coming very quick. As said in the article, \"Mercedes-Benz, Audi, and Nissan plan to have cars that can drive themselves by 2020. The road to the truly autonomous car stretches on ahead of us, but we grow closer to the destination every day.\" That being said, anytime soon there will be vehicles that will be able to do all things imaginable things in a short amount of time. It is crazy how all of this technology is happening in this type of era, but it is exactly correct we grow closer to greatness every day and we sometimes do not even notice, until it happens. Driverless Cars coming, there is also danger and percaution that comes along with is as well. That is something very important that people need to still take into consideration when buying cars like these and all the different effects it has. As stated in the article, \" This means the human driver must remain alert and be ready to take over when the situation requires. This necessitates the car bing ready to quickly get the driver's attention whenever a problem occurs.\" Therefore, as for the human driver will always have to be precaution about the different things that can happen, and as well as not to fully trust these driverless cars and all the different things it can portray. Taking into deep considerarion, will these vehicles benefit us and the way we live now? Many people can say it will, and then there are people that will say no, it will not. Imagining how much money it will take to afford a driverless car is also something to think about as well. In the article it informs us about all the different things these vehicles can do, \"They can steer, acclerate, and brake themselves, but all are designed to notify the driver when the road ahead requires human skills, such as navigating through work zones and around accidents.\" As much as it says in the article how they are \"driverless\" they still do need humans when it comes to certain occasions. So in the end it is your personal prefrence about being able to please yourself with a fance vehicle like these. Finally, what do you think the world will be like when these driverless cars come out? This world is growing in the world of technology there will always be different, exotic, marvalous, inventions that are coming and with all these crazy things so are the Driverless Cars Are Coming!", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"Driverless Cars Are Coming\" article presents many aspects, both positive and negative, about these cars. Some of the positives are the cars are forseen to use half of the fuel today's cars use, offer more felxiblity than a bus, and people would not have to buy cars anymore. I personally believe that this is a bad and possibly dangerous idea. Driverless cars have no laws regarding them and are hard to decide who is liabe, and the cars are not very well devolped yet. Firstly, the law aspect of Driverless Cars is majority of the time nonexistent. An exception to the pervious statement is that these cars are illegal even to test on roads in most state makeing it very obvious there has been little real-life testing. So no laws are in place to prepare for the new problems that will arise when these cars are actually in use and on the roads. If the technology fails and someone is injured who is at fault? Or if there is property damage? Should the car manufacturer or the driver be at blame for what happens? So many questions that will need to be answered and laws written for if these cars are ever use don the roads. But, I stand by the current laws which were written with the assumtpion that the only safe car has a human driver in control at all times. Secondly, these cars have very little testing, and devolpment to become fully driverless. All of the current \"driverless\" cars still require a human for work zones, accidents, and even sometimes coplicated traffic. Sure, these cars can steer, accelerate, and brake themselves meaning they have the basics down. But, without an alert driver this could cause many accidents. Also since these cars are dependant on coding, computer chips, and sensors what if one of these systems fail will the car have a backup or human driving needed. Because the facts is so much can go wrong with technology why would someone want to put all of their trust into this technolgy. I think it is clear that human drivign should always be an option no matter how advance and well madee the car is it is not smart to put all of your trust into a machine without human assitance needed. In the end despite all of the benifits and possiblities driverless cars provide it is not a good idea to put thes on the roads because of the lives these cars might put into danger. Even if they were fully safe their would be multiple questions concerning the law when these cars are concerned. It might be the conservative choice but, it is also the safe choice to say no to these new driverless cars.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"Driverless Cars Are Coming\" describes many of the issues in the debate of driverless cars. There are both advantages and disadvantages to adopting this new technology. Based on this article, driverless cars should continue being developed because they have potential to be safer and cheaper than cars with human drivers. Increased safety is one of the strongest advantages of self-driving cars. Google's self-driving cars have never crashed in more than five hundred thousand miles. While the article does not give a number for comparison, most would know that few humans possess such a clean driving record. Even if the cars are more expensive, they promote general welfare by protecting passengers. Currently, these \"driverless cars\" still require drivers, which highlights another strength of driverless cars: they do not sacrifice the benefits of cars driven by humans. If the car is in a situation too complex for its computer, a human can always take over. However, regular cars do not have the advantage of being able to use a computer to solve traffic situations too complec for humans. For example, a human probably could not quickly simplify the following math expression: ln(334^6). On the other hand, a computer could solve it nearly instantly. The driver and computer work together in current driverless cars, leading to increased safety. A potential issue with driverless cars is the cost, but driverless cars will actually become cheaper than human driven cars. Sergy Brin predicts driverless cars will \"use half the fuel of today's taxis.\" Fuel can be expensive, but driverless cars use less fuel. Also, since driverless cars are safer, they crash less, meaning that they need to be replaced less often. Eventually, driverless cars will no longer be much more expensive than regualar cars, as Sebastian Thrun decribes how radar previously was incredibly expensive but now can be affored by anyone. The greatest weakness of driverless cars is that they are illegal in most states. Still, this disadvantage is only a temporary issue. No polititian could have created laws for automobiles in the 1700's, but now, as mentioned in this article, there are numerous complex laws for cars. These laws must have taken time and effort to create. If regular cars could become legal with time, driverless cars will also become legal. Driverless cars are a new technology, but these cars are already safer than cars with human drivers. Development should continue, since prices will eventually fall, allowing many people to transport themselves safely compared to current cars.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"Driverless Cars Are Coming\" discusses the idea of regular automobiles and automobiles that are able to be controlled remotely by themselves. It states that companies such as Google have had self driven automobiles since 2009 and have continued to work on them. The arguements stands on which of the two are better for the overall socitey. From my standpoint I believe that regular automobiles from today's day and age are the best for everyone. I belive that self driven automobiles are much more of a safe choice to go with out of the two. We have come so far as humans to go from developing forks and knives to cars that can drive themselves. I believe this is a big accomplishment in mankind but I also belive that it's not practical and safe to do so. Cars driven by themselves will cause so many issues for drivng if they were ever brought on to roads and streets. So many things would have to be adjusted in order for the veichles to be able to be on public roads and highways. Driverless cars would change everything we know about the automobile and it's inner workings. Laws would be changed immensely and in a multitude of different ways. Mechanics would be of no use to us driverless cars. They would have to learn go back to school and learn a whole new way to operate on these cars. Many glitches could happen within these cars and end up causing accidents and many fatalities to drivers. Driverless cars are not way to go in terms of veichles. Cars driven by people is the only way we can keep control of what's going on within the highway and on the road itself. Driverless cars would cause more deaths and injuries within automobile accidents. We must stay with cars driven by people.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"Driverless Cars Are Coming\" introduces the idea that driverless cars are almost ready. My argument of driverless cars is, are they ready? Who is to blame if an accident happens? The manufacturer or the owner? Which the narrator also asks, \"If the technology fails and someone is injured, who is at fault- the driver or the manufacturer?\" The premise of my argument, is that the driver, should in no way be the one at fault. Unless they themselves wreck the car. Driverless cars are a very unique sort of car. For one, they do not need a driver. In most cases, that is. Driverless cars have one factor that many car companies are working on: they also need a driver. Which makes them half driverless and half driver... full? BMW driverless cars can only go to about 25 mph (miles per hour), \"The car can handle driving functions at speeds up to 25 mph,\" before needing assitance by the driver behind a wheel. GM has driver seats that vibrate when the vehicle is in danger, \"...driver's seats that vibrate...\" Also, the Google car just says whenever the person is required to take over. \"...simply announces when the driver should be prepared to take over.\" What if a special needs/ disabled person uses one of these cars? Are the manufacturers going to blame them for not being able to use their own hands and feet on the vehicle? This is another scary thing that could very well happen in the future. At least a person without some kind of disability would have control of the car if the autopilot did indeed fail. My counter-argument to my argument would be that there are plenty of sensors around the car stated in paragraph 4, \"...they needed a whole lot of sensors,\" but, what if the senors failed? What if every single sensor failed and someone was incapable of controlling the car? Who is responsible? My argument is not one that can be answered right now. It is just a question that many could use an answer from. The well-being and capability of the car is an important aspect of said car. Many bad accidents could happen and whether or not the accident is pinned on the car maker or the car driver is to be disputed.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"Driverless Cars Are Coming\" is a good idea do you think so. Driverless is an easy way to stop being in a car accident. Driverless cars are something that you would want to enjoy. They also form a public transportation system. Driverless cars form a public transport taxi system. Driverless cars is a good idea baecause there could be a accident that could happen and the car would stop. The driverless cars we havent had that before in life. It would help elders if they can't see what they doing. The driverless cars that are coming isn't a bad idea at all there is nothing worng with it. It will feel different because this is a type of car that can stop on it's own when it is known that something bad is about to happen. All im saying is there is nothing wrong with the driverless car. It's very different from other cars. It can do what other cars can't. It is a decent product and something new in life. The car do things on its own like it has a sensor wheel. The car has a rotating sensor on the roof and a video camera mounted near the rearview mirror. Even though the sensor isn't new or anything. Driverless cars is a good idea.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"Driverless Cars Are Coming\" is a great article and makes a lot of great points about this product. My opinion on driverless cars is I think it's a great idea. Also there could be a down side to this product as well. A public-transportation taxi system that use half the fuel of today's taxis would be a great idea. It would be great for the environment, as well as us as people. This system woul for sure change the world. The Google cars that work independantly have driven half a million miles withough a collision. Which is great because there goes a lot of injured people and totalled cars that people need as transportation. At the same time, these cars still need a human to operate them under certain conditions such as, puling in and out of places, driving through construction places or car accidents. The idea of the cars running on a track is a grea tidea as well, but there is just no time to fix all these roads to make our cars driverless. Also the cost of this would be too expensive. Also if the car could opperate on its own, I would think that the driver would be even more careless than they already are and would pay even less attention. If the car would still need the driver to be alert in case of needing to take over, drivers would just be more tempted to look away and do other things while driving, and then if the car needed the driver to take over they will have already crashed because the driver was distracted by something else. In my opinion driverless cars is a goof idea in some ways, but in other ways they are dangerous. They are nice to have, but only if you are able to be responsible with them. You need to be able to have self dicipline to be able to operate a car like this and stay alert even if the car is driving for you. Anything can happen in a split second. A plus side to them would be if you are someone that works in the city and always has to sit and wait in rush hour, then this would be a good car for you to have. The car would drive for you in this mess, so you wouldn't get so tired of it. But something that I would worry about personally is trusting the car to do it's job. It is a machine, it could malfunction and make a mistake. Like if it doesn't stop when the rest of the traffic does and it rear-ends someone. Or it doesn't go when the rest of the traffic does and someone rear-ends you. It could be dangerous, and the car messing up like that would't be the buyers fault, it is just still something I would worry about as a driver of a driverless car. The points made in this article are very helpful to understand the progress being made with driverless cars. They would definitely benefit us in the future, and make car pileups a thing of the past.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"Driverless Cars Are Coming\" is a passage which talks about the development of driverless cars. Driverless cars are currently in development but hope to see the roads of the world in a few years. They can change the way that everyone lives their normal lives since transportation will be evolved. Driving will be different than it has ever been before and once again society will have to learn how to use new technology. Driverless cars should be developed and made available to use by the public. First, driverless cars can help make the roads safer and less accident prone. In the recent years accidents have become a normal event to witness in everyday life. That's why driverless cars are going to be equipped with technology that allows the driver to know when they have to take the wheel. \"GM has developed driver's seats that vibrate when the vehicle is in danger of backing into an object.\" Another example that driver less cars will make the roads safer are they can help keep the driver focused. Accidents that happen on a daily basis are mostly caused by distrctions in or around the vehicle. Driverless cars will lower the distration rate by alerting the passenger when they need to completely focused.\" The google car simply announces when the driver should be prepared to take over...while the driver watches the road, the car watches the driver.\" Finally, driverless cars can help aid teenage drivers and teach them how to drive safer. Accidents among teenager has become a rising problem and the number is only growing. Driverless cars still require a driver so a teen would be perfect behind the wheel because they can get a feel of how a car should be driven. When it's time for them to take the wheel they will be able to show all they have been able to learn. \" Special touch sensors make sure the driver keeps hold of the wheel...but all are designed to notify the driver when the road ahead requires human skills.\" Another example is driverless cars will make driver easier for teens since they don't have to be so stressed about driving. Driving is one of those tasks which takes time to master and the aid of the driverless car will allow a teen to learn how to drive safer and easier. In conclusion, driverless cars are a develpment which will soon change the way driving is completed in everyday life. Driverless cars deserve their chance to hit the road as they come with many benefits. The driverless cars will be able to make roads safer and aid teenagers in developing good driving skills. Driverless cars in one way or another should be developed and made availble to own by the public.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"Driverless Cars Are Coming\" is an article about the positives and negatives of driverless cars. It was a very interesting topic, one of the best i've read on an Istep test. It was about how we could be seeing drverless cars in the near future. It talked about how they've tested out many options from magnets to electrical rods. The article gave facts and didn't shy from what the issues were. Now I'm going to express my opinon on the topic. My view on driverless cars is not a set voice. I agree with their concepts and the test ran but i don't agree with how fast they're trying to market it. It's only been sixteen years since we've gotten computers and only about eight or nine since we got modern computers. The touchscreen phone is fairly new and they have these \"Hoverboards\" which are just segways without handles. I guess what I'm trying to say is there's no reason to jump to something so big if we don't understand what we have yet. I don't doubt we will have self driving cars i just doubt it'll be so soon. I see self drving cars as something we should pursuit. I just don't think it should be a main part of our advances in technology. There's so many things we can be doing other then creating this. We should finish finding ourselves before we start building technology that doesn't need us. with all this \"machine doing\" stuff we'll just be sitting at home while the bots do everything. Thats no a world i want to live in. A world where everyone looks to machines to do their work.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"Driverless Cars Are Coming\" is an article that brings up the proposition of smart cars that drive themselves, but still need a driver. In the text it states: \" In fact, none of the cars developed so far are completely driverless. They can steer, accelerate, and brake themselves, but all are designed to notify the driver when the road ahead requires human skills, such as navigating through work zones and around accidents.\" The author makes it a great point that no car will be able to work correctly without a driver. Driverless Cars are something that has been around for awhile, many thoughts have went into creating something so advanced. But could this be a blessing or a disaster? From the article it states many negatives and positives. Negatives being such as who is at fault for when accidents occur the driver, or the manufacturer? Positives being that the driver has more warning signs and can be more prepared. Although the smart car does a lot, there still needs to be a driver who is prepared and ready to take action if the smart car can not do it alone. Personally my opinion is that smart cars are a wonderful advancement, but they should not be given to new drivers. A great way to decrease accidents if the new smart car becomes legal is to make a license test just for smart cars. Put everyone who wants one or has one through a program to learn how to drive the smart car, and this way they have to go through the same course as for a normal license. Drving these \"driverless cars\" as it is called can be misleading. These cars do not work by theirselves, although there are companies who are trying to advance to cars that can drive themselves. \"Waiting on the Law\" is a paragraph in the article that states: \"Still, even if traffic laws change, new laws will be needed in order to cover liability in the case of an accident.\" With this new smart car their will be new laws placed in order to keep everyone safe. Laws might include at what age may someone drive it, and the restrictions that will come with the car. It has many years to go before there are completely drivless cars. As of right now it states in the text: \"As a result, in most states it is illegal even to test computer-driven cars.\" It seems as though it will take awhile to become legal and to make sure these smart cars are really in the best interest of drivers. Smart Cars for sure have a long road ahead, there will be many improvements and many sleepless nights for the creators. It will have to meet every need and a back up system if something were to go wrong. The driver needs to understand that they still have to pay attention and watch the road. Again, there should be a restriction on who can use these cars until they become more \"normal\" in a sense. In the United States, everyone grows up learning and watching how to drive a car, or truck. It would be a learning experiance for the adults also with the new smart cars, and children would learn the \"new way\" of driving. \"Can you imagine a time in the future when no one buys cars because no one needs them anymore?\" The first line in the article makes you think in to the future. At first these smart cars won't be compleley driverless, but they will have their own control over the car as does the driver. It's a scary thought that a computer can be made that can do something so advanced. Driving is such a huge responsibility and is a privilage. Hopefully we grow in comfort with this new advance that is to come. \"Driverless Cars Are Coming\", be ready.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"Driverless Cars Are Coming\" is an article that is written by someone who has perspectives on what is good about driverless cars, and what is bad about the cars. After reading this article I believe that the driverless cars are going to be very helpful, and useful to people in the future. I believe that driverless cars will be helpful because the driver will not have to do much work, because the car drives itself 90% of the time. Also in this article the author tell us that the Google driverless cars, can drive up to half a million miles before the car crashes. Driverless cars will also be helpful because the people that were originally driving, do not have to memorize directions anymore. Being a driver requires a lot of attention to the road, and it is hard to pay attention to everything else that is going on around them. With the new driverless car, you do not have to drive the car 90% of the time, which allows for more time to think about other things or make sure that your kids are behaving in the back seats, without having to pay attention to the road. Although 10% of the time you may have to drive, the other 90% you are worry free of driving and can focus on other things that you need to. When people are driving themselves, they tend to be in car accidents very often whether it is severe or not. With the driverless car, you can prevent accidents from happening for a much longer time. Driverless cars have gone up to half a million miles before ever being in a single accident. Going half a million miles without an accident, or the car breaking down is unheard of and nearly impossible, but with the driverless cars, the technology is so outstanding, that the car can go this far. Using a GPS while in a car can be distracting and not safe to the driver, and everyone else that is in the car. Since the driverless car drives for people, now the people in the car can set the GPS and not be distracted by the road. With this feature, the car will always know when the right time to turn is, and will always get you to your destination on time. If you are a person who is late a lot or gets lost all the time, then you might be interested in this car, because it does all of the work for you. Driverless cars are a great idea because they drive 90% of the time, which leaves the driver to be focused on other things, it can drive up to half a million miles before crashing or breaking down, which will make the car owner feel very safe and secure in the car that they own, and also the car takes you where you tell it to because of the GPS system, which can make the owner worry free about getting lost. I believe that this car will be very successful, and it will be the future in the car industry.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"Driverless Cars Are Coming\" is an informative piece that thoroughly discusses the advantages and disadvantages of the autonomous automobile. The sole purpose of this article is to inform and impact one's knowledge on the future means of transportation technology. In my opinion, driverless cars are convenient and savvy, but are also to be handled delicately and with precaution. The self-driving vehicle is a realistic option for transportation. In paragraph 7 it states, \"They can steer, accelerate, and brake themselves, but all are designed to notify the driver when the road ahead requires human skill.\" This is evidently an advantage of driverless cars, for it minimizes the burden on the driver. It gives, us, readers reassurance and faith in the safety matters of the self-driving vehicle. The progression of transportation has been deemed impressive and remarkable over the years. The focus of this positive trend was concentrated on: How can one develop smart cars without developing smart roads? \"....in the late 1950s, General Motors created a concept car that could run on a special test track,\" ( Paragraph 3). Susequently, that ideal plateauded and was perceived to be extremely pricy. On the bright side, that lead to the development of smarter cars. It is extremely essential to convert to the usage of the autonomous automobile. Our country, as a whole, has made so many unique and outstanding technological advances. It would who of us to not cherish our accomplishments of advancement. This topic goes deeper than just the manufacturing of a new, authentic invention; it translates into ,the larger than life concept of, advocating towards a better and more proactive lifestyle.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"Driverless Cars Are Coming\" is very easy to consume an argument for. Driverless cars in a sense are a technical way for prevention. The overall purpose of driverless cars is to prevent injuries, and or in extreme cases death. I believe the idea and studies of driverless cars are sufficent. Driverless cars is a future life saver. With the development and further advancement of other sensors, this car is created to help. Texting and driving is a big legal issue around this day in age and this is a chance to stop all of the car accidents and legal situations involving addition concept. Although the advancement on cars now is not not fully prepared to stop accidents and is not a garuntee, it is ar least a good starting point for success. In the society we live in today blind and/or deaf people can not drive. A driverless car is giving the disabled people a chance to a more normal life than is what not so much expected. The arguement that continues to this day about everyone is equal, lets unabled people an acceptance call. Allowing the disabled to get around independently, will advance the statistics and knowledge of a widespread of people. Many ways and oppurtunities for the future are at stake. Giving driverless cars a chance may have a tremendous impact on the world. Automotive legal issues will decrease. Equality arguements will lessen. I believe the idea and studies of driverless cars are sufficent. This is an oppurtunity for an all around break through.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"Driverless Cars Are Coming\", what does that mean to you. Does it seem like a good idea, or does it seem like a bad idea. In this writing I am going to tell you some facts, and personal opionions about driverless cars. I personally feel that driverless cars are a bad idea. I feel this way because I feel the driver of the vehicle should be in control of the vehicle at all times. If the vehicle was to malfunction for any reason the driver should be aware at a moments notice and be able to take over as soon as possible. If the car is driving itself then the driver is not paying full attention to what is happening at all times. Driverless cars could be a good thing in some ways though. In 2013, BMW had started developing \"Traffic Jam Assistance\" for their new vehicles. This would allow the car to be able to drive up to 25 mph as long as the drivers hands were still on the wheel. The \"Traffic Jam Assistance\" is however not completely driverless. The car can steer, accelerate, and brake by itself. The only downside to that is it can't tell when there is road construction, accidents, or any other dangers on the roadway like humans can. There are only a few states that allow for \"driverless cars\" to be studied. California, Nevada, Florida, and the District of Columbia have led the country in allowing limited use of semi-autonomous cars. There are many car companies that are striving to get driverless cars on the road. Tesla has projected a 2016 release for a car capable of driving on autopilot 90 percent of the time. Mercedes Benz, Audi, and Nissan plan to have cars that can drive themselves by 2020. So of all of this writing and facts that have been stated, how do you feel about driverless cars? I feel that they are not a good idea and they should not be produced. I feel strongly about this because I believe a human should be aware of whats happening at all times. Besides, if you were to get into an accident and harm others, or even kill others, who would be at fault? The car, the driver, or the manufacturer?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"Driverless Cars Are Coming' I an for driverless cars i can see them even you can if you have ever seen any movies aboput how our futur will be. My position on driverless cars is for driverless cars not against them because i can see them in our future i can see them solving the many problems that people have now with cars i am here to explain why i am for the driverless cars. The reasons i thinkk that driverless cars would be a good thing is because of these reasons: they're will not be as many car recks as there is now there is no evidence or proof behind why they're will not be as many but this is why i think that most recks are caused by teens on there phones or drunk driving but with the driverless cars they will allready have routs set in place., The driverless cars will not cost as much money to go around in because gas will most likely not be a problem because cars are progressing into electrical cars. also if there ever is any trouble the car will tell the driver before it even happens unlike regular cars which you have to wait to you are right next to an accident when it happens you will then be stuck in slow traffic. This is why i am for driverless cars this is why i will argue for the evolution of driverless cars.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"Driverless Cars Are Coming,\" is an artical about the future cars in the world. People and scientist are trying to make safe driveless cars. There are negative and posities to this expieriment. Here's my take on things. Driverless cars seem a little interesting, but there are many hazards with these cars. I personally would want to drive on my own, i don't need my own car to be my taxi man. I would be scared to let a car drive me places, theres so many things that could happen to the car. Other drivers are insane thats like trusting a CAR with your life. They are definetly not stable enough for me to get one. But other people might think differently. People on the streets are not the best drivers, but is a car gonna have great reflex's like us HUMANS do? I mean, how many people would die a year then i wonder? Our death rates are already high, why test them to make them higher? The future will be crazy with people driving driverless cars, what a cruel world we live in. \"Why would anyone want a driverless car that still needs a driver?\" thats how i feel. We can drive ourselves. Not everything has to be \"new and improved.\" We can stay old fashioned. \"Who is at fault- the driver or the manufacturer?\" The manufacturer, of course. They need to help improve the car obviously. Air bags can't be the only thing that save people. \" The road to the truly autonomous car stretches on ahead of us, but we grow close to the destination every day.\" In all realitly Driverless cars will be a problem. Let's face it..", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"Driverless Cars Are Coming,\" is an article about driverless cars that have been in development for a while, but have been becoming even more revalent in the recent years. Essentially the cars will be able to drive themselves, but have a human passenger who would take over just in case the car would notbe able to handle the road by itself. From retrospeck this could like a good idea but we have to understand what we would be getting ourselves into with these driverless cars. We can not be one hundred percent safe in these cars, humans will become more lazy, and we do not need them. I am against the delopment of these cars. No matter how hard we try with this new technolagy we can never be one hundred percent safe with the use of it. So we need to ask ourselves is it really worth it letting the car drive itself when you can just drive yourself? Many bad things could happen, such as: the car not knowing it can't handle a certain situation. If the car does not know, chances are you might not either because you were not the one driving and truly controlling it. The car can malfunction while it is driving you and you can get seriously injured. Let us not forget that there are other people on the road, and if one of the driverless cars can't control where it is going it can hurt somebody else that is on the road and that is not fair. Driving isn't that difficult once you learn how to do it. Even with the driverless cars I'm sure people are going to have to learn to drive if they have the chance to control it if it can not figure out a certain situation. Why be lazy and have someone else drive you if you've taken the time to learn yourself. We already have so much stuff that helps us in our cars we have today. This is just going to cause more people to text and drive, and if they do need to takeover they probably will not be ready. We do not need them. Instead of focusing on new cool driverless cars lets focus on other thinks like texting driving, how to improve our roads, how to be more safe, better rules to set in place when it comes to driving. We should not add something new and crazy to the mix when we already have a lot to deal with it and get under control. I am not totally against the idea of ever having driverless cars, but we really do not need them any time soon. They are not always safe, humans need to control the driving, and if we don't need them then why have them. It will be a lot of spent making a bunch of these cars. Let us improve the cars we have now and the rules we have now. Let's improve our behavior on the road. Then we should discuss whether or not we should be gettting driverless cars on the roads for regular people in a few years. Do we really know if the problems ahead with be solved? Not really, so we should not just come to that assumption. So for now I would have to polietly object to the idea of continuing to spend money devolpong the driverless cars and getting them on the road.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"Driverless Cars Are Coming.\" Some people argue everyday about should we have driverless cars? Should we be in control of the car at alll times? Many arguments has happen over these simple questions, but think about it should we have driveless cars? Of course! All people should have driveless cars. Why should we have to drive when a car can take control? Some people cant drive till there 30 because they dont have their license. When you have a smart car who needs license or permits? The cars is driving it's self! People ask what happens if the car gets in an accident, or dont know what to do when it comes to traffic wrecks; or even backing out your driveway. Well \"GM has developed driver seats that vibrate when the vehicle is in danger of backing into an object.\" \"The Google car simply announces when the driver should be prepared to take over.\" \"Other options are flashinglights on the windshield and other heads-up displays.\" \"Some manufactures are also comnsidering using cameras to watch that drivers are reamaining focused on the road.\" Google has had cars that could drive independently. Their cars have been driven more than half a million miles without a crash. Google cars aren't really driverless cars. They still alert you to take over if anythings in there way. Google still working on the problems. Mercedes-Benz, Audi, and Nissan plan to have a car that can drive themselves by 2020. Would you test \"drive\" it? In conclusion, we the people should have driverless cars. We have almost nearly everything to make a driverless car. Why do you think we shouldn't have drivless cars? We will be safe, theres alerts. But do we think its a good idea?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"Driverless Cars Are Comming\". Really?, driverless cars? That just sounds bad by its name alone. Just by hearing the name I could only imagine the unnecesary tragedy's that will take place if this foolish expiriment continues. Driverless Cars are not at all what we need in this world, I dissagree with the Google cofounder, Sergey Brin, who invisions this. In my opinion I dont like the idea of it at all but I actually have several facts and resons why this \"vision\" of Brin's should not be continued, and will show you what mess this could all really become. First of all lets say they do make the driverless car, but when it comes out and some people dont want to buy it how will the mechanical cars act around those undecisive people who dont know where they are goingor turning? Also how will they know what to do with those drunk drivers or those people who fall asleep on the wheel of regular cars? People now these days have accidents because of those reasons. When the other driver not drunk or not tired is fully aware of whats going on but is just to slow to react. So do we really think a machine will \"allert the driver\" when its there time to drive on time when that drunk driver is going fifty miles down the main road?, dont think so. There are so many inevitable things that are bound to happen if there is no driver in the car. Secondly the cost of all these tests, sensors, and brakes are all a waist of money and time. they talk about the car being able to detect and respond to the danger of out-of-control skids but it took ten years! Yes I said ten, outrageous huh? Instead of fantasizing over \"a car he forsees to use half the fuel of today's taxis\" he could've been finding ways to make the car today use half the feul it does within those ten years, no blueprints for a whole new model or anything like that. Lastly the law doesnt even think its safe for the crazy driverless cars to be driving around endangering the citizens of America like you and me. The only places in the U.S that allows Brin and his team to use thier dangerous cars are in California, Nevada, Flordia, and the District of Columbia. Isnt it the law thats keeping us safe? Then why is it that only four places in the U.S lets them test the cars? Four out of fifty states...seems to me like the law is telling us that they dont want these dangerous driverless hunks of metal on our road hurting us citizens. This whole driverless car thing is a total waist of money, time, and work. They could be working on a way to make better adjustments on the car we have today that took so long for us to make (and still perfecting till this day). Its obvious that these driverless cars are just to big of a dream to make reality, next thing you know driverless bikes will be made or mailboxes that shoot leaders to the post office for you, or how about groceries that fly to your house! This is just an effort to make driving easier but driving is already helping us get to places faster then walking is,A lazy tactic I would say. The law says no, science says no, and I say no. Driverless cars are just not practical ,I would rather drive, and I bet most of America does to.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"Driverless Cars\" sound like something from a movie, not real life. These are one of the most outrageous and ridiculous ideas I have ever heard of. These cars should not be allowed in the future because they are unsafe, expensive and will cause conflicts betweeen owners and manufacturers. If these \"Driverless Cars\" become a common thing in our daily lives, things will be different and people will be in danger. Driverless cars would be very unsafe. If the system malfunctions or goes bad the car could do whatever it wants. There is always a chance that the car will not take you to the right place or the breaks decide they do not want to work or some reason. It says in the article that \"For starters, they need a whole lot of sensors.\" What would happen if a sensor broke or the sensor was covered up by something. Inevitable crashes would be the answer. The article also talks about how to alert the drivers when they need to take over when it says, \"GM has developed driver's seats that vibrate when the vehicle is in danger of backing into an object. The Google car simply announces when the driver should be prepared to take over.\" This could go wrong if the driver falls asleep or the seats lose the ability to vibrate. The driver could also be startled by the surprising vibration that it may cause him to swerve or crash. The announcement could go wrong if the driver is hard of hearing or if they lower the volume because they feel it is irritating. Overall \"Driverless Cars\" are unsafe. \"Driverless Cars\" would be very expensive not only to manufacture, but to purchase aswell. The majority of people are middle class and a car with such high-end features and accomodations would most likely be out of the price range for middle classed people. The article says, \"Radar was a device on a hilltop that cost two hundred million dollars.\" This shows that radar alone used to be very expensive. It is already expensive just to buy a regular car but all of the sensors and radar and other features added would only up the price. This is not including all of the gas prices, maintainence, and other features that people want and have to pay for. Expecting these \"Driverless Cars\" to be the new everyday thing is just not in the budget of everyday people. The conflict of who to blame when an accident happens is very simple. People would not want to pay for the accident so they would say that their car malfunctioned and end up filing for a lawsuit against the manufacturer. This whole entire idea of these new cars would cause an ongoing series of problems and lawsuits that would would fill up and awaste the courts time. \"Driverless Cars\" are a problem waiting to happen. In conclusion, I do not believe \"Driverless Cars should be allowed to drive on public roads. They are unsafe, expensive and will cause conflicts betweeen owners and manufacturers. The realistic idea of these cars working, and being reliable and safe, is very slim. People are fasinated by the idea of these cars, but they do not see the big picture which is all the threats and dangers this car holds.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"Driverless cars are coming\" ! I CANT WAIT, Driverless cars will be a success to the argriculture of technology. Honestly, i think that it will make a big differnce diffence on the way people get transportation from place to place. First of all one thing i think will ciome in handy when dealing with driverless cars is customer service. There wont be any one in the car with you so thats one less complaint about the driver being rude if youi need a ride somewhere as if it were a taxi or and uber. People may disagree with the idea of driverless cars but there are just as many if not more positive things about them as there are negative things about driverless cars. Think about all the handicapt people on earth that cant drive and would rather not get on the bus, they would not have to call a taxi either if there is a driverless car in ther garage. A lot of people do not like to drive everywhere because it can be exhausting to many. That is where these cars come in handy , because they might still want to drive in there own car but just dont want to drive it. Another fact about these cars is once they came out they would be evolutionary. People are already amazed at the fact of the creatation of hover boards ,and if that exites people then how do you think they would feel once a driverless car is released? since 2009 google has had cars that can drive independently. those cars still need a human in the car just in case of parking in garages or road blocks, or even traffic detours. The only bad part about these cars i think is the price it may cost to purchase one of the driverless cars. Drivers would not get board waiting to drive because once the driver is ready to drive he can turn that mode off. It also is just a new and improved way to trasport and have fun while doing it. you would be amazed at how many people turn out to like it after they had bad thoughts on the driverless cars .", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3.0", "role": "assistant" } ]

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.